Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 118 references

Perturbative dynamics and relativistic effects of a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Lorentz-violating parameter dominates corrections to quasinormal modes and relativistic effects in a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole, while dyonic charges produce milder shifts.

desk verdict Routine WKB spectra on a fixed Lorentz-violating dyonic metric with the usual observables attached; nothing structurally new but the numbers are concrete. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28580 v1 pith:GWLF7YOL submitted 2026-05-27 gr-qc hep-th

A. A. Araújo Filho This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords Kalb-RamondblackholeLorentzviolationdyonicchargesquasinormalmodestidalforcesgravitationalredshiftWKBmethodtimedelay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper examines perturbative dynamics, tidal effects, and relativistic frequency shifts for a black hole carrying both electric and magnetic charges in a Lorentz-violating antisymmetric tensor background. The geometry depends on mass M together with charges Q and p through the effective combination P_ℓ² that also incorporates the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ. Calculations of the gravitational Doppler effect, radial and angular tidal forces, and null geodesic time delay show how the charges weaken redshift and reduce delay while the violating parameter reverses tidal patterns at specific radii. In the perturbative sector the scalar, vector, tensor, and spinor effective potentials are derived and the sixth-order WKB method yields quasinormal frequencies whose numerical spectra indicate that ℓ supplies the leading correction by raising oscillation frequencies and altering damping rates.

What carries the argument

The effective combination P_ℓ² = Q²/(1-ℓ)² + p²/(1-2ℓ) that enters the metric and controls all derived potentials and observables.

What would settle it

Direct numerical evaluation of the sixth-order WKB quasinormal frequencies for independent variations of ℓ versus Q and p that fails to show larger frequency and damping shifts from ℓ would refute the claimed dominance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The geometry is controlled by the mass M, the electric charge Q, the magnetic charge p, and the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ, with the dyonic sector entering through the effective combination P_ℓ² = Q²/(1-ℓ)² + p²/(1-2ℓ). The Lorentz-violating parameter gives the dominant correction, increasing the oscillation frequencies and modifying the damping rates, while the dyonic charges produce milder shifts. These conclusions follow from explicit computation of the effective potentials, the WKB spectra, and the time-domain profiles that exhibit damped ringing followed by power-law tails.

Load-bearing premise

The spacetime geometry is fully determined by the mass, the two charges, and the single Lorentz-violating parameter through their combination in the effective P_ℓ² term.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dyonic charges shift the frequency ratio of radial signals toward unity and thereby weaken the gravitational redshift.
  • Tidal forces reverse their usual stretching and compression patterns at characteristic radii determined by the effective charges.
  • Electric and magnetic sectors both reduce the gravitational time delay along null trajectories relative to the reference case.
  • The Lorentz-violating parameter raises the real parts of the quasinormal frequencies and changes the imaginary parts more strongly than the dyonic charges.
  • Time-domain evolution shows the standard sequence of damped quasinormal ringing followed by late-time power-law tails.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dominance of ℓ persists in rotating or higher-dimensional extensions, gravitational-wave ringdown signals could carry distinguishable signatures of Lorentz violation.
  • The same effective combination might appear in other antisymmetric-tensor models and allow cross-checks between black-hole spectroscopy and particle-physics bounds.
  • Late-time tail exponents could be recomputed analytically to test whether the power-law indices remain universal once ℓ is nonzero.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates perturbative dynamics, tidal effects, and relativistic frequency shifts for a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole in a Lorentz-violating background. The static spherically symmetric geometry is parameterized by mass M, electric charge Q, magnetic charge p, and Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ, with the dyonic contributions entering via the effective combination P_ℓ² = Q²/(1-ℓ)² + p²/(1-2ℓ). The authors compute the gravitational Doppler shift for radial signals, radial and angular tidal forces in a freely falling frame, and gravitational time delay for null geodesics. They then derive effective potentials for scalar, vector, tensor, and spinor perturbations and extract quasinormal frequencies via sixth-order WKB, reporting that ℓ dominates the corrections (increasing frequencies and altering damping) while dyonic charges induce milder shifts; time-domain evolution confirms damped ringing followed by power-law tails.

Significance. If the derivations and numerics hold, the work supplies concrete quantitative results on how a Lorentz-violating parameter modifies both relativistic observables and black-hole ringdown spectra in a dyonic setting. The combination of analytic tidal/Doppler calculations with sixth-order WKB spectra and time-domain confirmation is a positive methodological feature. The reported dominance of ℓ over the dyonic charges is a falsifiable numerical outcome that follows directly once the metric and potentials are fixed.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Geometry section] The abstract states that the geometry is 'controlled by' the combination P_ℓ² but does not indicate whether this form is derived from the underlying action or posited as an ansatz; a brief derivation or reference in the geometry section would clarify the status of the effective charge.
  2. [Perturbative sector] Explicit expressions for the effective potentials of the scalar, vector, tensor, and spinor fields are not reproduced in the abstract; including them (or at least their leading ℓ and P_ℓ corrections) would allow readers to verify the WKB input without consulting external references.
  3. [Numerical results] The numerical spectra are said to show ℓ dominance, but the abstract does not specify the parameter ranges, grid resolution, or error estimates employed in the sixth-order WKB runs; adding a short table or statement on these choices would strengthen reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and accurate summary of our manuscript, as well as for the positive assessment of its significance and methodological approach. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. As the report lists no major comments, we have no specific points requiring point-by-point response or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper takes the static spherically symmetric geometry (with effective dyonic combination P_ℓ²) as an explicit input and performs standard derivations of effective potentials followed by sixth-order WKB extraction of quasinormal frequencies; these steps are direct consequences of the given metric and do not reduce to self-definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The reported dominance of ℓ is a numerical outcome from the fixed potentials rather than a constructed equivalence. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks in black-hole perturbation theory.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete and based solely on parameters named in the summary. The Lorentz-violating background is introduced without independent evidence supplied here.

