Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 193 references

Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read F-theory GUTs produce no axion-like particles with photon coupling-to-mass ratio above the QCD axion band in the geometric regime.

desk verdict F-theory GUTs now have a concrete axion-based falsification test because their hypercharge-flux ALPs end up with g_aγ/m_a ratios below the QCD line in controlled regimes. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09982 v1 pith:G44ZVRV2 submitted 2026-06-08 hep-th hep-ph

Michael Nee , Mario Reig , Timo Weigand This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords axionsF-theoryGUTsALPsaxiversethresholdcorrectionsD-instantonshyperchargeflux
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that axion-like particles arising from hypercharge flux in F-theory GUTs obey a strict upper bound on their photon coupling divided by mass. This bound matches the QCD axion value up to a calculable coefficient of order one, and the coefficient stays small because D-instantons set ALP masses once gauge unification fixes the size of threshold corrections. The result follows in the controlled geometric regime where the alpha-prime expansion remains valid. A sympathetic reader would care because the bound turns F-theory GUTs into a falsifiable class of models: an observed ALP far above the QCD band would exclude them.

What carries the argument

Non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions induced by hypercharge flux, which fix the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses.

What would settle it

Discovery of an ALP with g_aγ/m_a significantly larger than the QCD axion value, for example through axion-induced cosmic birefringence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Axions coupled to photons in F-theory GUTs satisfy g_aγ/m_a ≤ C (α_em / 2π) 1/(m_π f_π) with C a calculable coefficient. Topological GUT symmetry breaking by hypercharge flux generates ALPs without QCD coupling from non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions. When gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, D-instantons whose actions are controlled by these corrections break the ALP shift symmetries and produce masses that keep every non-universal ALP well below the QCD axion prediction. No loopholes allow the ratio to become arbitrarily large inside regions of control for the effective action, so no ALP parametrically above the QCD axion ba

Load-bearing premise

Gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, which fixes the size of threshold corrections and thereby controls the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bound holds for all non-universal ALPs even when large threshold corrections force new incomplete GUT multiplets at intermediate scales.
  • Finding an ALP far above the QCD band rules out F-theory GUTs inside regimes where the effective theory is under control.
  • The same bound applies in field-theoretic and perturbative heterotic GUT constructions.
  • F-theory GUTs become directly testable by axion searches that measure the coupling-to-mass ratio.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Axion searches could distinguish F-theory GUTs from other string constructions that allow higher-ratio ALPs.
  • The result restricts the possible mass spectrum of the axiverse inside controlled F-theory compactifications.
  • Extensions of the analysis beyond the geometric regime would be needed to identify any remaining windows for large-ratio ALPs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in F-theory GUTs with hypercharge flux breaking, non-universal ALPs arising from holomorphic threshold corrections to gauge kinetic functions obey the bound g_{aγ}/m_a ≤ C (α_em/(2π m_π f_π)) with C = O(1), saturated by the QCD axion. This follows because approximate gauge unification near the string scale keeps threshold corrections small, so that D-instanton actions are unsuppressed and ALP masses are not parametrically light. The authors compute the resulting axion potentials, show that every such ALP lies below the QCD band, and argue that candidate loopholes (decoupled cycles, large thresholds compensated by incomplete multiplets, effects outside the α' expansion) cannot produce C ≫ 1 while remaining inside the controlled geometric regime where the α' expansion holds. The result renders F-theory GUTs falsifiable by an ALP observation with parametrically large coupling-to-mass ratio.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable link between F-theory GUT model building and axion phenomenology. It converts the standard assumption of approximate unification into a sharp upper bound on ALP parameters, thereby offering a direct test (e.g., via cosmic birefringence) that can rule out entire classes of controlled F-theory constructions. The explicit mapping from threshold corrections to instanton actions and the systematic treatment of loopholes are strengths that increase the result's robustness. The paper thereby strengthens the interface between string-derived effective theories and observable axion physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and derivation of axion potentials] The central claim that D-instanton actions are controlled by the size of holomorphic threshold corrections (and hence cannot be parametrically suppressed while unification holds) is load-bearing; the manuscript should supply the explicit one-loop threshold formula used to relate the flux-induced non-universality to the instanton action in the geometric regime, together with the numerical size of the correction assumed for viable models.
  2. [Discussion of loopholes] The statement that none of the listed loopholes permits C ≫ 1 inside the controlled effective theory is central to the falsifiability claim. Each loophole (decoupled cycles, incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects outside α' control) requires a quantitative estimate showing that the resulting C remains O(1) or that the construction exits the geometric regime; a dedicated subsection with these estimates would make the argument inspectable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The coefficient C is introduced as 'calculable' but its explicit value for the non-universal ALPs (as opposed to the QCD axion) is not stated in the abstract; a short sentence giving the range obtained from the potential computation would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the axion-photon coupling g_{aγ} and the reference QCD scale m_π f_π should be defined at first use rather than assumed from the QCD axion literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and will improve the clarity of the central claims. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and derivation of axion potentials] The central claim that D-instanton actions are controlled by the size of holomorphic threshold corrections (and hence cannot be parametrically suppressed while unification holds) is load-bearing; the manuscript should supply the explicit one-loop threshold formula used to relate the flux-induced non-universality to the instanton action in the geometric regime, together with the numerical size of the correction assumed for viable models.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the one-loop threshold formula will make the load-bearing step more transparent. In the revised manuscript we will insert the standard holomorphic threshold correction formula (arising from the hypercharge flux integral over the matter curve) that relates the non-universality directly to the D-instanton action in the geometric regime. We will also add the numerical range of corrections (a few percent) that is required for approximate unification near the string scale in viable models, thereby quantifying the statement that the instanton action remains unsuppressed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of loopholes] The statement that none of the listed loopholes permits C ≫ 1 inside the controlled effective theory is central to the falsifiability claim. Each loophole (decoupled cycles, incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects outside α' control) requires a quantitative estimate showing that the resulting C remains O(1) or that the construction exits the geometric regime; a dedicated subsection with these estimates would make the argument inspectable.

