pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18165 · v1 · pith:EXYBKXJ5new · submitted 2026-06-16 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · nucl-th

Observation of a dominant boldsymbol{0f_(7/2)} neutron configuration in the boldsymbol{³²}Si boldsymbol{J^(π)=5^-} isomeric state

C. R. Hoffman , G. L. Wilson , J. Chen , B. P. Kay , T. L. Tang , S. R. Carmichael , M. Gott , S. Lesher
show 3 more authors
M. S. Martin G. E. Morgan J. Wu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex nucl-th
keywords nuclear structurespectroscopic factorsisomeric statestransfer reactions32Sineutron configurationsE3 transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 5^- isomer in 32Si shows a dominant single-neutron 0f7/2 configuration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the 31Si(d,p)32Si reaction to probe the neutron makeup of the negative-parity states in 32Si. A large spectroscopic factor for ℓ=3 transfer to the 5- state establishes that this isomer is mostly one neutron occupying the 0f7/2 orbital. The nearby 3- state shows a noticeably smaller factor of about 0.44 relative to the 5-. From this the authors conclude that the very slow E3 decay between the two states arises because protons and neutrons both stay largely inactive in the transition, rather than from mismatched neutron wave functions.

Core claim

The yrast 5- state in 32Si appears as a dominant ℓ=3 transfer with a relatively large spectroscopic factor in the 31Si(d,p)32Si reaction, confirming its single-particle ν0f7/2 character. The yrast 3- level shows a reduced ℓ=3 spectroscopic factor of approximately 0.44 compared with the 5-1 level. The hindrance of the 5-1 to 3-1 E3 transition is therefore not primarily due to differing neutron-structure overlaps; instead the lack of participation by both protons and neutrons is proposed as the mechanism that reduces the transition strength.

What carries the argument

Spectroscopic factors for ℓ=3 neutron transfer extracted via DWBA analysis of the 31Si(d,p)32Si reaction at 9.6 MeV/u.

If this is right

  • The E3 hindrance in 32Si is explained by minimal proton and neutron participation in the transition.
  • The neutron-structure difference between the 5- and 3- states is not the main cause of the reduced transition strength.
  • The same spectroscopic-factor pattern appears in 34S, yet that nucleus shows a much stronger 5- to 3- E2 transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Shell-model calculations that include explicit proton excitations may be needed to reproduce the observed transition rates.
  • Similar transfer-reaction studies on neighboring even-even nuclei could test whether proton inactivity is a general cause of hindered E3 decays in this mass region.
  • The single-particle assignment for the 5- isomer supplies a benchmark for testing effective interactions near the N=20 shell closure.

Load-bearing premise

The spectroscopic factors obtained from the DWBA analysis accurately reflect the single-particle neutron strengths without large multi-step reaction contributions or configuration mixing.

What would settle it

A measurement or shell-model result showing that the 5- to 3- E3 matrix element is dominated by neutron overlap differences rather than by simultaneous proton and neutron inactivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18165 by B. P. Kay, C. R. Hoffman, G. E. Morgan, G. L. Wilson, J. Chen, J. Wu, M. Gott, M. S. Martin, S. Lesher, S. R. Carmichael, T. L. Tang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The excited-state energies of the yrast 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The data points show the measured angular dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An yrast, $J^{\pi}=5^-$, spin-trap isomer has been previously identified in $^{32}$Si. The isomeric state decays predominantly via a hindered $E3$ transition [B($E3$) = 0.0841(10)~W.u.], bypassing a nearby $E2$ decay path to the first excited $3^-$ level. The single-neutron aspects of these negative parity levels were investigated via the $^{31}$Si$(d$,$p)^{32}$Si reaction at 9.6~MeV/$u$ using HELIOS and the ATLAS in-flight facility. The $5^-$ state appears as a dominant $\ell=3$ transfer with a relatively large spectroscopic factor, confirming its single-particle $\nu0f_{7/2}$ character. The yrast $3^-$ level had a reduced $\ell=3$ spectroscopic factor of $\approx$ 0.44 compared to that of the $5^-_1$ level. This is similar to the situation observed in nearby $^{34}$S which by contrast has a measured B($E2, 5^-\rightarrow 3^-$) transition strength closer to 1~W.u.. It has been concluded that the hinderance of the $5^-_1\rightarrow 3^-_1$ transition in $^{32}$Si is not primarily due to the differing overlaps in the neutron structure. Instead, the lack of participation by both the protons and the neutrons in the transition is proposed as the transition-strength reduction mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from the 31Si(d,p)32Si reaction at 9.6 MeV/u using HELIOS, finding that the 5- isomeric state in 32Si is populated via dominant ℓ=3 transfer with a relatively large spectroscopic factor, confirming its ν0f7/2 neutron character. The yrast 3- state shows a reduced ℓ=3 spectroscopic factor of ≈0.44 relative to the 5- state. By comparison to 34S (where the analogous E3 transition is stronger), the authors conclude that the observed E3 hindrance [B(E3)=0.0841(10) W.u.] in 32Si is not due to neutron overlap differences but instead arises from lack of participation by both protons and neutrons in the transition.

