pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22408 · v1 · pith:QVTBUG7Tnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Starobinsky-inflation in asymptotically safe shift-symmetric scalar-tensor theory

Benjamin Koch , Cristobal Laporte , Frank Saueressig This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords asymptotically safe gravityscalar-tensor theoriesStarobinsky inflationHorndeski theorynon-Gaussian fixed pointsrenormalization group improvementcosmological constraintsshift symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Starobinsky inflation rules out two of three non-Gaussian fixed points in asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how scalaron-driven inflation constrains asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories. Starting from a Horndeski-type theory, a renormalization group improvement generates higher-derivative couplings fixed by microscopic parameters at the Gaussian fixed point. Cosmological bounds on the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling are derived using multi-field inflationary models. These bounds exclude UV-completions from two non-Gaussian fixed points while identifying viable trajectories from the third.

Core claim

Applying renormalization group improvement to a shift-symmetric Horndeski-type scalar-tensor theory produces higher-derivative couplings determined by the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling. In the context of Starobinsky inflation analyzed via multi-field dynamics, cosmological observations constrain this coupling such that two of the three available non-Gaussian fixed points are ruled out as UV-completions, while the third fixed point admits phenomenologically viable renormalization group trajectories.

What carries the argument

Renormalization group improvement of the Horndeski-type theory that fixes higher-derivative couplings in terms of the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling parameter.

If this is right

  • The non-minimal gravity-matter coupling affects effective higher-derivative couplings in the gravitational sector.
  • Multi-field inflationary models yield explicit bounds on the non-minimal coupling from cosmological data.
  • Two of the three non-Gaussian fixed points lead to incompatible UV-completions.
  • Only RG trajectories from the third fixed point remain viable for matching inflation observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the RG improvement accurately captures the structure of first-principle computations, cosmological data can directly test the fixed point structure of quantum gravity.
  • This method may extend to other inflationary scenarios to further restrict the parameter space of asymptotically safe theories.
  • Precision measurements of inflationary observables could distinguish between different viable trajectories from the remaining fixed point.

Load-bearing premise

The structure of higher-derivative couplings generated by the renormalization group improvement procedure is expected to match those arising in first-principle asymptotic safety computations.

What would settle it

A first-principle calculation of the effective higher-derivative couplings in the asymptotically safe theory that deviates from the RG-improved values would falsify the applicability of the improvement procedure used here.

read the original abstract

We investigate the constraining power of scalaron-driven inflation on asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories. Starting from a Horndeski-type theory and applying a renormalization group improvement procedure generates higher-derivative couplings which are fixed in terms of the microscopic parameters - a structure that is expected to occur also within first principle computations based on the asymptotic safety mechanism. The latter are taken to be the free parameters appearing at the Gaussian fixed point. We find that the free parameter initially associated with the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling is not confined to the gravity-matter sector of the theory and also enters the effective higher-derivative couplings in the gravitational sector. We review the setting of multi-field inflationary models which is appropriate to analyze the inflationary dynamics in this context and illustrate their applicability by working out the explicit bounds on the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling resulting from cosmological observations. Given the fixed point structure of asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories, the results indicate that UV-completions by two of the three available non-Gaussian fixed points can be ruled out while pinpointing phenomenologically viable RG trajectories emanating from the third fixed point.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates constraints from scalaron-driven (Starobinsky) inflation on asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories. It starts from a Horndeski-type action, applies an RG-improvement procedure that generates higher-derivative couplings fixed by microscopic parameters (including the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling ξ), reviews the multi-field inflation framework, and derives observational bounds on ξ. The central claim is that, given the fixed-point structure of AS scalar-tensor theories, two of the three non-Gaussian fixed points are ruled out while viable RG trajectories from the third are identified.

