pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18091 · v1 · pith:FT5HB676new · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.soft

Quantum statistical enhancement of collective behaviour in a bosonic active Ising model

Kian L. Assent , Emil Strauch , Sabine H. L. Klapp , Andr\'e Eckardt , Alexander Schnell This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.soft
keywords active Ising modelbosonic quantum statisticsflockingaster formationcollective behaviorquantum active matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bosonic quantum statistics markedly enhance flocking and aster formation in a one-dimensional active Ising model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a quantum lattice version of the active Ising model built from ideal bosons that carry a spin. It establishes that the bosons' quantum statistics strengthen both flocking, in which particles align and move together, and aster formation, in which opposing groups bind and halt motion. These enhancements occur even as a transverse magnetic field adds quantum fluctuations that tend to disrupt the phases. The bosonic version differs from an earlier hard-core boson realization, where the statistical stabilization was absent.

Core claim

In a one-dimensional quantum active Ising model realized with ideal bosons on a lattice, the bosonic quantum statistics produce a clear enhancement of the classical collective behaviors of flocking and aster formation; this stabilization competes with the phase-suppressing effect of quantum fluctuations induced by a transverse external magnetic field.

What carries the argument

Ideal bosonic quantum statistics on a one-dimensional lattice with alignment and self-propulsion rules taken from the classical active Ising model.

If this is right

  • The quantum statistical effect stabilizes the collective phases against suppression by a transverse magnetic field.
  • The competition between statistical enhancement and fluctuation-induced suppression can be tuned by the field strength.
  • The model provides a controlled setting to compare quantum and classical active-matter dynamics on the same lattice geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous statistical enhancements could appear in other active systems once quantum indistinguishability is included.
  • Cold-atom platforms with multiple internal states might serve as experimental tests of the predicted stabilization.

Load-bearing premise

The particles are ideal non-interacting bosons whose only quantum feature is their statistics, and the alignment and propulsion rules are copied directly from the classical model.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or experiment in which the same lattice rules are run with distinguishable particles or with fermions instead of bosons, and the enhancement of flocking and aster formation disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18091 by Alexander Schnell, Andr\'e Eckardt, Emil Strauch, Kian L. Assent, Sabine H. L. Klapp.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) The particle’s spin species governs its pre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Phase diagram of the classical active Ising model, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Different setups of the AIM under investigation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dynamics of the mean-field kinetic equations of the AIM with classical particles ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Dynamics of a large quantum AIM of ideal bosons ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Different phase diagrams of the classical- and quantum AIM without transverse magnetic field. Flocking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Phase diagrams of the quantum AIM under the influence of an external Hamiltonian with varying frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Collective behaviour such as flocking (the collective motion of a spontaneously formed group along a common direction) or aster formation (the binding of opposing flocks, inhibiting each others motion) are intriguing emergent phenomena in active systems with local alignment rules. Until recently, their occurrence was mainly studied for classical systems, a prime example being the active Ising model (AIM), which translates the main ingredients of flocking and aster formation (i.e., alignment and self-propulsion) to a lattice framework. Here we introduce and study a one-dimensional (1D) quantum lattice variant of the AIM, based on ideal bosons with a spin degree of freedom. We find that both the collective behaviours of the 1D classical model, flocking and aster formation, are markedly enhanced by the bosonic quantum statistics. This contrasts with a recent quantum generalization of the AIM based onto hard-core bosons [Khasseh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 248302 (2025)], where flocking, but neither its quantum-statistical stabilization nor aster states were observed as a consequence of interactions. Moreover, we investigate the competition of this quantum statistical stabilization of collective phases with their suppression by the quantum fluctuations induced by a transverse external magnetic field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a one-dimensional quantum lattice version of the active Ising model constructed from ideal (non-interacting) bosons carrying a spin degree of freedom. It reports that bosonic quantum statistics produce a marked enhancement of both flocking and aster formation relative to the classical AIM, contrasts this with the hard-core boson variant of Khasseh et al., and examines the competition between this stabilization and suppression by a transverse magnetic field.