Significance. If the spectroscopic factors hold, the work provides useful experimental constraints on the single-particle structure of negative-parity states in 32Si and identifies proton configuration effects as the likely origin of E3 hindrance, which can benchmark shell-model predictions in the sd-fp region. The inverse-kinematics approach with a radioactive beam is a positive aspect of the experimental design.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim—that the 5- state has dominant ν0f7/2 character and that neutron overlaps are not the primary cause of the E3 hindrance—depends on the relative spectroscopic factors extracted from DWBA analysis of the (d,p) data. The reaction energy of 9.6 MeV/u lies at the lower end of the regime where single-step DWBA is typically reliable; multi-step or compound contributions are not discussed and could distort the angular distributions and the apparent ℓ=3 strengths. This is load-bearing for the interpretation and the comparison to 34S.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for recognizing the value of the inverse-kinematics transfer data. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim—that the 5- state has dominant ν0f7/2 character and that neutron overlaps are not the primary cause of the E3 hindrance—depends on the relative spectroscopic factors extracted from DWBA analysis of the (d,p) data. The reaction energy of 9.6 MeV/u lies at the lower end of the regime where single-step DWBA is typically reliable; multi-step or compound contributions are not discussed and could distort the angular distributions and the apparent ℓ=3 strengths. This is load-bearing for the interpretation and the comparison to 34S.

    Authors: We acknowledge that 9.6 MeV/u is toward the lower end of energies commonly used for (d,p) DWBA analyses and that the manuscript does not explicitly discuss possible multi-step or compound-nucleus contributions. The observed angular distributions for the 5− state are nevertheless well described by standard single-step DWBA calculations for ℓ=3 transfer using global optical potentials, with no obvious signatures of significant multi-step feeding. The same DWBA framework was applied to both 32Si and the comparison nucleus 34S, so the relative spectroscopic factors remain the basis for the structural interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the analysis section that (i) justifies the applicability of DWBA at this energy by reference to prior (d,p) work in the sd–fp region at comparable beam energies, (ii) notes the quality of the ℓ=3 fits, and (iii) briefly addresses the absence of evidence for compound or multi-step processes in the present data set. This addition will strengthen the manuscript without altering the central conclusions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: spectroscopic factors extracted from independent reaction data

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on new experimental cross-section measurements from the 31Si(d,p)32Si reaction at 9.6 MeV/u, followed by standard DWBA analysis to obtain ℓ=3 spectroscopic factors for the 5^- and 3^- states. These values are then compared to the known B(E3) hindrance in 32Si and the contrasting B(E2) strength in 34S. No equation or step defines a quantity in terms of the target conclusion, renames a fit as a prediction, or reduces the interpretation to a self-citation chain. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks (measured angular distributions and prior transition rates) with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of nuclear reaction theory and shell-model single-particle concepts; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Distorted-wave Born approximation reliably extracts spectroscopic factors for this (d,p) reaction on a light target at 9.6 MeV/u.
    Invoked implicitly when assigning ℓ=3 character and spectroscopic factor values from the measured angular distributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5890 in / 1325 out tokens · 26700 ms · 2026-06-26T21:36:41.564042+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [1]

