pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22906 · v1 · pith:LEIOO7FQnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Weak wave turbulence as a precursor to universal coarsening in a homogeneous Bose gas

Simon M. Fischer , Martin Gazo , Sebastian J. Morris , Nikolai Maslov , Haoyu Zhang , Ji\v{r}\'i Etrych , Gevorg Martirosyan , Christoph Eigen
show 1 more author
Zoran Hadzibabic
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords Bose gasweak wave turbulenceinverse cascadecoarseningmomentum distributionphase ordering kineticsfar-from-equilibrium dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Initial particle transport in a homogeneous Bose gas follows an inverse turbulent cascade with power-law exponent 2.4 before coarsening sets in.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies relaxation in an isolated low-energy Bose gas with tunable interactions. It claims that the first step toward long-range order is not immediate coarsening but an earlier phase of particle transport to low momenta. This transport matches the predictions of weak wave turbulence theory, producing a momentum distribution that follows a power law with exponent 2.4 and transport times that scale as the inverse square of the product of density and scattering length. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a universal description for the microscopic stage of coherence formation that precedes the algebraic growth of the coherence length.

Core claim

The initial transport of particles to low momenta corresponds to an inverse turbulent cascade that is, in agreement with the WWT theory, characterized by a power-law momentum distribution with exponent γ = 2.4(1) and transport times proportional to (na)^{-2}.

What carries the argument

Weak wave turbulence (WWT) framework applied to the inverse cascade of particles during the initial transport phase.

If this is right

  • The early dynamics admit a universal description independent of most microscopic details once the gas is in the WWT regime.
  • Coarsening, with its algebraic growth of coherence length, occurs only after the turbulent transport phase has moved particles to low momenta.
  • The measured exponent and the (na)^{-2} scaling of times provide a direct experimental test of WWT predictions for Bose gases.
  • Tuning the scattering length at fixed density allows isolation of the interaction dependence of the transport time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar inverse cascades could appear before ordering in other dilute quantum gases if the weak-turbulence window can be accessed.
  • The separation between the turbulent transport stage and the subsequent coarsening stage may set a natural timescale hierarchy in far-from-equilibrium Bose systems.
  • The result suggests that controlled quenches in homogeneous gases can be used to test the boundaries of the WWT regime by varying density and interaction strength.

Load-bearing premise

The system stays inside the weak wave turbulence regime long enough for the measured power law and scaling to be produced directly by that regime rather than by strong interactions or other effects.

What would settle it

An experiment that finds the momentum-distribution exponent differing from 2.4 by more than the reported uncertainty or that finds transport times failing to scale as (na)^{-2} would show the attribution to WWT is incorrect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22906 by Christoph Eigen, Gevorg Martirosyan, Haoyu Zhang, Ji\v{r}\'i Etrych, Martin Gazo, Nikolai Maslov, Sebastian J. Morris, Simon M. Fischer, Zoran Hadzibabic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Momentum-space particle transport during far-from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Emergence of the WWT power-law spectrum. (a) Momentum distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Characteristic particle-transport time. For different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Connection to universal coarsening. In WWT, d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Relaxation and condensation of an isolated low-energy Bose gas provide an ideal setting for the study of the universal features of far-from-equilibrium many-body dynamics and the emergence of long-range order. Conceptually, the emergence of such order involves two steps: the formation of local coherence, on a system-specific microscopic lengthscale, and the spreading of coherence, over lengthscales much larger than any microscopic scale. The latter is understood in terms of universal phase-ordering kinetics, or coarsening, characterized by an algebraic growth of the coherence length. Here, for a homogeneous Bose gas with tunable interactions, we show that the former also has a universal description, within the framework of weak wave turbulence (WWT). Specifically, the initial transport of particles to low momenta corresponds to an inverse turbulent cascade that is, in agreement with the WWT theory, characterized by a power-law momentum distribution, with exponent $\gamma = 2.4(1)$, and transport times ${\propto} (na)^{-2}$, where $n$ is the gas density and $a$ the $s$-wave scattering length.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in a tunable homogeneous Bose gas the initial transport of particles to low momenta constitutes an inverse particle cascade governed by weak wave turbulence (WWT). This cascade is reported to produce a power-law momentum distribution with measured exponent γ=2.4(1) and transport times that scale as (na)^{-2}, thereby serving as a universal precursor to subsequent phase-ordering coarsening.

