pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11060 · v1 · pith:MM5WF54Inew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Interplay between photon condensation and electron-electron interactions in molecular systems

Matteo Parisi , Elisabetta Paladino , Giuseppe A. Falci , Gian Marcello Andolina , Salvatore Savasta , Marco Polini , Francesco M. D. Pellegrino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords photon condensationVan Vleck mechanismHubbard repulsionphase transition ordermolecular plaquettescavity QEDmagnetostatic instabilitypolaritonic excitations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron-electron interactions can turn photon condensation into a first-order transition for most fillings in molecular plaquettes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines electrons on square planar plaquettes governed by a tight-binding Hamiltonian plus on-site Hubbard repulsion, coupled to a spatially nonuniform cavity mode. It shows that photon condensation arises as a magnetostatic instability from the paramagnetic Van Vleck mechanism. For generic electron fillings the Hubbard term allows the transition to become first-order, while half-filling and single-electron cases remain second-order if the transition occurs at all. Polaritonic excitation energies supply spectroscopic signatures that distinguish the order of the instability.

Core claim

Except for the special cases of half-filling and single electron, where the transition, if it occurs, is necessarily a second order phase transition, the global system may also undergo a first order transition because of the action of the electron-electron interaction. The polaritonic excitation energies are analyzed, providing clear spectroscopic signatures of the magnetostatic instability and of its order.

What carries the argument

Minimal model of Hubbard-interacting electrons on square planar plaquettes coupled to a spatially nonuniform cavity mode, where the Van Vleck paramagnetic mechanism produces the magnetostatic instability whose order depends on filling factor.

If this is right

  • Photon condensation occurs via the Van Vleck paramagnetic mechanism in the cavity-coupled molecular system.
  • The order of the transition is controlled by the electronic filling factor through the Hubbard repulsion term.
  • Polaritonic excitation energies exhibit distinct signatures that reveal both the presence and the order of the magnetostatic instability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cavity-modified molecular devices could exploit abrupt first-order switches in optical response at generic fillings.
  • Similar filling-dependent transition orders may appear in other lattice geometries under nonuniform cavity coupling.
  • Spectroscopic detection of polariton mode softening could serve as a practical diagnostic in cavity QED experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetostatic instability originates from the paramagnetic Van Vleck mechanism when the system couples to a spatially nonuniform cavity mode.

What would settle it

A discontinuous jump versus a continuous change in the lowest polaritonic energy or order parameter versus cavity coupling strength, observed at non-special fillings, would confirm first-order character.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11060 by Elisabetta Paladino, Francesco M. D. Pellegrino, Gian Marcello Andolina, Giuseppe A. Falci, Marco Polini, Matteo Parisi, Salvatore Savasta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. a) Low energy spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The lowest eigenenergy, for a square molecular pla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Photon condensation of square molecular plaquettes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Photonic order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Photon condensation of square molecular plaquettes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The energy functionals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Four lowest polaritonic energies as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a minimal molecular model consisting of square planar plaquettes hosting multiple electrons, whose dynamics is governed by a tight-binding Hamiltonian supplemented by on-site Hubbard repulsion. By coupling this system to a spatially nonuniform cavity mode, we analyze the emergence of a magnetostatic instability, namely photon condensation, originating from the paramagnetic Van Vleck mechanism. The global behavior of the system is analyzed for different electronic filling factors, and we find that, except for the special cases of half-filling and single electron, where the transition, if it occurs, is necessarily a second order phase transition, the global system may also undergo a first order transition because of the action of the electron-electron interaction. The polaritonic excitation energies are analyzed, providing clear spectroscopic signatures of the magnetostatic instability and of its order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a minimal model of square planar plaquettes with tight-binding hopping and on-site Hubbard repulsion U, coupled to a spatially nonuniform cavity mode. It claims that a magnetostatic instability (photon condensation) arises via the paramagnetic Van Vleck mechanism, that the transition is second-order at half-filling and single-electron cases but can become first-order for other fillings due to electron-electron interactions, and that polaritonic excitation energies furnish spectroscopic signatures of the instability and its order.