    Authors: We concur that a dedicated subsection containing quantitative estimates for each loophole will strengthen the falsifiability argument. In the revision we will add such a subsection, supplying order-of-magnitude estimates that show: (i) for decoupled cycles the resulting C stays O(1) while unification is preserved; (ii) incomplete multiplets at intermediate scales that compensate large thresholds push the model outside the controlled geometric regime; and (iii) non-perturbative effects outside the α' expansion likewise violate the regime of validity of the effective action. These estimates will be presented explicitly so that the claim can be inspected. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation self-contained from threshold corrections and unification assumption

full rationale

The central bound follows directly from the holomorphic threshold corrections to gauge kinetic functions (induced by hypercharge flux) setting the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses. Approximate unification near the string scale keeps those corrections small, yielding unsuppressed instantons and thus heavy ALPs with g_aγ/m_a below the QCD axion band. The paper explicitly enumerates and rules out candidate loopholes (decoupled cycles, large thresholds compensated by incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects) while remaining inside the controlled α' regime; none of these steps reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional renaming. The result is therefore independent of the target observable.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of approximate gauge coupling unification near the string scale and on the standard effective-field-theory control in the geometric regime; these are not derived inside the paper but taken as input for viable models.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale
    Invoked to ensure that threshold corrections remain small, thereby fixing D-instanton actions and ALP masses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G44ZVRV2

@misc{pith2026260609982,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G44ZVRV2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09982}
}
abstract

We show that axions coupled to photons in F-theory Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) satisfy the coupling-to-mass relation $g_{a\gamma}/m_a \leq C\, \frac{\alpha_{\rm em}}{2\pi}\frac{1}{m_\pi f_\pi}$, with $C$ a calculable coefficient. This bound is saturated for the QCD axion with $C = \mathcal{O}(1)$ and holds in field theoretic and perturbative heterotic GUT constructions. In F-theory, topological GUT symmetry breaking by hypercharge flux introduces axion-like particles (ALPs) coupled to photons without coupling to QCD. These ALPs arise from the non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions induced by the hypercharge flux. When gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, as required in phenomenologically viable models, the shift symmetries of these ALPs are broken by D-instantons whose action is controlled by the size of the threshold corrections to the gauge couplings. Small corrections imply unsuppressed instantons and heavy ALPs. We compute the resulting axion potentials and show that the coupling-to-mass ratio $g_{a\gamma}/m_a$ for every non-universal ALP lies well below the QCD axion prediction. We consider possible loopholes to this result -- some of which could lead to $C\gg 1$ -- and argue that none of them allows for $g_{a\gamma}/m_a$ to be arbitrarily above the QCD axion prediction within regions of control for the effective action. The bound persists in models with large threshold corrections, where new incomplete GUT multiplets at intermediate energy scales are required. As a result, in the geometric regime, where the $\alpha'$ expansion is under control, no ALP parametrically above the QCD axion band exists. Our results make F-theory GUTs falsifiable: finding an ALP far above the QCD band, for example discovering axion-induced cosmic birefringence, rules out F-theory GUTs in regimes of control of the effective theory.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 186 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Search for pro ton decay via p → e+π 0 and p → µ +π 0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande i–iv

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.32(1974) 438–441. [2]Super-KamiokandeCollaboration, A. Takenaka et al.,Search for proton decay viap→e +π0 and p→µ +π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 11 112011, [arXiv:2010.16098]

    work page arXiv 1974

  2. [2]

    Gauge Symmetry Reduction from the Extra Space $S^1/Z_2$

    Y. Kawamura,Gauge symmetry breaking from extra space S**1 / Z(2), Prog. Theor. Phys.103(2000) 613–619, [hep-ph/9902423]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Triplet-doublet Splitting, Proton Stability and Extra Dimension

    Y. Kawamura,Triplet doublet splitting, proton stability and extra dimension, Prog. Theor. Phys.105 (2001) 999–1006, [hep-ph/0012125]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    SU(5) Grand Unification in Extra Dimensions and Proton Decay

    G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio,SU(5) grand unification in extra dimensions and proton decay, Phys. Lett. B511(2001) 257–264, [hep-ph/0102301]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura,Gauge unification in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 055003, [hep-ph/0103125]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    A Minimal S^1/(Z_2 x Z_2') Orbifold GUT

    A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell,A Minimal S**1 / (Z(2) x Z-prime (2)) orbifold GUT, Nucl. Phys. B613(2001) 3–16, [hep-ph/0106166]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm,The Heterotic String, Phys. Rev. Lett.54 (1985) 502–505

    1985

  8. [8]

    Candelas, G

    P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten,Vacuum configurations for superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 46–74

    1985

Show all 193 references
  1. [9]

    Witten,Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models, Nucl

    E. Witten,Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models, Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 75–100

    1985

  2. [10]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory. Vol. 2: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology. 7, 1988

    1988

  3. [11]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,arXiv:2310.20559

  4. [12]

    Blumenhagen, B

    R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust, and S. Stieberger,Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes, Phys. Rept.445(2007) 1–193, [hep-th/0610327]

    2007 arXiv

  5. [13]

    L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, String theory and particle physics: An introduction to string phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    Marchesano, B

