pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12264 · v2 · pith:DMIL5NSPnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

The Confined beta-Soft rotor model in rare-earth nuclei

Jim A. Papadopoulos , T.J. Mertzimekis , P. Koseoglou , P. Vasileiou , Dennis Bonatsos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords confined beta-soft rotorrare-earth nucleinuclear collective modelB(E2) transitionsbeta bandeven-even nucleiR4/2 ratioX(5) symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

The confined beta-soft rotor model reproduces ground-state energies, B(E2) rates, and beta-band excitations in even-even rare-earth nuclei where the R4/2 ratio lies between 2.904 and 3.333.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the confined beta-soft rotor model to even-even nuclei in the rare-earth region. It calculates energies of ground-state bands, B(E2) transition rates, and excitations in beta bands. Results are compared to experimental data, with predictions made for unobserved quantities. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a practical collective description for nuclei in the transitional regime between the X(5) critical point and the rigid rotor limit.

Core claim

The confined beta-soft rotor model bridges the X(5) critical point symmetry and the rigid rotor limit for nuclei where the ratio of the first 4+ to 2+ state energies lies between 2.904 and 3.333. When applied to rare-earth nuclei, it yields calculated ground-state band energies, B(E2) values, and beta-band excitations that agree with available data and allow predictions for unmeasured observables.

What carries the argument

The Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model, which parametrizes beta-vibration confinement to interpolate between the X(5) critical point and the rigid rotor.

If this is right

  • Systematic comparison shows agreement between CBS predictions and experimental ground-state band energies and B(E2) rates.
  • Beta-band excitations are calculated and can be compared to data where available.
  • Predictions are provided for nuclear observables that have not yet been measured.
  • The results offer guidance for future experimental investigations in the rare-earth region.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model may serve as a quick classifier for nuclei in the transitional deformation window without full microscopic calculations.
  • Significant mismatches with new data could indicate where gamma degrees of freedom or other effects need inclusion.
  • The predictions supply concrete targets that experiments can use to test the model's range of validity.

Load-bearing premise

The confined beta-soft rotor model remains an accurate description for rare-earth nuclei whose R4/2 ratio lies between 2.904 and 3.333.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the 4+ energy level or a B(E2) transition strength in a rare-earth nucleus with R4/2 in the stated range that deviates substantially from the CBS calculation.

read the original abstract

Contemporary theoretical descriptions of nuclear structure rely mainly on microscopic, single-particle frameworks often in competition with collective degrees of freedom, especially when deformation plays a dominant role. Such phenomena are prominent in the rare-earth region, where rotational band structures and enhanced electric quadrupole transitions are systematically examined. The Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model, introduced by N. Pietralla and O.M. Gorbachenko, bridges the gap between the X(5) critical point and the rigid-rotor limit in the region where the R_4/2 = E(4+)/E(2+) ratio lies between 2.904 and 3.333. In the present work, the CBS framework is employed to calculate ground-state band energies, associated B(E2) transition rates, and beta-band excitations of even-even nuclei in the rare-earth region. The theoretical results are systematically compared with available experimental data, and predictions are provided for nuclear observables that have not yet been measured, offering guidance for future experimental investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the pre-existing Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model (Pietralla and Gorbachenko) to even-even rare-earth nuclei with 2.904 < R_{4/2} < 3.333. It computes ground-state band energies, B(E2) transition rates, and beta-band excitations, performs systematic comparisons to experimental data, and supplies predictions for unmeasured observables.

