Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 5 cited by

Spontaneous breaking of non-invertible symmetries and duality to beyond-Landau transitions

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-01 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Generalized gauging maps certain non-invertible symmetry-breaking transitions to deconfined quantum critical points of invertible symmetries.

desk verdict The paper gives lattice models for Rep(H8) non-invertible symmetry breaking and a gauging duality to invertible DQCPs under stated conditions. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.27672 v1 pith:XHI2ARHH submitted 2026-05-26 cond-mat.str-el hep-th

Xie Chen , Shang Liu , Da-chuan Lu , Nathanan Tantivasadakarn This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords non-invertiblesymmetryspontaneousbreakingdeconfinedquantumcriticalpointsgeneralizedgaugingbeyond-LandautransitionsRep(H8)latticemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses lattice models of gapped phases with non-invertible Rep(H8) symmetry to study spontaneous symmetry breaking beyond the invertible case. It shows that the broken phases are still marked by long-range correlations of local order parameters, but these obey a more general algebraic structure. The central result is a duality, obtained through generalized gauging, that relates some of these transitions to deconfined quantum critical points of ordinary symmetries. Precise conditions for the mapping are stated and demonstrated on several families of examples, supplying a route to analyze phase transitions outside the Landau framework.

What carries the argument

Generalized gauging procedure that establishes the duality between non-invertible symmetry-breaking transitions and deconfined quantum critical points of invertible symmetries.

What would settle it

An explicit lattice calculation or numerical simulation of the Rep(H8) models that shows the claimed duality mapping fails to hold under the stated conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Via generalized gauging, certain non-invertible symmetry-breaking transitions can be mapped to deconfined quantum critical points of invertible symmetries, and vice versa. The paper establishes precise conditions under which this duality holds and illustrates them with several families of examples.

Load-bearing premise

Concrete lattice models exist that realize gapped phases with non-invertible Rep(H8) symmetry and the generalized gauging procedure applies without additional obstructions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Symmetry-breaking phases associated with non-invertible symmetries are characterized by long-range correlation of local order parameters obeying a more general algebraic structure than in the invertible case.
  • The duality supplies a systematic route to studying beyond-Landau phase transitions by relating them to known deconfined critical points.
  • The same generalized gauging construction works in both directions, mapping invertible deconfined critical points back to non-invertible transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the duality extends to other non-invertible symmetries, it could convert a broader class of exotic transitions into problems already solved for ordinary symmetries.
  • The generalized algebraic structure of the order parameters may imply new selection rules or topological features in the ordered phases that are absent when symmetries are invertible.
  • Numerical studies of the dual deconfined critical points could be used to extract exponents or correlation functions that are hard to access directly in the non-invertible models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates spontaneous symmetry breaking for non-invertible symmetries, taking gapped phases with Rep(H_8) symmetry on concrete lattice models as the central example. It argues that the resulting phases are still diagnosed by long-range correlations of local order parameters, now obeying a generalized algebraic structure. Via generalized gauging it maps selected non-invertible symmetry-breaking transitions onto deconfined quantum critical points of invertible symmetries (and conversely), states precise conditions for the duality, and illustrates the construction with several families of examples.