    F. Marchesano, B. Schellekens, and T. Weigand, D-brane and F-theory Model Building. 2024. arXiv:2212.07443

    2024

  7. [15]

    Marchesano, G

    F. Marchesano, G. Shiu, and T. Weigand,The Standard Model from String Theory: What Have We Learned?, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74(2024), no. 1 113–140, [arXiv:2401.01939]

    2024

  8. [16]

    Vafa,Evidence for F theory, Nucl

    C. Vafa,Evidence for F theory, Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 403–418, [hep-th/9602022]

    1996 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Donagi and M

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt,Model Building with F-Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15(2011), no. 5 1237–1317, [arXiv:0802.2969]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Beasley, J

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman, and C. Vafa,GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - I, JHEP01 (2009) 058, [arXiv:0802.3391]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Beasley, J

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman, and C. Vafa,GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - II: Experimental Predictions, JHEP01(2009) 059, [arXiv:0806.0102]. – 41 –

    2009 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Donagi and M

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt,Breaking GUT Groups in F-Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15(2011), no. 6 1523–1603, [arXiv:0808.2223]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Buican, D

    M. Buican, D. Malyshev, D. R. Morrison, H. Verlinde, and M. Wijnholt,D-branes at Singularities, Compactification, and Hypercharge, JHEP01(2007) 107, [hep-th/0610007]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. J. Heckman,Particle Physics Implications of F-theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 237–265, [arXiv:1001.0577]

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Weigand,Lectures on F-theory compactifications and model building, Class

    T. Weigand,Lectures on F-theory compactifications and model building, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 214004, [arXiv:1009.3497]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Weigand,F-theory, PoST ASI2017(2018) 016, [arXiv:1806.01854]

    T. Weigand,F-theory, PoST ASI2017(2018) 016, [arXiv:1806.01854]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,arXiv:1109.3262

    K. Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,arXiv:1109.3262

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in grand unified theories, JHEP10(2022) 141, [arXiv:2206.07053]

    2022

  19. [27]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in Orbifold GUTs,arXiv:2511.21830

  20. [28]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in heterotic string theory, JHEP02(2025) 188, [arXiv:2410.03820]

    2025

  21. [29]

    Reig and T

    M. Reig and T. Weigand,Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon coupling, JHEP01(2026) 006, [arXiv:2509.08042]

    2026

  22. [30]

    Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and J. Thaler,Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 14 141801, [arXiv:1602.01086]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. ´A. Melc´ on et al.,Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project, JCAP05(2018) 040, [arXiv:1803.01243]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. L. Ouellet et al.,First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub-µeV Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019), no. 12 121802, [arXiv:1810.12257]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    D. J. E. Marsh, K.-C. Fong, E. W. Lentz, L. Smejkal, and M. N. Ali,Proposal to Detect Dark Matter using Axionic Topological Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 12 121601, [arXiv:1807.08810]

    2019

  26. [34]

    J. L. Ouellet et al.,Design and implementation of the ABRACADABRA-10 cm axion dark matter search, Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 5 052012, [arXiv:1901.10652]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Lawson, A

    M. Lawson, A. J. Millar, M. Pancaldi, E. Vitagliano, and F. Wilczek,Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 14 141802, [arXiv:1904.11872]

    2019

  28. [36]

    Beurthey et al.,MADMAX Status Report,arXiv:2003.10894

    S. Beurthey et al.,MADMAX Status Report,arXiv:2003.10894

    2003

  29. [37]

    Sch¨ utte-Engel, et al.,Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection, JCAP08(2021) 066, [arXiv:2102.05366]

    J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, et al.,Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection, JCAP08(2021) 066, [arXiv:2102.05366]

    2021

  30. [38]

    C. P. Salemi et al.,Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 8 081801, [arXiv:2102.06722]. [40]DMRadioCollaboration, L. Brouwer et al.,Projected sensitivity of DMRadio-m3: A search for the QCD axion below 1µeV, Phys. Rev. D10...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Aja et al.,The Canfranc Axion Detection Experiment (CADEx): search for axions at 90 GHz with Kinetic Inductance Detectors, JCAP11(2022) 044, [arXiv:2206.02980]

    B. Aja et al.,The Canfranc Axion Detection Experiment (CADEx): search for axions at 90 GHz with Kinetic Inductance Detectors, JCAP11(2022) 044, [arXiv:2206.02980]

    2022

  32. [40]

    J. F. Bourhill, E. C. I. Paterson, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar,Searching for ultralight axions with twisted cavity resonators of anyon rotational symmetry with bulk modes of nonzero helicity, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 5 052014, [arXiv:2208.01640]. [44]ALPHACollaboration, A....

    2023

  33. [41]

    J. N. Benabou, J. W. Foster, Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and C. P. Salemi,Lumped-element axion dark matter detection beyond the magnetoquasistatic limit, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 3 035009, [arXiv:2211.00008]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Berlin, et al.,Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion, JHEP07(2020), no

    A. Berlin, et al.,Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion, JHEP07(2020), no. 07 088, [arXiv:1912.11048]

    2020

  35. [43]

    Giaccone et al.,Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities, arXiv:2207.11346

    B. Giaccone et al.,Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities, arXiv:2207.11346. [48]DMRadioCollaboration, A. AlShirawi et al.,Electromagnetic modeling and science reach of DMRadio-m3,arXiv:2302.14084

  36. [44]

    Oshima, et al.,First results of axion dark matter search with DANCE, Phys

    Y. Oshima, et al.,First results of axion dark matter search with DANCE, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 7 072005, [arXiv:2303.03594]. [50]DALICollaboration, J. De Miguel, et al.,Discovery prospects with the Dark-photons & Axion-like particles Interferometer, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), ...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Ahyoune et al.,A Proposal for a Low-Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2µµeV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet, Annalen Phys.535(2023), no