Significance. If the data comparisons hold, the work supplies a systematic test of the CBS framework across the X(5)-to-rigid-rotor interval in a deformation-dominated region. The emphasis on collective observables and the provision of falsifiable predictions for future experiments constitute clear strengths for nuclear-structure phenomenology.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the applicability window is stated as lying between 2.904 and 3.333; clarify whether the bounds are inclusive and list the specific nuclei (or at least the count) examined so readers can immediately gauge the scope of the comparison.
  2. The manuscript should explicitly state whether any CBS parameters are adjusted to the present data set or whether all calculations use the original, fixed CBS values; this directly affects the interpretation of the agreement with experiment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The report correctly summarizes the scope of the work as a systematic application of the CBS rotor model to even-even rare-earth nuclei in the specified R_{4/2} range, with comparisons to data and predictions for unmeasured observables. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: application of pre-existing external model

full rationale

The paper applies the Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model, introduced by Pietralla and Gorbachenko (distinct authors), to compute ground-state band energies, B(E2) rates, and beta-band excitations for selected rare-earth nuclei within the stated R_{4/2} window. It then performs direct comparisons to experimental data and offers predictions for unmeasured observables. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce the central results to self-defined quantities, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the model framework and its applicability range are imported from prior independent work, and the comparisons serve as external tests rather than internal re-derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the model itself is referenced to prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1212 out tokens · 29828 ms · 2026-06-30T11:31:03.119504+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Hamamoto, B

    I. Hamamoto, B. Mottelson, Shape deformations in atomic nuclei, Scholarpedia 7 (2012) 10693. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.10693

    work page doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.10693 2012

  2. [2]

    Litvinova, Recent advancements in the strongly coupled many-body problem, arXiv (2025)

    E. Litvinova, Recent advancements in the strongly coupled many-body problem, arXiv (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.23644

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.23644 2025

  3. [3]

    Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, fphy 8 (2020) 379

    H. Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, fphy 8 (2020) 379. doi:10. 3389/fphy.2020.00379

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Ekström, C

    A. Ekström, C. Forssén, T. Papenbrock, et al., What isab initioin nuclear theory?, fphy 11 (2023) 1129094. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094 2023

  5. [5]

    Iachello, Dynamic symmetries at the critical point, Phys

    F. Iachello, Dynamic symmetries at the critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3580–3583. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3580

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3580 2000

  6. [6]

    Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys

    F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 052502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.052502 2001

  7. [7]

    Cejnar, J

    P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2155–2212. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2155 2010

  8. [8]

    βexcitation

    N. Pietralla, O. M. Gorbachenko, Evolution of the “βexcitation” in axially symmetric transitional nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004, 011304). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.011304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.011304 2004

  9. [9]

    Reese, CBS model program,https://sourceforge.net/projects/cbsmodel/, 2011

    M. Reese, CBS model program,https://sourceforge.net/projects/cbsmodel/, 2011

    2011

  10. [10]

    P. E. Garrett, Characterization of theβvibration and0 + 2 states in deformed nuclei, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 27 (2001) R1–R29. URL:https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0954-3899/27/1/201. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/27/1/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/27/1/201 2001

  11. [11]

    Sharpey-Schafer, R

    J. Sharpey-Schafer, R. Bark, S. Bvumbi, E. Lawrie, J. Lawrie, T. Madiba, S. Majola, A. Minkova, S. Mullins, P. Papka, D. Roux, J. Timár, A double vacuum, configuration dependent pairing and lack ofβ-vibrations in transitional nuclei: Band structure of N = 88 to N = 91 nuclei, Nu- clear Physics A 834 (2010) 45c–49c. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.01.014 2010

  12. [12]

    Sharpey-Schafer, R

    J. Sharpey-Schafer, R. Bark, S. Bvumbi, T. Dinoko, S. Majola, “stiff” deformed nuclei, configu- ration dependent pairing and theβandγdegrees of freedom, The European Physical Journal A 55 (2019) 15

    2019

  13. [13]

    Aprahamian, K

    A. Aprahamian, K. Lee, S. R. Lesher and R. Bijker, The nature of 0+ excitations in deformed nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 143 (2025, 104173). doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025. 104173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025 2025

  14. [14]

    Dusling, N

    K. Dusling, N. Pietralla, Description of ground-state band energies in well-deformed even-even nu- clei with the confinedβ-soft rotor model, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 011303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 72.011303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 2005