Significance. If the WWT regime is rigorously validated, the result supplies the first quantitative experimental test of the four-wave kinetic equation predictions for the inverse cascade in a quantum gas, directly linking microscopic wave turbulence to the onset of long-range order and thereby strengthening the theoretical framework for far-from-equilibrium Bose-gas dynamics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, results] Abstract and results section: the central attribution of the observed γ=2.4(1) and (na)^{-2} scaling to the WWT inverse cascade is load-bearing on the assumption that the four-wave kinetic equation remains valid throughout the fitted early-time window; no explicit evaluation of the nonlinearity parameter gn(k) relative to ħ²k²/2m (or equivalent perturbative criterion) is supplied for the momenta and times at which the power-law fit is performed.
  2. [Methods] Methods or supplementary material: the error analysis and fitting procedure that yield γ=2.4(1) and the (na)^{-2} scaling are not described, preventing assessment of whether the quoted uncertainty accounts for systematic deviations from pure WWT (finite-size cutoffs, mean-field shifts, or crossover to strong turbulence).
  3. [Results figures] Figure or table presenting the momentum distributions: the momentum window used for the power-law fit must be shown to lie inside the regime where the WWT kinetic equation applies; without this demarcation the numerical agreement with theory cannot be taken as confirmation of the perturbative cascade.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the symbol n is used for density while a is the scattering length; a brief reminder of the definition of the interaction parameter na would aid readability.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states agreement with WWT theory but does not cite the specific theoretical reference (e.g., the predicted exponent or scaling derivation) against which the data are compared.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to provide the requested validations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, results] Abstract and results section: the central attribution of the observed γ=2.4(1) and (na)^{-2} scaling to the WWT inverse cascade is load-bearing on the assumption that the four-wave kinetic equation remains valid throughout the fitted early-time window; no explicit evaluation of the nonlinearity parameter gn(k) relative to ħ²k²/2m (or equivalent perturbative criterion) is supplied for the momenta and times at which the power-law fit is performed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check of the perturbative validity criterion is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct evaluation of the nonlinearity parameter gn(k) relative to ħ²k²/2m (and the equivalent occupation-number criterion) evaluated at the momenta and times of the power-law fits, confirming that the four-wave kinetic equation remains applicable throughout the early-time window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods or supplementary material: the error analysis and fitting procedure that yield γ=2.4(1) and the (na)^{-2} scaling are not described, preventing assessment of whether the quoted uncertainty accounts for systematic deviations from pure WWT (finite-size cutoffs, mean-field shifts, or crossover to strong turbulence).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the fitting and error-analysis procedures were insufficiently documented. The revised Methods section (and supplementary material where appropriate) will describe the power-law fitting routine in detail, including the precise momentum window, the statistical method used to extract γ=2.4(1) and its uncertainty, and an explicit discussion of how finite-size cutoffs, mean-field shifts, and possible crossover to strong turbulence were assessed or bounded. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results figures] Figure or table presenting the momentum distributions: the momentum window used for the power-law fit must be shown to lie inside the regime where the WWT kinetic equation applies; without this demarcation the numerical agreement with theory cannot be taken as confirmation of the perturbative cascade.

    Authors: We will revise the relevant figure to explicitly mark the momentum window employed for the power-law fit and will overlay or reference the region satisfying the WWT validity criteria (derived from the nonlinearity-parameter evaluation). This demarcation will make clear that the fitted interval lies inside the perturbative regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental measurements compared directly to independent WWT predictions

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of the momentum distribution exponent γ = 2.4(1) and transport-time scaling ∝ (na)^{-2} during the initial particle transport phase, stating agreement with external weak wave turbulence (WWT) theory. No derivation chain is presented that reduces these quantities to fitted parameters defined from the same dataset, self-definitional relations, or load-bearing self-citations whose validity depends on the present work. The central claim is an empirical observation tested against pre-existing WWT predictions, with the abstract explicitly framing the results as 'in agreement with the WWT theory' rather than deriving the theory from the data. This is a standard non-circular comparison of experiment to independent theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claim rests on the applicability of the WWT framework to the observed transport and on the experimental identification of the inverse-cascade regime.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weak wave turbulence theory governs the inverse particle cascade in the low-momentum kinetic regime of the homogeneous Bose gas
    Invoked when equating the measured power law and scaling directly to WWT predictions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5771 in / 1416 out tokens · 35515 ms · 2026-05-25T02:21:12.466975+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    Berges, A