Significance. If the RG-improvement step faithfully reproduces the structure of first-principles AS computations, the work would provide a concrete link between the fixed-point landscape of quantum gravity and cosmological observables, offering a falsifiable way to discriminate among UV completions. The explicit use of multi-field dynamics and the mapping of microscopic parameters to the effective potential are strengths that could be built upon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the RG-improved higher-derivative couplings 'are fixed in terms of the microscopic parameters - a structure that is expected to occur also within first principle computations based on the asymptotic safety mechanism' is load-bearing for the subsequent ruling-out of two non-Gaussian fixed points, yet the manuscript does not derive these couplings from the functional renormalization group equation or demonstrate quantitative agreement with known fixed-point solutions of the scalar-tensor truncation. This leaves the mapping from ξ to the inflationary potential as an external modeling assumption rather than an output of the AS mechanism.
  2. [multi-field inflation analysis] The multi-field inflation analysis (reviewed in the appropriate section) produces bounds on the non-minimal coupling that are then used to discriminate fixed points; however, because the RG-improvement step itself is not shown to be consistent with the beta functions at the non-Gaussian fixed points, the exclusion of two fixed points rests on an unverified extrapolation whose error cannot be quantified from the given construction.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the microscopic parameters and the RG-improved couplings should be introduced with explicit equations early in the text to improve traceability of how ξ propagates into the gravitational sector.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the scope and nature of the RG-improvement procedure used in the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the RG-improved higher-derivative couplings 'are fixed in terms of the microscopic parameters - a structure that is expected to occur also within first principle computations based on the asymptotic safety mechanism' is load-bearing for the subsequent ruling-out of two non-Gaussian fixed points, yet the manuscript does not derive these couplings from the functional renormalization group equation or demonstrate quantitative agreement with known fixed-point solutions of the scalar-tensor truncation. This leaves the mapping from ξ to the inflationary potential as an external modeling assumption rather than an output of the AS mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that the RG-improvement procedure is presented as an ansatz motivated by the structure anticipated from asymptotic safety computations, rather than a direct derivation from the functional renormalization group equations performed in this manuscript. The work explores the phenomenological implications of this structure for the fixed-point landscape under Starobinsky inflation, consistent with approaches commonly used to connect UV fixed points to IR observables in the asymptotic safety literature. We will revise the abstract and relevant sections to state more explicitly that this constitutes a modeling assumption based on the expected fixed-point structure, without claiming a first-principles FRG derivation within the present analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [multi-field inflation analysis] The multi-field inflation analysis (reviewed in the appropriate section) produces bounds on the non-minimal coupling that are then used to discriminate fixed points; however, because the RG-improvement step itself is not shown to be consistent with the beta functions at the non-Gaussian fixed points, the exclusion of two fixed points rests on an unverified extrapolation whose error cannot be quantified from the given construction.

    Authors: The multi-field analysis yields observational constraints on the non-minimal coupling ξ, which are then applied to the parameter values at the non-Gaussian fixed points reported in the existing literature on asymptotically safe scalar-tensor theories. While a complete verification of consistency with the beta functions at those fixed points would require extending the truncation to include the generated higher-derivative operators and recomputing the flow, the present study uses the fixed-point values to identify potential tensions and viable trajectories. This provides an initial indication of which fixed points may be compatible with inflation, serving as motivation for more comprehensive computations. We do not claim to have quantified the extrapolation error, which indeed lies beyond the construction presented. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: RG improvement treated as modeling assumption, not self-derived

full rationale

The paper starts from a Horndeski-type theory, applies an RG improvement procedure whose output structure is described as 'expected to occur also within first principle computations based on the asymptotic safety mechanism,' and then uses the resulting effective action to constrain parameters against cosmological data. The microscopic parameters are taken from the Gaussian fixed point and bounded externally; the mapping to higher-derivative couplings is introduced as an ansatz whose fidelity to full AS computations is not claimed to be proven inside the paper. No equation is shown to equal another by construction, no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks even though the RG-improvement step carries modeling uncertainty.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; free parameters and axioms extracted directly from the provided text.

free parameters (1)
  • non-minimal gravity-matter coupling
    The free parameter initially associated with the non-minimal gravity-matter coupling; its value is bounded by cosmological observations and also enters gravitational higher-derivative terms.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The structure generated by the renormalization group improvement procedure is expected to occur within first-principle asymptotic safety computations
    Stated explicitly in the abstract as the justification for using the RG-improved action to constrain fixed points.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5723 in / 1269 out tokens · 42636 ms · 2026-06-26T10:14:03.027106+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. W. Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys.10(1974) 363

