pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10441 · v1 · pith:VE3HLEFXnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph

Sequential Clusterization of Light Nuclei and Hypernuclei in Heavy-Ion Collisions within a Wigner Function Coalescence Framework

Junyi Han , Yue-Hang Leung , Jiaxing Zhao , Yingjie Zhou , Norbert Hermann , Yaping Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-ph
keywords coalescencehypernucleilight nucleiheavy-ion collisionsWigner functionhyperspherical harmonicsformation timeAu+Au
0
0 comments X

The pith

Realistic wave functions show non-universal formation times for different nuclear clusters in collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs Wigner phase-space distributions for clusters from N-body wave functions solved in the hyperspherical harmonics formalism, then inserts them into a coalescence calculation inside the PHQMD transport model for Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV. Comparing the computed rapidity distributions to STAR data yields species-dependent coalescence times, which demonstrate that formation is not universal across light nuclei and hypernuclei. The same framework adds cluster-nucleon channels that raise the predicted yields for A=4 systems and supplies forecasts for heavier hypernuclei. A sympathetic reader cares because the method removes free parameters from the coalescence step and ties cluster production directly to nuclear structure.

Core claim

The formation of light nuclei and hypernuclei proceeds via coalescence whose timing depends on the specific cluster species, as extracted by matching rapidity distributions calculated from parameter-free Wigner functions to experimental data.

What carries the argument

Wigner phase-space distributions constructed from realistic N-body wave functions obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in the hyperspherical harmonics formalism.

Load-bearing premise

The coalescence times fitted to rapidity distributions of some clusters are physically meaningful, species-dependent, and transferable to other clusters and hypernuclei.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the yield or rapidity distribution of 5ΛHe or 5ΛΛHe that deviates substantially from the prediction obtained with the extracted coalescence times.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10441 by Jiaxing Zhao, Junyi Han, Norbert Hermann, Yaping Wang, Yingjie Zhou, Yue-Hang Leung.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Transverse-momentum spectra of deuterons in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: illustrates the dependence of the calculated proton, deuteron, triton, 3He, and 4He yields on the coalescence time tcoal, together with the correspond￾ing STAR measurements in 0–10% central Au+Au colli￾sions [9]. The PHQMD calculation overpredicts the pro￾ton yield around ycm ∼ −1. Given that the beam ra￾pidity is ybeam ≈ 1.05, this discrepancy occurs near the spectator region. To reduce the influence of s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Rapidity distributions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Transverse-momentum spectra of protons, light nuclei, Λ hyperons, and hypernuclei in Au+Au collisions at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Matched coalescence time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Matched coalescence time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Rapidity distributions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the formation of light nuclei and hypernuclei in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=3~\mathrm{GeV}$ within a coalescence framework embedded in the microscopic N-body Parton-Hadron-Quantum-Molecular Dynamics (PHQMD) transport model. The Wigner phase-space distributions employed in the coalescence calculation are constructed from realistic $N$-body wave functions obtained by solving the Schr\"odinger equation in the hyperspherical harmonics formalism, providing a solid and parameter-free description of nuclear clusters and hypernuclei. By comparing calculated rapidity distributions with STAR data, we extract species-dependent coalescence times, revealing a non-universal formation pattern among different clusters. The resulting yields and kinematic distributions of light nuclei and hypernuclei are systematically analyzed and shown to be sensitive to the underlying wave-function structure and formation time. In addition, we explore cluster-nucleon formation channels for $A=4$ systems. These additional channels improve the description of ${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$ and ${}^{4}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ yields and help address the underestimation of $A=4$ cluster production in theoretical approaches. Finally, we provide predictions for heavier hypernuclei, including ${}^{5}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{He}$ and ${}^{5}_{\Lambda\Lambda}\mathrm{He}$, which are of interest for future experimental measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a coalescence framework embedded in the PHQMD transport model for light nuclei and hypernuclei in √s_NN=3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Wigner phase-space distributions are constructed from realistic N-body wave functions obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in the hyperspherical harmonics formalism, providing a parameter-free description of cluster structure. Species-dependent coalescence times are extracted by comparing calculated rapidity distributions to STAR data, revealing a non-universal formation pattern. Additional cluster-nucleon channels are explored for A=4 systems to improve yields of 4He and 4_ΛH, and predictions are provided for 5_ΛHe and 5_ΛΛHe.

