pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21950 · v1 · pith:7OIMS6FUnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Discovery of a Featureless Tidal Disruption Event at z~1 with the Wide Field Survey Telescope

Jiazheng Zhu , Zelin Xu , Ning Jiang , Ji-an Jiang , Tinggui Wang , Yuhan Yao , Ryan Chornock , Erica Hammerstein
show 26 more authors
Yibo Wang Min-Xuan Cai Shifeng Huang Wenkai Li Mingxin Wu Chichuan Jin Jie Lin Jianwei Lyu Dezheng Meng Weiyu Wu Zhengyan Liu Junhan Zhao Ziqing Jia Chengyi Wang Lulu Fan Xu Kong Feng Li Ming Liang Jinling Tang Hairen Wang Jian Wang Yongquan Xue Ji Yang Hongfei Zhang Wen Zhao Qingfeng Zhu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords tidal disruption eventhigh-redshift TDEfeatureless spectrumblackbody SEDsupermassive black holeWFST survey
0
0 comments X

The pith

A featureless tidal disruption event has been discovered at redshift 1.037, the highest-redshift non-jetted TDE known.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the discovery of tidal disruption event WFST250820mmsw/AT2025wet by the Wide Field Survey Telescope. It shows a blue nuclear flare about three magnitudes brighter than its host, with a Keck spectrum revealing a featureless blue continuum and no emission lines. Redshift is fixed at 1.037 from host absorption lines. Multiband SED fits give a constant temperature near 19,000 K and peak luminosity of roughly 8 times 10^44 erg per second. Host properties indicate a 10^11.2 solar-mass galaxy with a 10^8 solar-mass black hole and no prior AGN activity. All data align with a TDE interpretation.

Core claim

The authors present WFST250820mmsw/AT2025wet as a featureless tidal disruption event at z = 1.037. The event displays a blue nuclear flare with a featureless spectrum, constant blackbody temperature of approximately 19,000 K, peak luminosity of (8.27 +0.92 -0.71) times 10^44 erg s^-1, and a host galaxy of stellar mass about 10^11.2 solar masses containing a roughly 10^8 solar-mass central black hole with no evidence of prior AGN activity. These properties are consistent with a TDE scenario and establish the source as the highest-redshift non-jetted TDE observed to date.

What carries the argument

Featureless blue continuum spectrum together with constant-temperature blackbody SED fits and host-galaxy absorption-line redshift determination, used to classify the flare as a TDE without AGN contamination.

If this is right

  • High-redshift TDEs enable direct tests of whether their spectral energy distributions peak in the extreme ultraviolet.
  • Such events can help resolve the missing-energy problem and clarify the origin of optical emission in TDEs.
  • WFST and LSST are expected to increase the sample of TDEs at z greater than 1, extending the census of supermassive black holes to earlier epochs.
  • Repeated high-z detections will allow statistical comparison of TDE rates and properties across cosmic time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the constant temperature across epochs may constrain the geometry of the emitting region in optical TDEs.
  • The event's brightness at z approximately 1 suggests that optical surveys can now reach the redshift range where UV emission can be directly observed from the ground.
  • Future multi-wavelength follow-up could test whether the inferred black-hole mass matches the scaling relations used for lower-redshift TDE hosts.

Load-bearing premise

That the flare is produced by a tidal disruption rather than AGN variability or another nuclear transient, resting on the featureless spectrum, constant temperature, and lack of prior activity in the host.

