pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28750 · v1 · pith:TRMYX35Ynew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph

Formal O(N3)-Scaling Second-Order Perturbation Theory by Block Tensor Decomposition: Implementation on MP2 and rPT2

Yueyang Zhang , Wei Wu , Peifeng Su This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 09:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords block tensor decompositioncanonical polyadic decompositionsecond-order perturbation theoryMP2renormalized PT2tensor hyper-contractionO(N^3) scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Block tensor decomposition reduces second-order perturbation theory to formal O(N^3) scaling while matching RI-MP2 accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a unified framework that combines block tensor decomposition with canonical polyadic decomposition to perform second-order perturbation theory at formal O(N^3) scaling. BTD builds the tensor hyper-contraction kernel through a dual-grid scheme, while CPD factorizes the exchange channel in a block-based two-stage process. An asymmetric half-kernel handles the screened exchange needed for renormalized PT2. The resulting method reproduces canonical RI-MP2 energies to 0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom and yields a 0.36 kcal/mol mean absolute error on rPT2 interaction benchmarks across 528 points, all with O(N^2) storage. A sympathetic reader would care because conventional PT2 implementations scale worse and require more memory, restricting their use on large molecules.

Core claim

Block tensor decomposition constructs the tensor hyper-contraction kernel at O(N^3) via a dual-grid scheme; canonical polyadic decomposition factorizes the exchange channel through a block-based two-stage ALS. An asymmetric half-kernel design applies bare Coulomb to one vertex and coupling-constant-averaged screening to the other, capturing the SOSEX component of rPT2 without a frequency-dependent CPD. For MP2 this reproduces canonical RI-MP2 to 0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom; for rPT2@PBE0 on the S66x8 benchmark the mean absolute error is 0.36 kcal/mol over 528 data points, with O(N^2) storage.

What carries the argument

The BTD-CPD framework, in which block tensor decomposition builds the hyper-contraction kernel at O(N^3) and canonical polyadic decomposition factorizes the exchange channel to deliver both the scaling and the accuracy.

If this is right

  • MP2 and rPT2 calculations become feasible with cubic rather than higher scaling.
  • Storage of intermediates drops from higher powers of N to quadratic.
  • The SOSEX contribution in rPT2 is obtained without introducing frequency dependence into the CPD step.
  • The same machinery applies uniformly to both MP2 and renormalized PT2 variants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could open PT2-level treatments to molecular systems previously limited by cost.
  • The block decomposition pattern may transfer to other tensor contractions common in quantum chemistry.
  • Direct comparison on systems with increasing numbers of heavy atoms would test whether the per-atom error remains bounded.

Load-bearing premise

The dual-grid BTD scheme and block-based CPD factorization must capture the tensor hyper-contraction kernel and exchange channel accurately for general molecules without errors that grow with system size or chemical complexity.

What would settle it

A BTD-CPD MP2 calculation on a molecule containing many heavy atoms that deviates from the canonical RI-MP2 result by substantially more than 0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom would falsify the accuracy claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28750 by Peifeng Su, Wei Wu, Yueyang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Per-heavy-atom error of BTD-MP2 relative to canon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Per-step wall-time scaling of BTD-MP2 (def2-TZVP). (a) Glycine chains, (b) water clusters. Solid lines: linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Log–log wall-time scaling of BTD-rPT2 (def2-TZVPP, HF reference) vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Potential energy curves of the parallel-displaced benzene dimer. (a) HF/aug-cc-pVDZ, (b) PBE0/aug-cc-pVDZ, (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Error distributions across all 528 data points of the S66x8 benchmark (aug-cc-pVDZ, CP-corrected). Violin plots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Block tensor decomposition (BTD) and canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) are combined into a unified $O(N^3)$-scaling framework for second-order perturbation theory (PT2), demonstrated on MP2 and renormalized PT2 (rPT2). BTD constructs the tensor hyper-contraction kernel at $O(N^3)$ via a dual-grid scheme; CPD factorizes the exchange channel through a block-based two-stage ALS. An asymmetric half-kernel design applies bare Coulomb to one vertex and coupling-constant-averaged screening to the other, capturing the SOSEX component of rPT2 without a frequency-dependent CPD. For MP2, BTD-CPD reproduces canonical RI-MP2 to 0.058~kcal/mol per heavy atom. For rPT2@PBE0 on the S66x8 benchmark, the mean absolute error is 0.36~kcal/mol (ME $-$0.19, RMSE 0.46) over 528 data points. The CPD-compressed intermediates yield $O(N^2)$ storage alongside $O(N^3)$ scaling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a BTD-CPD framework that combines block tensor decomposition with a dual-grid scheme to construct the tensor hyper-contraction kernel at formal O(N^3) cost and block-based canonical polyadic decomposition (two-stage ALS) to factorize the exchange channel, applied to MP2 and rPT2. An asymmetric half-kernel design captures the SOSEX term in rPT2 without frequency-dependent factorization. On the S66x8 benchmark the method reproduces canonical RI-MP2 to 0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom and yields 0.36 kcal/mol MAE (ME -0.19, RMSE 0.46) for rPT2@PBE0 over 528 points, with O(N^2) storage for the compressed intermediates.