Significance. The parameter-free construction of Wigner distributions from hyperspherical-harmonics solutions of the Schrödinger equation is a clear methodological strength that reduces phenomenological inputs for cluster wave functions. If the extracted coalescence times can be shown to have physical content beyond improving fits to the calibration data, the non-universal formation pattern and the A=5 predictions would constitute a useful advance for interpreting hypernuclear yields in heavy-ion collisions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and coalescence-times extraction section] Abstract and the section describing extraction of coalescence times: the non-universal formation pattern and all predictions for 5_ΛHe and 5_ΛΛHe rest on species-dependent coalescence times that are determined by fitting rapidity distributions to STAR data for lighter clusters; the manuscript does not demonstrate independent validation or sensitivity analysis showing that these times are transferable rather than compensating for deficiencies in the PHQMD background or the coalescence implementation itself.
  2. [A=4 channels section] Section on A=4 formation channels: the claim that the additional cluster-nucleon channels improve the description of 4He and 4_ΛH yields is load-bearing for the assertion that extra channels address underestimation in theoretical approaches, yet no quantitative table or figure directly compares the baseline versus extended-channel yields against the same STAR data set.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation throughout] Ensure consistent notation for hypernuclear species (e.g., 5_ΛHe) across text, equations, and figures.
  2. [Wave-function construction paragraph] The abstract mentions systematic analysis of yields and kinematic distributions; a brief statement on the numerical convergence of the hyperspherical-harmonics wave functions would strengthen the parameter-free claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and coalescence-times extraction section] Abstract and the section describing extraction of coalescence times: the non-universal formation pattern and all predictions for 5_ΛHe and 5_ΛΛHe rest on species-dependent coalescence times that are determined by fitting rapidity distributions to STAR data for lighter clusters; the manuscript does not demonstrate independent validation or sensitivity analysis showing that these times are transferable rather than compensating for deficiencies in the PHQMD background or the coalescence implementation itself.

    Authors: The coalescence times are extracted by fitting the model rapidity distributions to the STAR data available for the lighter species (A ≤ 4). This procedure is the explicit method used to determine the formation times within the PHQMD + Wigner coalescence framework, and the resulting non-universality is a direct outcome of those fits. The A = 5 predictions are obtained by applying the same extracted times to the corresponding hypernuclear channels. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not contain an independent cross-validation (e.g., on additional observables or different collision energies) that would demonstrate transferability beyond the calibration data. A brief discussion of this assumption and its implications can be added in the revised manuscript, but a full sensitivity study would require substantial additional calculations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [A=4 channels section] Section on A=4 formation channels: the claim that the additional cluster-nucleon channels improve the description of 4He and 4_ΛH yields is load-bearing for the assertion that extra channels address underestimation in theoretical approaches, yet no quantitative table or figure directly compares the baseline versus extended-channel yields against the same STAR data set.

    Authors: We agree that a direct side-by-side comparison is needed to substantiate the improvement. In the revised manuscript we will include a table (or supplementary figure) that reports the yields of 4He and 4_ΛH obtained with the baseline coalescence channels versus the extended set of cluster-nucleon channels, both compared to the same STAR data points. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Coalescence times fitted to data for lighter species then applied to A=5 predictions

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "By comparing calculated rapidity distributions with STAR data, we extract species-dependent coalescence times, revealing a non-universal formation pattern among different clusters. [...] Finally, we provide predictions for heavier hypernuclei, including 5_ΛHe and 5_ΛΛHe"

    Coalescence times are adjusted to match data for lighter species; the same times then determine the calculated yields for unmeasured heavier hypernuclei, so those predictions incorporate the fitted parameters rather than being independent first-principles outputs.

full rationale

The Wigner distributions are constructed parameter-free from hyperspherical-harmonics solutions of the Schrödinger equation, which is independent content. However, species-dependent coalescence times are extracted by fitting rapidity distributions to STAR data for lighter clusters and then used to generate yields and distributions for A=4 and A=5 hypernuclei. This constitutes a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern for the extrapolated results, though the central wave-function claim remains non-circular and the times are not self-defined by the target observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the coalescence approximation for cluster formation and the accuracy of wave functions from the hyperspherical harmonics method; coalescence times are fitted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • species-dependent coalescence times
    Extracted by comparing calculated rapidity distributions to STAR data for different clusters.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Coalescence model accurately describes cluster formation in heavy-ion collisions
    The framework assumes coalescence is the dominant mechanism and that phase-space overlap determines yields.
  • domain assumption Hyperspherical harmonics solutions provide accurate N-body wave functions for light nuclei and hypernuclei
    Used to construct the Wigner distributions without additional parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5799 in / 1573 out tokens · 31843 ms · 2026-06-27T11:35:41.956306+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    snowballs in hell

