pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00404 · v1 · pith:KX46PQCYnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.LG

Rethinking Amortized Neural Representations for High-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.LG
keywords terrainneuralper-tilemethodsrepresentationssharedamortizedbenchmark
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Implicit neural representations (INRs) model a signal as a continuous coordinate-to-value function. For terrain elevation data, this supports analytic derivatives, arbitrary-resolution decoding, and a smooth surface model of the underlying heightfield. However, fitting and storing a separate INR for every tile does not scale to large terrain datasets. Amortized neural representations reduce this cost with a shared network: a new tile is mapped to a compact per-tile payload, and a shared decoder reconstructs the heightfield from it. Most such methods are hypernetworks that predict the payload in a single forward pass, while others recover it through a short per-tile optimization. These methods were developed primarily for natural images, and their suitability for terrain heightfields remains unclear. We introduce a controlled benchmark on a 1 m/pixel terrain dataset and evaluate three representative methods under a unified protocol. Observing a clear cross-domain gap, we propose HUVR+SIREN, a hypernetwork that adapts the strongest benchmarked method (HUVR) by replacing its coordinate decoder with a smooth, analytically differentiable one. It attains the best height and derivative fidelity on the benchmark with no additional per-tile storage and lower decode cost, and tolerates aggressive post-training quantization with negligible quality loss, giving a compact terrain neural format. Ablations and diagnostics further identify which design choices transfer to terrain and show that the per-tile bottleneck is already near its useful limit, leaving the remaining gap in the shared hypernetwork's architectural design.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.