Significance. If the formal O(N^3) scaling is rigorously established and the decomposition ranks remain bounded for general systems, the approach would enable correlated PT2 calculations on substantially larger molecules while preserving chemical accuracy and reducing storage, constituting a meaningful methodological advance in quantum chemistry.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmark results] Benchmark results section: the reported error bounds (0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom for MP2; 0.36 kcal/mol MAE for rPT2) are obtained exclusively on the S66x8 set of small-to-medium organic complexes. No data or analysis is provided on how the required BTD grid density or CPD ranks scale with molecular size N or with increasing delocalization, which is necessary to confirm that the dual-grid BTD and block CPD errors remain bounded and do not compromise the formal O(N^3) scaling claim for arbitrary systems.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Theory] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the precise definition of the dual-grid BTD construction and the block partitioning used in the CPD factorization (e.g., which tensor blocks are treated independently) so that the O(N^3) scaling argument can be verified without ambiguity.
  2. Figure captions and table footnotes should clarify whether the quoted timings and storage figures include the cost of determining the decomposition ranks or are measured after rank selection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for highlighting the need to substantiate the scaling claims. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Benchmark results] Benchmark results section: the reported error bounds (0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom for MP2; 0.36 kcal/mol MAE for rPT2) are obtained exclusively on the S66x8 set of small-to-medium organic complexes. No data or analysis is provided on how the required BTD grid density or CPD ranks scale with molecular size N or with increasing delocalization, which is necessary to confirm that the dual-grid BTD and block CPD errors remain bounded and do not compromise the formal O(N^3) scaling claim for arbitrary systems.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical benchmarks are confined to the S66x8 set. The formal O(N^3) scaling is obtained from the algorithmic construction: the dual-grid BTD evaluates the THC kernel in O(N^3) operations once the grid density is fixed, and the block CPD factorizes the exchange integrals via two-stage ALS whose leading cost is also O(N^3) for fixed rank. The manuscript demonstrates that, for the grid densities and ranks chosen on S66x8, the errors remain below chemical accuracy. We do not, however, supply explicit data showing how those ranks or grid densities must increase with N or with greater delocalization. This constitutes a genuine limitation of the current benchmark suite. We will revise the manuscript to (i) restate that the O(N^3) claim assumes decomposition parameters sufficient to reach the target accuracy and (ii) add an explicit discussion of the need for future studies on larger and more delocalized systems to verify that the required ranks remain moderate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the derivation

full rationale

The paper introduces a BTD-CPD framework for O(N^3) PT2, with explicit validation that BTD-CPD reproduces canonical RI-MP2 to 0.058 kcal/mol per heavy atom on S66x8 and reports independent MAE on rPT2 benchmarks. No quoted equations or steps reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The central scaling and accuracy claims rest on the tensor decomposition applied to the PT2 integrals, which are externally benchmarked rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms; the approach relies on standard tensor decomposition assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Block tensor decomposition and canonical polyadic decomposition can be applied to the two-electron integrals and amplitudes of second-order perturbation theory without loss of formal scaling or essential accuracy.
    This premise underpins the entire O(N^3) claim and is invoked by the dual-grid and ALS constructions described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5735 in / 1211 out tokens · 33891 ms · 2026-06-29T09:19:41.837269+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references