    J. Berges, A. Rothkopf, and J. Schmidt, Nonthermal Fixed Points: Effective Weak Coupling for Strongly Correlated Sys- tems Far from Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 041603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    G. D. Moore, Condensates in relativistic scalar theories, Phys. Rev. D93, 065043 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    N. P. Proukakis, D. W. Snoke, and P. B. Littlewood, eds.,Uni- versal Themes of Bose–Einstein Condensation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Condensate Turbulence in a Weakly Cou- pled Boson Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 202 (1967)

    work page 1967

  8. [8]

    B. V . Svistunov, Highly nonequilibrium Bose condensation in a weakly interacting gas, J. Moscow Phys. Soc.1, 373 (1991)

    work page 1991

  9. [9]

    Dyachenko, A

    S. Dyachenko, A. C. Newell, A. Pushkarev, and V . E. Za- kharov, Optical turbulence: weak turbulence, condensates and collapsing filaments in the nonlinear Schrödinger equa- tion, Physica D57, 96 (1992)

    work page 1992

  10. [10]

    Kagan and B

    Y . Kagan and B. V . Svistunov, Kinetics of the onset of long- range order during Bose condensation in an interacting gas, Sov. Phys. JETP78, 187 (1994)

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    D. V . Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Kinetics of Bose Condensa- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3093 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Kagan, Kinetics of Bose–Einstein Condensate Formation in an Interacting Bose Gas, inBose–Einstein Condensation, edited by A

    Y . Kagan, Kinetics of Bose–Einstein Condensate Formation in an Interacting Bose Gas, inBose–Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. W. Snoke, and S. Stringari (Cam- bridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  13. [13]

    B. V . Svistunov, Superfluid turbulence in the low-temperature limit, Phys. Rev. B52, 3647 (1995)

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    D. V . Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Condensation of bosons in the kinetic regime, Phys. Rev. D55, 489 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Lacaze, P

    R. Lacaze, P. Lallemand, Y . Pomeau, and S. Rica, Dynamical formation of a Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom.152-153, 779 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    N. G. Berloff and B. V . Svistunov, Scenario of strongly nonequilibrated Bose–Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. A 66, 013603 (2002)

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    Connaughton and Y

    C. Connaughton and Y . Pomeau, Kinetic theory and Bose– Einstein condensation, C. R. Phys.5, 91 (2004)

    work page 2004

  18. [18]

    Nazarenko,Wave turbulence(Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    S. Nazarenko,Wave turbulence(Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Semisalov, V

    B. Semisalov, V . Grebenev, S. Medvedev, and S. Nazarenko, Numerical analysis of a self-similar turbulent flow in Bose– Einstein condensates, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.102, 105903 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Y . Zhu, B. Semisalov, G. Krstulovic, and S. Nazarenko, Test- ing wave turbulence theory for the Gross–Pitaevskii system, Phys. Rev. E106, 014205 (2022). 4

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Y . Zhu, B. Semisalov, G. Krstulovic, and S. Nazarenko, Self- similar evolution of wave turbulence in Gross–Pitaevskii sys- tem, Phys. Rev. E108, 064207 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C. F. Barenghi, L. Skrbek, and K. R. Sreenivasan,Quantum Turbulence(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Rosenhaus and G

    V . Rosenhaus and G. Falkovich, Weak and strong turbulence in self-focusing and defocusing media, arXiv:2501.12451 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    V . E. Zakharov, V . S. L’vov, and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov- Zakharov Spectra of Turbulence, 2nd ed. (Springer Switzer- land, 2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Nowak, J

    B. Nowak, J. Schole, D. Sexty, and T. Gasenzer, Nonthermal fixed points, vortex statistics, and superfluid turbulence in an ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A85, 043627 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Chantesana, A

    I. Chantesana, A. Piñeiro Orioli, and T. Gasenzer, Kinetic the- ory of nonthermal fixed points in a Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A99, 043620 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    A. N. Mikheev, I. Siovitz, and T. Gasenzer, Universal dynam- ics and non-thermal fixed points in quantum fluids far from equilibrium, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top.232, 3393 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Miesner, D