  15. [15]

    Bohr, The Coupling of Nuclear Surface Oscillations to the Motion of Individual Nucleons, Det Kgl

    A. Bohr, The Coupling of Nuclear Surface Oscillations to the Motion of Individual Nucleons, Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Matematisk-fysiske meddelelser, Komm. Munksgaard, 1952. URL:https://books.google.gr/books?id=A8QTtQEACAAJ

    1952

  16. [16]

    A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, World Scientific, New York, 1997

    1997

  17. [17]

    A. Bohr, B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Volume II: Nuclear Deformations, W.A. Benjamin, 1975

    1975

  18. [18]

    Solutions of the Bohr hamiltonian, a compendium

    L. Fortunato, Solutions of the Bohr Hamiltonian, a compendium, Eur. Phys. J. A 26S1 (2005) 1–30. doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-07-115-8.arXiv:nucl-th/0411087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-07-115-8.arxiv:nucl-th/0411087 2005

  19. [19]

    Bonatsos, P

    D. Bonatsos, P. E. Georgoudis, D. Lenis, N. Minkov, C. Quesne, Bohr hamiltonian with a deformation-dependent mass term for the davidson potential, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011). doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.044321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.044321 2011

  20. [20]

    Buganu, L

    P. Buganu, L. Fortunato, Recent approaches to quadrupole collectivity: models, solutions and applications based on the Bohr hamiltonian, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43 (2016) 093003. URL:https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003. doi:10. 1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003 2016

  21. [21]

    J. A. Papadopoulos, T. J. Mertzimekis, P. Koseoglou, D. Bonatsos, P. Vasileiou, M. Efstathiou, Investigation of the Yb and W Isotopic Chains using the Confinedβ-Soft Rotor Model, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 32 (2026) 107–112. doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.8764. 17

    work page doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.8764 2026

  22. [22]

    Kocheva, K

    D. Kocheva, K. A. Gladnishki, A. Blazhev, et al., Lifetimes and electromagnetic transition strengths in Er, Eur. Phys. J. A 62 (2026) 18. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01778-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01778-0 2026

  23. [23]

    NUDAT, National Nuclear Data Center, online.https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/

  24. [24]

    S. Basu, A. Sonzogni, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=150, Nucl. Data Sheets 114 (2013) 435–660. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2013.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2013.04.001 2013

  25. [25]

    Martin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=152, Nucl

    M. Martin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=152, Nucl. Data Sheets 114 (2013) p. 1497–1847. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2013.11.001

    2013

  26. [26]

    Nica, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=154, Nuclear Data Sheets 200 (2025) 2–524

    N. Nica, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=154, Nuclear Data Sheets 200 (2025) 2–524. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2025.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2025.02.002 2025

  27. [27]

    Iimura, J

    H. Iimura, J. Katakura, S. Ohya, Nuclear data sheets for A = 126, Nucl. Data Sheets 180 (2022) 1–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2022.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.02.001 2022

  28. [28]

    Elekes, J

    Z. Elekes, J. Timar, Nuclear data sheets for A = 128, Nuclear Data Sheets 129 (2015) 191–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.09.002 2015

  29. [29]

    Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=156, Nucl

    C. Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=156, Nucl. Data Sheets 113 (2012) 2537–2840. doi:10.1016/ j.nds.2012.10.003

    2012

  30. [33]

    Singh, J

    B. Singh, J. Chen, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=164, Nucl. Data Sheets 147 (2018). doi:10.1016/ j.nds.2018.01.001

    2018

  31. [34]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=166, Nucl. Data Sheets 109 (2008) 1103–1382. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2008.04.001

    2008

  32. [35]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=168, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 (2010) 1807 – 2080. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2010.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2010.07.001 2010

  33. [36]