Significance. If the central derivation of the instability is robust, the work would clarify how cavity-induced paramagnetic contributions compete with Hubbard correlations to control the order of photon condensation transitions in molecular systems, with potential relevance to cavity QED materials and spectroscopic diagnostics.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (or equivalent section deriving the effective photon Hamiltonian): the emergence of a negative photon mass or instability from the Van Vleck paramagnetic term alone must be shown explicitly to survive the inclusion of the diamagnetic A² contribution; standard light-matter treatments indicate the latter can cancel or reverse the paramagnetic effect, and the nonuniform mode introduces additional gauge considerations that require explicit verification.
  2. [§4] §4 (analysis of filling factors and transition order): the claim that electron-electron interactions drive a first-order transition for generic fillings rests on the prior existence of the instability; if the diamagnetic cancellation occurs, the first-order regime and its spectroscopic signatures would need re-derivation.
  3. [Eq. (cavity mode definition)] Eq. (defining the cavity mode or effective mass term): the modeling of the spatially nonuniform mode must be shown to avoid unphysical gauge artifacts while still yielding a net paramagnetic instability; the manuscript should provide the explicit form of the vector potential and the resulting matrix elements.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the polaritonic modes and filling factors should be unified across figures and text to avoid ambiguity in the phase diagrams.
  2. The abstract states the transition 'may also undergo a first order transition'; the main text should clarify the precise parameter window (U, filling) where this occurs versus where it remains second-order.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below. We agree that explicit verification of the diamagnetic term and gauge properties is required for robustness and will revise the manuscript to include these calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (or equivalent section deriving the effective photon Hamiltonian): the emergence of a negative photon mass or instability from the Van Vleck paramagnetic term alone must be shown explicitly to survive the inclusion of the diamagnetic A² contribution; standard light-matter treatments indicate the latter can cancel or reverse the paramagnetic effect, and the nonuniform mode introduces additional gauge considerations that require explicit verification.

    Authors: We agree that the diamagnetic A² term must be treated explicitly. Our §3 derivation isolates the paramagnetic Van Vleck contribution as the source of the instability for the chosen nonuniform mode, but we acknowledge that a complete effective Hamiltonian requires both terms. In the revision we will add an explicit calculation of the full photon mass (paramagnetic plus diamagnetic) and demonstrate that the negative mass survives for the model parameters and mode profile. We will also include the gauge-fixing procedure and verify that no unphysical artifacts arise from the spatial nonuniformity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (analysis of filling factors and transition order): the claim that electron-electron interactions drive a first-order transition for generic fillings rests on the prior existence of the instability; if the diamagnetic cancellation occurs, the first-order regime and its spectroscopic signatures would need re-derivation.

    Authors: The filling-dependent analysis in §4 is conditional on the instability derived in §3. Once the revised §3 confirms (or modifies) the conditions under which the instability persists after inclusion of the diamagnetic term, we will re-examine the first-order regime and the associated polaritonic signatures for the affected fillings. If the instability survives, the reported distinction between half-filling/single-electron cases and generic fillings remains; otherwise the relevant sections will be updated accordingly. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Eq. (cavity mode definition)] Eq. (defining the cavity mode or effective mass term): the modeling of the spatially nonuniform mode must be shown to avoid unphysical gauge artifacts while still yielding a net paramagnetic instability; the manuscript should provide the explicit form of the vector potential and the resulting matrix elements.

    Authors: We will add the explicit expression for the vector potential of the nonuniform cavity mode together with the computed paramagnetic and diamagnetic matrix elements. This addition will make transparent that the chosen mode profile produces a net paramagnetic instability without introducing gauge artifacts, consistent with the minimal molecular model employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation is model-driven and self-contained.

full rationale

The paper constructs a minimal tight-binding plus Hubbard model for square plaquettes, couples it to a nonuniform cavity mode, and derives the magnetostatic instability and its order (first vs second) directly from the resulting Hamiltonian for varying fillings. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation; the polaritonic spectra are computed from the same microscopic model. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger based solely on abstract description of the minimal model; no full details or equations available for exhaustive audit.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard repulsion strength U
    On-site repulsion parameter varied to analyze effects on transition order.
  • electron filling factor
    Number of electrons per plaquette, analyzed across different values to identify special cases.
axioms (3)
  • standard math Tight-binding Hamiltonian governs electron dynamics
    Standard for molecular hopping in plaquettes.
  • domain assumption On-site Hubbard repulsion supplements the Hamiltonian
    Common interaction term for electron-electron repulsion.
  • domain assumption Coupling to spatially nonuniform cavity mode induces Van Vleck instability
    Assumed mechanism for photon condensation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1399 out tokens · 30273 ms · 2026-06-27T11:49:04.596196+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1 (2021). 20