Significance. If the reported enhancement survives controls that isolate statistics from occupancy, the result would establish a concrete mechanism by which Bose statistics can stabilize collective phases in active matter, providing a clear point of comparison with both classical and hard-core quantum models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model construction (§2)] Model construction (likely §2 or §3): the Hamiltonian and update rules are defined for ideal bosons, which permit arbitrary occupation numbers per site. The classical AIM comparison retains the standard single-occupancy exclusion. No auxiliary classical simulation or analytic limit with unlimited occupancy (while preserving all other alignment and propulsion rules) is presented; without it the attribution of the enhancement specifically to quantum statistics rather than the occupancy constraint remains untested.
  2. [Results (§4)] Results on flocking and aster states (likely §4): the quantitative measures of enhancement (order parameters, correlation lengths, or phase boundaries) are reported only for the ideal-boson case versus the classical single-occupancy case. A direct comparison to a classical unlimited-occupancy variant is required to establish that the observed difference is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract states that the model is 'based on ideal bosons'; a single sentence in the introduction clarifying how the spin-1/2 degree of freedom is attached to the bosonic operators would remove any ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the construction.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the phase diagrams should explicitly state whether the plotted quantities are obtained from exact diagonalization, quantum Monte Carlo, or mean-field theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model construction (§2)] Model construction (likely §2 or §3): the Hamiltonian and update rules are defined for ideal bosons, which permit arbitrary occupation numbers per site. The classical AIM comparison retains the standard single-occupancy exclusion. No auxiliary classical simulation or analytic limit with unlimited occupancy (while preserving all other alignment and propulsion rules) is presented; without it the attribution of the enhancement specifically to quantum statistics rather than the occupancy constraint remains untested.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The classical AIM is conventionally formulated with single-occupancy exclusion. Our quantum model is defined for ideal bosons, where multiple occupancy follows directly from the bosonic commutation relations and is thus inseparable from the quantum statistics under study. Constructing an auxiliary classical model with unlimited occupancy would require additional, non-standard rules for alignment and self-propulsion among multiple particles on one site, taking the comparison outside the established AIM framework. The contrast with the hard-core boson model (single occupancy enforced quantum-mechanically, no enhancement) supports that the observed stabilization is tied to Bose statistics. We will add a clarifying paragraph in §2 of the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results (§4)] Results on flocking and aster states (likely §4): the quantitative measures of enhancement (order parameters, correlation lengths, or phase boundaries) are reported only for the ideal-boson case versus the classical single-occupancy case. A direct comparison to a classical unlimited-occupancy variant is required to establish that the observed difference is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: The quantitative comparisons are presented between the ideal-boson case and the standard single-occupancy classical AIM. As explained in our response to the model-construction comment, multiple occupancy is an intrinsic consequence of the bosonic statistics rather than an independent parameter. The absence of comparable stabilization in the hard-core boson variant further indicates that the statistics, not merely occupancy, drive the effect. We therefore maintain that the existing comparisons are sufficient and load-bearing for the central claim. We will expand the discussion in §4 to make this reasoning explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new model construction is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel 1D quantum AIM variant using ideal bosons and reports enhanced flocking/aster formation relative to the classical AIM and a separate hard-core boson model. No equations, fits, or derivations are shown that reduce a claimed prediction to an input parameter by construction, nor any load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The central claim rests on direct comparison of the constructed model, which is independent of the result itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 921 out tokens · 26872 ms · 2026-06-27T00:08:20.680276+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D X l (1 +ε)D h a† l−1↓al↓ i ρ #! =D (1 +ε) 2 D a† k↑a† k+1↓ak+1↓ak↓ −a † k↑a† k−1↓ak−1↓ak↓ −a † k↑ak↓ E (C9) dt⟨a† k↑ak↓⟩5 =tr a† k↑ak↓

    is an interesting question to explore in future work. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge discussions with Hendrik Weimer, Markus Heyl and Michael te Vr¨ ugt. AE and AS acknowl- edge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) via the Research Unit FOR 5688 (Project No. 521530974). Appendix A: Higher moments in kinetic equa...