    Baglin, E

    C. Baglin, E. McCutchan, S. Basunia, E. Browne, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=170, Nucl. Data Sheets 153 (2018) 1–494. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.11.001. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.11.001 2018

  34. [37]

    Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=172, Nucl

    B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=172, Nucl. Data Sheets 75 (1995) 199 – 376. doi:10.1006/ ndsh.1995.1025

    work page arXiv 1995

  35. [38]

    Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=176, Nucl

    M. Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=176, Nucl. Data Sheets 107 (2006) p. 791–1026. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2006.03.001

    2006

  36. [39]

    Achterberg, O

    E. Achterberg, O. A. Capurro, G. V. Marti, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=178, Nucl. Data Sheets 110 (2009) 1473 – 1688. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2009.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2009.05.002 2009

  37. [40]

    E. A. McCutchan, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=180, Nucl. Data Sheets 126 (2015) 151 – 372. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.05.002 2015

  38. [41]

    Comput- ers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6, 100234

    B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=182, Nucl. Data Sheets 130 (2015) 21–126. doi:10.1016/j. nds.2015.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2015

  39. [42]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=184, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 (2010) 275–523. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2010.01.001

    2010

  40. [43]

    Batchelder, A

    J. Batchelder, A. Hurst, M. Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=186, Nucl. Data Sheets 183 (2022) 1–346. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.06.001 2022

  41. [44]

    Kondev, S

    F. Kondev, S. Juutinen, D. Hartley, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=188, Nucl. Data Sheets 150 (2018) 1–364. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.05.001 2018

  42. [45]

    Singh, J

    B. Singh, J. Chen, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=190, Nucl. Data Sheets 169 (2020) 1–390. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2020.10.001

    2020

  43. [46]

    Pritychenko, M

    B. Pritychenko, M. Birch, B. Singh, M. Horoi, Tables of E2 transition probabilities from the first 2+ states in even–even nuclei, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 107 (2016) 1–139. doi:10.1016/j.adt. 2015.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt 2016

  44. [47]

    C. W. Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=154, Nucl. Data Sheets 110 (2009) 2257–2532. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2009.09.001

    2009

  45. [48]

    R. L. Canavan, M. Rudigier, P. H. Regan, M. Lebois, J. N. Wilson, N. Jovancevic, P.-A. Söderström, S. M. Collins, D. Thisse, J. Benito, S. Bottoni, M. Brunet, N. Cieplicka-Oryńczak, S. Courtin, D. T. Doherty, L. M. Fraile, K. Hadyńska-Klęk, G. Häfner, M. Heine, L. W. Iskra, V. Karayonchev, A. Kennington, P. Koseoglou, G. Lotay, G. Lorusso, M. Nakhostin, C...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.024313 2020

  46. [49]

    Petkov, A

    P. Petkov, A. Dewald, O. Möller, I. Deloncle, R. Chapman, S. Pascu, D. Bucurescu, D. Tonev, M. Reese, C. Fransen, S. Araddad, G. Asova, J. Copnell, N. Goutev, M. Hackstein, J. Jolie, J. Lisle, J. Mo, T. Pissulla, W. Rother, A. Smith, C. Tenereiro, D. Thompson, K. Zell, On the quadrupole collectivity in the yrast band of168Yb, Nucl. Phys. A 957 (2017) 240–...

    2017

  47. [50]

    Karayonchev, J.-M

    V. Karayonchev, J.-M. Régis, J. Jolie, A. Blazhev, R. Altenkirch, S. Ansari, M. Dannhoff, F. Diel, A. Esmaylzadeh, C. Fransen, R.-B. Gerst, K. Moschner, C. Müller-Gatermann, N. Saed-Samii, S. Stegemann, N. Warr, K. O. Zell, Evolution of collectivity in then= 100isotones near170Yb, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 034316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.034316 2017

  48. [51]