What would settle it

Detection of strong X-ray variability or broad emission lines in follow-up spectra that would instead indicate an AGN flare.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21950 by Chengyi Wang, Chichuan Jin, Dezheng Meng, Erica Hammerstein, Feng Li, Hairen Wang, Hongfei Zhang, Ji-an Jiang, Jian Wang, Jianwei Lyu, Jiazheng Zhu, Jie Lin, Jinling Tang, Ji Yang, Junhan Zhao, Lulu Fan, Ming Liang, Mingxin Wu, Min-Xuan Cai, Ning Jiang, Qingfeng Zhu, Ryan Chornock, Shifeng Huang, Tinggui Wang, Weiyu Wu, Wenkai Li, Wen Zhao, Xu Kong, Yibo Wang, Yongquan Xue, Yuhan Yao, Zelin Xu, Zhengyan Liu, Ziqing Jia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top left: WFST r-band image which was taken on 2025-08-23 UT. Top middle: WFST r-band stack reference image of the host galaxy. Top right: Difference image of AT 2025wet. Bottom: The multiwavelength light curves of AT 2025wet showing a slow decline with blue color in the optical bands (∼ 100days). The 10-day binned measurements are shown as diamond symbols, overlaid on the individual measurements shown as … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: Optical spectra of AT 2025wet. Each spectrum is labeled by the instrument employed and the date of observation. Smoothed spectra obtained with a Savitzky-Golay filter are shown, with the original, unsmoothed data plotted in gray behind. Ca II H&K and Mg II λ2800 absorption lines corresponding to the host-galaxy redshift of z = 1.037 are marked in the figure. The data used to create this figure … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quasi-simultaneous SED fitting of AT 2025wet obtained between 2025 October 23 and November 3. The SED is fitted separately with a power-law model (blue line) and a blackbody model (red line). Our high SNR Keck/LRIS spectrum is overplotted below for comparison. The photometric SED of the transient itself of AT 2025wet can be well described by a power-law model, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of blackbody temperature, radius and lu￾minosity of AT 2025wet form top to bottom, respectively. The data used to create this figure are made available digitally. tainties and covariance. The fit quality is assessed using the minimum and reduced χ 2 values to evaluate the validity of the blackbody model at each epoch. The blackbody luminosity show a slowly decline while the temperature remain… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The host SED fitting results using the package CIGALE. Top panel: The different components considered in the SED fitting. The red points represent the model flux for each band derived from the best-fit SED, and the violet circles indicate the observed data. Bottom panel: The residuals between the observed data and model flux. • The Keck/LRIS spectrum taken around the optical peak shows a strong high-temper… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left panel: Peak blackbody luminosity (LBB) versus black hole mass (MBH). We compare AT 2025wet (red dot) with other optical TDEs (blue dots) from Yao et al. (2023), with the featureless subclass indicated by black dots. Right panel: ZTF-selected TDEs (2019.0–2022.3, Yao et al. 2025, 2026) on the diagram of redshift versus peak rest-frame g-band absolute magnitude. AT 2025wet are marked by a red star. that… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the discovery of tidal disruption event (TDE) WFST250820mmsw/AT2025wet by the 2.5-meter Wide Field Survey Telescope (WFST). It exhibits a blue nuclear flare throughout the observed evolution with a g-band peak magnitude ~22, which is about 3 magnitudes brighter than its host galaxy. A Keck/LRIS spectrum taken near the optical peak reveals a featureless blue continuum, with no discernible emission lines. However, its redshift can be accurately determined to be 1.037 by its host galaxy absorption lines. Blackbody fits to the multiband spectral energy distribution (SED) of AT2025wet yield a constant temperature of ~19,000K and a peak luminosity of (8.27 +0.92 -0.71)*10^44 erg s^-1 while actually the SED likely peaks at a much shorter wavelength than a 19,000K blackbody. The SED modeling of the host galaxy implies a stellar mass of ~10^11.2 M_odot and an estimated central black hole mass of ~10^8 M_odot, with no evidence of significant active galactic nucleus activity prior to the flare. All of these observations are well consistent with a featureless TDE scenario, making it the highest-redshift non-jetted TDE known to date. TDEs at such high redshift provide us a unique opportunity to explore the intrinsic SEDs of TDEs, particularly to test whether they peak in the extreme-UV regime, thereby addressing the missing energy puzzle and the origin of optical emission in TDEs. Ongoing surveys represented by WFST and the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) are expected to discover an increasing number of TDEs at higher redshifts, which will extend our census of SMBHs across redshift space and help unravel the mysteries of optical TDEs through direct probes of their UV emission.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of a tidal disruption event (TDE) WFST250820mmsw/AT2025wet at redshift z = 1.037 by the Wide Field Survey Telescope (WFST). The event shows a blue nuclear flare peaking at g-band magnitude ~22, a featureless blue continuum in the Keck/LRIS spectrum, constant temperature blackbody fits to the SED at ~19,000 K with peak luminosity (8.27 +0.92 -0.71) x 10^44 erg/s, and host galaxy properties indicating a stellar mass of ~10^11.2 solar masses and central black hole mass ~10^8 solar masses with no prior AGN activity. The authors conclude that these observations are consistent with a featureless TDE, making it the highest-redshift non-jetted TDE known.