free parameters (3)
  • ℓ
    Lorentz-violating parameter that enters the metric and effective charge combination.
  • Q
    Electric charge appearing in the dyonic sector.
  • p
    Magnetic charge appearing in the dyonic sector.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The effective combination P_ℓ² = Q²/(1-ℓ)² + p²/(1-2ℓ) fully controls the dyonic contribution to the geometry.
    Explicitly stated as the way the geometry is controlled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbative dynamics and relativistic effects of a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GWLF7YOL

@misc{pith2026260528580,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbative dynamics and relativistic effects of a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GWLF7YOL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28580}
}
abstract

We investigate perturbative dynamics, tidal effects, and relativistic frequency shifts in a dyonic Kalb-Ramond black hole generated by a Lorentz-violating antisymmetric tensor background. The geometry is controlled by the mass $M$, the electric charge $Q$, the magnetic charge $p$, and the Lorentz-violating parameter $\ell$, with the dyonic sector entering through the effective combination $P_{\ell}^{2}=Q^{2}/(1-\ell)^{2}+p^{2}/(1-2\ell)$. First, we analyze the gravitational Doppler effect for radial signal exchange between freely falling and static observers, showing how the dyonic charges weaken the redshift by shifting the frequency ratio toward unity. We then compute the radial and angular tidal forces in a freely falling frame and determine the characteristic radii at which the usual stretching and compression patterns are reversed. The gravitational time delay is also evaluated for null trajectories, showing that the electric and magnetic sectors reduce the delay relative to the reference configuration. In the perturbative sector, we derive the scalar, vector, tensor, and spinor effective potentials and compute the corresponding quasinormal frequencies through the sixth-order WKB method. The numerical spectra indicate that the Lorentz-violating parameter gives the dominant correction, increasing the oscillation frequencies and modifying the damping rates, while the dyonic charges produce milder shifts. Finally, the time-domain profiles confirm the presence of damped quasinormal ringing followed by late-time power-law tails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28580 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radial behavior of the gravitational Doppler frequency ratio ω (r) r0 /ω(s) ff for different values of the dyonic charge parameter, assuming Q = p, with M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1. unity in the plotted branch, indicating a redshift of the received signal with respect to the emitted one. The electric and magnetic charges enter through P 2 ℓ and reduce the square root contribution. Consequently, larger values of Q = p shift th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radial tidal force for different values of the dyonic charges with Q = p, fixing M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1. The dashed horizontal line separates radial stretching from radial compression. B. Radial tidal force Substituting the derivatives in Eq. (45) into the general radial relation (43), one obtains the radial tidal acceleration for the dyonic Kalb–Ramond geometry as D2 η ˆ1 Dτ 2 =  2M r 3 − 3P 2 ℓ r 4  η ˆ1 . (46) Equiv… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Angular tidal force for different values of the dyonic charges with Q = p, fixing M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1. The dashed horizontal line separates angular compression from angular stretching. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (24 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Horizon radii and characteristic tidal radii as functions of the charge parameters. On the left panel, the variation with Q/M for fixed p/M = 0.1. On the right one, the variation with p/M for fixed Q/M = 0.1. In both panels we set M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1, while the vertical …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Shifted time delay as a function of the normalized electric and magnetic charges. Upper panel: ∆T(Q) − ∆T(Qmin) versus Q/M for fixed p/M = 0.1. Bottom panel: ∆T(p) − ∆T(pmin) versus p/M for fixed Q/M = 0.1. In both panels, M = 1, r0 = 6M, and rS = rO = 80M, while the c…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The scalar effective potential Vs as a function of the radial coordinate r for M = 1 and several values of ℓ. The panels correspond to different multipole numbers: top–left, l = 0; top–right, l = 1; and bottom, l = 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scalar effective potential Vs as a function of the tortoise coordinate r ∗ for M = 1 and ℓ = p = Q = 0.1. The curves correspond to the multipole numbers l = 0, 1, 2. the time–domain evolution. After characterizing the behavior of Vs, we proceed to the scalar quasinorma…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Vector effective potential Vv as a function of the radial coordinate r for M = 1 and several values of ℓ. The panels correspond to the multipole sectors l = 1 top–left, l = 2 top–right, and l = 3 bottom. -20 0 20 40 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Vector effective potential Vv expressed in terms of the tortoise coordinate r ∗ for M = 1 and ℓ = Q = p = 0.1, considering the multipole sectors l = 1, 2, 3. and l = 3, with the mass normalized to M = 1. The remaining parameters are varied so that the separate effects …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Tensor effective potential Vt as a function of the radial coordinate r for M = 1 and several choices of the Lorentz–violating parameter ℓ. The panels represent the multipole sectors l = 2 top–left, l = 3 top–right, and l = 4 bottom. -20 0 20 40 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 [P…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Tensor effective potential Vt written in terms of the tortoise coordinate r ∗ for M = 1 and fixed parameters ℓ = p = Q = 0.1. The curves correspond to the multipole sectors l = 2, 3, 4. The multipole dependence follows the usual ordering of black hole