    2021

  3. [3]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature 606, 41–48 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    and Ciuti, Cristiano and Ebbesen, Thomas W., Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Francisco J. and Ciuti, Cristiano and Ebbesen, Thomas W., Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, F. Appugliese, E. Richter, F. Valmorra, J. Keller, M. Beck, N. Bartolo, C. R¨ ossler, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Ciuti, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Magneto-transport controlled by Landau polariton states, Nature Physics15, 186 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic, P. Prelovˇ sek, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to- insulator transition in 1T-TaS2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Chiriac` o, Thermal Purcell effect and cavity-induced renormalization of dissipations, Phys

    G. Chiriac` o, Thermal Purcell effect and cavity-induced renormalization of dissipations, Phys. Rev. B110, L161107 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Science Advances4, eaau6969 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity Quantum Eliashberg Enhance- ment of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- Mediated Electron-Photon Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    G. M. Andolina, A. De Pasquale, F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, F. H. L. Koppens, and M. Polini, Amperean superconductivity cannot be induced by deep subwave- length cavities in a two-dimensional material, Phys. Rev. B109, 104513 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. de Giovan- nini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO 3: Cavity materials engineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118, e2105618118 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. m. c. ˙Imamo˘ glu, J. Faist, D. Jaksch, A. Cavalleri, and E. Demler, Quantum Electrodynamic Control of Matter: Cavity-Enhanced Ferroelectric Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. X10, 041027 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum Hall systems, Phys

    C. Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B104, 155307 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Chiocchetta, D

    A. Chiocchetta, D. Kiese, C. P. Zelle, F. Piazza, and S. Diehl, Cavity-induced quantum spin liquids, Nature Communications12, 5901 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir` o, Controlling topological phases of matter with quantum light, Communications Physics5, 271 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Bacciconi, G

    Z. Bacciconi, G. M. Andolina, and C. Mora, Topological protection of Majorana polaritons in a cavity, Phys. Rev. B109, 165434 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Winter and O

    L. Winter and O. Zilberberg, Fractional quantum Hall edge polaritons, Phys. Rev. B112, L241105 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke Model: From Equilibrium to Nonequilibrium, and Vice Versa, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies2(2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Baumann, Kristian and Guerlin, Christine and Bren- necke, Ferdinand and Esslinger, Tilman, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  24. [24]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports93, 301 (1982)

    1982

  25. [25]

    G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, V. Giovannetti, A. H. MacDonald, and M. Polini, Cavity quantum elec- trodynamics of strongly correlated electron systems: A no-go theorem for photon condensation, Phys. Rev. B 100, 121109 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Annals of Physics76, 360–404 (1973)

    1973

  27. [27]

    Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase Transition in the Dicke Model of Superradiance, Physical Review A7, 831–836 (1973)

    1973

  28. [28]

    Jaako, Z.-L

    T. Jaako, Z.-L. Xiang, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, and P. Rabl, Ultrastrong-coupling phenomena beyond the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A94, 033850 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Hagenm¨ uller and C

    D. Hagenm¨ uller and C. Ciuti, Cavity QED of the Graphene Cyclotron Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 267403 (2012)

    2012

  30. [30]

    F. M. D. Pellegrino, L. Chirolli, R. Fazio, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Theory of integer quantum Hall polaritons in graphene, Phys. Rev. B89, 165406 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    Chirolli, M

    L. Chirolli, M. Polini, V. Giovannetti, and A. H. Mac- Donald, Drude Weight, Cyclotron Resonance, and the Dicke Model of Graphene Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267404 (2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Bamba, K

    M. Bamba, K. Inomata, and Y. Nakamura, Superradiant Phase Transition in a Superconducting Circuit in Ther- mal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 173601 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    G. C. Duncan, Effect of antiresonant atom-field interac- tions on phase transitions in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A9, 418 (1974)

    1974

  34. [34]

    Rza˙ zewski, K

    K. Rza˙ zewski, K. W´ odkiewicz, and W.˙Zakowicz, Phase transitions, two-level atoms, and theA 2 term, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 432 (1975)

