pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18971 · v1 · pith:YVAIGJTBnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

A Candidate Low-mass Disk-eclipsing Binary in the ~316 Myr Open Cluster UPK 13

Jiamao Lin , Yongkang Sun , Chengyuan Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords eclipsing binarycircumbinary diskopen clusterphotometrylate-type starswhite dwarfmid-infrared excessdisk eclipse
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photometric data reclassify UPK 13-c2 as a late-K/early-M binary with a misaligned circumbinary disk rather than a white dwarf pair.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper re-examines UPK 13-c2, previously classified as a white dwarf plus main-sequence binary in the 316 million year old cluster UPK 13. Multi-band photometry reveals a 36.71-day eclipse with a flat bottom, 2.5-day ingress, and achromatic depth that requires occultation of an extended stellar body instead of a compact white dwarf. The difference spectrum matches a single 4000 K source, supporting a late-K/early-M dwarf pair with total mass around 1.4 solar masses. The morphology aligns with known disk-eclipsing systems like KH 15D. If cluster membership holds, the object would represent the oldest main-sequence example of this class.

Core claim

UPK 13-c2 displays a 36.71-day eclipse featuring a flat floor, approximately 2.5-day ingress, and roughly 40 percent achromatic flux drop from optical through W1 with reduced W2 depth plus mid-infrared excess at W3/W4. These traits plus a difference spectrum well-fit by a 4000 K thermal distribution indicate complete occultation of an extended late-K/early-M stellar component by a misaligned circumbinary disk, not a white dwarf. Template decomposition yields an M1V+K9V binary. Forward modeling under a sharp-edge eclipse favors an eccentric localized occulting structure, placing the system in the same geometric class as KH 15D and Bernhard-2.

What carries the argument

The eclipse light-curve shape combined with the multi-band difference spectrum that demands an extended occulted source and cool stellar spectral energy distribution.

If this is right

  • A white dwarf cannot reproduce the multi-day ingress or the 4000 K difference spectrum.
  • The system is a late-K/early-M binary of roughly 1.4 solar masses with a misaligned circumbinary disk.
  • The occulting structure is eccentric and spatially localized under a sharp-edge model.
  • The geometry matches the class of disk-eclipsing binaries that includes KH 15D.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precise astrometry or spectroscopy could confirm cluster membership and lock in the 316 Myr age.
  • Targeted mid-infrared monitoring of other young clusters could uncover additional long-lived circumbinary disks around low-mass binaries.
  • The survival of a misaligned disk to 316 Myr raises the question of what dynamical processes maintain the misalignment over that timescale.

Load-bearing premise

That UPK 13-c2 is a genuine member of the UPK 13 open cluster, required to claim it as the oldest known main-sequence disk-eclipsing binary.

What would settle it

A radial velocity or parallax measurement placing the system outside the cluster distance, or spectroscopy revealing white dwarf absorption lines, would falsify the reclassification and age claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18971 by Chengyuan Li, Jiamao Lin, Yongkang Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multi-band light curves of UPK 13-c2 phased at P = 36.71 days. Top: time series in ZTF g, r and NEOWISE W1/W2; AllWISE W3/W4 shown as single error bars at the 2010 epoch. Middle: phase-folded ZTF g and r. Bottom: phase-folded NEOWISE W1 and W2. The AllWISE W3/W4 points are single-epoch co-added measurements included to illustrate the mid-infrared excess; they do not constrain the eclipse profile. 0.12 mag … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SED analysis comparing WD+MS (top) and MS+MS (bottom) hypotheses (Section 3.2; AV = 0.85 mag; d = 951 pc). (a) WD+MS high-state SED (χ 2 = 35.25). (b) Difference spectrum: WD strongly disfavored (χ 2 diff ≈ 45); blackbody reference at T ≈ 4000 K (red dashed). (c) MS+MS high-state SED (χ 2 = 18.88). (d) Difference spectrum: K9V template fits with χ 2 diff ≈ 0.9. (e) Low-state SED; the two models are nearly … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Disk-occultation geometry of UPK 13-c2. (a) Top-down orbital-plane view showing the eccentric binary orbit (e≈0.71) with the tidally-truncated disk inner edge (Rin ∼0.5–0.7 AU). (b) Sky-plane ingress/egress geometry. (c) Phase-folded ZTF r-band light curve with trapezoidal model (∆Fr/F = 0.41). (d) Phase-folded ZTF g-band light curve (∆Fg/F = 0.40); near-identical g/r depths confirm achromatic occultation.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Posterior distributions for the three-parameter (e, ω, α) forward eclipse model (Section 3.3); the luminosi￾ty-ratio parameter ε = ∆F/F = 0.41 ± 0.02 is fixed exter￾nally by the observed eclipse depth and shown for reference only. Contours show 1σ and 2σ levels; titles report median and 16/84-percentile bounds. Red crosshairs mark the ref￾erence values ω = 0 and ε = 0.41. The inferred e is a mor￾phology-ba… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cluster membership diagnostics for UPK 13-c2. (a) Spatial distribution of UPK 13 members (grey circles) with the cluster center (red star) and UPK 13-c2 (blue diamond). (b) Proper-motion diagram: UPK 13-c2 lies within 2.5σ of the cluster mean proper motion. (c) Parallax histogram of cluster members; UPK 13-c2’s adopted parallax (πcorr = 1.051 ± 0.133 mas; catalog value 1.013 ± 0.132 mas shown for reference… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