    1974

  2. [2]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini,The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 064036 [0811.2197]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Deffayet, G

    C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and A. Vikman,Covariant Galileon,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 084003 [0901.1314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Kobayashi,Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,Rept

    T. Kobayashi,Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) 086901 [1901.07183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Hui and A

    L. Hui and A. Nicolis,No-Hair Theorem for the Galileon,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 241104 [1202.1296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou,Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 251102 [1312.3622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Kobayashi and N

    T. Kobayashi and N. Tanahashi,Exact black hole solutions in shift symmetric scalar–tensor theories,PTEP2014(2014) 073E02 [1403.4364]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis and M. Hassaine,Charged Galileon black holes,JCAP05 (2015) 031 [1503.02545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, A. Leh´ ebel and T. Moskalets,Black holes in a cubic Galileon universe,JCAP09(2016) 011 [1605.07438]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis and A. Leh´ ebel,Black holes and stars in Horndeski theory, Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 154002 [1604.06402]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Ogawa, T

    H. Ogawa, T. Kobayashi and T. Suyama,Instability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064078 [1510.07400]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis and A. Leh´ ebel,Asymptotically flat black holes in Horndeski theory and beyond,JCAP04(2017) 027 [1702.01938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Benkel, T

    R. Benkel, T. P. Sotiriou and H. Witek,Black hole hair formation in shift-symmetric generalised scalar-tensor gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 064001 [1610.09168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Hajian, S

    K. Hajian, S. Liberati, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and M. H. Vahidinia,On Black Hole Temperature in Horndeski Gravity,Phys. Lett. B812(2021) 136002 [2005.12985]

    arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Khoury, M

    J. Khoury, M. Trodden and S. S. C. Wong,Existence and instability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories,JCAP11(2020) 044 [2007.01320]. – 26 –

    arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Creminelli, N

    P. Creminelli, N. Loayza, F. Serra, E. Trincherini and L. G. Trombetta,Hairy Black-holes in Shift-symmetric Theories,JHEP08(2020) 045 [2004.02893]

    arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Barreira, B

    A. Barreira, B. Li, C. Baugh and S. Pascoli,The observational status of Galileon gravity after Planck,JCAP08(2014) 059 [1406.0485]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    J. Renk, M. Zumalac´ arregui, F. Montanari and A. Barreira,Galileon gravity in light of ISW, CMB, BAO and H 0 data,JCAP10(2017) 020 [1707.02263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Frusciante, S

    N. Frusciante, S. Peirone, L. Atayde and A. De Felice,Phenomenology of the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model and cosmological bounds,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 064001 [1912.07586]

    arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Zumalacarregui,Gravity in the Era of Equality: Towards solutions to the Hubble problem without fine-tuned initial conditions,Phys

    M. Zumalacarregui,Gravity in the Era of Equality: Towards solutions to the Hubble problem without fine-tuned initial conditions,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 023523 [2003.06396]

    arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Petronikolou, S

    M. Petronikolou, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis,AlleviatingH 0 tension in Horndeski gravity,2110.01338

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol. 3 of100 Years of General Relativity. World Scientific, 2017, 10.1142/10369

    work page doi:10.1142/10369 2017

  23. [23]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety. Cambridge University Press, 1, 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Quantum Einstein Gravity,New J. Phys.14(2012) 055022 [1202.2274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Eichhorn,An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter,Front

    A. Eichhorn,An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2019) 47 [1810.07615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Quantum gravity: a fluctuating point of view, 2007.10353

    arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Saueressig,The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity,2302.14152

    F. Saueressig,The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity,2302.14152

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Eichhorn,Quantum-gravity-induced matter self-interactions in the asymptotic-safety scenario,Phys

    A. Eichhorn,Quantum-gravity-induced matter self-interactions in the asymptotic-safety scenario,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 105021 [1204.0965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Laporte, A

    C. Laporte, A. D. Pereira, F. Saueressig and J. Wang,Scalar-tensor theories within Asymptotic Safety,JHEP12(2021) 001 [2110.09566]

    arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Pastor-Guti´ errez, J

    A. Pastor-Guti´ errez, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,The Asymptotically Safe Standard Model: From quantum gravity to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking,2207.09817