    S. Ahyoune et al.,A Proposal for a Low-Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2µµeV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet, Annalen Phys.535(2023), no. 12 2300326, [arXiv:2306.17243]

    2023

  38. [46]

    Alesini et al.,The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys

    D. Alesini et al.,The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101370, [arXiv:2309.00351]. [53]BREADCollaboration, S. Knirck et al.,First Results from a Broadban...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Kalia, et al.,Ultralight dark matter detection with levitated ferromagnets, Phys

    S. Kalia, et al.,Ultralight dark matter detection with levitated ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 115029, [arXiv:2408.15330]

    2024

  40. [48]

    Friel, J

    M. Friel, J. W. Gjerloev, S. Kalia, and A. Zamora,Search for ultralight dark matter in the SuperMAG high-fidelity dataset, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 115036, [arXiv:2408.16045]

    2024

  41. [49]

    Baryakhtar, L

    M. Baryakhtar, L. Rosenberg, and G. Rybka,Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion, arXiv:2504.10607

  42. [50]

    Ankel et al.,DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches,arXiv:2604.16602

    V. Ankel et al.,DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches,arXiv:2604.16602

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Esposito, K

    A. Esposito, K. C. Fong, and L. Hui,An ultra-broadband axion dark matter experiment, arXiv:2605.11078

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Caputo, S

    A. Caputo, S. J. Witte, A. A. Philippov, and T. Jacobson,Pulsar Nulling and Vacuum Radio Emission from Axion Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 16 161001, [arXiv:2311.14795]. – 43 –

    2024

  45. [53]

    Regis, M

    M. Regis, M. Taoso, and J. Terol Calvo,Searching for axion-like particles with SPHEREx, JCAP05 (2025) 008, [arXiv:2412.12286]. [62]EPT ACollaboration, N. K. Porayko et al.,Searches for signatures of ultralight axion dark matter in polarimetry data of the European Pulsar Timing...

    2025

  46. [54]

    J. N. Benabou, et al.,Time-delayed gamma-ray signatures of heavy axions from core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 9 095029, [arXiv:2412.13247]

    2025

  47. [55]

    Ning and B

    O. Ning and B. R. Safdi,Leading Axion-Photon Sensitivity with NuSTAR Observations of M82 and M87, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 17 171003, [arXiv:2404.14476]

    2025

  48. [56]

    O. Ning, K. Raman, and B. R. Safdi,Cosmological Neutron Stars Produce Diffuse Axion X-Ray Signatures,arXiv:2512.15849

  49. [57]

    A. G. De Marchi, O. Ning, and T. Xiao,Blazar Constraints on Axions through New Spectral Modulation Searches in 1ES 1959+650 & B2 1811+31,arXiv:2603.13480

    1959

  50. [58]

    Terol Calvo, M

    J. Terol Calvo, M. Taoso, A. Caputo, M. Negro, and M. Regis,Searching for dark matter X-ray lines from the Large Magellanic Cloud with eROSITA,arXiv:2603.19109

  51. [59]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020), no. 22 221301, [arXiv:2011.11254]

    2018

  52. [60]

    J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu,Improved constraints on cosmic birefringence from the WMAP and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization data, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 6 063503, [arXiv:2205.13962]

    2022

  53. [61]

    Diego-Palazuelos,Search for ultra-light axions with CMB polarization, 4, 2023.arXiv:2304.03647

    P. Diego-Palazuelos,Search for ultra-light axions with CMB polarization, 4, 2023.arXiv:2304.03647

    2023

  54. [62]

    Galaverni, F

    M. Galaverni, F. Finelli, and D. Paoletti,Redshift evolution of cosmic birefringence in CMB anisotropies, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 083529, [arXiv:2301.07971]

    2023

  55. [63]

    Diego-Palazuelos and E

    P. Diego-Palazuelos and E. Komatsu,Cosmic Birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6,arXiv:2509.13654

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Carralot, et al.,Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference,arXiv:2602.12019

    F. Carralot, et al.,Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference,arXiv:2602.12019

  57. [65]

    Alonso, D

    R. Alonso, D. Dimakou, and M. West,Fractional-charge hadrons and leptons to tell the Standard Model group apart, Phys. Lett. B863(2025) 139354, [arXiv:2404.03438]

    2025

  58. [66]

    Koren and A

    S. Koren and A. Martin,Fractionally charged particles at the energy frontier: The SM gauge group and one-form global symmetry, SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 1 004, [arXiv:2406.17850]

    2025

  59. [67]

    Koren and A

    S. Koren and A. Martin,Phenomenology of fractionally charged particles: Two reps are better than one, Nucl. Phys. B1021(2025) 117196, [arXiv:2507.16900]

    2025

  60. [68]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory, JHEP06(2006) 051, [hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

    2010 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Honecker and W

    G. Honecker and W. Staessens,On axionic dark matter in Type IIA string theory, Fortsch. Phys.62 (2014) 115–151, [arXiv:1312.4517]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse, JHEP07(2025) 049, [arXiv:2503.16387]

    2025

  64. [72]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology, JHEP10(2012) 146, [arXiv:1206.0819]. – 44 –

    2012 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in 9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp

    M. Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in 9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp. 235–242, 2013.arXiv:1309.6988