perturbations. A…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spinor effective potential Vψ as a function of the radial coordinate r for M = 1 and several values of the Lorentz–violating parameter ℓ. The panels correspond to l = 1/2 top–left, l = 3/2 top–right, and l = 5/2 bottom. qualitative manner observed for the scalar, vect…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spinor effective potential Vψ expressed in terms of the tortoise coordinate r ∗ for M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1, considering the multipole sectors l = 1/2, l = 3/2, and l = 5/2. The right panel covers a broader interval of r ∗ , making the single–peak structure explicit for eac…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Effective potentials for the different perturbative sectors as functions of the tortoise coordinate r ∗ . The comparison uses l = 5/2 for the spinor field and l = 2 for the scalar, vector, and tensor fields, yielding the hierarchy Vψ > Vs > Vv > Vt . display a slower …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Scalar time–domain response ψ˜ for a black hole with M = 1 under four choices of the Lorentz–violating parameter, ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels correspond to l = 0, l = 1, and l = 2, respectively, allowing a direct comparison of…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Logarithmic time–domain profile ln |ψ˜| of the scalar perturbation for M = 1 and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels display the modes l = 0, l = 1, and l = 2, respectively, highlighting the dependence of the attenuation rate on the L…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Late–time scalar response represented in logarithmic variables, with ln |ψ˜| displayed as a function of ln t for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels refer to the modes l = 0, l = 1, and l = 2, respectively, mak…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Vector perturbation profiles ψ˜ obtained in the time domain for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The panels show the multipoles l = 1, l = 2, and l = 3 in the upper–left, upper–right, and lower positions, respectively, allowing the dependence of the rin…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Logarithmic time–domain evolution of the vector perturbation, represented by ln |ψ˜|, for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels correspond to l = 1, l = 2, and l = 3, respectively, displaying the attenuation patt…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Asymptotic vector response displayed in a log–log representation, with ln |ψ˜| plotted versus ln t for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The panels show the modes l = 1, l = 2, and l = 3 in the upper–left, upper–right, and lower positions, respectively, …
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Time–domain tensor waveforms ψ˜ for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels correspond to the multipoles l = 2, l = 3, and l = 4, respectively, showing how the Lorentz–violating parameter affects the amplitude and …
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Logarithmic time–domain profiles of tensor perturbations, given by ln |ψ˜|, for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The panels correspond to the modes l = 2, l = 3, and l = 4 in the upper–left, upper–right, and lower positions, respectively, showing how th…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Late–time tensor signal in logarithmic representation, with ln |ψ˜| plotted as a function of ln t for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels display the modes l = 2, l = 3, and l = 4, respectively, making evident …
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Time–domain spinor waveforms ψ˜ for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels display the modes l = 1/2, l = 3/2, and l = 5/2, respectively. 0 50 100 150 10-7 10-5 0.001 0.100 0 50 100 150 10-9 10-7 10-5 0.001 0.100 …
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Logarithmic time–domain profiles of the spinor perturbation, represented by ln |ψ˜|, for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels correspond to the modes l = 1/2, l = 3/2, and l = 5/2, respectively. 49 [PITH_FULL_I…
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Asymptotic spinor signal shown in a log–log representation, where ln |ψ˜| is plotted as a function of ln t for M = 1, Q = p = 0.1, and ℓ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4. The upper–left, upper–right, and lower panels correspond to the modes l = 1/2, l = 3/2, and l = 5/2, respecti…
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Time–domain comparison among the scalar, vector, tensor, and spinor sectors for ℓ = 0.1, M = 1, and Q = p = 0.1. The figure displays both ψ˜ and ln |ψ˜|. 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_27.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Constraints on lorentz violation from clock-comparison experi- ments,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and C. D. Lane, “Constraints on lorentz violation from clock-comparison experi- ments,”Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 11, p. 116010, 1999

    1999

  2. [2]

    Cpt violation and the standard model,

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Cpt violation and the standard model,”Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 11, p. 6760, 1997

    1997

  3. [3]

    Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,”Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 10, p. 105009, 2004

    2004

  4. [4]

    Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 683, 1989

    1989

  5. [5]

    Data tables for lorentz and cpt violation,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and N. Russell, “Data tables for lorentz and cpt violation,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 11–31, 2011

    2011

  6. [6]

    Spontaneous lorentz and diffeomorphism violation, massive modes, and gravity,

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung, and V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Spontaneous lorentz and diffeomorphism violation, massive modes, and gravity,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 77, no. 6, p. 065020, 2008

    2008

  7. [7]