    (b) The 0f 7/2−0d3/2 single-neutron energy centroid differences in the odd-N,N= 17 andN= 19 isotones [18–22]

    and 36Ar (Z= 18). (b) The 0f 7/2−0d3/2 single-neutron energy centroid differences in the odd-N,N= 17 andN= 19 isotones [18–22]. (c) The 2 + 1 to ground state [B(E2,2 + 1 → 0+ 1 )] and 5 − 1 to 3− 1 [B(E2,5− 1 →3− 1 )] quadrupole transition strengths in theN= 18 even-even systems in Weisskopf units (W.u.) [13, 23]. Note that the B(E2,5 −→3−) include a fact...

  2. [2]

    Lindner, New Nuclides Produced in Chlorine Spalla- tion, Phys

    M. Lindner, New Nuclides Produced in Chlorine Spalla- tion, Phys. Rev.91, 642 (1953)

    1953

  3. [3]

    Thoennessen, Discovery of the Isotopes with 11≤ Z≤19, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables98, 933 (2012)

    M. Thoennessen, Discovery of the Isotopes with 11≤ Z≤19, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables98, 933 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    H. T. Fortune, L. Bland, D. L. Watson, and M. A. Abouzeid, 32Si from 30Si(t,p), Phys. Rev. C25, 5 (1982)

    1982

  5. [5]

    Fornal, R

    B. Fornal, R. Broda, W. Kr´ olas, T. Paw/suppress lat, J. Wrzesi´ nski, D. Bazzacco, D. Fabris, S. Lunardi, C. Rossi Alvarez, G. Viesti, G. de Angelis, M. Cinausero, D. R. Napoli, and Z. W. Grabowski,γ-ray studies of neutron-rich N = 18,19 nuclei produced in deep-inelastic collisions, Phys. Rev. C55, 762 (1997)

    1997

  6. [6]

    J. G. Pronko and R. E. McDonald, Study of 32Si using the 30Si(t,pγ) reaction, Phys. Rev. C6, 2065 (1972)

    2065

  7. [7]

    Guillaume, B

    G. Guillaume, B. Rastegar, P. Fintz, and A. Gallmann, Transitions ´ electromagn´ etiques dans le noyau32Si atteint par la r´ eaction 30Si(t,pγ)32Si, Nucl. Phys. A227, 284 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    A. Paul, S. R¨ ottger, A. Zimbal, and U. Keyser, Prompt (n,γ) mass measurements for the avogadro project, Hy- perfine Interactions132, 189 (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    Heery, J

    J. Heery, J. Henderson, C. R. Hoffman, A. M. Hill, T. Beck, C. Cousins, P. Farris, A. Gade, S. A. Gillespie, J. D. Holt, B. Hu, H. Iwasaki, S. Kisyov, A. N. Kuchera, B. Longfellow, C. M¨ uller-Gatermann, A. Poves, E. Ru- bino, R. Russell, R. Salinas, A. Sanchez, D. Weisshaar, C. Y. Wu, and J. Wu, Suppressed electric quadrupole collectivity in 32Si, Phys. ...

    2024

  10. [10]

    Williams, G

    J. Williams, G. Hackman, K. Starosta, R. S. Lubna, P. Choudhary, P. C. Srivastava, C. Andreoiu, D. An- nen, H. Asch, M. D. H. K. G. Badanage, G. C. Ball, M. Beuschlein, H. Bidaman, V. Bildstein, R. Coleman, A. B. Garnsworthy, B. Greaves, G. Leckenby, V. Karay- onchev, M. S. Martin, C. Natzke, C. M. Petrache, A. Radich, E. Raleigh-Smith, D. Rhodes, R. Russ...