    1975

  35. [35]

    Bialynicki-Birula and K

    I. Bialynicki-Birula and K. Rza ¸ ˙ zewski, No-go theorem concerning the superradiant phase transition in atomic systems, Phys. Rev. A19, 301 (1979)

    1979

  36. [36]

    Gaw¸ edzki and K

    K. Gaw¸ edzki and K. Rza ¸ ´ zewski, No-go theorem for the superradiant phase transition without dipole approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. A23, 2134 (1981)

    1981

  37. [37]

    G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, V. Giovannetti, A. H. MacDonald, and M. Polini, Theory of photon con- densation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field, Physical Review B102(2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Nataf, T

    P. Nataf, T. Champel, G. Blatter, and D. M. Basko, Rashba Cavity QED: A Route Towards the Superradi- ant Quantum Phase Transition, Physical Review Letters 123(2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Guerci, P

    D. Guerci, P. Simon, and C. Mora, Superradiant Phase 21 Transition in Electronic Systems and Emergent Topolog- ical Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 257604 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Guerci, P

    D. Guerci, P. Simon, and C. Mora, Moir´ e lattice effects on the orbital magnetic response of twisted bilayer graphene and Condon instability, Phys. Rev. B103, 224436 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Rom´ an-Roche, F

    J. Rom´ an-Roche, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Photon Conden- sation and Enhanced Magnetism in Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 167201 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Manzanares, T

    G. Manzanares, T. Champel, D. M. Basko, and P. Nataf, Superradiant quantum phase transition for Landau po- laritons with Rashba and Zeeman couplings, Phys. Rev. B105, 245304 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    J. H. Condon, Nonlinear de Haas-van Alphen Effect and Magnetic Domains in Beryllium, Phys. Rev.145, 526 (1966)

    1966

  44. [44]

    C. J. Eckhardt, G. Passetti, M. Othman, C. Karrasch, F. Cavaliere, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Quan- tum Floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight- binding chain in a cavity, Commun. Phys.5, 122 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Bacciconi, G

    Z. Bacciconi, G. M. Andolina, T. Chanda, G. Chiriac` o, M. Schir` o, and M. Dalmonte, First-order photon conden- sation in magnetic cavities: A two-leg ladder model, Sci- Post Phys.15, 113 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    De Bernardis, P

    D. De Bernardis, P. Pilar, T. Jaako, S. De Liberato, and P. Rabl, Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong- coupling cavity QED, Physical Review A98(2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Di Stefano, A

    O. Di Stefano, A. Settineri, V. Macr` ı, L. Garziano, R. Stassi, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity quantum elec- trodynamics, Nature Physics15, 803–808 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Savasta, O

    S. Savasta, O. Di Stefano, A. Settineri, D. Zueco, S. Hughes, and F. Nori, Gauge principle and gauge in- variance in two-level systems, Physical Review A103 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, A. Mercurio, O. Di Stefano, M. Polini, and S. Savasta, A non- perturbative no-go theorem for photon condensation in approximate models, The European Physical Journal Plus137(2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    J. Li, D. Golez, G. Mazza, A. J. Millis, A. Georges, and M. Eckstein, Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter, Phys. Rev. B101, 205140 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir´ o, Gauge fixing for strongly correlated electrons coupled to quantum light, Phys. Rev. B103, 075131 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    J. M. Luttinger, The Effect of a Magnetic Field on Elec- trons in a Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev.84, 814 (1951)

    1951

  53. [53]

    Kohn, Theory of Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field: The Effective Hamiltonian, Phys

    W. Kohn, Theory of Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field: The Effective Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev.115, 1460 (1959)

    1959

  54. [54]

    A. S. Alexandrov and H. Capellmann, Orbital diamag- netism of two-dimensional electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 365 (1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    Graf and P

    M. Graf and P. Vogl, Electromagnetic fields and dielectric response in empirical tight-binding theory, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4940 (1995)

    1995

  56. [56]

    T. B. Boykin, Tight-binding-like expressions for the continuous-space electromagnetic coupling Hamiltonian, American Journal of Physics69, 793 (2001)

    2001

  57. [57]