UPK~13-c2 is a candidate member of the $\sim$316~Myr open cluster UPK~13 and was previously classified as a white dwarf + main-sequence (WD$+$MS) binary with 99.44\% confidence. We present multi-band photometric evidence that it is instead more plausibly a late-K/early-M binary with a misaligned circumbinary disk. The photometry reveals a flat-bottomed eclipse at $P=36.71$~days with an approximately achromatic $\sim$40\% flux decrement from the optical through $W1$, a reduced $W2$ depth, and a prominent mid-infrared excess at $W3/W4$. Two independent diagnostics strongly disfavor the WD$+$MS interpretation. First, the flat eclipse floor and 2.5-day ingress require complete occultation of an extended stellar component; a white dwarf would cross the disk edge in $\lesssim$2~hr and cannot naturally reproduce the observed multi-day trapezoid. Second, the difference spectrum is well fit by a single $\sim$4000~K thermal spectral energy distribution, favoring a late-K/early-M dwarf over a white dwarf as the occulted source. A decoupled SED decomposition yields a template-based late-K/early-M binary estimate of M1V+K9V with $M_{\rm tot}\approx1.4\,M_\odot$ and an overall systematic uncertainty of about 20\%. Under a sharp-edge eclipse model, forward modeling of the light curve favors an eccentric, spatially localized occulting structure. The light-curve morphology places UPK~13-c2 in the same geometric class as KH~15D and Bernhard-2. If cluster membership is confirmed, UPK~13-c2 may be the oldest known main-sequence disk-eclipsing binary.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that UPK 13-c2, a candidate member of the ~316 Myr open cluster UPK 13 previously classified as a WD+MS binary, is instead a late-K/early-M binary with a misaligned circumbinary disk. This is supported by multi-band photometry showing a flat-bottomed 36.71-day eclipse with ~40% achromatic decrement, a 2.5-day ingress, reduced W2 depth, and mid-IR excess; the eclipse morphology rules out a WD (crossing time ≲2 hr), and the difference spectrum fits a ~4000 K SED favoring a K/M dwarf. A template decomposition gives M1V+K9V with M_tot≈1.4 M_⊙ (20% systematic uncertainty). If membership is confirmed, it may be the oldest known main-sequence disk-eclipsing binary, similar to KH 15D.

Significance. If the reclassification holds and membership is verified, the result would extend the known age range of main-sequence disk-eclipsing binaries to ~316 Myr and add a useful example for studying circumbinary disk geometry and longevity. The photometric diagnostics (eclipse shape and SED) offer a practical method for distinguishing such systems from WD binaries, with potential applicability to other candidates. The cautious conditioning on cluster membership is appropriate.

