pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17372 · v2 · pith:YCUMAWIBnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

From inter-filamentary gas to filaments and hubs: gas flows in the Mon R2 hub-filament system

Jihye Hwang , Doris Arzoumanian , Yoshito Shimajiri , Masahiro N. Machida , Shu-ichiro Inutsuka , M. S. N. Kumar , Shingo Nozaki , Kazuki Tokuda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 13:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords hub-filament systemsMon R2gas flowsvelocity gradientsmass accretionmolecular cloudsstar formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the Mon R2 hub-filament system, gas from both filaments and inter-filamentary regions flows into the central hub, faster along the filaments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the gas motions in the Mon R2 hub-filament system using 13CO and C18O line observations that trace different density regimes. It separates the gas into velocity-coherent filaments and the lower-density spaces between them, then measures how the gas moves both along and across these structures. The data indicate that material in both regions is directed toward the hub, but the along-structure component is stronger inside filaments. The work also finds that inter-filament gas supplies new material to the filaments themselves. These results emphasize that the full gas reservoir, not only the dense filaments, participates in building the hub where massive stars form.

Core claim

The overall gas within both filaments and inter-filamentary regions flows directly into the hub. Gas flows faster along the filaments than in the inter-filamentary regions, shown by a mean ratio of parallel to perpendicular mass accretion rates of 6.8 in filaments versus 1.5 in inter-filamentary regions. At least 30 percent of the gas mass in the inter-filamentary regions may flow toward the filaments, replenishing them. This demonstrates the importance of including both low- and high-density gas when calculating the reservoir that feeds massive star formation in the hub.

What carries the argument

Velocity gradients measured parallel and perpendicular to velocity-coherent structures in 13CO and C18O emission, converted into mass accretion rates along and across filaments and inter-filamentary regions.

If this is right

  • The hub accumulates mass from the entire surrounding region rather than filaments alone.
  • Filaments receive ongoing replenishment from the lower-density gas between them.
  • Both low- and high-density gas contribute to the growth of the hub where massive stars form.
  • The total mass inflow rate onto the hub is higher once inter-filamentary gas is included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar flow patterns may operate in other hub-filament systems and affect how much mass reaches the sites of cluster formation.
  • Star-formation models that omit inter-filamentary inflows will underestimate the fuel supply to the central hub.
  • The replenishment process implies a continuous supply chain from diffuse gas to dense filaments to the hub.