    Spontaneous lorentz violation, nambu-goldstone modes, and grav- ity,

    R. Bluhm and V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Spontaneous lorentz violation, nambu-goldstone modes, and grav- ity,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 71, no. 6, p. 065008, 2005. 51

    2005

  8. [8]

    Spontaneous and Explicit Spacetime Symmetry Breaking in Einstein–Cartan Theory with Background Fields,

    R. Bluhm and Y. Zhi, “Spontaneous and Explicit Spacetime Symmetry Breaking in Einstein–Cartan Theory with Background Fields,”Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 25, 2024

    2024

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    Matter-gravity scattering in the presence of spontaneous Lorentz violation,

    R. V. Maluf, V. Santos, W. T. Cruz, and C. A. S. Almeida, “Matter-gravity scattering in the presence of spontaneous Lorentz violation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 025005, 2013

    2013

  2. [10]

    Einstein-Hilbert graviton modes modified by the Lorentz-violating bumblebee Field,

    R. V. Maluf, C. A. S. Almeida, R. Casana, and M. M. Ferreira, Jr., “Einstein-Hilbert graviton modes modified by the Lorentz-violating bumblebee Field,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 025007, 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Gravity with explicit spacetime symmetry breaking and the Standard-Model Extension,

    R. Bluhm, H. Bossi, and Y. Wen, “Gravity with explicit spacetime symmetry breaking and the Standard-Model Extension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, no. 8, p. 084022, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Photon and graviton masses in string theories,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and S. Samuel, “Photon and graviton masses in string theories,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 66, no. 14, p. 1811, 1991

    1991

  5. [13]

    Einstein-aether waves,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-aether waves,”Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 024003, 2004

    2004

  6. [14]

    The Flight of the bumblebee: Vacuum solutions of a gravity model with vector-induced spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,

    O. Bertolami and J. Paramos, “The Flight of the bumblebee: Vacuum solutions of a gravity model with vector-induced spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 72, p. 044001, 2005

    2005

  7. [15]

    Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis, and E. B. Santos, “Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 10, p. 104001, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Lorentz violation alleviates gravitationally induced entanglement degradation,

    W. Liu, C. Wen, and J. Wang, “Lorentz violation alleviates gravitationally induced entanglement degradation,”JHEP, vol. 01, p. 184, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    How does non-metricity affect particle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “How does non-metricity affect particle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 026, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Polarizations of gravitational waves in the bumblebee gravity model,

    D. Liang, R. Xu, X. Lu, and L. Shao, “Polarizations of gravitational waves in the bumblebee gravity model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 12, p. 124019, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,

    R. Oliveira, D. M. Dantas, and C. A. S. Almeida, “Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,”EPL, vol. 135, no. 1, p. 10003, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality,

    H.-F. Liu, W. Liu, Y.-X. Liu, Q. Su, and D.-f. Zeng, “Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality,” 5 2026

    2026

  13. [21]

    Schwarzschild-like black hole with a topological defect in bumblebee gravity,

    I. G¨ ull¨ u and A.¨Ovg¨ un, “Schwarzschild-like black hole with a topological defect in bumblebee gravity,” Annals Phys., vol. 436, p. 168721, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Bumblebee gravity and particle motion in Snyder noncommutative spacetime structures,

    S. Kumar Jha, H. Barman, and A. Rahaman, “Bumblebee gravity and particle motion in Snyder noncommutative spacetime structures,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 036, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    The Flight of the Bumblebee in a Non-Commutative Geometry: A New Black Hole Solution,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, Y. Shi, and F. S. N. Lobo, “The Flight of the Bumblebee in a Non-Commutative Geometry: A New Black Hole Solution,” 9 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,

    R. V. Maluf and J. C. S. Neves, “Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 4, p. 044002, 2021. 52

    2021

  17. [25]

    Cosmological implications of Bumble- bee theory on an FLRW background,

    M. Gonzalez-Espinoza, G. Panotopoulos, and F. Tello-Ortiz, “Cosmological implications of Bumble- bee theory on an FLRW background,” 12 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    When Bumblebee Meets NLED: Lorentz-Violating Black Holes and Regular Spacetimes,

    Z.-C. Li and H. Lu, “When Bumblebee Meets NLED: Lorentz-Violating Black Holes and Regular Spacetimes,” 5 2026

    2026

  19. [27]

    Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,

    C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana, and A. Cavalcante, “Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 80, no. 3, p. 178, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Thin accretion disk around a rotating Kerr-like black hole in Einstein- bumblebee gravity model,

    C. Liu, C. Ding, and J. Jing, “Thin accretion disk around a rotating Kerr-like black hole in Einstein- bumblebee gravity model,” 10 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Gravitational lensing under the effect of Weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of Gauss–Bonnet theorem,

    A. Ovg¨ un, K. Jusufi, and I. Sakalli, “Gravitational lensing under the effect of Weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of Gauss–Bonnet theorem,”Annals Phys., vol. 399, pp. 193–203, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Circular Orbit of a Particle and Weak Gravitational Lensing,

    Z. Li, G. Zhang, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Circular Orbit of a Particle and Weak Gravitational Lensing,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 12, p. 124058, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Quasinormal Modes of Massive Scalar Per- turbations in Slow-Rotation Bumblebee Black Holes with Traceless Conformal Electrodynamics,