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Demirtas, C

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister, and M. Stillman,The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse, JHEP04(2020) 138, [arXiv:1808.01282]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. Leonhardt, J. Moritz, and A. Westphal,Thraxions: Ultralight Throat Axions, JHEP 04(2019) 158, [arXiv:1812.03999]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    V. M. Mehta, et al.,Superradiance in string theory, JCAP07(2021) 033, [arXiv:2103.06812]

    2021

  69. [77]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, N. Righi, and A. Westphal,Fuzzy Dark Matter candidates from string theory, JHEP05(2022) 107, [arXiv:2110.02964]

    2022

  70. [78]

    Carta, A

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, N. Righi, and A. Westphal,Thraxions: towards full string models, JHEP01 (2022) 082, [arXiv:2110.02963]

    2022

  71. [79]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Schachner, and P. Shukla,Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions, JHEP04(2022) 003, [arXiv:2109.14624]

    2022

  72. [80]

    Demirtas, N

    M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz,PQ axiverse, JHEP06(2023) 092, [arXiv:2112.04503]

    2023

  73. [81]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker, J. Jaeckel, and M. Wittner,Axions in string theory — slaying the Hydra of dark radiation, JHEP09(2022) 198, [arXiv:2203.08833]

    2022

  74. [82]

    Gendler, D

    N. Gendler, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz,Glimmers from the axiverse, JCAP09 (2024) 071, [arXiv:2309.13145]

    2024

  75. [83]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, J. M. Leedom, M. Putti, and A. Westphal,Gravitational axiverse spectroscopy: seeing the forest for the axions, JHEP08(2024) 072, [arXiv:2312.13431]

    2024

  76. [84]

    Sheridan, et al.,Fuzzy Axions and Associated Relics,arXiv:2412.12012

    E. Sheridan, et al.,Fuzzy Axions and Associated Relics,arXiv:2412.12012

  77. [85]

    J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi,String Theory and Grand Unification Suggest a Sub-Microelectronvolt QCD Axion,arXiv:2505.15884

  78. [86]

    Yin, et al.,Constraining the axiverse with reionization,arXiv:2507.03535

    Z. Yin, et al.,Constraining the axiverse with reionization,arXiv:2507.03535

  79. [87]

    Cheng and N

    J. Cheng and N. Gendler,Universality in the Axiverse,arXiv:2507.12516

  80. [88]

    K. Choi, K. S. Jeong, K.-I. Okumura, and M. Yamaguchi,Mixed Mediation of Supersymmetry Breaking with Anomalous U(1) Gauge Symmetry, JHEP06(2011) 049, [arXiv:1104.3274]

    2011 arXiv

  81. [89]

    K. Choi, K. S. Jeong, and M.-S. Seo,String theoretic QCD axions in the light of PLANCK and BICEP2, JHEP07(2014) 092, [arXiv:1404.3880]

    2014 arXiv

  82. [90]

    E. I. Buchbinder, A. Constantin, and A. Lukas,Heterotic QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 4 046010, [arXiv:1412.8696]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Loladze, A

    V. Loladze, A. Platschorre, and M. Reig,Higher Axion Strings,arXiv:2503.18707

  84. [92]

    J. M. Leedom, M. Putti, and A. Westphal,Towards a Heterotic Axiverse,arXiv:2509.03578

  85. [93]

    J. N. Benabou, G. A. Dainelli, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi,Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV,arXiv:2605.04142

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    S. H. Im, H. P. Nilles, and M. Olechowski,Axion clockworks from heterotic M-theory: the QCD-axion and its ultra-light companion, JHEP10(2019) 159, [arXiv:1906.11851]

    2019

  87. [95]

    G. B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba,Hyperbolic compactification of M-theory and de Sitter quantum gravity, SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 3 083, [arXiv:2104.13380]. – 45 –

    2022

  88. [96]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson, and G. Salinas,Towards string theory expectations for photon couplings to axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 10 106010, [arXiv:1909.05257]

    2019

  89. [97]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson, and G. Salinas,Axion reheating in the string landscape, Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 8 086014, [arXiv:1903.04495]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    S. V. P. Fallon, J. Halverson, L. McAllister, and Y. Zhu,F-theory Axiverse,arXiv:2511.20458

  91. [99]

    K. Chen, Q. Lou, and Y.-N. Wang,Constraining F-theory Model Building with QCD Axions, arXiv:2605.03963

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    Kitajima and F

    N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi,Resonant conversions of QCD axions into hidden axions and suppressed isocurvature perturbations, JCAP01(2015) 032, [arXiv:1411.2011]

    2015 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Cyncynates, T

    D. Cyncynates, T. Giurgica-Tiron, O. Simon, and J. O. Thompson,Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 5 055005, [arXiv:2109.09755]

    2022

  94. [102]

    Gavela, P

    B. Gavela, P. Qu´ ılez, and M. Ramos,The QCD axion sum rule, JHEP04(2024) 056, [arXiv:2305.15465]

    2024

  95. [103]

    de Giorgi and M

    A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos,Extra-dimensional axion patterns, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 7 075006, [arXiv:2412.00179]

    2025

  96. [104]

    Murai, Y

    K. Murai, Y. Narita, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin,QCD axion dark matter from level crossing with refined adiabatic condition, JHEP04(2025) 124, [arXiv:2412.10232]

    2025

  97. [105]

    de Giorgi, J

    A. de Giorgi, J. Jaeckel, S. Monath, and V. Takhistov,Multiple Axions in Laboratory Experiments, arXiv:2512.16837

  98. [106]

    Baryakhtar, D

    M. Baryakhtar, D. Cyncynates, and E. Henry,Axiverse Lampposts,arXiv:2602.23424

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. M. Lee, M. Ramos, and F. Vilches,How well can the QCD axion hide?,arXiv:2604.08657