Load-bearing premise

The measured velocity gradients are taken to represent gravitational infall rather than turbulence, rotation, or projection effects.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution maps or kinematic modeling that show the gradients are dominated by rotation or random motions instead of systematic inflow toward the hub would undermine the accretion interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17372 by Doris Arzoumanian, Jihye Hwang, Kazuki Tokuda, Masahiro N. Machida, M. S. N. Kumar, Shingo Nozaki, Shu-ichiro Inutsuka, Yoshito Shimajiri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Left) Filaments (Fs) and inter-filamentary regions (IFs) overlaid on the H2 column density map obtained from Herschel data (Didelon et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2022). The filled contours indicate individual regions identified as C18O velocity coherent structures tracing the Fs. The non-filled contours correspond to the region identified as 13CO velocity coherent structures tracing the IFs. The two dotted li… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ratio of local mass accretion rate between F and IF along (∥, red circles) and across (⊥, blue circles) the structure. The left and right panels show the ratios between F1 and IF1, and F2 and IF2, respectively. The green arrow indicates the sub-region containing the prestellar core shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary results of relative mass accretion ratio and velocity gradient along and across the F and IF. Top four boxes indicate each structure. The green and magenta arrows indicate the relative velocity gradient along and across the structure. The lengths of the arrows indicates the relative scale based on the mean ratio listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The total (red line in the upper left panel) and the mean (red line in the upper right panel) core mass as a function of the radial distance from the IRS 1 in steps of 0.8 pc. The blue lines in both panels indicate the number of cores as a function of the radial distance. The error bars in the right panel indicate the standard deviation of the core mass within the 0.8 pc bin used to derive the mean core ma… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: H2 column density (left) and dust temperature (right) maps obtained from Herschel data (Didelon et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2022). The green box in the left panel indicates the observed region using the Nobeyama 45 m telescope. The white box in the left panel shows the same area shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Left) The map of integrated intensity of C18O integrated over velocities from 8 km s−1 to 13 km s−1 . Velocity￾coherent components of C18O emission shown as color contours. The magenta star indicates the position of the IRS 1 source, we consider, in our analysis, as the center of the hub of Mon R2. The effective beam size of 21.8′′ of the Nobeyama C18O observations is shown as black circle at the lower le… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) Map of the 13CO integrated intensity integrated over velocities from 8 km s−1 to 13 km s−1 . The white and orange contours show velocity-coherent components of 13CO emission with sizes larger than three beam sizes and the largest component, respectively. (Right) Map of intensity weigthed velocity of 13CO in the orange contours of the left panel. The colored contours represents Fs and IFs as shown in… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Top Left) Filaments and inter-filamentary regions overlaid on the H2 column density map obtained from Herschel data (Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Mass accretion rates (M˙ ; Left) and velocity gradients (∆v; Right) along (∥) and across (⊥) the Fs and IFs measured in 0.2 pc steps (within the arcs shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hub-filament systems (HFSs) play an important role in the formation of massive stars and star clusters. Although the velocity structures along dense filaments have been studied, the gas kinematics in the low density inter-filament regions has not been investigated. We use $^{13}$CO ($J$ = 1--0) and C$^{18}$O ($J$ = 1--0) observations obtained with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope to study the gas dynamics towards the Monoceros R2 (Mon R2) HFS. From the $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O data, tracing low- and high-density gas, respectively, we identify velocity coherent structures and divide them into filaments (Fs) and inter-filamentary regions (IFs). We estimate velocity gradients ($\Delta v$) and mass accretion rates ($\dot{M}$) along ($\parallel$) and across ($\perp$) the Fs and IFs. The mean ratio of $\dot{M}_\parallel$ to $\dot{M}_\perp$ in Fs is 6.8, while that in IFs is 1.5. These results show that the overall gas within both Fs and IFs flows directly into the hub and the gas flows faster along the Fs than the IFs. In addition, we found that at least 30\% of the gas mass in the IFs may flow towards the Fs replenishing the latter with new matter. Our study reveals the importance of considering the total gas mass reservoir, both low- and high-density, infalling into the hub and promoting the formation of massive stars, which are preferentially located in the hub of Mon R2.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes 13CO (J=1-0) and C18O (J=1-0) observations from the Nobeyama 45 m telescope toward the Mon R2 hub-filament system. Velocity-coherent structures are identified and partitioned into filaments (Fs) and inter-filamentary regions (IFs). Velocity gradients are measured parallel and perpendicular to these structures and converted to mass accretion rates, yielding mean ratios of parallel to perpendicular rates of 6.8 in Fs and 1.5 in IFs. The authors conclude that gas from both Fs and IFs flows into the hub, with faster flows along Fs, and that at least 30% of IF gas mass flows toward Fs to replenish them, emphasizing the role of the total (low- and high-density) gas reservoir in massive star formation.