    Y. Sekhmani, W. Liu, W. Deng, and K. Boshkayev, “Quasinormal Modes of Massive Scalar Per- turbations in Slow-Rotation Bumblebee Black Holes with Traceless Conformal Electrodynamics,” 10 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Quasinormal Modes of a Massive Scalar Field in Slowly Rotating Einstein-Bumblebee Black Holes,

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao, and J. Jing, “Quasinormal Modes of a Massive Scalar Field in Slowly Rotating Einstein-Bumblebee Black Holes,” 7 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    S. Long, Z.-w. Xia, H. Gong, Z. Cao, Q. Pan, and J. Jing, “Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” 5 2026

    2026

  26. [34]

    Classical direct interstring action,

    M. Kalb and P. Ramond, “Classical direct interstring action,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 9, p. 2273, 1974

    1974

  27. [35]

    Antisymmetric tensor propagator with spontaneous lorentz violation,

    R. V. Maluf, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, W. Cruz, and C. Almeida, “Antisymmetric tensor propagator with spontaneous lorentz violation,”Europhysics Letters, vol. 124, p. 61001, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Lorentz violation with an antisymmetric tensor,

    B. Altschul, Q. Bailey, and V. Kostelecky, “Lorentz violation with an antisymmetric tensor,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 065028, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,

    K. Yang, Y.-Z. Chen, Z.-Q. Duan, and J.-Y. Zhao, “Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 124004, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Particle dynamics and gravita- tional weak lensing around black hole in the kalb-ramond gravity,

    F. Atamurotov, D. Ortiqboev, A. Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa, “Particle dynamics and gravita- tional weak lensing around black hole in the kalb-ramond gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 82, p. 659, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Exploring antisymmetric tensor effects on black hole shadows and quasinormal frequencies,

    A. A. A. Filho, J. A. A. S. Reis, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exploring antisymmetric tensor effects on black hole shadows and quasinormal frequencies,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 029, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Quasinormal modes and greybody factor of a Lorentz-violating black hole,

    W.-D. Guo, Q. Tan, and Y.-X. Liu, “Quasinormal modes and greybody factor of a Lorentz-violating black hole,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,, vol. 07, p. 008, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Gravitational lensing of a schwarzschild-like black hole in kalb-ramond 53 gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Gravitational lensing of a schwarzschild-like black hole in kalb-ramond 53 gravity,”Physical Review D, vol. 110, no. 2, p. 024077, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry-breaking constraints in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry-breaking constraints in Kalb–Ramond gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 12, p. 1257, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Periodical orbits and waveforms with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry- breaking in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Periodical orbits and waveforms with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry- breaking in Kalb–Ramond gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 5, p. 557, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Cir- cular motion and qpos near black holes in kalb–ramond gravity,

    S. Jumaniyozov, S. U. Khan, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujabbarov, S. Urinbaev, and S. Murodov, “Cir- cular motion and qpos near black holes in kalb–ramond gravity,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 84, no. 9, p. 964, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Accretion of vlasov gas onto a black hole in the kalb–ramond field,

    Y.-H. Jiang and X. Zhang, “Accretion of vlasov gas onto a black hole in the kalb–ramond field,” Chinese Physics C, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Particle creation and evaporation in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Particle creation and evaporation in Kalb-Ramond gravity,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 076, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Neutrino oscillations in a Kalb-Ramond black hole background,

    Y. Shi, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, K. E. L. de Farias, V. B. Bezerra, and A. R. Queiroz, “Neutrino oscillations in a Kalb-Ramond black hole background,” 12 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Influence of a Kalb-Ramond black hole on neutrino behavior,

    Y. Shi and A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Influence of a Kalb-Ramond black hole on neutrino behavior,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 028, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    Electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,

    Z.-Q. Duan, J.-Y. Zhao, and K. Yang, “Electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 8, p. 798, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Geodesics structure and deflection angle of electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,

    A. al Badawi, S. Shaymatov, and I. Sakallı, “Geodesics structure and deflection angle of electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 8, p. 825, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Electric Penrose, circular orbits and collisions of charged particles near charged black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    M. Zahid, J. Rayimbaev, N. Kurbonov, S. Ahmedov, C. Shen, and A. Abdujabbarov, “Electric Penrose, circular orbits and collisions of charged particles near charged black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 7, p. 706, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Antisymmetric tensor influence on charged black hole lensing phenomena and time delay,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Antisymmetric tensor influence on charged black hole lensing phenomena and time delay,”Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, p. 100401, 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    The impact of an antisymmet- ric tensor on charged black holes: evaporation process, geodesics, deflection angle, scattering effects and quasinormal modes,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, J. A. A. S. Reis, and H. Hassanabadi, “The impact of an antisymmet- ric tensor on charged black holes: evaporation process, geodesics, deflection angle, scattering effects and quasinormal modes,”Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 42, no. 6, p...