    H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, M. R. Andrews, D. S. Durfee, S. Inouye, and W. Ketterle, Bosonic Stimulation in the Formation of a Bose–Einstein Condensate, Science279, 1005 (1998)

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    M. Köhl, M. J. Davis, C. W. Gardiner, T. W. Hänsch, and T. Esslinger, Growth of Bose–Einstein condensates from ther- mal vapor, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 080402 (2002)

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Ritter, A

    S. Ritter, A. Öttl, T. Donner, T. Bourdel, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Observing the formation of long-range order during Bose–Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 090402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Hugbart, J

    M. Hugbart, J. A. Retter, A. F. Varón, P. Bouyer, A. Aspect, and M. J. Davis, Population and phase coherence during the growth of an elongated Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A75, 011602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    R. P. Smith, S. Beattie, S. Moulder, R. L. Campbell, and Z. Hadzibabic, Condensation dynamics in a quantum- quenched Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 105301 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    M. A. Moreno-Armijos, A. R. Fritsch, A. D. García-Orozco, S. Sab, G. Telles, Y . Zhu, L. Madeira, S. Nazarenko, V . I. Yukalov, and V . S. Bagnato, Observation of Relaxation Stages in a Nonequilibrium Closed Quantum System: Decaying Tur- bulence in a Trapped Superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 023401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    J. A. P. Glidden, C. Eigen, L. H. Dogra, T. A. Hilker, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bidirectional dynamic scaling in an isolated Bose gas far from equilibrium, Nat. Phys.17, 457 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    M. Gazo, A. Karailiev, T. Satoor, C. Eigen, M. Gałka, and Z. Hadzibabic, Universal Coarsening in a Homogeneous Two-Dimensional Bose Gas, Science389, 802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Martirosyan, M

    G. Martirosyan, M. Gazo, J. Etrych, S. M. Fischer, S. J. Mor- ris, C. J. Ho, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, A universal speed limit for spreading of coherence, Nature647, 608 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    S. J. Morris, M. Gazo, S. M. Fischer, H. Zhang, C. J. Ho, N. R. Cooper, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, Observation of Vinen turbulence during far-from-equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation, arXiv:2604.28191 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    The condensation dynamics after the particles have accumu- lated at lowkcan be further split into two stages – the for- mation of a ‘quasi-condensate’ with suppressed density fluc- tuations, but no long-range order, and the spreading of coher- ence [12, 16]

    work page

  39. [39]

    W. F. Vinen, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II I. Experiments on steady heat currents, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A240, 114 (1957)

    work page 1957

  40. [40]

    W. F. Vinen, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II III. Theory of the mutual friction, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 242, 493 (1957)

    work page 1957

  41. [41]

    Eigen, A

    C. Eigen, A. L. Gaunt, A. Suleymanzade, N. Navon, Z. Hadz- ibabic, and R. P. Smith, Observation of Weak Collapse in a Bose–Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. X6, 041058 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Navon, R

    N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nat. Phys.17, 1334 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Etrych, G

    J. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, J. A. P. Glidden, L. H. Dogra, J. M. Hutson, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Pinpoint- ing Feshbach resonances and testing Efimov universalities in 39K, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013174 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Martirosyan, C

    G. Martirosyan, C. J. Ho, J. Etrych, Y . Zhang, A. Cao, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Observation of Subdiffusive Dynamic Scaling in a Driven and Disordered Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 113401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    We evolve the gas tok p ≈0.4µm −1 always at the same a=90a 0 to ensure that we extractdk −2p /dtalways start- ing with the sameN k, with onlyk p/kξ being different. If we evolve fromk 0 at differenta=(7–240)a 0, theN k profiles for the samek p ≈0.4µm −1 and differentaare not the same, be- cause for the largest-asystemk p drops well belowk ξ already during...

    work page

  46. [46]

    3,∆tfor the largestnacorresponds tok p/kξ evolving from≈2.8to≈1.4, and for all the other datasets kp/kξ is always>2

    Note that in Fig. 3,∆tfor the largestnacorresponds tok p/kξ evolving from≈2.8to≈1.4, and for all the other datasets kp/kξ is always>2

    work page

  47. [47]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic criti- cal phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    work page 1977