Significance. If the velocity gradients can be shown to trace net gravitational accretion, the work would usefully extend studies of hub-filament systems by including the kinematics of lower-density inter-filamentary gas and demonstrating its potential contribution to filament replenishment. The dual-tracer approach and focus on both parallel and perpendicular flows are strengths. The result would support models in which hubs grow by accretion along multiple channels, but its impact depends on validating the accretion interpretation against alternative kinematic explanations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and analysis of velocity gradients and accretion rates] The central claims (abstract) that overall gas within Fs and IFs flows into the hub and that the mean ratio of parallel to perpendicular accretion rates is 6.8 (Fs) versus 1.5 (IFs) rest on converting observed velocity gradients to mass accretion rates. No quantitative comparison of gradient amplitudes to local velocity dispersion, no PV-diagram coherence tests, and no forward-modeling against synthetic observations are described to show that the gradients require net gravitational infall rather than turbulence, rotation, or projection effects; this assumption is load-bearing for the inflow and replenishment conclusions.
  2. [Mass fraction and replenishment estimate] The claim that at least 30% of the gas mass in the IFs flows toward the Fs (abstract) is derived from the perpendicular accretion rate after partitioning emission into velocity-coherent structures. The available text provides no explicit formula, integration limits, or uncertainty budget for this mass fraction, making it impossible to assess whether post-hoc selection or assumptions in the partitioning affect the reported value.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods and results] Notation for parallel and perpendicular quantities (Ṁ∥ and Ṁ⊥) should be defined at first use and used consistently in all figures and tables.
  2. [Identification of structures] The division criteria for velocity-coherent structures into Fs versus IFs would benefit from a brief quantitative description (e.g., coherence length or dispersion threshold) to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. The comments on the interpretation of velocity gradients and the transparency of the mass-fraction calculation are well taken. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation while remaining faithful to the observational data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and analysis of velocity gradients and accretion rates] The central claims (abstract) that overall gas within Fs and IFs flows into the hub and that the mean ratio of parallel to perpendicular accretion rates is 6.8 (Fs) versus 1.5 (IFs) rest on converting observed velocity gradients to mass accretion rates. No quantitative comparison of gradient amplitudes to local velocity dispersion, no PV-diagram coherence tests, and no forward-modeling against synthetic observations are described to show that the gradients require net gravitational infall rather than turbulence, rotation, or projection effects; this assumption is load-bearing for the inflow and replenishment conclusions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional quantitative support for the accretion interpretation would strengthen the paper. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct comparison of the measured velocity-gradient amplitudes to the local velocity dispersion in both the filament and inter-filamentary regions, demonstrating that the gradients exceed the dispersion by a statistically significant factor. We will also include position-velocity diagrams extracted parallel and perpendicular to the structures to illustrate their kinematic coherence. While a full forward-modeling campaign with synthetic observations lies beyond the scope of the present observational study, we will expand the discussion section to explicitly address the possible contributions of turbulence, rotation, and projection effects, noting that the systematic alignment of gradients toward the hub and the consistency between the two independent tracers argue against purely random motions. These additions will be placed in the methods and discussion sections. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Mass fraction and replenishment estimate] The claim that at least 30% of the gas mass in the IFs flows toward the Fs (abstract) is derived from the perpendicular accretion rate after partitioning emission into velocity-coherent structures. The available text provides no explicit formula, integration limits, or uncertainty budget for this mass fraction, making it impossible to assess whether post-hoc selection or assumptions in the partitioning affect the reported value.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the 30% mass-fraction estimate requires explicit documentation. In the revised manuscript we will insert the precise formula used to compute the fraction of inter-filamentary mass flowing toward the filaments, specify the spatial integration limits (the area of the velocity-coherent IF regions) and the relevant timescale (derived from the perpendicular velocity gradient), and provide an uncertainty budget that incorporates variations in the velocity-coherence partitioning threshold as well as observational uncertainties in column density and velocity. These details will be added to the methods section and referenced in the abstract and results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results derived from direct observational measurements

full rationale

The paper performs an observational analysis using Nobeyama 45m telescope data in 13CO and C18O to identify velocity-coherent structures, partition emission into filaments (Fs) and inter-filamentary regions (IFs), and compute velocity gradients Δv together with mass accretion rates Ṁ∥ and Ṁ⊥. These quantities are obtained by applying standard conversion formulas to the measured line-of-sight velocities and column densities; the central claims (faster parallel flows, net inflow to the hub, and ≥30% IF mass replenishing Fs) follow directly from the data without reducing to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain remains independent of prior author work and is externally falsifiable against the raw spectral cubes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, specific free parameters and assumptions are not detailed; typical studies of this type rely on standard conversions from line intensity to column density and assumptions about geometry and distance to convert angular scales to physical accretion rates.