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Percacci and G

    R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca,Search of scaling solutions in scalar-tensor gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 188 [1501.00888]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Maitiniyazi, C

    Y. Maitiniyazi, C. Wetterich and M. Yamada,Scaling solutions for gauge invariant flow equations in dilaton quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106023 [2512.14009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Wetterich,Quantum Gravity and Scale Symmetry in Cosmology

    C. Wetterich,Quantum Gravity and Scale Symmetry in Cosmology. 2023.2211.03596

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Renormalization group improved black hole space-times,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043008 [hep-th/0002196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  35. [35]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Cosmology of the Planck era from a renormalization group for quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 043508 [hep-th/0106133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  36. [36]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Cosmology with selfadjusting vacuum energy density from a renormalization group fixed point,Phys. Lett. B527(2002) 9 [astro-ph/0106468]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Reuter and E

    M. Reuter and E. Tuiran,Quantum Gravity Effects in Rotating Black Holes, in11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pp. 2608–2610, 12, 2006,hep-th/0612037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Koch and F

    B. Koch and F. Saueressig,Structural aspects of asymptotically safe black holes,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 015006 [1306.1546]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Koch and F

    B. Koch and F. Saueressig,Black holes within Asymptotic Safety,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29 (2014) 1430011 [1401.4452]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    Koch and P

    B. Koch and P. Rioseco,Black Hole Solutions for Scale Dependent Couplings: The de Sitter and the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Case,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 035002 [1501.00904]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Platania,Dynamical renormalization of black-hole spacetimes,Eur

    A. Platania,Dynamical renormalization of black-hole spacetimes,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 470 [1903.10411]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Knorr and A

    B. Knorr and A. Platania,Sifting quantum black holes through the principle of least action, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L021901 [2202.01216]

    arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Platania,Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity

    A. Platania,Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity. 2023.2302.04272

    arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Reuter and H

    M. Reuter and H. Weyer,Quantum gravity at astrophysical distances?,JCAP12(2004) 001 [hep-th/0410119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  45. [45]

    Reuter and H

    M. Reuter and H. Weyer,Running Newton constant, improved gravitational actions, and galaxy rotation curves,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 124028 [hep-th/0410117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    Bonanno, B

    A. Bonanno, B. Koch and A. Platania,Cosmic Censorship in Quantum Einstein Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 095012 [1610.05299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Bonanno, B

    A. Bonanno, B. Koch and A. Platania,Gravitational collapse in Quantum Einstein Gravity, Found. Phys.48(2018) 1393 [1710.10845]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Bonanno, D

    A. Bonanno, D. Malafarina and A. Panassiti,Dust Collapse in Asymptotic Safety: A Path to Regular Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 031401 [2308.10890]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Bentivegna, A

    E. Bentivegna, A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Confronting the IR fixed point cosmology with high redshift supernova data,JCAP01(2004) 001 [astro-ph/0303150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    Reuter and H

    M. Reuter and H. Weyer,Renormalization group improved gravitational actions: A Brans-Dicke approach,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 104022 [hep-th/0311196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,From big bang to asymptotic de Sitter: Complete cosmologies in a quantum gravity framework,JCAP09(2005) 012 [hep-th/0507167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  52. [52]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Entropy Production during Asymptotically Safe Inflation, Entropy13(2011) 274 [1011.2794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Bonanno, A

    A. Bonanno, A. Platania and F. Saueressig,Cosmological bounds on the field content of asymptotically safe gravity–matter models,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 229 [1803.02355]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Hindmarsh, D

    M. Hindmarsh, D. Litim and C. Rahmede,Asymptotically Safe Cosmology,JCAP07 (2011) 019 [1101.5401]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    Zarikas,Renormalization group approaches to Quantum Gravity and Tensions in Modern Cosmology,PoSCORFU2023(2024) 186 [2410.07818]

    V. Zarikas,Renormalization group approaches to Quantum Gravity and Tensions in Modern Cosmology,PoSCORFU2023(2024) 186 [2410.07818]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Contreras, ´A