    Rudigier, K

    M. Rudigier, K. Nomura, M. Dannhoff, R.-B. Gerst, J. Jolie, N. Saed-Samii, S. Stegemann, J.- M. Régis, L. M. Robledo, R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, A. Blazhev, C. Fransen, N. Warr, K. O. Zell, Evolution of E2 transition strength in deformed hafnium isotopes from new measurements on 172Hf, 174Hf, and 176Hf, Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) 044301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.044301 2015

  49. [52]

    Wiederhold, V

    J. Wiederhold, V. Werner, R. Kern, N. Pietralla, D. Bucurescu, R. Carroll, N. Cooper, T. Daniel, D. Filipescu, N. Florea, R.-B. Gerst, D. Ghita, L. Gurgi, J. Jolie, R. S. Ilieva, R. Lica, N. Marginean, R. Marginean, C. Mihai, I. O. Mitu, F. Naqvi, C. Nita, M. Rudigier, S. Stege- mann, S. Pascu, P. H. Regan, Evolution of E2 strength in the rare-earth isoto...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024316 2019

  50. [53]

    Harter, L

    A. Harter, L. Knafla, G. Frießner, G. Häfner, J. Jolie, A. Blazhev, A. Dewald, F. Dunkel, A. Esmaylzadeh, C. Fransen, V. Karayonchev, K. Lawless, M. Ley, J.-M. Régis, K. O. Zell, Lifetime measurements in the tungsten isotopes176,178,180W, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 024326. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024326

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.024326 2022

  51. [54]

    Harter, A

    A. Harter, A. Esmaylzadeh, L. Knafla, C. Fransen, F. v. Spee, J. Jolie, M. Ley, V. Karayonchev, J. Fischer, A. Pfeil, Lifetime measurements in low yrast states and spectroscopic peculiarities in 182Os, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 024305. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.024305 2023

  52. [55]

    Costin, M

    A. Costin, M. Reese, H. Ai, R. F. Casten, K. Dusling, C. R. Fitzpatrick, G. Gürdal, A. Heinz, E. A. McCutchan, D. A. Meyer, O. Möller, P. Petkov, N. Pietralla, J. Qian, G. Rainovski, V. Werner, Centrifugal stretching along the ground state band of168Hf, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 024307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024307. 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.024307 2009

  53. [56]

    Stephens, R

    F. Stephens, R. Simon, Coriolis effects in the yrast states, Nucl. Phys. A 183 (1972) 257–284. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90658-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90658-6 1972

  54. [57]

    R. Wyss, M. A. Riley, Fifty years of backbending, Nucl. Phys. News 32 (2022) 16–20. doi:10. 1080/10619127.2022.2063000.arXiv:10.1080/10619127.2022.2063000

    work page doi:10.1080/10619127.2022.2063000 2022

  55. [58]

    P. Ring, P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problems, volume 103, Springer, 1980. doi:10.1063/ 1.2915762

    1980

  56. [59]

    F. S. Stephens, R. S. Simon, Properties of rotational bands in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 183 (1972) 257–270. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90619-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90619-4 1972

  57. [60]

    F. S. Stephens, Phenomena associated with the rotational alignment of nucleons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 43–65. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.47.43

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.47.43 1975

  58. [61]

    Bengtsson, S

    R. Bengtsson, S. Frauendorf, Rotational bands and particle alignment, Nucl. Phys. A 327 (1979) 139–160. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(79)90509-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(79)90509-8 1979

  59. [62]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, D. Bonatsos, N=90 QSPT: Cerium, neodymium and samarium isotopic chains in the IBM symmetry triangle, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 26 (2019) 37–43. doi:10.12681/hnps.1793

    work page doi:10.12681/hnps.1793 2019

  60. [63]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, S. Ilieva, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, P. Alexa, M. Thürauf, C. Bernards, A. Blanc, A. M. Bruce, R. B. Cakirli, N. Cooper, L. M. Fraile, G. de France, M. Jentschel, J. Jolie, U. Köster, W. Korten, T. Kröll, S. Lalkovski, H. Mach, N. Mărginean, P. Mutti, Z. Patel, V. Paziy, Z. Podolyák, P. H. Regan, J.-M. Régis, O. J. Rob...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.014303 2020