  1. [1]

    ˇC´ ıˇ zek, On the correlation problem in atomic and molecular systems

    J. ˇC´ ıˇ zek, On the correlation problem in atomic and molecular systems. calculation of wavefunction compo- nents in Ursell-type expansion using quantum-field theo- retical methods, J. Chem. Phys.45, 4256 (1966)

    1966

  2. [2]

    R. J. Bartlett, Many-body perturbation theory and cou- pled cluster theory for electron correlation in molecules, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.32, 359 (1981)

    1981

  3. [3]

    R. J. Bartlett and M. Musia l, Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 291 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    T. D. Crawford and H. F. Schaefer, An introduction to coupled cluster theory for computational chemists, Rev. Comput. Chem.14, 33 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    Shavitt and R

    I. Shavitt and R. J. Bartlett,Many-Body Methods in Chemistry and Physics: MBPT and Coupled-Cluster Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Helgaker, P

    T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory(Wiley, Chichester, 2000)

    2000

  7. [7]

    Møller and M

    C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev.46, 618 (1934)

    1934

  8. [8]

    Grimme, Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation, J

    S. Grimme, Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 034108 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    Schwabe and S

    T. Schwabe and S. Grimme, Double-hybrid density func- tionals with long-range dispersion corrections: Higher ac- curacy and extended applicability, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.9, 3397 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    Chai and M

    J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Long-range corrected double-hybrid density functionals, J. Chem. Phys.131, 174105 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Xu, and W. A. Goddard, Doubly hybrid density functional for accurate descriptions of nonbond interactions, thermochemistry, and thermochemical ki- netics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106, 4963 (2009)

    2009

  12. [12]

    Goerigk and S

    L. Goerigk and S. Grimme, A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 6670 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    Goerigk and S

    L. Goerigk and S. Grimme, Double-hybrid density func- tionals, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.4, 576 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Mardirossian and M

    N. Mardirossian and M. Head-Gordon, Survival of the most transferable at the top of Jacob’s ladder: Defining and testing theωB97M(2) double hybrid density func- tional, J. Chem. Phys.148, 241736 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    J. M. L. Martin and G. Santra, Empirical double-hybrid density functional theory: A ‘third way’ in between WFT and DFT, Isr. J. Chem.60, 787 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Lee and M

    J. Lee and M. Head-Gordon, Regularized orbital- optimized second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation the- ory: A reliable fifth-order-scaling electron correlation model with orbital energy dependent regularizers, J. Chem. Theory Comput.14, 5203 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    Carter-Fenk and M

    K. Carter-Fenk and M. Head-Gordon, Repartitioned Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory with a size- consistent second-order correlation energy, J. Chem. Phys.158, 234108 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Carter-Fenk, J

    K. Carter-Fenk, J. Shee, and M. Head-Gordon, Opti- mizing the regularization in size-consistent second-order Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 171104 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Bohm and D

    D. Bohm and D. Pines, A collective description of elec- tron interactions: III. Coulomb interactions in a degen- erate electron gas, Phys. Rev.92, 609 (1953)

    1953

  20. [20]

    D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Exchange-correlation energy of a metallic surface: Wave-vector analysis, Phys. Rev. B15, 2884 (1977)

    1977

  21. [21]

    Furche, Molecular tests of the random phase approx- imation to the exchange-correlation energy functional, Phys

    F. Furche, Molecular tests of the random phase approx- imation to the exchange-correlation energy functional, Phys. Rev. B64, 195120 (2001)

    2001

  22. [22]

    J. P. Perdew and K. Schmidt, Jacob’s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy, AIP Conf. Proc.577, 1 (2001)

    2001

  23. [23]

    Gunnarsson and B

    O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist, Exchange and corre- lation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin-density- functional formalism, Phys. Rev. B13, 4274 (1976)

    1976

  24. [24]

    Eshuis, J

    H. Eshuis, J. E. Bates, and F. Furche, Electron correla- tion methods based on the random phase approximation, Theor. Chem. Acc.131, 1084 (2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    X. Ren, P. Rinke, C. Joas, and M. Scheffler, Random- phase approximation and its applications in computa- tional chemistry and materials science, J. Mater. Sci.47, 7447 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    Gr¨ uneis, M