Significance. If the TDE classification is robust, this would represent the highest-redshift non-jetted TDE discovered to date, offering a unique probe into the intrinsic spectral energy distributions of TDEs at high redshift. This could help address the missing energy puzzle and the origin of optical emission in TDEs by testing whether they peak in the extreme-UV regime. The paper also highlights the potential of ongoing surveys like WFST and LSST to discover more high-redshift TDEs, extending the census of supermassive black holes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the blackbody fit reports a constant temperature of ~19,000 K and peak luminosity of (8.27 +0.92 -0.71)*10^44 erg s^-1, yet the text immediately notes that the SED likely peaks at a much shorter wavelength than a 19,000 K blackbody. This tension directly affects the reliability of the constant-temperature claim and the inferred luminosity used to support the TDE classification; a more detailed justification or alternative modeling (e.g., multi-component SED) is needed to substantiate the central consistency argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the long sentence on blackbody fits contains an abrupt contrast ('while actually...') that reduces readability; rephrasing for clarity would improve presentation.
  2. [Title] Title vs. abstract: the title states 'z~1' while the text gives z=1.037; aligning the title or adding the precise value would aid precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for identifying this point of potential confusion in the abstract. We address the comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity while preserving the scientific content.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the blackbody fit reports a constant temperature of ~19,000 K and peak luminosity of (8.27 +0.92 -0.71)*10^44 erg s^-1, yet the text immediately notes that the SED likely peaks at a much shorter wavelength than a 19,000 K blackbody. This tension directly affects the reliability of the constant-temperature claim and the inferred luminosity used to support the TDE classification; a more detailed justification or alternative modeling (e.g., multi-component SED) is needed to substantiate the central consistency argument.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this wording. The reported temperature and luminosity come from fitting a single-temperature blackbody to the observed multi-band optical photometry, which samples the rest-frame near-UV portion of the SED at z=1.037. The accompanying note acknowledges that the true peak likely lies at shorter wavelengths (UV/EUV), as is common for TDEs where optical data often lie on the Rayleigh-Jeans tail or near the peak. This does not invalidate the constant-temperature result from the data, which remains stable over time and is consistent with the featureless spectrum and other TDE properties. The quoted luminosity is the value obtained from the fitted model. To eliminate any ambiguity and better support the classification, we will revise the abstract for clearer phrasing and expand the methods/results section with additional justification of the SED fitting procedure and its limitations. We do not consider multi-component modeling required given the current photometric coverage and the adequacy of the single-component description for the observed data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational classification

full rationale

This is a pure observational discovery paper reporting photometry, spectroscopy, SED fitting, and host-galaxy modeling for a nuclear transient. The central claim—that the data are consistent with a featureless TDE at z=1.037—rests on direct comparison to external, independently established TDE benchmarks (featureless blue continuum, constant-temperature blackbody, lack of prior AGN activity, host stellar mass and BH mass estimates). No derivation, prediction, or uniqueness theorem is presented that reduces to the paper’s own inputs or self-citations by construction. Standard external classification criteria are applied; the analysis is therefore self-contained against those benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions for TDE identification and SED fitting drawn from prior astrophysics literature, with no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Blackbody model accurately describes the multiband SED of the transient
    Invoked to derive constant temperature ~19,000 K and peak luminosity from observed fluxes.
  • domain assumption Host galaxy SED modeling yields reliable stellar mass and central black hole mass estimates without significant AGN contamination
    Used to infer ~10^11.2 M_sun stellar mass and ~10^8 M_sun BH mass, supporting TDE interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6012 in / 1519 out tokens · 83778 ms · 2026-05-22T05:05:38.306136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2022, Publ

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y ., Ando, M., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  2. [2]

    W., Perley, D

    Andreoni, I., Coughlin, M. W., Perley, D. A., et al. 2022, Nature, 612, 430, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 2022

  3. [3]

    2014, ApJ, 793, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/38

    Arcavi, I., Gal-Yam, A., Sullivan, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 793, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/38

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/38 2014

  4. [4]

    S., Kulkarni, S

    Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. R., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2002, AJ, 123, 1111, doi: 10.1086/338893

    work page doi:10.1086/338893 2002

  5. [5]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y ., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  6. [6]

    A., Landsman, W., Holland, S

    Breeveld, A. A., Landsman, W., Holland, S. T., et al. 2011, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 1358, Gamma Ray Bursts 2010, ed. J. E. McEnery, J. L. Racusin, & N. Gehrels (AIP), 373–376, doi: 10.1063/1.3621807

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3621807 2011

  7. [7]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.15018, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15018

    Cai, M., Xu, Z., Fan, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.15018, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15018

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.15018 2025

  8. [8]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Chen, Y ., Luo, B., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 191, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f89

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f89 2024

  10. [10]

    C., Roth, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Miller, M

    Dai, L., McKinney, J. C., Roth, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Miller, M. C. 2018, ApJL, 859, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab429

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab429 2018

  11. [11]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  12. [12]