    2025

  46. [54]

    Energy extraction from rotating charged black holes in kalb-ramond gravity,

    J.-T. Yao, K.-J. He, Z.-C. Lin, and H. Yu, “Energy extraction from rotating charged black holes in kalb-ramond gravity,”Physics Letters B, p. 140562, 2026

    2026

  47. [55]

    Thermal, topological, and scattering effects of an AdS charged black hole with an antisymmetric tensor background,

    H. Chen, M. Y. Zhang, A. A. A. Filho, F. Hosseinifar, and H. Hassanabadi, “Thermal, topological, and scattering effects of an AdS charged black hole with an antisymmetric tensor background,” 54 Commun. Theor. Phys., vol. 78, no. 2, p. 025404, 2026

    2026

  48. [56]

    A non-commutative Kalb-Ramond black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and I. P. Lobo, “A non-commutative Kalb-Ramond black hole,” JCAP, vol. 09, p. 076, 2025

    2025

  49. [57]

    Black hole solutions surrounded by an anisotropic fluid in a Kalb–Ramond two–form background,

    Y. Sekhmani, A. Al-Badawi, M. Fathi, A. Vachher, and S. G. Ghosh, “Black hole solutions surrounded by an anisotropic fluid in a Kalb–Ramond two–form background,” 3 2026

    2026

  50. [58]

    Lorentz- violating ModMax black holes in phantom-enhanced Kalb–Ramond gravity: Thermodynamics and topological charges,

    Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov, “Lorentz- violating ModMax black holes in phantom-enhanced Kalb–Ramond gravity: Thermodynamics and topological charges,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 50, p. 102079, 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Kalb-Ramond black holes sourced by ModMax electrodynamics: Some perturbative properties in the phantom sector,

    Y. Sekhmani, A. Baruah, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov, “Kalb-Ramond black holes sourced by ModMax electrodynamics: Some perturbative properties in the phantom sector,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 50, p. 102157, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    Constraining Kalb-Ramond gravity with cloud of strings using EHT shadow observations and X-ray binary QPO data,

    F. Ahmed, A. Al-Badawi, and I. Sakallı, “Constraining Kalb-Ramond gravity with cloud of strings using EHT shadow observations and X-ray binary QPO data,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 52, p. 102315, 2026

    2026

  53. [61]

    Charged Black Holes in KR-gravity Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Dark Matter,

    F. Ahmed, M. Fathi, and E. O. Silva, “Charged Black Holes in KR-gravity Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Dark Matter,” 4 2026

    2026

  54. [62]

    Dyonic ModMax Black Holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity with a Cloud of Strings as Source,

    F. Ahmed and E. O. Silva, “Dyonic ModMax Black Holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity with a Cloud of Strings as Source,” 3 2026

    2026

  55. [63]

    Self-consistency of compact objects in Lorentz-violating gravity theories,

    L. A. Lessa, R. B. Magalh˜ aes, and M. M. Ferreira Junior, “Self-consistency of compact objects in Lorentz-violating gravity theories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 064031, 2025

    2025

  56. [64]

    Static neutral black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Static neutral black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 017, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Shadow of slowly rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Shadow of slowly rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 017, 2025

    2025

  58. [66]

    Quasinormal modes of scalar, electromagnetic, and gravi- tational perturbations in slowly rotating Kalb–Ramond black holes,

    W. Deng, W. Liu, K. Xiao, and J. Jing, “Quasinormal modes of scalar, electromagnetic, and gravi- tational perturbations in slowly rotating Kalb–Ramond black holes,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 86, no. 3, p. 232, 2026

    2026

  59. [67]

    Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity,

    F. M. Belchior, R. V. Maluf, A. Y. Petrov, and P. J. Porf´ ırio, “Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 6, p. 658, 2025

    2025

  60. [68]

    Dyonic Black Holes in Lorentz-Violating Gravity with a Back- ground Kalb–Ramond Field,

    Y.-X. Lin, J.-Z. Liu, and Y.-X. Liu, “Dyonic Black Holes in Lorentz-Violating Gravity with a Back- ground Kalb–Ramond Field,” 5 2026

    2026

  61. [69]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 6, p. 061102, 2016

    2016

  62. [70]

    First sagittarius a ∗ event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the 55 supermassive black hole in the center of the milky way,

    K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, J. C. Algaba, R. Anantua, K. Asada, R. Azulay, U. Bach, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball,et al., “First sagittarius a ∗ event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the 55 supermassive black hole in the center of the milky way,”The Astrophysical Jour...

    2022

  63. [71]

    First M87 ∗ event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the super- massive black hole,

    T. E. H. T. Collaboration, “First M87 ∗ event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the super- massive black hole,”The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 875, no. 1, p. L1, 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 793–836, 2011

    2011

  65. [73]

    Massive charged scalar field in the Kerr-Newman background I: quasinormal modes, late-time tails and stability,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Massive charged scalar field in the Kerr-Newman background I: quasinormal modes, late-time tails and stability,”Physical Review D, vol. 88, p. 024054, 2013

    2013

  66. [74]

    Quasinormal modes and thermodynamic properties of gup-corrected schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence,

    R. Karmakar, D. J. Gogoi, and U. D. Goswami, “Quasinormal modes and thermodynamic properties of gup-corrected schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence,”International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 37, no. 28n29, p. 2250180, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations,

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, “Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 36, p. 155002, 2019