  2. [2]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Re- views of Modern Physics85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 10.1103/revmodphys.89.011004 (2017)

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 10.1103/revmodphys.89.011004 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.011004 2017

  5. [5]

    A. J. Daley, I. Bloch, C. Kokail, S. Flannigan, N. Pearson, M. Troyer, and P. Zoller, Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation, Nature607, 667 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387–408 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quan- tum matter, Science357, 1002–1010 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    C. J. Eckhardt, G. Passetti, M. Othman, C. Karrasch, F. Cavaliere, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Quan- tum floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight- binding chain in a cavity, Communications Physics5, 10.1038/s42005-022-00880-9 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00880-9 2022

  9. [9]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Bloch, I

    J. Bloch, I. Carusotto, and M. Wouters, Non-equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation in photonic systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 470 (2022), iSBN: 2522-5820

    2022

  11. [11]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Reviews of Modern Physics97, 025004 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Vorberg, W

    D. Vorberg, W. Wustmann, H. Schomerus, R. Ketzmer- ick, and A. Eckardt, Nonequilibrium steady states of ideal bosonic and fermionic quantum gases, Phys. Rev. E92, 062119 (2015), publisher: American Physical Society

    2015

  13. [13]

    Leymann, D

    H. Leymann, D. Vorberg, T. Lettau, C. Hopfmann, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. H¨ ofling, R. Ketzmerick, J. Wiersig, S. Reitzenstein, and A. Eckardt, Pump- Power-Driven Mode Switching in a Microcavity Device and Its Relation to Bose-Einstein Condensation, Physi- 18 cal Review X7, 021045 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    D. A. Lidar, Lecture notes on the theory of open quantum systems (2020), arXiv:1902.00967 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    R. P. Rundle, T. Tilma, J. H. Samson, V. M. Dwyer, R. F. Bishop, and M. J. Everitt, General approach to quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, Physical Re- view A99, 10.1103/physreva.99.012115 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012115 2019

  16. [16]

    Minganti and A

    F. Minganti and A. Biella, Open quantum systems – a brief introduction (2024), arXiv:2407.16855 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.99 (2025)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.99 2025

  18. [18]

    Sza´ nkowski, Introduction to the theory of open quantum systems, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.68 (2023)

    P. Sza´ nkowski, Introduction to the theory of open quantum systems, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.68 (2023)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.68 2023

  19. [19]

    Fontaine, D

    Q. Fontaine, D. Squizzato, F. Baboux, I. Amelio, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, M. Morassi, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, M. Wouters, I. Carusotto, A. Amo, M. Richard, A. Minguzzi, L. Canet, S. Ravets, and J. Bloch, Kardar–Parisi–Zhang universality in a one- dimensional polariton condensate, Nature608, 687 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Klaers, J

    J. Klaers, J. Schmitt, F. Vewinger, and M. Weitz, Bose–Einstein condensation of photons in an optical mi- crocavity, Nature468, 545 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    Vretenar, C

    M. Vretenar, C. Toebes, and J. Klaers, Modified Bose- Einstein condensation in an optical quantum gas, Nature Communications12, 5749 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Si- mon, and D. I. Schuster, A dissipatively stabilized Mott insulator of photons, Nature566, 51 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    I. T. Rosen, S. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, A. Chatter- jee, M. Hays, M. A. DeMarco, A. H. Karamlou, D. A. Rower, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, A synthetic magnetic vector potential in a 2D superconducting qubit array, Nature Physics20, 1881 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    L. W. Clark, N. Schine, C. Baum, N. Jia, and J. Si- mon, Observation of Laughlin states made of light, Na- ture582, 41 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons, Science384, 579 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Vorberg, W

    D. Vorberg, W. Wustmann, R. Ketzmerick, and A. Eckardt, Generalized bose-einstein condensation into multiple states in driven-dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 240405 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Schnell, D

    A. Schnell, D. Vorberg, R. Ketzmerick, and A. Eckardt, High-Temperature Nonequilibrium Bose Condensation Induced by a Hot Needle, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 140602 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Schnell, R

    A. Schnell, R. Ketzmerick, and A. Eckardt, On the num- ber of Bose-selected modes in driven-dissipative ideal Bose gases, Phys. Rev. E97, 032136 (2018), publisher: American Physical Society

    2018

  31. [31]

    Altman, L

    E. Altman, L. M. Sieberer, L. Chen, S. Diehl, and J. Toner, Two-Dimensional Superfluidity of Exciton Po- laritons Requires Strong Anisotropy, Physical Review X 5, 011017 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Uni- versal Phenomenology at Critical Exceptional Points of Nonequilibrium$\mathrm{O}(N)$Models, Physical Re- view X14, 021052 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Iadecola, T

    T. Iadecola, T. Neupert, and C. Chamon, Occupation of topological Floquet bands in open systems, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235133 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Shirai, T