Significance. If the lattice realizations and the gauging map are free of hidden obstructions, the work supplies a concrete, systematic bridge between non-invertible symmetry breaking and the well-studied landscape of DQCPs. This could open a practical route to classifying and numerically accessing beyond-Landau transitions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (lattice constructions): the central duality claim rests on the existence of faithful, purely non-invertible Rep(H_8) realizations whose local operators transform without additional invertible symmetries or anomalies; the manuscript must exhibit at least one explicit Hamiltonian (or tensor-network state) together with the explicit action of the non-invertible generators on the order-parameter operators.
  2. [§5] §5 (generalized gauging): the statement that the duality holds “under precise conditions” is load-bearing; the conditions must be stated as a theorem that tracks how the order-parameter algebra and the anomaly data transform under the gauging map, so that it is clear when the target DQCP is reached without extra relevant operators.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the symmetry group is inconsistent (Rep(H_8) versus Rep(H8)); adopt a single convention throughout.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “several families of examples”; the main text should list them explicitly (e.g., by model name or Hamiltonian) so the reader can locate the concrete illustrations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (lattice constructions): the central duality claim rests on the existence of faithful, purely non-invertible Rep(H_8) realizations whose local operators transform without additional invertible symmetries or anomalies; the manuscript must exhibit at least one explicit Hamiltonian (or tensor-network state) together with the explicit action of the non-invertible generators on the order-parameter operators.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit lattice realization is required to make the duality claim fully concrete. Section 3 of the manuscript already introduces families of models with Rep(H_8) symmetry, but we will add, in the revised version, one fully explicit Hamiltonian (a decorated Ising model on the square lattice) together with the explicit action of the non-invertible generators on the local order-parameter operators. This will confirm the absence of additional invertible symmetries or anomalies in the chosen realization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (generalized gauging): the statement that the duality holds “under precise conditions” is load-bearing; the conditions must be stated as a theorem that tracks how the order-parameter algebra and the anomaly data transform under the gauging map, so that it is clear when the target DQCP is reached without extra relevant operators.

    Authors: We accept the referee’s point that the conditions should be elevated to a formal statement. In the revised manuscript we will formulate the duality as a theorem that explicitly tracks the transformation of the order-parameter algebra and the anomaly data under the generalized gauging map, thereby making transparent when the image is a clean DQCP without extraneous relevant operators. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; derivation relies on explicit lattice constructions and generalized gauging without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe concrete lattice models realizing Rep(H8) phases, characterization via order-parameter correlations, and a duality via generalized gauging under stated conditions. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains that reduce the central mapping to its own inputs are visible. The claims rest on explicit constructions and examples rather than tautological definitions or load-bearing self-references.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the provided text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spontaneous breaking of non-invertible symmetries and duality to beyond-Landau transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHI2ARHH

@misc{pith2026260527672,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spontaneous breaking of non-invertible symmetries and duality to beyond-Landau transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHI2ARHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.27672}
}
abstract

Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a well-understood mechanism for generating distinct phases of matter. Recently, the notion of symmetry has been broadened to include operations without inverses, leading to the concept of non-invertible symmetries. How do symmetry-breaking phases associated with non-invertible symmetries differ from those arising from conventional invertible symmetries? We address this question using concrete lattice models of the gapped phases with non-invertible Rep($H_8$) symmetry as an example. We find that, despite the symmetry being non-invertible, the symmetry-breaking phases can still be characterized by the long-range correlation of local order parameters, which obey a more general algebraic structure than in the invertible setting. Furthermore, via generalized gauging, certain non-invertible symmetry-breaking transitions can be mapped to deconfined quantum critical points of invertible symmetries, and vice versa. We establish precise conditions under which this duality holds and illustrate them with several families of examples, providing a systematic route to studying beyond-Landau phase transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27672 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In the Symmetry Topological Field Theory, a 1 + 1D system is realized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rep(H8) symmetry realized in two qubits chains. Wψ1 , the spin flip operation in the first chain, and Wψ2 , the spin flip operation in the qubit chain, generate the invertible part of the symmetry. Wσ1σ2 , the joint Kramers-Wannier transformation in both chains, gives the non-invertible symmetry operation. If we assume periodic boundary condition, N 2 o N 2 e = T 2 (1 + ηo + ηe + ηoηe) where the translation symmetry… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fusion algebra of two local order parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The energy gap ∆E of H11 as a function of 1/(2N) 2 . ∆E is the same as the 6-th lowest energy eigenvalue. The squares are numerical data from exact diagonalization, with 2N goes from 10 to 24. The dashed line is a quadratic fitting, i.e. ∆Efit = a + b/(2N) + c/(2N) 2 .…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding deconfined quantum critical points from crystalline categorical Landau paradigm

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gauging anomalous onsite symmetries in LSM-anomalous spin chains yields a noninvertible crystalline categorical symmetry whose breaking transitions correspond to the original DQCPs, realized as Rep(D8) and Rep(H8) cat...

  2. Twin Phases: Intrinsic Deconfined Quantum Criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Twin phases are inequivalent phases sharing a generalized charge under symmetry S, enabling stable direct transitions without spontaneous symmetry breaking even after gauging.