    2019

  68. [76]

    Quasinormal modes, thermodynamics and shadow of black holes in Hu–Sawickif(R) gravity theory,

    R. Karmakar and U. D. Goswami, “Quasinormal modes, thermodynamics and shadow of black holes in Hu–Sawickif(R) gravity theory,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 84, no. 9, p. 969, 2024

    2024

  69. [77]

    Decay of a charged scalar and Dirac fields in the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter background,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Decay of a charged scalar and Dirac fields in the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter background,”Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 8, p. 084018, 2007. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 029901 (2014)]

    2007

  70. [78]

    Quasinormal modes, scattering and Hawking radiation of Kerr-Newman black holes in a magnetic field,

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, “Quasinormal modes, scattering and Hawking radiation of Kerr-Newman black holes in a magnetic field,”Physical Review D, vol. 83, p. 024031, 2011

    2011

  71. [79]

    Connection Between the Shadow Radius and Quasinormal Modes in Rotating Space- times,

    K. Jusufi, “Connection Between the Shadow Radius and Quasinormal Modes in Rotating Space- times,”Physical Review D, vol. 101, no. 12, p. 124063, 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,, vol. 09, p. 068, 2024

    2024

  73. [81]

    Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal fre- quencies for rotating black holes,

    R. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal fre- quencies for rotating black holes,”Physics Letters B, vol. 861, p. 139288, 2025

    2025

  74. [82]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. V¨ olkel,Testing general relativity with black hole quasi-normal modes, pp. 361–

  75. [83]

    Free-falling test particles in a charged Kalb-Ramond black hole: Gravitational Doppler effect and tidal forces,

    D. S. J. Cordeiro, E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera- Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Free-falling test particles in a charged Kalb-Ramond black hole: Gravitational Doppler effect and tidal forces,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. ...

    2025

  76. [84]

    Generalized observers and velocity measurements in general relativity,

    P. Crawford and I. Tereno, “Generalized observers and velocity measurements in general relativity,” 56 General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, pp. 2075–2088, 2002

  77. [85]

    The doppler shift in a schwarzschild spacetime,

    A. Radosz, A. T. Augousti, and K. Ostasiewicz, “The doppler shift in a schwarzschild spacetime,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, pp. 801–803, 2009

    2009

  78. [86]

    On the speed of a test particle inside the schwarzschild event horizon and other kinds of black holes,

    A. T. Augousti, P. Gusin, B. Ku´ smierz, J. Masajada, and A. Radosz, “On the speed of a test particle inside the schwarzschild event horizon and other kinds of black holes,”General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 50, p. 131, 2018

    2018

  79. [87]

    Inside spherically symmetric black holes or how a uniformly accelerated particle may slow down,

    A. Radosz, P. Gusin, A. T. Augousti, and F. Formalik, “Inside spherically symmetric black holes or how a uniformly accelerated particle may slow down,”European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, p. 876, 2019

    2019

  80. [88]

    Free-falling test particles in a charged kalb–ramond black hole: Gravitational doppler effect and tidal forces,

    D. S. J. Cordeiro, E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera- Garcia, L. F. Dias da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Free-falling test particles in a charged kalb–ramond black hole: Gravitational doppler effect and tidal forces,”Physical Review D...

    2025

  81. [89]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973

    1973

  82. [90]

    Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

    S. Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983

    1983

  83. [91]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984

    1984

  84. [92]

    Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  85. [93]

    Tidal forces in reissner–nordstr¨ om spacetimes,

    L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, L. A. Oliveira, and E. S. de Oliveira, “Tidal forces in reissner–nordstr¨ om spacetimes,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 76, no. 3, p. 168, 2016

    2016

  86. [94]

    Time delay of light in the gravitational lensing of supermassive black holes in dark matter halos,

    C.-K. Qiao and P. Su, “Time delay of light in the gravitational lensing of supermassive black holes in dark matter halos,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 10, p. 1032, 2024

    2024

  87. [95]

    Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quantum gravity,

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quantum gravity,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 47, p. 101815, 2025

    2025

  88. [96]

    Analysis of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Analysis of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 4, p. 454, 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    Remarks on a nonlinear electromagnetic extension in AdS Reissner-Nordstr¨ om spacetime,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Remarks on a nonlinear electromagnetic extension in AdS Reissner-Nordstr¨ om spacetime,”JCAP, vol. 01, p. 072, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    Gravitational aspects of a new bumblebee black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, and V. B. Bezerra, “Gravitational aspects of a new bumblebee black hole,”Annals Phys., vol. 489, p. 170469, 2026

    2026

  91. [99]

    Quasinormal modes, greybody factors, and Hawking radiation sparsity of black holes influenced by a global monopole charge in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    A. Baruah, Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, A. Deshamukhya, and M. K. Jasim, “Quasinormal modes, greybody factors, and Hawking radiation sparsity of black holes influenced by a global monopole charge in Kalb-Ramond gravity,”JCAP, vol. 08, p. 023, 2025

    2025

  92. [100]

    Dark matter signatures of black holes 57 with Yukawa potential,

    A. A. A. Filho, K. Jusufi, B. Cuadros-Melgar, and G. Leon, “Dark matter signatures of black holes 57 with Yukawa potential,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 44, p. 101500, 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    Charged black holes with Yukawa potential,