    2023

  11. [11]

    Williams, G

    J. Williams, G. Hackman, K. Starosta, R. S. Lubna, P. Choudhary, S. Sahoo, P. C. Srivastava, C. Andreoiu, D. Annen, H. Asch, M. D. H. K. G. Badanage, G. C. Ball, M. Beuschlein, H. Bidaman, V. Bildstein, R. Cole- man, A. B. Garnsworthy, B. Greaves, G. Leckenby, V. Karayonchev, M. S. Martin, C. Natzke, C. M. Petra- che, A. Radich, E. Raleigh-Smith, D. Rhode...

    2025

  12. [12]

    Williams, G

    J. Williams, G. Hackman, K. Starosta, R. S. Lubna, P. Choudhary, S. Sahoo, P. C. Srivastava, C. Andreoiu, D. Annen, H. Asch, M. D. H. K. G. Badanage, G. C. Ball, M. Beuschlein, H. Bidaman, V. Bildstein, R. J. Coleman, A. B. Garnsworthy, B. Greaves, G. Leckenby, V. Karayonchev, M. S. Martin, C. Natzke, C. M. Petra- che, A. Radich, E. Raleigh-Smith, D. Rhod...

    2025

  13. [13]

    Kib´ edi and R

    T. Kib´ edi and R. H. Spear, Electric octupole (E3) tran- sition probabilities in nuclei, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables80, 35 (2002)

    2002

  14. [14]

    M. W. Greene, J. A. Kuehner, G. C. Ball, C. Broude, and J. S. Forster, Lifetime of the 5.69 Mev 5 −level in 34S, Nucl. Phys. A188, 83 (1972)

    1972

  15. [15]

    Piskoˇ r, J

    ˇS. Piskoˇ r, J. Nov´ ak, E.ˇSimeˇ ckov´ a, J. Cejpek, V. Kroha, J. Dobeˇ s, and P. Navr´ atil, A study of the 30Si(d,p)31Si reaction, Nucl. Phys. A662, 112 (2000)

    2000

  16. [16]

    D. J. Crozier, Energy levels of 34S from the 33S(d,p)34S reaction, Nucl. Phys. A198, 209 (1972)

    1972

  17. [17]

    J. G. Van Der Baan and B. R. Sikora, Investigation of the 33S(d,p)34S reaction, Nuclear Physics A173, 456 (1971)

    1971

  18. [18]

    P. T. MacGregor, D. K. Sharp, S. J. Freeman, C. R. Hoff- man, B. P. Kay, T. L. Tang, L. P. Gaffney, E. F. Baader, M. J. G. Borge, P. A. Butler, W. N. Catford, B. D. Crop- per, G. de Angelis, J. Konki, T. Kr¨ oll, M. Labiche, I. H. Lazarus, R. S. Lubna, I. Martel, D. G. McNeel, R. D. Page, O. Poleshchuk, R. Raabe, F. Recchia, and J. Yang, Evolution of sing...

    2021

  19. [19]

    J. Chen, B. P. Kay, C. R. Hoffman, T. L. Tang, I. A. Tolstukhin, D. Bazin, R. S. Lubna, Y. Ayyad, S. Beceiro- Novo, B. J. Coombes, S. J. Freeman, L. P. Gaffney, R. Garg, H. Jayatissa, A. N. Kuchera, P. MacGregor, A. J. Mitchell, W. Mittig, B. Monteagudo, A. Munoz- Ramos, C. M¨ uller-Gatermann, F. Recchia, N. Rijal, C. Santamaria, M. Z. Serikow, D. K. Shar...

    2024

  20. [20]

    A. N. Kuchera, C. R. Hoffman, G. Ryan, I. B. D’Amato, O. M. Guarinello, P. S. Kielb, R. Aggarwal, S. Ajayi, A. L. Conley, I. Conroy, P. D. Cottle, J. C. Esparza, S. Genty, K. Hanselman, M. Heinze, D. Houlihan, B. Kelly, M. I. Khawaja, E. Lopez-Saavedra, G. W. McCann, A. B. Morelock, L. A. Riley, A. Sandrik, V. Sitaraman, M. Spieker, E. Temanson, C. Wibiso...