    A. Gr¨ uneis, M. Marsman, J. Harl, L. Schimka, and G. Kresse, Making the random phase approximation to electronic correlation accurate, J. Chem. Phys.131, 154115 (2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    Paier, B

    J. Paier, B. G. Janesko, T. M. Henderson, G. E. Scuse- ria, A. Gr¨ uneis, and G. Kresse, Hybrid functionals includ- ing random phase approximation correlation and second- order screened exchange, J. Chem. Phys.132, 094103 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    I. Y. Zhang and X. Xu, Simultaneous attenuation of both self-interaction error and nondynamic correlation error in density functional theory: A spin-pair distinc- tive adiabatic-connection approximation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 2617 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Toulouse, I

    J. Toulouse, I. C. Gerber, G. Jansen, A. Savin, and J. G. ´Angy´ an, Adiabatic-connection fluctuation- dissipation density-functional theory based on range sep- aration, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 096404 (2009)

    2009

  30. [30]

    D. L. Freeman, Coupled-cluster expansion applied to the electron gas: Inclusion of ring and exchange effects, Phys. Rev. B15, 5512 (1977)

    1977

  31. [31]

    Jansen, R.-F

    G. Jansen, R.-F. Liu, and J. G. ´Angy´ an, On the equiva- lence of ring-coupled-cluster doubles and adiabatic con- nection fluctuation-dissipation theorem random phase approximation, J. Chem. Phys.133, 154106 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    X. Ren, A. Tkatchenko, P. Rinke, and M. Scheffler, Be- yond the random-phase approximation for the electron correlation energy: The importance of single excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 153003 (2011)

    2011

  33. [33]

    X. Ren, P. Rinke, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Scheffler, Renor- malized second-order perturbation theory for the elec- tron correlation energy: Concept, implementation, and benchmarks, Phys. Rev. B88, 035120 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Neese, F

    F. Neese, F. Wennmohs, and A. Hansen, Efficient and accurate local approximations to coupled-electron pair approaches: An attempt to revive the pair natural orbital method, J. Chem. Phys.130, 114108 (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Schmitz, C

    G. Schmitz, C. H¨ attig, and D. P. Tew, Explicitly cor- related PNO-MP2-F12 and PNO-CCSD(F12*) methods, 11 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 22167 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Pinski, C

    P. Pinski, C. Riplinger, E. F. Valeev, and F. Neese, Sparse maps—a systematic infrastructure for reduced- scaling electronic structure methods. I. An efficient and simple linear scaling local MP2 method, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 034108 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Riplinger and F

    C. Riplinger and F. Neese, An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method, J. Chem. Phys.138, 034106 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    Riplinger, B

    C. Riplinger, B. Sandhoefer, A. Hansen, and F. Neese, Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calcu- lations with pair natural orbitals, J. Chem. Phys.139, 134101 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Riplinger, P

    C. Riplinger, P. Pinski, U. Becker, E. F. Valeev, and F. Neese, Sparse maps—a systematic infrastructure for reduced-scaling electronic structure methods. II. linear scaling domain based pair natural orbital coupled cluster theory, J. Chem. Phys.144, 024109 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    J. Yang, G. K.-L. Chan, F. R. Manby, M. Sch¨ utz, and H.-J. Werner, The orbital-specific-virtual local coupled cluster singles and doubles method, J. Chem. Phys.136, 144105 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    B. I. Dunlap, J. W. D. Connolly, and J. R. Sabin, On some approximations in applications of Xαtheory, J. Chem. Phys.71, 3396 (1979)

    1979

  42. [42]

    Feyereisen, G

    M. Feyereisen, G. Fitzgerald, and A. Komornicki, Use of approximate integrals in ab initio theory. An application in MP2 energy calculations, Chem. Phys. Lett.208, 359 (1993)

    1993

  43. [43]

    N. H. F. Beebe and J. Linderberg, Simplifications in the generation and transformation of two-electron integrals in molecular calculations, Int. J. Quantum Chem.12, 683 (1977)

    1977

  44. [44]

    Røeggen and T

    I. Røeggen and T. Johansen, Cholesky decomposition of the two-electron integral matrix in electronic structure calculations, J. Chem. Phys.128, 194107 (2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    Neese, F