    A. A. A. Filho, K. Jusufi, B. Cuadros-Melgar, G. Leon, A. Jawad, and C. E. Pellicer, “Charged black holes with Yukawa potential,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 46, p. 101711, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Spin effects on particle creation and evaporation inf(R, T) gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and F. S. N. Lobo, “Spin effects on particle creation and evaporation inf(R, T) gravity,” 10 2025

    2025

  95. [103]

    Gravitational signatures of a nonlinear electrodynamics in f(R,T) gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, and V. B. Bezerra, “Gravitational signatures of a nonlinear electrodynamics in f(R,T) gravity,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 015, 2025

    2025

  96. [104]

    Black Hole Gravitational Phenomena in Higher- Order Curvature-Scalar Gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and I. P. Lobo, “Black Hole Gravitational Phenomena in Higher- Order Curvature-Scalar Gravity,” 9 2025

    2025

  97. [105]

    Gravitational perturbations of nonsingular black holes in conformal grav- ity,

    C.-Y. Chen and P. Chen, “Gravitational perturbations of nonsingular black holes in conformal grav- ity,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 99, no. 10, p. 104003, 2019

    2019

  98. [106]

    A consistent model of non-singular Schwarzschild black hole in loop quantum gravity and its quasinormal modes,

    M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, P. Chen, and D.-h. Yeom, “A consistent model of non-singular Schwarzschild black hole in loop quantum gravity and its quasinormal modes,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 066, 2020

    2020

  99. [107]

    Massless dirac perturbations in a consistent model of loop quantum gravity black hole: quasinormal modes and particle emission rates,

    S. Albuquerque, I. P. Lobo, and V. B. Bezerra, “Massless dirac perturbations in a consistent model of loop quantum gravity black hole: quasinormal modes and particle emission rates,”Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 40, no. 17, p. 174001, 2023

    2023

  100. [108]

    Massless dirac perturbations of black holes in f (q) gravity: quasinormal modes and a weak deflection angle,

    A. Al-Badawi and S. K. Jha, “Massless dirac perturbations of black holes in f (q) gravity: quasinormal modes and a weak deflection angle,”Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 76, no. 9, p. 095403, 2024

    2024

  101. [109]

    Hawking radiation by spherically- symmetric static black holes for all spins: Teukolsky equations and potentials,

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, M. Geiller, E. R. Livine, and F. Sartini, “Hawking radiation by spherically- symmetric static black holes for all spins: Teukolsky equations and potentials,”Physical Review D, vol. 103, no. 10, p. 104010, 2021

    2021

  102. [110]

    S. Devi, R. Roy, and S. Chakrabarti, “Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of the novel four dimensional gauss–bonnet black holes in asymptotically de sitter space time: scalar, electromagnetic and dirac perturbations,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 80, no. 8, p. 760, 2020

    2020

  103. [111]

    Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized perturbations,

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, “Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized perturbations,”Physical Review D, vol. 49, pp. 883–889, 1994

    1994

  104. [112]

    Ringing of extreme regular black holes,

    M. Skvortsova, “Ringing of extreme regular black holes,”Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 279–288, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Echoes of massless scalar field induced from hairy schwarzschild black hole,

    Z.-H. Yang, C. Xu, X.-M. Kuang, B. Wang, and R.-H. Yue, “Echoes of massless scalar field induced from hairy schwarzschild black hole,”Physics Letters B, vol. 853, p. 138688, 2024

    2024

  106. [114]

    Late time decay of scalar and Dirac fields around an asymptotically de Sitter black hole in the Euler–Heisenberg electrodynamics,

    S. V. Bolokhov, “Late time decay of scalar and Dirac fields around an asymptotically de Sitter black hole in the Euler–Heisenberg electrodynamics,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 84, no. 6, p. 634, 2024. 58

    2024

  107. [115]

    Quasinormal modes and bounding greybody factors of GUP-corrected black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    A. Baruah, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, and A. Deshamukhya, “Quasinormal modes and bounding greybody factors of GUP-corrected black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,”Annals of Physics, vol. 455, p. 169393, 2023

    2023

  108. [116]

    Scalar fields around a loop quantum gravity black hole in de Sitter spacetime: Quasinormal modes, late-time tails and strong cosmic censorship,

    C.-Y. Shao, C. Zhang, W. Zhang, and C.-G. Shao, “Scalar fields around a loop quantum gravity black hole in de Sitter spacetime: Quasinormal modes, late-time tails and strong cosmic censorship,” Physical Review D, vol. 109, no. 6, p. 064012, 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Echoes and quasinormal modes of asymmetric black bounces,

    A. C. L. Santos, L. A. Lessa, R. V. Maluf, and G. J. Olmo, “Echoes and quasinormal modes of asymmetric black bounces,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 010, 2026

    2026

  110. [118]

    Long-lived quasinormal modes, grey-body factors and absorption cross-section of the black hole immersed in the Hernquist galactic halo,

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, “Long-lived quasinormal modes, grey-body factors and absorption cross-section of the black hole immersed in the Hernquist galactic halo,” 10 2025. 59

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.