    2024

  21. [21]

    Burgunder, O

    G. Burgunder, O. Sorlin, F. Nowacki, S. Giron, F. Ham- mache, M. Moukaddam, N. de S´ er´ eville, D. Beaumel, L. C` aceres, E. Cl´ ement, G. Duchˆ ene, J. P. Ebran, B. Fernandez-Dominguez, F. Flavigny, S. Franchoo, J. Gibelin, A. Gillibert, S. Gr´ evy, J. Guillot, A. Le- pailleur, I. Matea, A. Matta, L. Nalpas, A. Obertelli, T. Otsuka, J. Pancin, A. Poves,...

    2014

  22. [22]

    Eckle, H

    G. Eckle, H. Kader, H. Clement, F. J. Eckle, F. Merz, R. Hertenberger, H. J. Maier, P. Schiemenz, and G. Graw, A 36S(d,p) study with high energy resolution, Nucl. Phys. A491, 205 (1989)

    1989

  23. [23]

    M. C. Mermaz, C. A. Whitten, J. W. Champlin, A. J. Howard, and D. A. Bromley, Study of the (d,p) reaction on 28Si, 32S, and 36Ar atE d = 18.00 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 4, 1778 (1971)

    1971

  24. [24]

    Raman, C

    S. Raman, C. Nestor Jr., and P. Tikkanen, Transition probability from the ground to the first-excited 2 + state of even–even nuclides, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables78, 1 (2001)

    2001

  25. [25]

    Watwood, C

    N. Watwood, C. R. Hoffman, B. P. Kay, I. A. Tolstukhin, J. Chen, T. L. Tang, D. Bazin, Y. Ayyad, S. Beceiro- Novo, S. J. Freeman, L. P. Gaffney, R. Garg, H. Jay- atissa, A. N. Kuchera, P. T. MacGregor, A. J. Mitchell, A. Mu˜ noz Ramos, C. M¨ uller-Gatermann, F. Recchia, C. Santamaria, M. Z. Serikow, D. K. Sharp, G. L. Wil- son, A. H. Wuosmaa, and J. C. Za...

    2025

  26. [26]

    Bohr and B

    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson,Nuclear Structure: Nuclear Deformations, Vol. 2 (Benjamin, Reading, MA, 1975)

    1975

  27. [27]

    R. H. Spear, Reduced electric-octupole transition proba- bilities,B(E3; 0 +→3− 1 ), for even-even nuclides through- out the periodic table, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables42, 55 (1989)

    1989

  28. [28]

    R. S. Lubna, K. Kravvaris, S. L. Tabor, V. Tripathi, E. Rubino, and A. Volya, Evolution of the N = 20 and 28 shell gaps and two-particle-two-hole states in the FSU interaction, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043342 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    R. S. Lubna, A. B. Garnsworthy, V. Tripathi, G. C. Ball, C. R. Natzke, M. Rocchini, C. Andreoiu, S. S. Bhattacharjee, I. Dillmann, F. H. Garcia, S. A. Gille- spie, G. Hackman, C. J. Griffin, G. Leckenby, T. Miyagi, B. Olaizola, C. Porzio, M. M. Rajabali, Y. Saito, P. Spag- noletti, S. L. Tabor, R. Umashankar, V. Vedia, A. Volya, J. Williams, and D. Yates,...

    2024

  30. [30]

    Hoffman, T

    C. Hoffman, T. Tang, M. A vila, Y. Ayyad, K. Brown, J. Chen, K. Chipps, H. Jayatissa, B. Kay, C. M¨ uller- Gatermann, H. Ong, J. Song, and G. Wilson, In-flight production of an isomeric beam of 16N, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1032, 166612 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    K. Rehm, J. Greene, B. Harss, D. Henderson, C. Jiang, R. Pardo, B. Zabransky, and M. Paul, Gas cell targets for experiments with radioactive beams, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A647, 3 (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    A. H. Wuosmaa, J. P. Schiffer, B. B. Back, C. J. Lister, and K. E. Rehm, A solenoidal spectrometer for reactions in inverse kinematics, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A580, 1290 (2007)

    2007

  33. [33]