    F. Neese, F. Wennmohs, A. Hansen, and U. Becker, Effi- cient, approximate and parallel Hartree–Fock and hybrid DFT calculations. A ‘chain-of-spheres’ algorithm for the Hartree–Fock exchange, Chem. Phys.356, 98 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    R. A. Friesner, Solution of the Hartree–Fock equations by a pseudospectral method: Application to diatomic molecules, J. Chem. Phys.85, 1462 (1986)

    1986

  47. [47]

    E. G. Hohenstein, R. M. Parrish, and T. J. Mart´ ınez, Tensor hypercontraction density fitting. I. Quartic scal- ing second- and third-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, J. Chem. Phys.137, 044103 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    R. M. Parrish, E. G. Hohenstein, T. J. Mart´ ınez, and C. D. Sherrill, Tensor hypercontraction. II. Least-squares renormalization, J. Chem. Phys.137, 224106 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    J. Lee, L. Lin, and M. Head-Gordon, Systematically im- provable tensor hypercontraction: Interpolative separa- ble density fitting for molecules applied to exact ex- change, second- and third-order Møller-Plesset pertur- bation theory, J. Chem. Theory Comput.16, 243 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    J. E. Moussa, Cubic-scaling algorithm and self-consistent field for the random-phase approximation with second- order screened exchange, J. Chem. Phys.140, 014107 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    Duchemin and X

    I. Duchemin and X. Blase, Separable resolution-of-the- identity with all-electron Gaussian bases: Application to cubic-scaling RPA, J. Chem. Phys.150, 174120 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Wilhelm, P

    J. Wilhelm, P. Seewald, M. Del Ben, and J. Hutter, Large-scale cubic-scaling random phase approximation correlation energy calculations using a Gaussian basis, J. Chem. Theory Comput.12, 5851 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    H. F. Schurkus and C. Ochsenfeld, Communication: An effective linear-scaling atomic-orbital reformulation of the random-phase approximation using a contracted double-Laplace transformation, J. Chem. Phys.144, 031101 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Yeh and M

    C.-N. Yeh and M. Morales, Low-scaling algorithm for the random phase approximation using tensor hypercontrac- tion withk-point sampling, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 6197 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Yeh and M

    C.-N. Yeh and M. Morales, Low-scaling algorithms for GWand constrained random phase approximation us- ing symmetry-adapted interpolative separable density fit- ting, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 3184 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Zhang, W

    Y. Zhang, W. Wu, and P. Su, FormalO(N 3) scaling GWcalculations by block tensor decomposition for large molecule systems, J. Chem. Phys.164, 144106 (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    Y. Jung, R. C. Lochan, A. D. Dutoi, and M. Head- Gordon, Scaled opposite-spin second order Møller-Plesset correlation energy: An economical electronic structure method, J. Chem. Phys.121, 9793 (2004)

    2004

  58. [58]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Xiong, W. Wu, and P. Su, Block tensor decomposition: A dual-grid scheme with a formalO(N 3) scale for THC decomposition of molecular systems, J. Chem. Phys.163, 174109 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    T. Y. Takeshita, W. A. de Jong, D. Neuhauser, R. Baer, and E. Rabani, Stochastic formulation of the resolution of identity: Application to second order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory, J. Chem. Theory Comput.13, 4605 (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    W. Dou, M. Chen, T. Y. Takeshita, R. Baer, D. Neuhauser, and E. Rabani, Stochastic resolution of identity second-order Matsubara Green’s function the- ory, J. Chem. Phys.151, 044114 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    C. Zhao, Q. Ou, J. Lee, and W. Dou, Stochastic resolu- tion of identity to CC2 for large systems: Excited state properties, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 6211 (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    F. L. Hitchcock, The expression of a tensor or a polyadic as a sum of products, J. Math. Phys.6, 164 (1927)

    1927

  63. [63]

    Benedikt, A

    U. Benedikt, A. A. Auer, M. Espig, and W. Hackbusch, Tensor decomposition in post-Hartree–Fock methods. I. Two-electron integrals and MP2, J. Chem. Phys.134, 054118 (2011)

    2011

  64. [64]