  3. Tensor network study of deconfined quantum criticality in a one-dimensional spin-phonon model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tensor networks demonstrate DQCP stability in the 1D spin-phonon model only for high phonon frequencies, with a first-order transition below a critical value whose endpoint belongs to the four-state Potts universality class.

  4. $E_\infty^{1,2}$-type Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies, deconfined quantum critical points, and non-invertible symmetry breaking

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    E∞^{1,2}-type LSM anomalies lead to non-invertible symmetry breaking at type-II deconfined quantum critical points in 1D spin chains.

  5. Twin Phases: Intrinsic Deconfined Quantum Criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Twin phases share generalized charges under a symmetry, so direct transitions between them are intrinsically beyond-Landau deconfined quantum critical points without hidden symmetry breaking.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.7, 19 (1937), doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-010586-4.50034-1

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50034-1 1937

  2. [2]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2015(2), 172 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015

  3. [3]

    D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Goldstone modes and photonization for higher form symmetries, SciPost Phys.6, 006 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.1.006

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.1.006 2019

  4. [4]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, D. M. Hofman and G. Mathys, Superfluids as higher-form anomalies, SciPost Phys.8, 047 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.3.047

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.8.3.047 2020

  5. [5]

    Iqbal and J

    N. Iqbal and J. McGreevy, Toward a 3d ising model with a weakly-coupled string theory dual, SciPost Phys.9, 019 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.2.019

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.9.2.019 2020

  6. [6]

    Moradi, S

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian and A. Tiwari, Topological holography: Towards a unification of landau and beyond-landau physics (2022),2207.10712

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, Categorical landau paradigm for gapped phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 161601 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.161601. 42

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.161601 2024

  8. [8]

    J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14(Volume 14, 2023), 57 (2023), doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029 2023

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, Essay: Generalized landau paradigm for quantum phases and phase transitions, Phys

    X. Chen, Essay: Generalized landau paradigm for quantum phases and phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 250001 (2025), doi:10.1103/tmvy-vsqd

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries (2024),2308.00747

    S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries (2024),2308.00747

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki,Ictp lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Physics Reports1063, 1 (2024), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.007, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Tft construction of rcft correlators i: partition functions, Nuclear Physics B646(3), 353 (2002), doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00744- 7

    2002 doi

  5. [13]

    Carqueville and I

    N. Carqueville and I. Runkel, Orbifold completion of defect bicategories, Quantum Topology7(2), 203 (2016), doi:10.4171/qt/76

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    Aasen, R

    D. Aasen, R. S. Mong and P. Fendley, Topological defects on the lattice: I. the ising model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49(35), 354001 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, arXiv e-prints arXiv:1712.09542 (2017), doi:10.48550/arXiv.1712.09542,1712.09542

    Y. Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, arXiv e-prints arXiv:1712.09542 (2017), doi:10.48550/arXiv.1712.09542,1712.09542

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics2018(3) (2018), doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)189

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry i: Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases (2019),1912.02817

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley and R. S. Mong, Topological defects on the lattice: dualities and degeneracies, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08598 (2020)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz and F. Verstraete, Dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models: Symmetric hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners, PRX Quantum4, 020357 (2023), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020357

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp and F. Verstraete, Dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models: topological sectors (2024),2211.03777

    2024

  13. [21]

    Haegeman, K

    J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, N. Schuch, J. I. Cirac and F. Verstraete, Gauging quantum states: From global to local symmetries in many-body systems, Physical Review X5(1) (2015), doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.011024

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng, Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry: A holographic and entanglement view of symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043086 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043086

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2) (2021), doi:10.1007/jhep02(2021)132. 43

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness, Phys. Rev. B108, 075105 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.075105

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Huang and M

    S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng, Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states (2023),2310.16878

    2023

  18. [26]

    Kong, Z.-H

    L. Kong, Z.-H. Zhang, J. Zhao and H. Zheng, Higher condensation theory (2025), 2403.07813

    2025

  19. [27]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d, SciPost Phys.18, 032 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.1.032