    T. Shirai, T. Mori, and S. Miyashita, Condition for emer- gence of the Floquet-Gibbs state in periodically driven open systems, Phys. Rev. E91, 030101 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    Shirai, J

    T. Shirai, J. Thingna, T. Mori, S. Denisov, P. H¨ anggi, and S. Miyashita, Effective Floquet-Gibbs states for dis- sipativbe quantum systems, New J.\Phys.18, 053008 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Schnell, C

    A. Schnell, C. Weitenberg, and A. Eckardt, Dissipative preparation of a Floquet topological insulator in an opti- cal lattice via bath engineering, SciPost Physics17, 052 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Petiziol and A

    F. Petiziol and A. Eckardt, Cavity-Based Reservoir En- gineering for Floquet-Engineered Superconducting Cir- cuits, Physical Review Letters129, 233601 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Schnell, L.-N

    A. Schnell, L.-N. Wu, A. Widera, and A. Eckardt, Floquet-heating-induced Bose condensation in a scarlike mode of an open driven optical-lattice system, Physical Review A107, L021301 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    V. N. Gladilin and M. Wouters, Vortex-pair annihilation in arrays of photon cavities, Phys. Rev. A105, 013527 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  41. [41]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czirok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995)

    1995

  43. [43]

    A. P. Solon, H. Chat´ e, and J. Tailleur, From Phase to Microphase Separation in Flocking Models: The Essen- tial Role of Nonequilibrium Fluctuations, Physical Re- view Letters114, 068101 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Chat´ e, Dry Aligning Dilute Active Matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 189 (2020)

    H. Chat´ e, Dry Aligning Dilute Active Matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 189 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Benvegnen, H

    B. Benvegnen, H. Chat´ e, P. L. Krapivsky, J. Tailleur, and A. Solon, Flocking in one dimension: Asters and reversals, Phys. Rev. E106, 054608 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-Induced Phase Sep- aration, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    Bialk´ e, H

    J. Bialk´ e, H. L¨ owen, and T. Speck, Microscopic theory for the phase separation of self-propelled repulsive disks, Europhysics Letters103, 30008 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    H. H. Wensink, J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, H. L¨ owen, , and J. M. Yeomans, Meso- scale turbulence in living fluids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA)109(2012). 19

    2012

  49. [49]

    Ghosh and C

    H. Reinken, S. Heidenreich, M. B¨ ar, and S. H. Klapp, Ising-like critical behavior of vortex lattices in an ac- tive fluid, Physical Review Letters128, 10.1103/phys- revlett.128.048004 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  50. [50]

    Khasseh, S

    R. Khasseh, S. Wald, R. Moessner, C. A. Weber, and M. Heyl, Active quantum flocks (2024), arXiv:2308.01603 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    A. P. Antonov, Y. Zheng, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Engineering active motion in quantum matter, Physical Review Research7, 10.1103/z3gm-32jn (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/z3gm-32jn 2025

  52. [52]

    A. P. Solon and J. Tailleur, Revisiting the Flocking Tran- sition Using Active Spins, Physical Review Letters111, 078101 (2013)

    2013

  53. [53]

    A. P. Solon and J. Tailleur, Flocking with discrete sym- metry: The two-dimensional active ising model, Physical Review E92, 10.1103/physreve.92.042119 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.042119 2015

  54. [54]

    Scandolo, J

    M. Scandolo, J. Pausch, and M. E. Cates, Active Ising Models of flocking: a field-theoretic approach, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal E46, 103 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Wolff, Collective monte carlo updating for spin sys- tems, Phys

    U. Wolff, Collective monte carlo updating for spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 361 (1989)

    1989

  56. [56]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York, 2002)

    2002

  57. [57]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed. (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012) eprint: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/8334

    work page doi:10.1142/8334 2012

  58. [58]

    Bandyopadhyay, S

    S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chatterjee, A. K. Dutta, M. Kar- makar, H. Rieger, and R. Paul, Ordering kinetics in the active ising model, Physical Review E109, 10.1103/physreve.109.064143 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.064143 2024

  59. [59]

    Lange, Z

    F. Lange, Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, and A. Rosch, Pumping approx- imately integrable systems, Nature Communications8, 15767 (2017), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017

  60. [60]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. L. Klapp, Synchronization and exceptional points in nonreciprocal active polar mix- tures, Communications Physics8, 307 (2025)

    2025