    2019, PASP, 131, 075004, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab1d78

    Fabricant, D., Fata, R., Epps, H., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 075004, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab1d78

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab1d78 2019

  13. [13]

    A., Gunn, J

    Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Gunn, J. E., et al. 1999, ApJL, 526, L57, doi: 10.1086/312382

    work page doi:10.1086/312382 1999

  14. [14]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb0c7

    Farrah, D., Engholm, A., Hatziminaoglou, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb0c7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb0c7 2025

  15. [15]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 4790, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1530

    Gafton, E., & Rosswog, S. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 4790, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1530

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1530 2019

  16. [16]

    2019, ARA&A, 57, 305, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051819

    Gal-Yam, A. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 305, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051819

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051819 2019

  17. [17]

    2021, ARA&A, 59, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029

    Gezari, S. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029 2021

  18. [18]

    2012, Nature, 485, 217, doi: 10.1038/nature10990

    Gezari, S., Chornock, R., Rest, A., et al. 2012, Nature, 485, 217, doi: 10.1038/nature10990

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10990 2012

  19. [19]

    B., et al

    Gezari, S., Hung, T., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/144 AT 2025WET11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/144 2017

  20. [20]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f9f

    Guolo, M., Gezari, S., Yao, Y ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f9f 2024

  21. [21]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283

    Hammerstein, E., van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca283 2023

  22. [22]

    W., Pahre, M

    Hogg, D. W., Pahre, M. A., McCarthy, J. K., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 404, doi: 10.1093/mnras/288.2.404

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/288.2.404 1997

  23. [23]

    W.-S., Kochanek, C

    Holoien, T. W.-S., Kochanek, C. S., Prieto, J. L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2486

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2486 2016

  24. [24]

    Holoien, T. W. S., Neustadt, J. M. M., Vallely, P. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac74b9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac74b9 2022

  25. [25]

    2022, Universe, 9, 7, doi: 10.3390/universe9010007

    Hu, M., Hu, L., Jiang, J.-a., et al. 2022, Universe, 9, 7, doi: 10.3390/universe9010007

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9010007 2022

  26. [26]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 1865, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3269

    Huang, H.-T., & Lu, W. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1865, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3269

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3269 2024

  27. [27]

    R., Yun, S

    Huang, X., Meza, M. R., Yun, S. B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.12985, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.12985

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.12985 2025

  28. [28]

    Jiang, N., Luo, D., Zhu, J., & Cutri, R. M. 2025, ApJL, 980, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaeb9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaeb9 2025

  29. [29]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 830, 125, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125

    Jiang, Y .-F., Guillochon, J., & Loeb, A. 2016, ApJ, 830, 125, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/125 2016

  30. [30]

    2025, ApJ, 990, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf216

    Karmen, M., Gezari, S., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf216

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf216 2025

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x 2007

  32. [32]

    J., Tanvir, N

    Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 199, doi: 10.1126/science.1207143

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1207143 2011

  33. [33]

    2025a, ApJS, 278, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adc0fc

    Lin, J., Wang, T., Cai, M., et al. 2025a, ApJS, 278, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adc0fc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adc0fc

  34. [34]

    2022a, MNRAS, 513, 2422, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac946

    Lin, Z., Jiang, N., & Kong, X. 2022a, MNRAS, 513, 2422, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac946

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac946

  35. [35]

    2022b, ApJL, 939, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9c63

    Lin, Z., Jiang, N., Kong, X., et al. 2022b, ApJL, 939, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9c63

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9c63 2041

  36. [36]

    2025b, ApJ, 990, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adef10

    Lin, Z., Jiang, N., Wang, Y ., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 990, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adef10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adef10

  37. [37]

    1997, ApJ, 489, 573, doi: 10.1086/304814

    Loeb, A., & Ulmer, A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 573, doi: 10.1086/304814

    work page doi:10.1086/304814 1997

  38. [38]

    2018, ApJ, 865, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad54a

    Lu, W., & Kumar, P. 2018, ApJ, 865, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad54a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad54a 2018

  39. [39]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac —. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.16279, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.16279

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac 2019

  40. [40]

    C., Canizares, C., Elvis, M., et al

    McDowell, J. C., Canizares, C., Elvis, M., et al. 1995, ApJ, 450, 585, doi: 10.1086/176168

    work page doi:10.1086/176168 1995

  41. [41]

    D., & Stone, N

    Metzger, B. D., & Stone, N. C. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1394

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1394 2016

  42. [42]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 6233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3636 Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc)

    Mummery, A. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3636 Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc). 2014, HEAsoft: Unified Release of FTOOLS and