    D. Oliinychenko, L.-G. Pang, H. Elfner, and V. Koch, Deuterons at LHC: “snowballs in hell” via hydrodynam- ics and hadronic afterburner, Phys. Rev. C99, 044907 (2019), arXiv:1809.03071 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Oliinychenko, C

    D. Oliinychenko, C. Shen, and V. Koch, Deuteron pro- duction in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 7–200 GeV via pion catalysis, Phys. Rev. C103, 034913 (2021), arXiv:2009.14681 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    J. Aichelin, “Quantum” molecular dynamics — A dy- namical microscopicn-body approach to investigate frag- ment formation and the nuclear equation of state in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rep.202, 233 (1991)

    1991

  4. [5]

    Gl¨ aßel, V

    S. Gl¨ aßel, V. Kireyeu, V. Voronyuk, J. Aichelin, 11 C. Blume, E. Bratkovskaya, G. Coci, V. Kolesnikov, and M. Winn, Cluster and hypercluster production in rela- tivistic heavy-ion collisions within the parton–hadron– quantum–molecular-dynamics approach, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014908 (2022)

    2022

  5. [6]

    G. Coci, S. Gl¨ asel, V. Kireyeu, J. Aichelin, C. Blume, E. Bratkovskaya, V. Kolesnikov, and V. Voronyuk, Dy- namical mechanisms for deuteron production at mid- rapidity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions from energies available at the GSI schwerionensynchrotron to those at the BNL relativistic heavy ion collider, Phys. Rev. C108, 014902 (2023)

    2023

  6. [7]

    Kireyeu, V

    V. Kireyeu, V. Voronyuk, M. Winn, S. Gl¨ asel, J. Aiche- lin, C. Blume, E. Bratkovskaya, G. Coci, and J. Zhao, Constraints on the equation of state from low-energy heavy-ion collisions within the PHQMD microscopic approach with momentum-dependent potential, arXiv preprint (2024), arXiv:2411.04969 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [8]

    Zhang, C

    L.-Y. Zhang, C. M. Ko, Y.-G. Ma, Q.-Y. Shou, K.- J. Sun, R. Wang, and S. Zhang, Shedding Light on (Anti-)nuclei Production with Pion-Nucleus Femtoscopy (2025), arXiv:2511.10298 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [9]

    M. I. Abdulhamid, B. E. Aboona, J. Adam, L. Adam- czyk, J. R. Adams, I. Aggarwal, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, E. C. Aschenauer, et al. (STAR), Produc- tion of protons and light nuclei in au+au collisions at√sN N = 3 gev with the star detector, Phys. Rev. C110, 054911 (2024)

    2024

  9. [10]

    M. S. A. et al. (STAR Collaboration), Measurements of 3 ΛH and 4 ΛH lifetimes and yields in au+au collisions in the high baryon density region, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 202301 (2022)

    2022

  10. [11]

    S. A. et al. (ALICE Collaboration), First measurement of a= 4 hypernuclei and antihypernuclei at the lhc, Physi- cal Review Letters134, 162301 (2025)

    2025

  11. [12]

    Collaboration, Measurement of 3 ΛH production in pb– pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 tev, Physics Letters B860, 139066 (2025)

    A. Collaboration, Measurement of 3 ΛH production in pb– pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 tev, Physics Letters B860, 139066 (2025)

    2025

  12. [13]

    T. A. Armstrong et al. (E864), Production of H- 3(Lambda) and H-4(Lambda) in central 11.5-GeV/c Au + Pt heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C70, 024902 (2004), arXiv:nucl-ex/0211010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [14]

    T. A. Armstrong et al. (E864), Measurements of light nuclei production in 11.5-A-GeV/c Au + Pb heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C61, 064908 (2000), arXiv:nucl- ex/0003009

    arXiv 2000

  14. [15]

    S. S. Adler et al. (PHENIX), Deuteron and antideuteron production in Au + Au collisions at √sN N = 200- GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 122302 (2005), arXiv:nucl- ex/0406004

    arXiv 2005

  15. [16]

    Abou Yassine et al

    R. Abou Yassine et al. (HADES), Formation and lifetime measurements of light hypernuclei in Ag+Ag collisions at√sNN = 2.55 GeV (2025), arXiv:2512.12454 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    STAR Collaboration, Light nuclei collectivity from√sN N = 3 gev au+au collisions at rhic, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136941 (2022)