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Seifnashri, S.-H

    S. Seifnashri, S.-H. Shao and X. Yang, Gauging non-invertible symmetries on the lattice (2025),2503.02925

    2025

  21. [29]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i, Phys. Rev.60, 252 (1941), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.60.252

    1941 doi

  22. [30]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, ¨Uber das paulische ¨ aquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik47(9), 631 (1928), doi:10.1007/BF01331938

    1928 doi

  23. [31]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden symmetry breaking and the haldane phase ins=1 quantum spin chains, Communications in Mathematical Physics147(3), 431 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF02097239

    1992 doi

  24. [32]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden z2×z 2 symmetry breaking in haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B45, 304 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.45.304

    1992 doi

  25. [33]

    Tambara and S

    D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups, Journal of Algebra209(2), 692 (1998), doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1998.7558

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    Fechisin, N

    C. Fechisin, N. Tantivasadakarn and V. V. Albert, Noninvertible symmetry-protected topological order in a group-based cluster state, Phys. Rev. X15(1), 011058 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.011058,2312.09272

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Chatterjee, ¨O

    A. Chatterjee, ¨O. M. Aksoy and X.-G. Wen, Quantum phases and transitions in spin chains with non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys.17(4), 115 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.4.115,2405.05331

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari, Lattice models for phases and transitions with non-invertible symmetries (2025),2405.05964

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    K. T. K. Chung, U. Borla, A. H. Nevidomskyy and S. Moroz, Spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetries in transverse-field ising qudit chains (2025),2508.11003

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional ising model with a defect line, Nuclear Physics B495(3), 533 (1997), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00219-8

    1997 doi

  31. [39]

    Petkova and J.-B

    V. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber, Generalised twisted partition functions, Physics Letters B504(1), 157 (2001), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00276-3. 44

    2001 doi

  32. [40]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Kramers-wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 070601 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070601

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin, Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019(1) (2019), doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)026

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Feiguin, S

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang and M. H. Freedman, Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 160409 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.160409

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    Buican and A

    M. Buican and A. Gromov, Anyonic chains, topological defects, and conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys.356(3), 1017 (2017), doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2995-6, 1701.02800

    2017 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ning, B.-B

    S.-Q. Ning, B.-B. Mao and C. Wang, Building 1d lattice models with g-graded fusion category, SciPost Phys.17(5), 125 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.5.125, 2301.06416

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds, In XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, pp. 608–613, doi:10.1142/9789814304634 0056, ArXiv:0909.5013 [hep-th, physics:math- ph] (2010)

    2010 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. part ii. categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond, JHEP07, 051 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)051,2106.12577

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    Bhardwaj, D

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Warman, Hasse diagrams for gapless spt and ssb phases with non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys.19(4), 113 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.4.113,2403.00905

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Inamura, On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries, JHEP03, 036 (2022), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)036,2110.12882

    K. Inamura, On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries, JHEP03, 036 (2022), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)036,2110.12882

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng, Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers (2015),1502.01690

    2015 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033417 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033417

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    Bhardwaj, Y

    L. Bhardwaj, Y. Lee and Y. Tachikawa, Sl(2, z) action on qfts with z2 symmetry and the brown-kervaire invariants, Journal of High Energy Physics2020(11) (2020), doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)141

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Pulmann, P

    J. Pulmann, P. ˇSevera and F. Valach, A nonabelian duality for (higher) gauge theories, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics25(1), 241 (2021), doi:10.4310/atmp.2021.v25.n1.a5

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    Lichtman, R

    T. Lichtman, R. Thorngren, N. H. Lindner, A. Stern and E. Berg, Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states, Phys. Rev. B104, 075141 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075141

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. part i, Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2), 1 (2020). 45

    2020

  47. [55]

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng, Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics2020(9) (2020), doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)093

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, Symmetry tfts from string theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics402(1), 895 (2023), doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04737-2

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle, Phys. Rev. B107, 155136 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.155136,2203.03596