free parameters (1)
  • conversion factors for mass accretion rate from velocity gradient
    Estimation of mass accretion rates from observed velocity gradients requires assumptions on gas density, inclination, and geometry that are not specified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Velocity-coherent structures identified in 13CO and C18O maps correspond to physically distinct filaments and inter-filamentary regions
    The paper divides the gas into Fs and IFs on the basis of velocity coherence from the line data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5889 in / 1448 out tokens · 52630 ms · 2026-05-20T13:12:14.591880+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The Formation and Evolution of Prestellar Cores

    Andr \'e , P., Basu, S., & Inutsuka, S.\ 2009, Structure Formation in Astrophysics, 254. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0801.4210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0801.4210 2009

  2. [2]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume =

    Arzoumanian, D., Shimajiri, Y., Inutsuka, S.-. ichiro ., et al.\ 2018, , 70, 5, 96. doi:10.1093/pasj/psy095

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psy095 2018

  3. [3]

    V., Zhang, Q., Wright, M

    Chen, H.-R. V., Zhang, Q., Wright, M. C. H., et al.\ 2019, , 875, 1, 24. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3e 2019

  4. [4]

    J., Lee, C

    Chung, E. J., Lee, C. W., Kim, S., et al.\ 2019, , 877, 2, 114. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d1 2019

  5. [5]

    J., Lee, C

    Chung, E. J., Lee, C. W., Kim, S., et al.\ 2021, , 919, 1, 3. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0881

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0881 2021

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526239

    Didelon, P., Motte, F., Tremblin, P., et al.\ 2015, , 584, A4. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526239

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526239 2015

  7. [7]

    & Hopkins, P

    Guszejnov, D. & Hopkins, P. F.\ 2015, , 450, 4, 4137. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv872

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv872 2015

  8. [8]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4900

    Fukui, Y., Tokuda, K., Saigo, K., et al.\ 2019, , 886, 1, 14. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4900

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4900 2019

  9. [9]

    & Racine, R.\ 1976, , 81, 840

    Herbst, W. & Racine, R.\ 1976, , 81, 840. doi:10.1086/111963

    work page doi:10.1086/111963 1976

  10. [10]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    Hu, B., Qiu, K., Cao, Y., et al.\ 2021, , 908, 1, 70. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd03a 2021

  11. [11]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf3c4

    Hwang, J., Kim, J., Pattle, K., et al.\ 2021, , 913, 85. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf3c4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf3c4 2021

  12. [12]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac99e0

    Hwang, J., Kim, J., Pattle, K., et al.\ 2022, , The JCMT BISTRO Survey: A Spiral Magnetic Field in a Hub-filament Structure, Monoceros R2, 941, 1, 51. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac99e0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac99e0 2022

  13. [13]

    M., et al.\ 2026, , 171, 1, 50

    Hwang, J., Sanhueza, P., Girart, J. M., et al.\ 2026, , 171, 1, 50. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae18c9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae18c9 2026

  14. [14]

    A., okas E

    Kirk, J. M., Ward-Thompson, D., & Andr \'e , P.\ 2005, , 360, 4, 1506. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09145.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09145.x 2005

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Kohno, M. & Sofue, Y.\ 2024, , 527, 3, 9290. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3648

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3648 2024

  16. [16]

    Kumar, M. S. N., Palmeirim, P., Arzoumanian, D., et al.\ 2020, , 642, A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038232 2020

  17. [17]

    Kumar, M. S. N., Arzoumanian, D., Men'shchikov, A., et al.\ 2022, , 658, A114. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140363

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140363 2022

  18. [18]

    Kwon, J., Doi, Y., Tamura, M., et al.\ 2018, , 859, 4

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345986

    Louvet, F., Sanhueza, P., Stutz, A., et al.\ 2024, , 690, A33. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345986