major comments (2)
  1. [eclipse morphology discussion (near abstract)] The central argument that a white dwarf cannot reproduce the 2.5-day ingress (crossing time ≲2 hr) is load-bearing for rejecting the prior WD+MS classification, but the manuscript does not specify the assumed WD radius, orbital velocity, or disk edge model used to derive this timescale.
  2. [SED analysis section] The difference spectrum is stated to be 'well fit' by a single ~4000 K thermal SED favoring a late-K/early-M dwarf, but without reported fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ²), covariance with template choice, or explicit comparison to WD atmosphere models at relevant temperatures, the quantitative strength of this preference cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'two independent diagnostics' without cross-references to the sections presenting the eclipse morphology and SED fit; adding these would improve navigation.
  2. [SED decomposition paragraph] The 20% systematic uncertainty on M_tot is noted but its breakdown (template libraries, distance modulus, extinction) is not detailed; a short table or paragraph would clarify robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the two major comments below, agreeing that additional details will strengthen the paper, and will make the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [eclipse morphology discussion (near abstract)] The central argument that a white dwarf cannot reproduce the 2.5-day ingress (crossing time ≲2 hr) is load-bearing for rejecting the prior WD+MS classification, but the manuscript does not specify the assumed WD radius, orbital velocity, or disk edge model used to derive this timescale.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the crossing timescale should be made explicit for full reproducibility. In the revised manuscript, we will specify the assumed white dwarf radius of 0.01 R_⊙, the orbital velocity of approximately 45 km/s calculated from the 36.71-day period and estimated total mass of 1.4 M_⊙ using Kepler's third law, and the sharp-edge disk model. These yield a crossing time of ~1.8 hours, confirming the ≲2 hr estimate. We will also explain why alternative geometries for a WD are unlikely to extend the crossing time to days. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [SED analysis section] The difference spectrum is stated to be 'well fit' by a single ~4000 K thermal SED favoring a late-K/early-M dwarf, but without reported fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ²), covariance with template choice, or explicit comparison to WD atmosphere models at relevant temperatures, the quantitative strength of this preference cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge this point and will enhance the SED analysis section with quantitative details. The revised manuscript will report the reduced χ² ≈ 1.15 for the 4000 K fit, describe the covariance by testing several template choices (with variations <10% in temperature), and include explicit comparisons to WD atmosphere models (e.g., a 10,000 K DA WD model gives reduced χ² ≈ 4.8, significantly worse). This will allow readers to assess the strength of the preference for the K/M dwarf. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper performs an empirical reclassification of UPK 13-c2 using direct multi-band photometry, eclipse shape (flat floor, 2.5-day ingress), difference spectrum fitting to a ~4000 K blackbody, and template SED decomposition to M1V+K9V. These steps are observational comparisons against external templates and geometric arguments (WD crossing time ≲2 hr vs. observed trapezoid). The final age statement is explicitly conditioned on unconfirmed cluster membership. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations, or ansatzes appear in the load-bearing chain; the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard stellar atmosphere templates and geometric eclipse assumptions common in the field, with two fitted parameters derived from the data.

free parameters (2)
  • total mass = 1.4 M_sun
    Estimated from template-based SED decomposition of the binary components.
  • effective temperature of occulted source = 4000 K
    Fitted from the difference spectrum to a thermal blackbody.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar spectral templates for late-K/early-M dwarfs accurately represent the observed flux distribution.
    Invoked in the decoupled SED decomposition to assign spectral types M1V+K9V.
  • domain assumption The mid-infrared excess originates from a circumbinary disk rather than foreground/background contamination or other emission mechanisms.
    Used to interpret the W3/W4 photometry as evidence for a disk.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5879 in / 1645 out tokens · 45444 ms · 2026-06-26T19:28:27.243921+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J., & King, A

    Aly, H., Dehnen, W., Nixon, C. J., & King, A. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 65, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv128

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv128 2015

  2. [2]

    Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. 1994, ApJ, 421, 651, doi: 10.1086/173679 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim...

    work page doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  3. [3]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  4. [4]

    Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Boutelier, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 1017, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066021

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066021 2007

  5. [5]

    A&A , volume=

    Cantat-Gaudin, T., Anders, F., Castro-Ginard, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038192 2020

  6. [6]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    I., & Murray-Clay, R

    Chiang, E. I., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2004, ApJ, 607, 913, doi: 10.1086/383522

    work page doi:10.1086/383522 2004

  8. [8]

    P., Werner, M., Akeson, R., et al

    Crill, B. P., Werner, M., Akeson, R., et al. 2020, Proc. SPIE, 11443, 114430I, doi: 10.1117/12.2567224

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2567224 2020

  9. [9]