    Pierce and M

    K. Pierce and M. Morales, Using matrix-free tensor- network optimizations to construct a reduced-scaling and robust second-order Møller-Plesset theory, J. Chem. The- ory Comput.21, 5952 (2025)

    2025

  65. [65]

    W. Hu, L. Lin, and C. Yang, Interpolative separable den- sity fitting decomposition for accelerating hybrid density functional calculations with applications to defects in sil- icon, J. Chem. Theory Comput.13, 5420 (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    X. Qin, W. Hu, and J. Yang, Interpolative separable den- sity fitting for accelerating two-electron integrals: A the- oretical perspective, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 679 (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    Alml¨ of, Elimination of energy denominators in Møller– Plesset perturbation theory by a Laplace transform ap- proach, Chem

    J. Alml¨ of, Elimination of energy denominators in Møller– Plesset perturbation theory by a Laplace transform ap- proach, Chem. Phys. Lett.181, 319 (1991)

    1991

  68. [68]

    H¨ aser and J

    M. H¨ aser and J. Alml¨ of, Laplace transform techniques in Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, J. Chem. Phys.96, 489 (1992)

    1992

  69. [69]

    Kaltak, J

    M. Kaltak, J. Klimeˇ s, and G. Kresse, Low scaling al- gorithms for the random phase approximation: Imagi- 12 nary time and Laplace transformations, J. Chem. Theory Comput.10, 2498 (2014)

    2014

  70. [70]

    Azizi, J

    M. Azizi, J. Wilhelm, D. Golze, F. Delesma, R. Panad’es- Barrueta, P. Rinke, M. Giantomassi, and X. Gonze, Val- idation of the GreenX library time-frequency component for efficientGWand RPA calculations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245101 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    X. Ren, P. Rinke, V. Blum, J. Wieferink, A. Tkatchenko, A. Sanfilippo, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Resolution-of- identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hybrid density func- tionals, RPA, MP2 andGWwith numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions, New J. Phys.14, 053020 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    G. E. Scuseria, T. M. Henderson, and D. C. Sorensen, The ground state correlation energy of the random phase approximation from a ring coupled cluster doubles ap- proach, J. Chem. Phys.129, 231101 (2008)

    2008

  73. [73]

    G. E. Scuseria, T. M. Henderson, and I. W. Bulik, Particle-particle and quasiparticle random phase approx- imations: Connections to coupled cluster theory, J. Chem. Phys.139, 104113 (2013)

    2013

  74. [74]

    Bleiziffer, A

    P. Bleiziffer, A. Heßelmann, and A. G¨ orling, Efficient self-consistent treatment of electron correlation within the random phase approximation, J. Chem. Phys.139, 084113 (2013)

    2013

  75. [75]

    D. A. Matthews, Improved grid optimization and fitting in least squares tensor hypercontraction, J. Chem. The- ory Comput.16, 1382 (2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    Weigend, A fully direct RI-HF algorithm: Implemen- tation, optimised auxiliary basis sets, demonstration of accuracy and efficiency, Phys

    F. Weigend, A fully direct RI-HF algorithm: Implemen- tation, optimised auxiliary basis sets, demonstration of accuracy and efficiency, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.4, 4285 (2002)

    2002

  77. [77]

    Smith, L

    D. Smith, L. Burns, A. Simmonett, R. Parrish, M. Schieber, R. Galvelis, P. Kraus, H. Kruse, R. Di Remi- gio, A. Alenaizan, A. James, S. Lehtola, J. Misiewicz, M. Scheurer, R. Shaw, J. Schriber, Y. Xie, Z. Glick, D. Sirianni, and C. Sherrill, Psi4 1.4: Open-source soft- ware for high-throughput quantum chemistry, J. Chem. Phys.152, 184108 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    ˇRez´ aˇ c, K

    J. ˇRez´ aˇ c, K. E. Riley, and P. Hobza, S66: A Well- balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures, J. Chem. Theory Comput.7, 2427 (2011)

    2011

  79. [79]

    S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate to- tal energies. Some procedures with reduced errors, Mol. Phys.19, 553 (1970)

    1970

  80. [80]

    Jeziorski, R

    B. Jeziorski, R. Moszynski, and K. Szalewicz, Perturba- tion theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der waals complexes, Chem. Rev.94, 1887 (1994)

    1994

Showing first 80 references.