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory (2023),2209.07471

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri and Y. Tachikawa, Asymptotic density of states in 2d cfts with non-invertible symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2023(3), 1 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Gapless edges of 2d topological orders and enriched monoidal categories, Nuclear Physics B927, 140 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. part ii, Nuclear Physics B966, 115384 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng, One dimensional gapped quantum phases and enriched fusion categories, Journal of High Energy Physics2022(3), 1 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Categories of quantum liquids i, Journal of High Energy Physics2022(8), 1 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Categories of quantum liquids ii, Communications in Math- ematical Physics405(9), 203 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Xu and Z.-H

    R. Xu and Z.-H. Zhang, Categorical descriptions of one-dimensional gapped phases with abelian onsite symmetries, Physical Review B110(15), 155106 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    I. Cong, M. Cheng and Z. Wang, Hamiltonian and algebraic theories of gapped boundaries in topological phases of matter, Communications in Mathematical Physics355(2), 645 (2017), doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2960-4

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    Choi, D.-C

    Y. Choi, D.-C. Lu and Z. Sun, Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry, Journal of High Energy Physics2024(1), 142 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)142

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Diatlyk, C

    O. Diatlyk, C. Luo, Y. Wang and Q. Weller, Gauging non-invertible symmetries: topological interfaces and generalized orbifold groupoid in 2d qft, Journal of High Energy Physics2024(3), 127 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)127,2311.17044

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Perez-Lona, D

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen and X. Yu, Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases, JHEP 02, 154 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)154,2311.16230

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    C. Meng, X. Yang, T. Lan and Z. Gu, Non-invertible spts: an on-site realization of (1+1)d anomaly-free fusion category symmetry (2024),2412.20546. 46

    2024

  63. [71]

    Chen and T

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, Analogs of deconfined quantum criticality for noninvertible symmetry breaking in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B112(19), 195129 (2025), doi:10.1103/8tsg-q9j6,2506.01131

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    Y. Li, M. Dell’acqua and A. Mitra, Classification of thouless pumps with non-invertible symmetries and implications for floquet phases (2025),2510.01626

    2025

  65. [73]

    D.-C. Lu, A. Chatterjee and N. Tantivasadakarn, Generalized kramers-wannier self-duality in hopf-ising models (2026),2602.10183

    2026

  66. [74]

    Roumpedakis, S

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, Higher gauging and non-invertible condensation defects, Commun. Math. Phys.401(3), 3043 (2023), doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04706-9,2204.02407

    2023 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ostrik, Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group, arXiv preprint math/0202130 (2002)

    V. Ostrik, Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group, arXiv preprint math/0202130 (2002)

    2002 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Natale et al., On the equivalence of module categories over a group-theoretical fusion category, SIGMA

    S. Natale et al., On the equivalence of module categories over a group-theoretical fusion category, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications13, 042 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    D.-C. Lu, Z. Sun and Z. Zhang, Symsets and self-dualities under gauging non-invertible symmetries (2025),2501.07787

    2025

  70. [78]

    Coste, T

    A. Coste, T. Gannon and P. Ruelle, Finite group modular data, Nucl. Phys. B581, 679 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00285-6,hep-th/0001158

    2000 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    Gelaki, D

    S. Gelaki, D. Naidu and D. Nikshych, Centers of graded fusion categories, Algebra & Number Theory3(8), 959 (2009),0905.3117

    2009 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Zhang and C

    C. Zhang and C. C´ ordova,Anomalies of (1+1)-dimensional categorical symmetries, Phys. Rev. B110(3), 035155 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.035155,2304. 01262

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Hu and Y

    J. Hu and Y. Zhang, β-character algebra and a commuting pair in hopf algebras, Algebras and Representation Theory10(5), 497 (2007)

    2007

  74. [82]

    Shi, Finite dimensional hopf algebras over kac-paljutkin algebra h 8, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03262 (2016)

    Y. Shi, Finite dimensional hopf algebras over kac-paljutkin algebra h 8, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03262 (2016)

    2016

  75. [83]

    Kitaev and L

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics313(2), 351 (2012)

    2012

  76. [84]

    Seifnashri and S.-H

    S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, Cluster state as a noninvertible symmetry-protected topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 116601 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.116601

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    Van Grinsven, h-equivariant morita equivalences of loewy-graded comodule algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.09540 (2025)

    J. Van Grinsven, h-equivariant morita equivalences of loewy-graded comodule algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.09540 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    Levin and T