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345986 2024

  20. [20]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/31

    Liu, T., Zhang, Q., Kim, K.-T., et al.\ 2016, , 824, 1, 31. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/31

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/1/31 2016

  21. [21]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039913

    Men'shchikov, A.\ 2021, , 649, A89. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039913

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039913 2021

  22. [22]

    W., Kim, S., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 1, 117

    Moharana, S., Lee, C. W., Kim, S., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 1, 117. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae23ca

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae23ca 2026

  23. [23]

    S., G \"u sten, R., et al.\ 2023, , 520, 2, 2517

    Mookerjea, B., Veena, V. S., G \"u sten, R., et al.\ 2023, , 520, 2, 2517. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad215

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad215 2023

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014690

    Motte, F., Zavagno, A., Bontemps, S., et al.\ 2010, , 518, L77. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014690

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014690 2010

  25. [25]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae25f6

    Morii, K., Sanhueza, P., Zhang, Q., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 155. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae25f6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae25f6 2026

  26. [26]

    C.\ 2009, , 706, 1341

    Myers, P. C.\ 2009, , 706, 1341. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1341

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/2/1341 2009

  27. [27]

    A., Duarte-Cabral, A., et al.\ 2013, , 555, A112

    Peretto, N., Fuller, G. A., Duarte-Cabral, A., et al.\ 2013, , 555, A112. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321318

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321318 2013

  28. [28]

    A., Andr \'e , P., et al.\ 2014, , 561, A83

    Peretto, N., Fuller, G. A., Andr \'e , P., et al.\ 2014, , 561, A83. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322172

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322172 2014

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244776

    Pouteau, Y., Motte, F., Nony, T., et al.\ 2023, , 674, A76. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244776

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244776 2023

  30. [30]

    Pillai, T. G. S., Clemens, D. P., Reissl, S., et al.\ 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1195. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1172-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1172-6 2020

  31. [31]

    Rayner, T. S. M., Griffin, M. J., Schneider, N., et al.\ 2017, , 607, A22. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630039

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630039 2017

  32. [32]

    , year = 1955, month = jan, volume =

    Salpeter, E. E.\ 1955, , 121, 161. doi:10.1086/145971

    work page doi:10.1086/145971 1955

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Seshadri, A., Vig, S., Ghosh, S. K., et al.\ 2024, , 527, 2, 4244. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3385

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3385 2024

  34. [34]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322912

    Shimajiri, Y., Kitamura, Y., Saito, M., et al.\ 2014, , 564, A68. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322912

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322912 2014

  35. [35]

    J., Glover, S

    Smith, R. J., Glover, S. C. O., Klessen, R. S., et al.\ 2016, , 455, 4, 3640. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2559

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2559 2016

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Suin, P., Arzoumanian, D., Zavagno, A., et al.\ 2025, , 698, A119. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553795

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553795 2025

  37. [37]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab48ff

    Tokuda, K., Fukui, Y., Harada, R., et al.\ 2019, , 886, 1, 15. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab48ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab48ff 2019

  38. [38]

    Tokuda, K., Harada, N., Tanaka, K. E. I., et al.\ 2023, , 955, 1, 52. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acefb7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acefb7 2023

  39. [39]

    The case of the high-mass star-forming complex Monoceros R2

    Trevi \ n o-Morales, S. P., Fuente, A., S \'a nchez-Monge, \'A ., et al.\ 2019, , 629, A81. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935260

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935260 2019

  40. [40]

    Wells, M. R. A., Pillsworth, R., Beuther, H., et al.\ 2025, , 704, A64. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555118

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555118 2025

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Yang, D., Liu, H.-L., Tej, A., et al.\ 2023, , 953, 1, 40. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42 2023

  42. [42]

    W., Chung, E

    Yoo, H., Lee, C. W., Chung, E. J., et al.\ 2023, , 957, 2, 94. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf8c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf8c2 2023

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348580

    Zhang, W., Zhou, J., Esimbek, J., et al.\ 2024, , 688, A99. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348580

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348580 2024