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Fern´ andez Navarro, M

    M. Fern´ andez Navarro, M. F. Zamoro, M. Pesut, and X. Ponce D´ ıaz,The structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem,arXiv:2605.06787

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Reece,Axion-gauge coupling quantization with a twist, JHEP10(2023) 116, [arXiv:2309.03939]

    M. Reece,Axion-gauge coupling quantization with a twist, JHEP10(2023) 116, [arXiv:2309.03939]

    2023

  102. [110]

    Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Noninvertible Higher Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 12 121601, [arXiv:2309.03937]

    2024

  103. [111]

    Cordova, S

    C. Cordova, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang,Axion domain walls, small instantons, and non-invertible symmetry breaking, JHEP05(2024) 325, [arXiv:2309.05636]

    2024

  104. [112]

    Agrawal and A

    P. Agrawal and A. Platschorre,The monodromic axion-photon coupling, JHEP01(2024) 169, [arXiv:2309.03934]

    2024

  105. [113]

    Cordova, S

    C. Cordova, S. Hong, and S. Koren,Noninvertible Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and the Massless Quark Solution to the Strong CP Problem, Phys. Rev. X15(2025), no. 3 031011, [arXiv:2402.12453]

    2025

  106. [114]

    Delgado and S

    A. Delgado and S. Koren,Non-invertible Peccei-Quinn symmetry, natural 2HDM alignment, and the visible axion, JHEP02(2025) 178, [arXiv:2412.05362]

    2025

  107. [115]

    G. Choi, S. Hong, and S. Koren,Global Structure, Non-Invertible PQ Symmetry, and the DFSZ Domain Wall Problem,arXiv:2603.26867

  108. [116]

    Blumenhagen,Gauge Coupling Unification in F-Theory Grand Unified Theories, Phys

    R. Blumenhagen,Gauge Coupling Unification in F-Theory Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(2009) 071601, [arXiv:0812.0248]

    2009 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Mayrhofer, E

    C. Mayrhofer, E. Palti, and T. Weigand,Hypercharge Flux in IIB and F-theory: Anomalies and Gauge Coupling Unification, JHEP09(2013) 082, [arXiv:1303.3589]. – 46 –

    2013 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Blumenhagen, G

    R. Blumenhagen, G. Honecker, and T. Weigand,Loop-corrected compactifications of the heterotic string with line bundles, JHEP06(2005) 020, [hep-th/0504232]

    2005 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Blumenhagen, S

    R. Blumenhagen, S. Moster, and T. Weigand,Heterotic GUT and standard model vacua from simply connected Calabi-Yau manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B751(2006) 186–221, [hep-th/0603015]

    2006 arXiv

  112. [120]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.”https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020

    2020

  113. [121]

    Robles-Llana, M

    D. Robles-Llana, M. Rocek, F. Saueressig, U. Theis, and S. Vandoren,Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 211602, [hep-th/0612027]

    2007 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Robles-Llana, F

    D. Robles-Llana, F. Saueressig, U. Theis, and S. Vandoren,Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 681–711, [arXiv:0707.0838]

    2007 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Saueressig and S

    F. Saueressig and S. Vandoren,Conifold singularities, resumming instantons and non-perturbative mirror symmetry, JHEP07(2007) 018, [arXiv:0704.2229]

    2007 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1infinite distance limits – Part I:g s obstructions,arXiv:2603.12315

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1infinite distance limits – Part II: K¨ ahler obstructions,arXiv:2603.13470

  118. [126]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP06(2007) 060, [hep-th/0601001]

    2007 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Collinucci and I

    A. Collinucci and I. Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria,E6 Yukawa couplings in F-theory as D-brane instanton effects, JHEP03(2017) 155, [arXiv:1612.06874]

    2017 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Blumenhagen, M

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, D. Lust, R. Richter, and T. Weigand,Non-perturbative Yukawa Couplings from String Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 061602, [arXiv:0707.1871]

    2008 arXiv

  121. [129]

    T. W. Grimm,The N=1 effective action of F-theory compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 48–92, [arXiv:1008.4133]

    2011 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Hayashi, R

    H. Hayashi, R. Tatar, Y. Toda, T. Watari, and M. Yamazaki,New Aspects of Heterotic–F Theory Duality, Nucl. Phys. B806(2009) 224–299, [arXiv:0805.1057]

    2009 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Marsano, N

    J. Marsano, N. Saulina, and S. Schafer-Nameki,Compact F-theory GUTs with U(1) (PQ), JHEP04 (2010) 095, [arXiv:0912.0272]

    2010 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Marsano, N

    J. Marsano, N. Saulina, and S. Schafer-Nameki,F-theory Compactifications for Supersymmetric GUTs, JHEP08(2009) 030, [arXiv:0904.3932]

    2009 arXiv

  125. [133]

    T. W. Grimm, S. Krause, and T. Weigand,F-Theory GUT Vacua on Compact Calabi-Yau Fourfolds, JHEP07(2010) 037, [arXiv:0912.3524]

    2010 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Dudas and E

    E. Dudas and E. Palti,On hypercharge flux and exotics in F-theory GUTs, JHEP09(2010) 013, [arXiv:1007.1297]

    2010 arXiv

  127. [135]

    M. J. Dolan, J. Marsano, N. Saulina, and S. Schafer-Nameki,F-theory GUTs with U(1) Symmetries: Generalities and Survey, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 066008, [arXiv:1102.0290]

    2011 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Palti,A Note on Hypercharge Flux, Anomalies, and U(1)s in F-theory GUTs, Phys

    E. Palti,A Note on Hypercharge Flux, Anomalies, and U(1)s in F-theory GUTs, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 8 085036, [arXiv:1209.4421]