    J. C. Lighthall, B. B. Back, S. I. Baker, S. J. Freeman, H. Y. Lee, B. P. Kay, S. T. Marley, K. E. Rehm, J. E. Rohrer, J. P. Schiffer, D. V. Shetty, A. W. Vann, J. R. Winkelbauer, and A. H. Wuosmaa, Commissioning of the HELIOS spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A622, 97 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    C. R. Hoffman, B. B. Back, B. P. Kay, J. P. Schiffer, M. Alcorta, S. I. Baker, S. Bedoor, P. F. Bertone, J. A. Clark, C. M. Deibel, B. DiGiovine, S. J. Freeman, J. P. Greene, J. C. Lighthall, S. T. Marley, R. C. Pardo, K. E. Rehm, A. Rojas, D. Santiago-Gonzalez, D. K. Sharp, 9 D. V. Shetty, J. S. Thomas, I. Wiedenh¨ over, and A. H. Wuosmaa, Experimental s...

    2012

  35. [35]

    M. H. Macfarlane and S. C. Pieper, Ptolemy: A pro- gram for heavy-ion direct-reaction calculations (1978), Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-76-11, Rev. 1

    1978

  36. [36]

    An and C

    H. An and C. Cai, Global deuteron optical model poten- tial for the energy range up to 183 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 73, 054605 (2006)

    2006

  37. [37]

    A. J. Koning and J. P. Delaroche, Local and global nu- cleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV, Nucl. Phys. A713, 231 (2003)

    2003

  38. [38]

    C. M. Perey and F. G. Perey, Deuteron optical-model analysis in the range of 11 to 27 MeV, Phys. Rev.132, 755 (1963)

    1963

  39. [39]

    F. G. Perey, Optical-model analysis of proton elastic scat- tering in the range of 9 to 22 MeV, Phys. Rev.131, 745 (1963)

    1963

  40. [40]

    R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Accu- rate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking, Phys. Rev. C51, 38 (1995)

    1995

  41. [41]

    R. W. Ibbotson, T. Glasmacher, B. A. Brown, L. Chen, M. J. DeCola, D. E. Groh, M. Honma, C. Jewell, K. W. Kemper, P. F. Mantica, D. Miller, W. F. Mueller, T. Ot- suka, L. A. Riley, and M. Weber, Quadrupole collectivity in 32Mg, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2081 (1998)

    2081

  42. [42]

    P. W. M. Glaudemans, P. M. Endt, and A. E. L. Dieperink, Many-particle shell model calculation of elec- tromagnetic transition rates and multipole moments in A= 30–34 nuclei, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)63, 134 (1971)

    1971

  43. [43]

    Mackh, H

    H. Mackh, H. Oeschler, G. J. Wagner, D. Dehnhard, and H. Ohnuma, Energy levels in 30Si from the 29Si(d, p) 30Si reaction, Nucl. Phys. A202, 497 (1973)

    1973

  44. [44]

    A. M. Baxter, J. A. Kuehner, D. T. Petty, and J. M. O’Donnell, Gamma-ray spectroscopy in 30Si, Phys. Rev. C2, 320 (1970)

    1970

  45. [45]

    A. M. Bernstein, V. R. Brown, and V. A. Madsen, Isospin decomposition of nuclear multipole matrix elements from γdecay rates of mirror transitions: Test of values ob- tained with hadronic probes, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 425 (1979)

    1979

  46. [46]

    Mutschler, A

    A. Mutschler, A. Lemasson, O. Sorlin, D. Bazin, C. Borcea, R. Borcea, Z. Dombr´ adi, J. P. Ebran, A. Gade, H. Iwasaki, E. Khan, A. Lepailleur, F. Recchia, T. Roger, F. Rotaru, D. Sohler, M. Stanoiu, S. R. Stroberg, J. A. Tostevin, M. Vandebrouck, D. Weisshaar, and K. Wim- mer, A proton density bubble in the doubly magic 34Si nucleus, Nature Physics13, 152 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    Baumann, A