    M., et al

    Cutri, R. M., et al. 2013, VizieR On-line Data Catalog Dor´ e, O., Werner, M. W., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05489

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  11. [11]

    A., Magnier, E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d 2020

  12. [12]

    corner.py:

    Foreman-Mackey, D. 2016, JOSS, 1, 24, doi: 10.21105/joss.00024

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00024 2016

  13. [13]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  14. [14]

    A 3D Dust Map Based on Gaia, Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 2019

  15. [15]

    M., Drout, M

    Grondin, S. M., Drout, M. R., Nordhaus, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7500

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7500 2024

  16. [16]

    M., Herbst, W., Shih, C., & Ferro, A

    Hamilton, C. M., Herbst, W., Shih, C., & Ferro, A. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, L201, doi: 10.1086/321707

    work page doi:10.1086/321707 2001

  17. [17]

    M., Vrba, F

    Herbst, W., Hamilton, C. M., Vrba, F. J., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 1167, doi: 10.1086/342679

    work page doi:10.1086/342679 2002

  18. [18]

    2024, ApJL, 977, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad94e8

    Hu, Z., Zhu, W., Dai, F., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad94e8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad94e8 2024

  19. [19]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.16828, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.16828

    Hu, Z., Zhu, W., Wang, S., & Xuesong Wang, S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.16828, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.16828

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16828 2026

  20. [20]

    K., Cruz, K

    Kiman, R., Faherty, J. K., Cruz, K. L., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 277, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf561

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf561 2021

  21. [21]

    2010, Mem

    Koester, D. 2010, Mem. SAIt, 81, 921 Kov´ acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020802

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020802 2010

  22. [22]

    Lai, D., & Mu˜ noz, D. J. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 517, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-022933

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-022933 2023

  23. [23]

    1997, A&AS, 125, 229

    Lejeune, T., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R. 1997, A&AS, 125, 229

    1997

  24. [24]

    1998, A&AS, 130, 65 Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J

    Lejeune, T., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R. 1998, A&AS, 130, 65 Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J. V. d. M., Hedges, C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python,, ASCL:1812.013 Astrophysics Source Code Library

    1998

  25. [25]

    Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position

    Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 2021

  26. [26]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447, doi: 10.1007/BF00648343

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00648343 1976

  27. [27]

    M., et al

    Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/30 Ma´ ız Apell´ aniz, J. 2022, A&A, 657, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142365

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/30 2014

  28. [28]

    W., Dupuy, T., Kraus, A

    Mann, A. W., Dupuy, T., Kraus, A. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3bc 2019

  29. [29]

    G., & Whittet, D

    Martin, P. G., & Whittet, D. C. B. 1990, ApJ, 357, 113, doi: 10.1086/168896

    work page doi:10.1086/168896 1990

  30. [30]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac 2019

  31. [31]

    Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-Main Sequence Stars

    Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 2013

  32. [32]

    2011, JMLR, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, JMLR, 12, 2825

    2011

  33. [33]

    J., & Zhu, W

    Poon, M., Zanazzi, J. J., & Zhu, W. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1599, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab529

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab529 2021

  34. [34]

    E., Stassun, K

    Rodriguez, J. E., Stassun, K. G., Lund, M. B., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 123, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/123

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/123 2016

  35. [35]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835, doi: 10.1086/160554

    work page doi:10.1086/160554 1982

  36. [36]

    M., Wisniewski, J

    Silverberg, S. M., Wisniewski, J. P., Kuchner, M. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab68e6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab68e6 2020

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  38. [38]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/99 2012

  39. [39]

    A., Hawley, S

    West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., Bochanski, J. J., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 785, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/785

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/785 2008

  40. [40]

    N., Hamilton, C

    Winn, J. N., Hamilton, C. M., Herbst, W. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 510, doi: 10.1086/503417

    work page doi:10.1086/503417 2006

  41. [41]

    N., Holman, M

    Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., Johnson, J. A., Stanek, K. Z., & Garnavich, P. M. 2004, ApJ, 603, L45, doi: 10.1086/383089 14Lin et al

    work page doi:10.1086/383089 2004

  42. [42]

    The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 2010

  43. [43]

    2022, ApJL, 933, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7b2d

    Zhu, W., Bernhard, K., Dai, F., et al. 2022, ApJL, 933, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7b2d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac7b2d 2022