    M. Levin and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum criticality and n´ eelorder via dimer disorder, Phys. Rev. B70(22), 220403 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.220403, cond-mat/0405702

    2004 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023),2306.12638

    T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023),2306.12638. 47

    2023

  80. [88]

    Etingof, D

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych and V. Ostrik, On fusion categories, Annals of mathematics pp. 581–642 (2005)

    2005

  81. [89]

    Burciu and S

    S. Burciu and S. Natale, Fusion rules of equivariantizations of fusion categories, Journal of Mathematical Physics54(1), 013511 (2013), doi:10.1063/1.4774293, 1206.6625

    2013 doi

  82. [90]

    D.-C. Lu, Z. Sun and Y.-Z. You, Realizing triality and p-ality by lattice twisted gauging in (1+1)d quantum spin systems, SciPost Phys.17(5), 136 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.5.136,2405.14939

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    Lu and Z

    D.-C. Lu and Z. Sun, On triality defects in 2d cft, JHEP02, 173 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)173,2208.06077

    2023 doi

  84. [92]

    Natale, On group theoretical hopf algebras and exact factorizations of finite groups, Journal of Algebra270(1), 199 (2003)

    S. Natale, On group theoretical hopf algebras and exact factorizations of finite groups, Journal of Algebra270(1), 199 (2003)

    2003

  85. [93]

    Nikshych, Non-group-theoretical semisimple hopf algebras from group actions on fusion categories, Selecta Mathematica14(1), 145 (2008)

    D. Nikshych, Non-group-theoretical semisimple hopf algebras from group actions on fusion categories, Selecta Mathematica14(1), 145 (2008)

    2008

  86. [94]

    Natale, Hopf algebra extensions of group algebras and tambara-yamagami categories, Algebras and representation theory13(6), 673 (2010)

    S. Natale, Hopf algebra extensions of group algebras and tambara-yamagami categories, Algebras and representation theory13(6), 673 (2010)

    2010

  87. [95]

    Cuadra and E

    J. Cuadra and E. Meir, Orders of nikshych’s hopf algebra, arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.2977 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Lu and Z

    D.-C. Lu and Z. Sun, Intrinsic nispt phases, ignispt phases, and mixed anomalies of non-invertible symmetries (2025),2511.01965

    2025

  89. [97]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. Ferrari and J. Pearson, Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory i, SciPost Physics17(1), 015 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. Ferrari and J. Pearson, Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory ii, SciPost Physics17(2), 067 (2024)

    2024

  91. [99]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Levin, Exactly solvable model for a deconfined quantum critical point in 1d, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2), 026801 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.026801,2206.01222

    2023 doi

  92. [100]

    R. A. Lanzetta and L. Fidkowski, Bootstrapping lieb-schultz-mattis anomalies, Phys. Rev. B107(20), 205137 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.205137,2207.05092

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    D.-C. Lu, Z. Sun and Z. Zhang, Exploring g-ality defects in 2-dim qfts, JHEP11, 081 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)081,2406.12151

    2025 doi

  94. [102]

    Antinucci, F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati and G. Rizi, Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging (2023),2308. 11707

    2023

  95. [103]

    Sun and Y

    Z. Sun and Y. Zheng, When are duality defects group-theoretical?, JHEP10, 104 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)104,2307.14428

    2025 doi

  96. [104]

    C. Goff, G. Mason and S.-H. Ng, On the Gauge Equivalence of Twisted Quantum Doubles of Elementary Abelian and Extra-Special 2-Groups, Journal of Algebra 312(2), 849 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.10.022, ArXiv:math/0603191. 48

    2007 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    Etingof, R

    P. Etingof, R. Kinser and C. Walton, Tensor algebras in finite tensor categories, International Mathematics Research Notices2021(24), 18529 (2021)

    2021

  98. [106]

    Li and M

    Y. Li and M. Litvinov, Non-invertible spt, gauging and symmetry fractionalization (2024),2405.15951

    2024

  99. [107]

    Uribe Jongbloed, On the classification of pointed fusion categories up to weak morita equivalence, Pacific Journal of Mathematics290(2), 437 (2017)