    2022

  17. [18]

    B. E. A. et al. (STAR Collaboration), Observation of directed flow of hypernuclei 3 ΛH and 4 ΛH in √sN N = 3 gev au+au collisions at rhic, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 212301 (2023)

    2023

  18. [19]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement of the produc- tion and elliptic flow of (anti)nuclei in Xe-Xe collisions at sNN=5.44 TeV, Phys. Rev. C110, 064901 (2024), arXiv:2405.19826 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  19. [20]

    Adamczewski-Musch et al

    J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. (HADES), Directed, El- liptic, and Higher Order Flow Harmonics of Pro- tons, Deuterons, and Tritons in Au + Au Collisions at√sN N = 2.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 262301 (2020), arXiv:2005.12217 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  20. [21]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement of (anti)alpha production in central Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B858, 138943 (2024), arXiv:2311.11758 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [22]

    L. K. Liu, C. L. Hu, X. H. He, S. S. Shi, and G. N. Xie, Light and hyper nuclei formation at sNN= 3 GeV Au+Au collisions using Wigner coalescence approach, Phys. Lett. B855, 138853 (2024), arXiv:2404.13582 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [23]

    Scheibl and U

    R. Scheibl and U. W. Heinz, Coalescence and flow in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C59, 1585 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9809092

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [24]

    Sato and K

    H. Sato and K. Yazaki, On the coalescence model for high energy nuclear reactions, Physics Letters B98, 153 (1981)

    1981

  24. [25]

    Scheibl and U

    R. Scheibl and U. Heinz, Coalescence and flow in ultra- relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C59, 1585 (1999)

    1999

  25. [26]

    Bellini, K

    F. Bellini, K. Blum, A. P. Kalweit, and M. Puccio, Examination of coalescence as the origin of nuclei in hadronic collisions, Phys. Rev. C103, 014907 (2021), arXiv:2007.01750 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    Mahlein, B

    M. Mahlein, B. Singh, M. Viviani, F. Bellini, L. Fabbietti, A. Kievsky, and L. E. Marcucci, ToMCCA-3: A realistic 3-body coalescence model (2025), arXiv:2504.02491 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Y. H. Leung, Y. Zhou, and N. Herrmann, Data- guided coalescence model for production of light nu- clei and hypernuclei in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at√sN N = 3–200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C113, 034912 (2026), arXiv:2510.06758 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [29]

    K.-J. Sun, R. Wang, C. M. Ko, Y.-G. Ma, and C. Shen, Unveiling the dynamics of little-bang nucleosynthesis, Nature Commun.15, 1074 (2024), arXiv:2207.12532 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Shuryak and J

    E. Shuryak and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Light-nuclei pro- duction and search for the QCD critical point, Eur. Phys. J. A56, 241 (2020), arXiv:2005.14216 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [31]

    Friman, K

    B. Friman, K. Redlich, and A. Rustamov, Baselines for Abelian Charge Fluctuations in Nuclear Colli- sions:Theory and Comparison with Experimental Data (2025), arXiv:2508.18879 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Aichelin, E

    J. Aichelin, E. Bratkovskaya, A. Le F` evre, V. Kireyeu, V. Kolesnikov, Y. Leifels, V. Voronyuk, and G. Coci, Parton-hadron-quantum-molecular dynamics: A novel microscopicn-body transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, dynamical cluster formation, and hypernu- clei production, Phys. Rev. C101, 044905 (2020), arXiv:1907.03860 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  32. [33]

    Gl¨ aßel, V

    S. Gl¨ aßel, V. Kireyeu, V. Voronyuk, J. Aichelin, C. Blume, E. Bratkovskaya, G. Coci, V. Kolesnikov, and M. Winn, Cluster and hypercluster production in rel- ativistic heavy-ion collisions within the parton-hadron- quantum-molecular-dynamics approach, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014908 (2022), arXiv:2106.14839 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  33. [34]

    Kireyeu, J

    V. Kireyeu, J. Steinheimer, J. Aichelin, M. Bleicher, and E. Bratkovskaya, Deuteron production in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions: A comparison of the coalescence and the minimum spanning tree procedure, Phys. Rev. C105, 12 044909 (2022), arXiv:2201.13374 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [35]