  61. [64]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, N = 90 shape phase transition: increasing axial asymmetry towards 148Ce, Bulg. J. Phys. 49 (2022) p. 89–96. doi:10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.1.089

    work page doi:10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.1.089 2022

  62. [65]

    Koseoglou, et al., 2026

    P. Koseoglou, et al., 2026. (in preparation)

    2026

  63. [66]

    R. F. Casten, Possible unified interpretation of heavy nuclei, Physical Review Letters 54 (1985) 1991–1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1991

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1991 1985

  64. [67]

    D. H. Feng, C.-L. Wu, M. W. Guidry, Z.-P. Li, Dynamical Pauli effects and the saturation of nuclear collectivity, Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 156–162. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91639-5. 21

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91639-5 1988

  65. [68]

    Koseoglou, T

    P. Koseoglou, T. J. Mertzimekis, M. Efstathiou, P. Vasileiou, H. Mayr, C. M. Nickel, N. Pietralla, V. Werner, A. Blazhev, A. Esmaylzadeh, J. Fischer, C. Fransen, J. Jolie, M. Ley, A. Pfeil, F. von Spee, K. Gladnishki, D. Kocheva, G. Rainovski, N. Florea, A. Radu, D. Tofan, D. Bonatsos, K. E. Karakatsanis, Gamma-spectrometry on the well-deformed 178Yb: exc...

    work page doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.9053 2026

  66. [69]

    Zyriliou, et al., Nuclear Structure Investigations in Yb isotopes, HNPS Adv

    A. Zyriliou, et al., Nuclear Structure Investigations in Yb isotopes, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 28 (2022) 104–108. doi:10.12681/hnps.3609

    work page doi:10.12681/hnps.3609 2022

  67. [70]

    Gupta, V

    J. Gupta, V. Katoch, Review of nuclear structure N=86–118 of W isotopes, Nucl. Phys. A 1057 (2025, 123032). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123032 2025

  68. [71]

    M. A. Caprio, Structure of collective modes in transitional and deformed nuclei, arXiv: Nuclear Experiment (2005). URL:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119368092

    2005

  69. [72]

    J. B. Gupta, J. H. Hamilton, Outstanding problems in the band structures of152Sm, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 034321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.034321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.034321 2017

  70. [73]

    doi:10.1142/S0218301306005538

    Balabanski et al., Evidence for x(5) critical point symmetry in128Ce, International Journal of Modern Physics E 15 (2012). doi:10.1142/S0218301306005538

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301306005538 2012

  71. [74]

    Tonev, A

    D. Tonev, A. Dewald, T. Klug, P. Petkov, J. Jolie, A. Fitzler, O. Möller, S. Heinze, P. von Brentano, R. F. Casten, Transition probabilities in154Gd: Evidence for X(5) critical point sym- metry, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034334. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.034334

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.034334 2004

  72. [75]

    Mccutchan, N

    E. Mccutchan, N. Zamfir, M. Caprio, R. Casten, H. Amro, C. Beausang, D. Brenner, A. Hecht, C. Hutter, S. Langdown, D. Meyer, P. Regan, J. Ressler, A. Yamamoto, Low spin states in162Y b and the X(5) critical point symmetry, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.024308 2004

  73. [76]

    Browne, H

    E. Browne, H. Junde, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=174, Nucl. Data Sheets 87 (1999) 15 – 176. doi:10.1006/ndsh.1999.0015. 22 Figures Fig. 2: Evolution of the CBS parameterrβ along the even–even isotopic chains of Ce-Os elements as a function of neutron number N. The bold gray point at178Yb(N= 108) represents the valuer β = 0.509, obtained from the CBS calculat...

    work page doi:10.1006/ndsh.1999.0015 1999