    B. Uribe Jongbloed, On the classification of pointed fusion categories up to weak morita equivalence, Pacific Journal of Mathematics290(2), 437 (2017)

    2017

  100. [108]

    Masuoka, Calculations of some groups of hopf algebra extensions, Journal of Algebra191(2), 568 (1997)

    A. Masuoka, Calculations of some groups of hopf algebra extensions, Journal of Algebra191(2), 568 (1997)

    1997

  101. [109]

    Vercleyen, On Low-Rank Multiplicity-Free Fusion Categories, National Univer- sity of Ireland, Maynooth (Ireland) (2024)

    G. Vercleyen, On Low-Rank Multiplicity-Free Fusion Categories, National Univer- sity of Ireland, Maynooth (Ireland) (2024)

    2024

  102. [110]

    Perez-Lona, D

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, S. Roy, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen and X. Yu, Anomaly resolution by noninvertible symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40(35), 2550161 (2025), doi:10.1142/S0217751X25501611,2504.06333

    2025 doi

  103. [111]

    Shimizu, Some computations of frobenius–schur indicators of the regular representations of hopf algebras, Algebras and representation theory15(2), 325 (2012)

    K. Shimizu, Some computations of frobenius–schur indicators of the regular representations of hopf algebras, Algebras and representation theory15(2), 325 (2012)

    2012

  104. [112]

    A. M. Casta˜ no, S. Montgomery, S. Natale, M. D. Vega and C. Walton, Cocycle deformations and galois objects for semisimple hopf algebras of dimension p3 and pq2, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra222(7), 1643 (2018)

    2018

  105. [113]

    Tantivasadakarn, A

    N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath and R. Verresen, Hierarchy of topological order from finite-depth unitaries, measurement, and feedforward, PRX Quantum4(2), 020339 (2023), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020339,2209.06202

    2023 doi

  106. [114]

    Manjunath, V

    N. Manjunath, V. Mattei, A. Tiwari and T. D. Ellison, Universal quantum computation with group surface codes (2026),2603.05502

    2026

  107. [115]

    Wakui, Braided morita equivalence for finite-dimensional semisimple and cosemisimple hopf algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03042 (2018)

    M. Wakui, Braided morita equivalence for finite-dimensional semisimple and cosemisimple hopf algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03042 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Fukuda, Semisimple hopf algebras of dimension 12, Tsukuba journal of mathe- matics pp

    N. Fukuda, Semisimple hopf algebras of dimension 12, Tsukuba journal of mathe- matics pp. 43–54 (1997)

    1997

  109. [117]

    Kashina, Classification of semisimple hopf algebras of dimension 16, Journal of Algebra232(2), 617 (2000)

    Y. Kashina, Classification of semisimple hopf algebras of dimension 16, Journal of Algebra232(2), 617 (2000)

    2000

  110. [118]

    Natale, On semisimple hopf algebras of dimension pq2, Journal of Algebra221(1), 242 (1999)

    S. Natale, On semisimple hopf algebras of dimension pq2, Journal of Algebra221(1), 242 (1999)

    1999

  111. [119]

    Natale, On semisimple hopf algebras of dimension pq r, Algebras and represen- tation theory7(2), 173 (2004)

    S. Natale, On semisimple hopf algebras of dimension pq r, Algebras and represen- tation theory7(2), 173 (2004)

    2004

  112. [120]

    Galindo, J

    C. Galindo, J. Plavnik and E. C. Rowell, Integral non-group-theoretical modular categories of dimension pˆ2qˆ2 (2024)

    2024

  113. [121]

    Zhu, Hopf algebras of prime dimension, International Mathematics Research Notices1994(1), 53 (1994)

    Y. Zhu, Hopf algebras of prime dimension, International Mathematics Research Notices1994(1), 53 (1994)

    1994

  114. [122]

    Masuoka, The pn theorem for semisimple hopf algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society124(3), 735 (1996)

    A. Masuoka, The pn theorem for semisimple hopf algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society124(3), 735 (1996). 49

    1996

  115. [123]

    Etingof and S

    P. Etingof and S. Gelaki, Semisimple hopf algebras of dimension pq are trivial, arXiv preprint math/9801129 (1998). 50

    1998 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.