    P. Baumann, A. Huck, G. Klotz, A. Knipper, G. Walter, G. Marguier, H. L. Ravn, C. Richard-Serre, A. Poves, and J. Retamosa, 34Si: A new doubly magic nucleus?, Phys. Lett. B228, 458 (1989)

    1989

  48. [48]

    Nummela, P

    S. Nummela, P. Baumann, E. Caurier, P. Dessagne, A. Jokinen, A. Knipper, G. Le Scornet, C. Mieh´ e, F. Nowacki, M. Oinonen, Z. Radivojevic, M. Ramdhane, G. Walter, and J. ¨Ayst¨ o, Spectroscopy of34,35Si byβde- cay:sd−fpshell gap and single-particle states, Phys. Rev. C63, 044316 (2001)

    2001

  49. [49]

    Paschalis, P

    S. Paschalis, P. Fallon, A. O. Macchiavelli, R. M. Clark, H. L. Crawford, C. J. Lister, R. Vondrasek, D. Bazin, J. S. Berryman, C. A. Bertulani, B. A. Brown, C. M. Campbell, M. P. Carpenter, R. Chapman, P. Chowdhury, A. Gade, T. Glasmacher, J. P. Greene, A. A. Hecht, C. R. Hoffman, R. V. F. Janssens, B. P. Kay, T. Lauritsen, C. Nair, H. J. Ong, W. Reviol,...

    2011

  50. [50]

    Rotaru, F

    F. Rotaru, F. Negoita, S. Gr´ evy, J. Mrazek, S. Lukyanov, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, O. Sorlin, C. Borcea, R. Borcea, A. Buta, L. C´ aceres, S. Calinescu, R. Chevrier, Z. Dombr´ adi, J. M. Daugas, D. Lebhertz, Y. Penionzhke- vich, C. Petrone, D. Sohler, M. Stanoiu, and J. C. Thomas, Unveiling the intruder deformed 0 + 2 state in 34Si, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 092...

    2012

  51. [51]

    Lic˘ a, F

    R. Lic˘ a, F. Rotaru, M. J. G. Borge, S. Gr´ evy, F. Negoit ¸˘ a, A. Poves, O. Sorlin, A. N. Andreyev, R. Borcea, C. Costache, H. De Witte, L. M. Fraile, P. T. Greenlees, M. Huyse, A. Ionescu, S. Kisyov, J. Konki, I. Lazarus, M. Madurga, N. M˘ arginean, R. M˘ arginean, C. Mi- hai, R. E. Mihai, A. Negret, F. Nowacki, R. D. Page, J. Pakarinen, V. Pucknell, ...

    2019

  52. [52]

    Grocutt, R

    L. Grocutt, R. Chapman, M. Bouhelal, F. Haas, A. Goas- duff, J. F. Smith, R. S. Lubna, S. Courtin, D. Bazza- cco, T. Braunroth, L. Capponi, L. Corradi, X. Derkx, P. Desesquelles, M. Doncel, E. Fioretto, A. Gottardo, V. Liberati, B. Melon, D. Mengoni, C. Michelagnoli, T. Mijatovi´ c, V. Modamio, G. Montagnoli, D. Montanari, K. F. Mulholland, D. R. Napoli, ...

    2022

  53. [53]

    Rudolph, C

    D. Rudolph, C. Baktash, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, W. Satula, M. Devlin, D. R. Hart- ley, D. R. LaFosse, F. Lerma, D. G. Sarantites, A. V. Afanasjev, M. P. Carpenter, T. Lauritsen, A. O. Mac- chiavelli, C. E. Svensson, C. Andreoiu, M. Axiotis, E. Farnea, A. Gadea, D. R. Napoli, and G. de Angelis, Spherical and deformed high-spin states in 38Ar, Phys. ...

    2002

  54. [54]

    G. A. P. Engelbertink, K. W. Jones, J. W. Olness, and E. K. Warburton, Lifetime of the 5−, 4585 keV 38Ar level, Phys. Lett. B33B, 353 (1970)

    1970

  55. [55]

    J. J. Kolata, Investigation of high-spin states in 38Ar, Phys. Rev. C13, 1944 (1976)

    1944