    2013 arXiv

  129. [137]

    A. P. Braun, A. Collinucci, and R. Valandro,Hypercharge flux in F-theory and the stable Sen limit, JHEP07(2014) 121, [arXiv:1402.4096]. – 47 –

    2014 arXiv

  130. [138]

    S. Y. Li and W. Taylor,Gauge symmetry breaking with fluxes and natural Standard Model structure from exceptional GUTs in F-theory, JHEP11(2022) 089, [arXiv:2207.14319]

    2022

  131. [139]

    S. Y. Li and W. Taylor,Towards natural and realistic E 7 GUTs in F-theory, JHEP05(2024) 334, [arXiv:2401.00040]

    2024

  132. [140]

    T. W. Grimm, M. Kerstan, E. Palti, and T. Weigand,Massive Abelian Gauge Symmetries and Fluxes in F-theory, JHEP12(2011) 004, [arXiv:1107.3842]

    2011 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Krause, C

    S. Krause, C. Mayrhofer, and T. Weigand,Gauge Fluxes in F-theory and Type IIB Orientifolds, JHEP 08(2012) 119, [arXiv:1202.3138]

    2012 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Jockers and J

    H. Jockers and J. Louis,D-terms and F-terms from D7-brane fluxes, Nucl. Phys. B718(2005) 203–246, [hep-th/0502059]

    2005 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Dasgupta and S

    K. Dasgupta and S. Mukhi,F theory at constant coupling, Phys. Lett. B385(1996) 125–131, [hep-th/9606044]

    1996 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Blumenhagen and M

    R. Blumenhagen and M. Schmidt-Sommerfeld,Gauge Thresholds and Kaehler Metrics for Rigid Intersecting D-brane Models, JHEP12(2007) 072, [arXiv:0711.0866]

    2007 arXiv

  137. [145]

    J. P. Conlon and E. Palti,On Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local IIB/F-theory GUTs, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 106004, [arXiv:0907.1362]

    2009 arXiv

  138. [146]

    J. P. Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation, JHEP05(2006) 078, [hep-th/0602233]

    2006 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range, Phys

    W.-H. Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 5 051301

    2020

  140. [148]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer, and B. R. Heckel,New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 10 101101, [arXiv:2002.11761]

    2020

  141. [149]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. L¨ ust, A. Schachner, and S. Schreyer,Effective potentials, warping, and implications for F-term uplifting,arXiv:2512.17995

  142. [150]

    Kaufmann, T

    L. Kaufmann, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner,On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds, arXiv:2604.25988

    arXiv

  143. [151]

    Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys

    K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101602, [hep-ph/0308024]

    2004 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Choi and T

    G. Choi and T. Gherghetta,An Extra-Dimensional Axion in a 5D Warped Orbifold GUT, arXiv:2512.15666

  145. [153]

    K. Choi, C. H. Lee, and C. S. Shin,Axion Quality in Warped Extra-Dimension,arXiv:2604.08700

    arXiv

  146. [154]

    Di Ubaldo, L

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. V. Iliesiu, H. W. Lin, and C. Yan,Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture,arXiv:2605.05305

    arXiv

  147. [155]

    Maldacena, A

    J. Maldacena, A. Maloney, and B. McPeak,Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound, arXiv:2605.05336

    arXiv

  148. [156]

    Etheredge, M

    M. Etheredge, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and C. Tudball,Sharpening the Supersymmetric Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture,arXiv:2605.22912

    arXiv

  149. [157]

    T. W. Grimm, M. Kerstan, E. Palti, and T. Weigand,On Fluxed Instantons and Moduli Stabilisation in IIB Orientifolds and F-theory, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 066001, [arXiv:1105.3193]

    2011 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Beasley and E

    C. Beasley and E. Witten,New instanton effects in string theory, JHEP02(2006) 060, [hep-th/0512039]. – 48 –

    2006 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Alexandrov, A

    S. Alexandrov, A. H. Fırat, M. Kim, A. Sen, and B. Stefa´ nski,D-instanton induced superpotential, JHEP07(2022) 090, [arXiv:2204.02981]

    2022

  152. [160]

    Petersson,Superpotentials From Stringy Instantons Without Orientifolds, JHEP05(2008) 078, [arXiv:0711.1837]

    C. Petersson,Superpotentials From Stringy Instantons Without Orientifolds, JHEP05(2008) 078, [arXiv:0711.1837]

    2008 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Blumenhagen, M

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, S. Kachru, and T. Weigand,D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009) 269–296, [arXiv:0902.3251]

    2009 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Blumenhagen, M

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, and T. Weigand,Spacetime instanton corrections in 4D string vacua: The Seesaw mechanism for D-Brane models, Nucl. Phys. B771(2007) 113–142, [hep-th/0609191]

    2007 arXiv

  155. [163]

    L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga,Neutrino Majorana Masses from String Theory Instanton Effects, JHEP03(2007) 052, [hep-th/0609213]

    2007 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Palti, C

    E. Palti, C. Vafa, and T. Weigand,Supersymmetric Protection and the Swampland, JHEP06(2020) 168, [arXiv:2003.10452]

    2020

  157. [165]

    G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi,Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rept. 322(1999) 419–499, [hep-ph/9801271]

    1999 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Marsano, N

    J. Marsano, N. Saulina, and S. Schafer-Nameki,Gauge Mediation in F-Theory GUT Models, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 046006, [arXiv:0808.1571]

    2009 arXiv

  159. [167]

    J. J. Heckman and C. Vafa,F-theory, GUTs, and the Weak Scale, JHEP09(2009) 079, [arXiv:0809.1098]

    2009 arXiv

  160. [168]