    Iba˜ nez Azpiroz, A

    J. Iba˜ nez Azpiroz, A. Eiguren, A. Bergara, G. Pettini, and M. Modugno, Breakdown of the Peierls substitution for the Haldane model with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A90, 033609 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    E. C. S., The Theory of Electric and Magnetic Suscepti- bilities, Nature130, 490–491 (1932)

    1932

  59. [59]

    Grosso and G

    G. Grosso and G. Pastori Parravicini,Solid State Physics (Elsevier, United States, 2014)

    2014

  60. [60]

    Mercurio, G

    A. Mercurio, G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, O. Di Stefano, P. Jarillo-Herrero, C. Felser, F. H. L. Kop- pens, S. Savasta, and M. Polini, Photon condensation, Van Vleck paramagnetism, and chiral cavities, Physical Review Research6(2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many–Body Quantum The- ory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction(Ox- ford University PressOxford, 2004)

    2004

  62. [62]

    Nataf and C

    P. Nataf and C. Ciuti, No-go theorem for superradiant quantum phase transitions in cavity QED and counter- example in circuit QED, Nature Communications1, 72 (2010)

    2010

  63. [63]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2010)

    2010

  64. [64]

    C. P. Koch, J. P. Palao, R. Kosloff, and F. m. c. Masnou- Seeuws, Stabilization of ultracold molecules using opti- mal control theory, Phys. Rev. A70, 013402 (2004)

    2004

  65. [65]

    Klein, Y

    A. Klein, Y. Shagam, W. Skomorowski, P. S. ˙Zuchowski, M. Pawlak, L. M. C. Janssen, N. Moiseyev, S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, A. van der Avoird, C. P. Koch, and E. Narevicius, Directly probing anisotropy in atom–molecule collisions through quantum scattering resonances, Nature Physics13, 35–38 (2016)

    2016

  66. [66]

    D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garc´ ıa, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, Polariton panorama, Nanophotonics10, 549–577 (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    Fregoni, F

    J. Fregoni, F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, and J. Feist, Theoretical Challenges in Polaritonic Chemistry, ACS Photonics9, 1096–1107 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    T. W. Ebbesen, A. Rubio, and G. D. Scholes, Intro- duction: Polaritonic Chemistry, Chemical Reviews123, 12037–12038 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, J

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, J. Feist, E. Gonzalo Bad´ ıa, E. Moreno, and F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Uncoupled Dark States Can Inherit Polaritonic Properties, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 156402 (2016)

    2016

  70. [70]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical Advances in Polariton Chemistry and Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrody- namics, Chemical Reviews123, 9786–9879 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    Hirai, J

    K. Hirai, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, Molecular Chem- istry in Cavity Strong Coupling, Chemical Reviews123, 8099–8126 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    B. Gu, Y. Gu, V. Y. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Cav- ity Control of Molecular Spectroscopy and Photophysics, Accounts of Chemical Research56, 2753–2762 (2023)

    2023

  73. [73]

    Xiang and W

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, Molecular Polaritons for Chem- istry, Photonics and Quantum Technologies, Chemical Reviews124, 2512–2552 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Mart´ ınez-Mart´ ınez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polari- ton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with op- tical cavities, Chemical Science9, 6325–6339 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    T. T. Heikkil¨ a,The Physics of Nanoelectronics: Trans- port and Fluctuation Phenomena at Low Temperatures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013)

    2013

  76. [76]

    H. Lin, J. Gubernatis, H. Gould, and J. Tobochnik, Exact Diagonalization Methods for Quantum Systems, Com- puters in Physics7, 400–407 (1993). 22

    1993

  77. [77]

    Honet, L

    A. Honet, L. Henrard, and V. Meunier, Exact and many- body perturbation solutions of the Hubbard model ap- plied to linear chains, AIP Advances12(2022)

    2022

  78. [78]

    Sharma and M

    M. Sharma and M. Ahsan, Organization of the Hilbert space for exact diagonalization of Hubbard model, Com- puter Physics Communications193, 19–29 (2015)

    2015

  79. [79]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13, 239–274 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    Tasaki, The Hubbard model - an introduction and selected rigorous results, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter10, 4353–4378 (1998)

    H. Tasaki, The Hubbard model - an introduction and selected rigorous results, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter10, 4353–4378 (1998)

    1998

Showing first 80 references.