    E. Contreras, ´A. Rinc´ on, B. Koch and P. Bargue˜ no,A regular scale-dependent black hole solution,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2017) 1850032 [1711.08400]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Hern´ andez-Arboleda,´A

    A. Hern´ andez-Arboleda,´A. Rinc´ on, B. Koch, E. Contreras and P. Bargue˜ no,Preliminary test of cosmological models in the scale-dependent scenario,1802.05288. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Contreras, ´A

    E. Contreras, ´A. Rinc´ on, G. Panotopoulos, P. Bargue˜ no and B. Koch,Black hole shadow of a rotating scale–dependent black hole,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 064053 [1906.06990]

    arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    P. D. Alvarez, B. Koch, C. Laporte and ´A. Rinc´ on,Can scale-dependent cosmology alleviate theH 0 tension?,JCAP06(2021) 019 [2009.02311]

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    P. D. Alvarez, B. Koch, C. Laporte and A. Rincon,Observational constraints on scale-dependent cosmology,Phys. Dark Univ.45(2024) 101531 [2210.11853]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    B. Koch, G. J. Olmo, A. Riahinia, ´A. Rinc´ on and D. Rubiera-Garcia,Quasi-normal modes and shadows of scale-dependent regular black holes,JCAP03(2026) 048 [2506.15944]

    arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Neckam, C

    P. Neckam, C. K¨ ading, B. Koch, C. Laporte, M. Pitschmann, A. Riahinia et al., Equivalence of scalar-tensor theories and scale-dependent gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.43 (2026) 045012 [2511.04467]

    arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Gubitosi, R

    G. Gubitosi, R. Ooijer, C. Ripken and F. Saueressig,Consistent early and late time cosmology from the RG flow of gravity,JCAP12(2018) 004 [1806.10147]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Gubitosi, C

    G. Gubitosi, C. Ripken and F. Saueressig,Scales and hierachies in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: a review,Found. Phys.49(2019) 972 [1901.01731]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys

    C. Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 90 [1710.05815]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  66. [66]

    T. R. Morris,The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 2411 [hep-ph/9308265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  67. [67]

    Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,Phys

    M. Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 971 [hep-th/9605030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    Griguolo and R

    L. Griguolo and R. Percacci,The Beta functions of a scalar theory coupled to gravity,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5787 [hep-th/9504092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  69. [69]

    Shaposhnikov and C

    M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich,Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Lett. B683(2010) 196 [0912.0208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Narain and R

    G. Narain and R. Percacci,Renormalization Group Flow in Scalar-Tensor Theories. I, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 075001 [0911.0386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Narain and C

    G. Narain and C. Rahmede,Renormalization Group Flow in Scalar-Tensor Theories. II, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 075002 [0911.0394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    Zanusso, L

    O. Zanusso, L. Zambelli, G. P. Vacca and R. Percacci,Gravitational corrections to Yukawa systems,Phys. Lett. B689(2010) 90 [0904.0938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [73]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn and R. Percacci,Matter matters in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 084035 [1311.2898]

    arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Labus, R

    P. Labus, R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca,Asymptotic safety inO(N)scalar models coupled to gravity,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 274 [1505.05393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Meibohm, J

    J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Asymptotic safety of gravity-matter systems,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 084035 [1510.07018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn, P. Labus and R. Percacci,Asymptotic safety in an interacting system of gravity and scalar matter,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 044049 [1512.01589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Hamada and M

    Y. Hamada and M. Yamada,Asymptotic safety of higher derivative quantum gravity non-minimally coupled with a matter system,JHEP08(2017) 070 [1703.09033]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    Eichhorn, S

    A. Eichhorn, S. Lippoldt and V. Skrinjar,Nonminimal hints for asymptotic safety,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 026002 [1710.03005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Eichhorn, Y

    A. Eichhorn, Y. Hamada, J. Lumma and M. Yamada,Quantum gravity fluctuations flatten the Planck-scale Higgs potential,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 086004 [1712.00319]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Biemans, A

    J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig,Renormalization group fixed points of foliated gravity-matter systems,JHEP05(2017) 093 [1702.06539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.