    S. M. Carroll,Quintessence and the rest of the world, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 3067–3070, [astro-ph/9806099]

    1998 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Finelli and M

    F. Finelli and M. Galaverni,Rotation of Linear Polarization Plane and Circular Polarization from Cosmological Pseudo-Scalar Fields, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 063002, [arXiv:0802.4210]

    2009 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background, Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background, Nature Rev. Phys.4(2022), no. 7 452–469, [arXiv:2202.13919]

    2022

  163. [171]

    Gasparotto and E

    S. Gasparotto and E. I. Sfakianakis,Cosmic birefringence from the Axiverse, JCAP11(2023) 017, [arXiv:2306.16355]

    2023

  164. [172]

    Agrawal, A

    P. Agrawal, A. Hook, and J. Huang,A CMB Millikan experiment with cosmic axiverse strings, JHEP 07(2020) 138, [arXiv:1912.02823]

    2020

  165. [173]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin,Kilobyte Cosmic Birefringence from ALP Domain Walls, JCAP04(2021) 007, [arXiv:2012.11576]

    2021

  166. [174]

    R. Z. Ferreira, S. Gasparotto, T. Hiramatsu, I. Obata, and O. Pujolas,Axionic defects in the CMB: birefringence and gravitational waves, JCAP05(2024) 066, [arXiv:2312.14104]

    2024

  167. [175]

    Kaloper,CMB Birefringence from Vacuum Interfaces,arXiv:2605.11065

    N. Kaloper,CMB Birefringence from Vacuum Interfaces,arXiv:2605.11065

    arXiv

  168. [176]

    Sousa and P

    L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino,Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies generated by domain wall networks, Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 8 083520, [arXiv:1507.01064]

    2015 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Akerblom, R

    N. Akerblom, R. Blumenhagen, D. Lust, E. Plauschinn, and M. Schmidt-Sommerfeld,Non-perturbative SQCD Superpotentials from String Instantons, JHEP04(2007) 076, [hep-th/0612132]

    2007 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Blumenhagen, V

    R. Blumenhagen, V. Braun, T. W. Grimm, and T. Weigand,GUTs in Type IIB Orientifold Compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B815(2009) 1–94, [arXiv:0811.2936]

    2009 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Cicoli, et al.,Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter, JHEP05 (2014) 001, [arXiv:1312.0014]

    M. Cicoli, et al.,Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter, JHEP05 (2014) 001, [arXiv:1312.0014]. – 49 –

    2014 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Aldazabal, S

    G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A. M. Uranga,D = 4 chiral string compactifications from intersecting branes, J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 3103–3126, [hep-th/0011073]. [190]Simons ObservatoryCollaboration, P. Ade et al.,The Simons Observatory: Science goals and...

    2001 arXiv

  173. [181]

    M. Murata, et al.,The Simons Observatory: A fully remote controlled calibration system with a sparse wire grid for cosmic microwave background telescopes, Review of Scientific Instruments94(Dec., 2023) 124502, [arXiv:2309.02035]. [192]LiteBIRDCollaboration, E. Allys et al.,Pro...

    2023

  174. [182]

    M. Jain, A. J. Long, and M. A. Amin,CMB birefringence from ultralight-axion string networks, JCAP 05(2021) 055, [arXiv:2103.10962]

    2021

  175. [183]

    M. Jain, R. Hagimoto, A. J. Long, and M. A. Amin,Searching for axion-like particles through CMB birefringence from string-wall networks, JCAP10(2022) 090, [arXiv:2208.08391]

    2022

  176. [184]

    W. W. Yin, L. Dai, and S. Ferraro,Testing charge quantization with axion string-induced cosmic birefringence, JCAP07(2023) 052, [arXiv:2305.02318]

    2023

  177. [185]

    P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran,New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 035023, [arXiv:1306.6088]

    2013 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Budker, P

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. Sushkov,Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Phys. Rev. X4(2014), no. 2 021030, [arXiv:1306.6089]

    2014 arXiv

  179. [187]

    D. F. Jackson Kimball et al.,Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr), Springer Proc. Phys.245(2020) 105–121, [arXiv:1711.08999]

    2020 arXiv

  180. [188]

    Aybas, et al.,Quantum sensitivity limits of nuclear magnetic resonance experiments searching for new fundamental physics, Quantum Sci

    D. Aybas, et al.,Quantum sensitivity limits of nuclear magnetic resonance experiments searching for new fundamental physics, Quantum Sci. Technol.6(2021), no. 3 034007, [arXiv:2103.06284]

    2021

  181. [189]

    J. A. Dror, S. Gori, J. M. Leedom, and N. L. Rodd,Sensitivity of Spin-Precession Axion Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 18 181801, [arXiv:2210.06481]

    2023

  182. [190]

    Banks, M

    T. Banks, M. Berkooz, S. H. Shenker, G. W. Moore, and P. J. Steinhardt,Modular cosmology, Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 3548–3562, [hep-th/9503114]

    1995 arXiv

  183. [191]

    P. W. Graham and A. Scherlis,Stochastic axion scenario, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 3 035017, [arXiv:1805.07362]

    2018 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Reig,The stochastic axiverse, JHEP09(2021) 207, [arXiv:2104.09923]

    M. Reig,The stochastic axiverse, JHEP09(2021) 207, [arXiv:2104.09923]

    2021

  185. [193]

    Cecotti, M

    S. Cecotti, M. C. N. Cheng, J. J. Heckman, and C. Vafa,Yukawa Couplings in F-theory and Non-Commutative Geometry,arXiv:0910.0477. – 50 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.