    G. Coci, S. Gl¨ aßel, V. Kireyeu, J. Aichelin, C. Blume, E. Bratkovskaya, V. Kolesnikov, and V. Voronyuk, Dy- namical mechanisms for deuteron production at mid- rapidity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions from energies available at the GSI Schwerionensynchrotron to those at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C 108, 014902 (2023), arXiv:...

    arXiv 2023

  35. [36]

    Y. Zhou, S. Gl¨ aßel, Y.-H. Leung, V. Kireyeu, J. Zhao, H. Liu, C. Blume, I. Vassiliev, V. Voronyuk, et al., Prob- ing the nuclear equation of state with clusters and hy- pernuclei, Phys. Rev. C113, 014909 (2026)

    2026

  36. [37]

    Cassing and E

    W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Parton-Hadron- String Dynamics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies, Nucl. Phys. A831, 215 (2009), arXiv:0907.5331 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [38]

    STAR Collaboration, Disappearance of partonic collec- tivity in √sN N = 3 gev au+au collisions at rhic, Phys. Lett. B827, 137003 (2022)

    2022

  38. [39]

    J. Zhao, J. Aichelin, and E. Bratkovskaya, Wigner phase- space densities of nuclear clusters and hypernuclei, Phys. Rev. C112, 064902 (2025)

    2025

  39. [40]

    Barnea, W

    N. Barnea, W. Leidemann, and G. Orlandini, State de- pendent effective interaction for the hyperspherical for- malism, Phys. Rev. C61, 054001 (2000), arXiv:nucl- th/9910062

    arXiv 2000

  40. [41]

    L. E. Marcucci, J. Dohet-Eraly, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, A. Kievsky, and M. Viviani, The Hyperspherical Har- monics method: a tool for testing and improving nu- clear interaction models, Front. in Phys.8, 69 (2020), arXiv:1912.09751 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  41. [42]

    J. Zhao, S. Shi, and P. Zhuang, Fully-heavy tetraquarks in a strongly interacting medium, Phys. Rev. D102, 114001 (2020), arXiv:2009.10319 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    Bedjidian, A

    M. Bedjidian, A. Filipkowski, J. Grossiord, A. Guichard, M. Gusakow, S. Majewski, H. Piekarz, J. Piekarz, and J. Pizzi, Observation of aγtransition in the 4 ΛH hyper- nucleus, Physics Letters B62, 467 (1976)

    1976

  43. [44]

    Deltuva and A

    A. Deltuva and A. C. Fonseca, Four-nucleon scattering: Ab initio calculations in momentum space, Phys. Rev. C 75, 014005 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0611029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [45]

    R.-Q. Wang, J. Song, M.-Y. Wu, H.-T. Xue, and F.-L. Shao, Production of HΛ3, HΛ4, and HeΛ4 in different coalescence channels in Au-Au collisions at sNN=3 GeV, Phys. Rev. C112, 034908 (2025), arXiv:2504.13640 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR), Strangeness production in √sNN = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC, JHEP10, 139, arXiv:2407.10110 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv

  46. [47]

    Adamczyk, J

    L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, N. N. Ajitanand, I. Alek- seev, J. Alford, et al. (STAR Collaboration), Measure- ment of the 3 ΛH lifetime in au+au collisions at the bnl rel- ativistic heavy ion collider, Physical Review C97, 054909 (2018)

    2018

  47. [48]

    Juri´ c, G

    M. Juri´ c, G. Bohm, J. Klabuhn, U. Krecker, F. Wysotzki, G. Coremans-Bertrand, J. Sacton, G. Wil- quet, T. Cantwell, F. Esmael, A. Montwill, D. H. Davis, D. Kie lczewska, T. Pniewski, T. Tymieniecka, and J. Za- krzewski, A new determination of the binding-energy val- ues of the light hypernuclei (a≤15), Nuclear Physics B 52, 1 (1973)

    1973

  48. [49]

    J. G. Congleton, A simple model of the hypertriton, Jour- nal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics18, 339 (1992)

    1992

  49. [50]

    Kamada, J

    H. Kamada, J. Golak, K. Miyagawa, H. Wita la, and W. Gl¨ ockle,π-mesonic decay of the hypertriton, Phys- ical Review C57, 1595 (1998)

    1998

  50. [51]

    H. Outa, M. Aoki, R. S. Hayano, T. Ishikawa, M. Iwasaki, A. Sakaguchi, E. Takada, H. Tamura, and T. Yamazaki, Mesonic and non-mesonic decay widths of 4 ΛH and 4 ΛHe, Nuclear Physics A639, 251c (1998)

    1998