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3636 2024

  43. [43]

    Neustadt, J. M. M., Holoien, T. W. S., Kochanek, C. S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2538, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa859

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa859 2020

  44. [44]

    B., Gunn J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    work page doi:10.1086/160817 1983

  45. [45]

    B., Cohen, J

    Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., et al. 1995, PASP, 107, 375, doi: 10.1086/133562

    work page doi:10.1086/133562 1995

  46. [46]

    D., Plotkin, R

    Paul, J. D., Plotkin, R. M., Shemmer, O., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5bd6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5bd6 2022

  47. [47]

    M., & Shiokawa, H

    Piran, T., Svirski, G., Krolik, J., Cheng, R. M., & Shiokawa, H. 2015, ApJ, 806, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/164

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/164 2015

  48. [48]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 3473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf719

    Qiao, E., Wu, Y ., Lin, Y ., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 3473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf719

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf719 2025

  49. [49]

    M., Kulkarni, S

    Quimby, R. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2011, Nature, 474, 487, doi: 10.1038/nature10095

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10095 2011

  50. [50]

    Rees, M. J. 1988, Nature, 333, 523, doi: 10.1038/333523a0

    work page doi:10.1038/333523a0 1988

  51. [51]

    BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey - V. X-ray properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN catalog

    Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2017, ApJS, 233, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad 2017

  52. [52]

    2016, ApJ, 827, 3, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/3

    Roth, N., Kasen, D., Guillochon, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2016, ApJ, 827, 3, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/3

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/3 2016

  53. [53]

    2023, ApJL, 946, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc390

    Ryu, T., Krolik, J., & Piran, T. 2023, ApJL, 946, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc390

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc390 2023

  54. [54]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  55. [55]

    M., Bordoloi, R., & Danforth, C

    Shull, J. M., Bordoloi, R., & Danforth, C. 2025, ApJ, 991, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfb5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfb5f 2025

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Silverman, J. M., Foley, R. J., Filippenko, A. V ., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1789, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21270.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21270.x 2012

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Strubbe, L. E., & Quataert, E. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2070, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x 2009

  58. [58]

    M., Milisavljevic, D., Chornock, R., et al

    Subrayan, B. M., Milisavljevic, D., Chornock, R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 948, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accf1a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accf1a 2023

  59. [59]

    L., Kwan, T

    Thomsen, L. L., Kwan, T. M., Dai, L., et al. 2022, ApJL, 937, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac911f van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafe0c van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., Hammerstein, E., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc258

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac911f 2022

  60. [60]

    2023, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 109512, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2197-5

    Wang, T., Liu, G., Cai, Z., et al. 2023, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 109512, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2197-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2197-5 2023

  61. [61]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3992, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1000

    Wiseman, P., Wang, Y ., Hönig, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3992, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1000

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1000 2023

  62. [62]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L77, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf229

    Wu, M., Jiang, N., Zhu, J., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L77, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf229

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf229 2025

  63. [63]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.17268, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17268 12 ZHUET AL

    Wu, W., Jiang, J.-a., Xu, Z., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.17268, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17268 12 ZHUET AL

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.17268 2026

  64. [64]

    2025, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2025-3441, 1

    Xu, Z., Meng, D., Jiang, J., et al. 2025, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2025-3441, 1

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    2019, ApJ, 874, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab074b

    Yan, L., Wang, T., Jiang, N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab074b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab074b 2019

  66. [66]

    2023, ApJL, 955, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf216

    Yao, Y ., Ravi, V ., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf216

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf216 2023

  67. [67]

    D., Lu, W., et al

    Yao, Y ., Alexander, K. D., Lu, W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae08b3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae08b3 2025

  68. [68]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21624, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21624

    Yao, Y ., Chornock, R., Mummery, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21624, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21624

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21624 2026

  69. [69]

    2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 239501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3

    Yuan, W., Dai, L., Feng, H., et al. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 239501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3 2025

  70. [70]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.17275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17275

    Zhao, J., Jiang, J.-a., Xu, Z., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.17275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17275

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.17275 2026

  71. [71]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3153

    Zheng, R., Lin, Z., Kong, X., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3153

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3153 2026

  72. [72]

    2023, ApJL, 952, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace625

    Zhu, J., Jiang, N., Wang, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace625

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace625 2023

  73. [73]

    2025, ApJL, 994, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae19ea

    Zhu, J., Jiang, N., Wang, Y ., et al. 2025, ApJL, 994, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae19ea

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae19ea 2025