pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26171 · v1 · pith:WEM2VAVSnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

LCG: Long-Context Consistent Image Generation with Sparse Relational Attention

Zihao Wang , Yijia Xu , Haoze Zheng , Xuran Ma , Haokun Gui , Harry Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords long-context image generationcharacter consistencysparse relational attentionrouting consistency constraintmulti-image text-to-imagecomics and storyboardssynthetic dataset
0
0 comments X

The pith

Long-context image generation maintains character consistency using sparse relational attention and routing constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes LCG to generate consistent sequences of images from text, solving the drift problem in models for comics and narratives. It introduces Sparse Relational Attention to handle long contexts efficiently by selective feature attention. The Routing Consistency Constraint uses identity-aware masks to align appearances across images. A new dataset LCCD with hundreds of thousands of sequences supports training. Tests show improved performance over baselines in alignment and consistency for multi-character scenes.

Core claim

LCG achieves consistent long-context multi-image text-to-image generation by employing Sparse Relational Attention to selectively attend to core features across extended contexts and the Routing Consistency Constraint to align structural patterns using identity-aware masks, outperforming baselines in prompt alignment and character consistency on the LCCD dataset.

What carries the argument

Sparse Relational Attention (SRA), which selectively attends to core features across extended visual contexts to ensure tractable propagation of semantic and layout information.

If this is right

  • Supports generation of comics, storyboards, and visual narratives with maintained consistency.
  • Scales to sequences of 6 to 20 images without computational explosion.
  • Improves handling of complex multi-character scenes.
  • Provides a large synthetic dataset for further research in consistent image sequences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be adapted for generating consistent video frames from text descriptions.
  • Real-world testing on human-drawn story sequences would be needed to confirm generalization beyond synthetic data.
  • Combining this with other diffusion model improvements might enable interactive story creation tools.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic Long-Context Consistency Dataset and identity-aware masks capture the distribution of real-world multi-image consistency challenges without introducing new artifacts.

What would settle it

Evaluating LCG on a collection of real human-created comic or storyboard sequences and measuring if consistency holds compared to baselines would test the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26171 by Haokun Gui, Haoze Zheng, Harry Yang, Xuran Ma, Yijia Xu, Zihao Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed LCG pipeline. The model integrates Sparse Relational Attention (SRA) and Routing Consistency Constraint (RCC) to achieve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Qualitative comparison on long-context multi-image text-to-image generation. Rows correspond to Flux.1-dev, Story2Board, StoryDiffusion, and LCG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative examples of user-specified identity generation. The left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Additional long-context consistent image generation results. LCG preserves identity and appearance across single- and multi-character scenarios while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison for the RCC ablation. Red circles highlight regions where removing RCC weakens prompt alignment, character consistency, or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scalability comparison between dense cross-branch attention and SRA on H800. SRA reduces peak memory usage and latency as the number of jointly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: LCCD training-set distribution. Left: sequence length distribution over 6–20 generated images. Right: character-count distribution across training [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative samples from the LCCD dataset (Part I). These 20-frame sequences show representative samples from our synthesis and filtering pipeline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative samples from the LCCD dataset (Part II). Additional examples demonstrating the high degree of character identity preservation and prompt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Single-character multi-image generation results of LCG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Additional single-character multi-image generation results of LCG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Multi-character multi-image generation results of LCG. For compactness, each prompt in the figure omits the shared prefix: “Photorealistic cinematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Visual comparison for the ablation of RCC. Red circles highlight regions showing degradation in prompt alignment and character consistency when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent image generation models achieve impressive quality in single-image synthesis, but often fail to maintain consistency across sequential outputs, as required in comics, storyboards, and visual narratives. We propose Long-Context Generation (LCG), a framework for long-context multi-image text-to-image generation, to improve consistency and scalability in long-context multi-image generation. LCG employs the Sparse Relational Attention (SRA) mechanism to selectively attend to core features across extended visual contexts, ensuring that the propagation of semantic and layout information remains computationally tractable. To enforce semantic alignment, we introduce the Routing Consistency Constraint (RCC), which leverages identity-aware masks to align structural patterns across generation branches, effectively mitigating drift in appearance even in complex multi-character scenes. To support training and evaluation in this setting, we construct the Long-Context Consistency Dataset (LCCD), a large-scale synthetic dataset comprising character-centric multi-image sequences spanning varied situational contexts. LCCD contains 600K training sequences and a separate 1K test set, with each sequence containing 6 to 20 images. The experiments demonstrate that LCG outperforms the compared baselines in prompt alignment and character consistency for long-context image generation, including multi-character scenes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Long-Context Generation (LCG), a framework for consistent multi-image text-to-image synthesis over long sequences. It introduces Sparse Relational Attention (SRA) to handle extended visual contexts tractably and the Routing Consistency Constraint (RCC) that uses identity-aware masks to reduce appearance drift. A synthetic Long-Context Consistency Dataset (LCCD) with 600K training sequences (6-20 images each) and a 1K test split is constructed to train and evaluate the method. The central claim is that LCG outperforms baselines on prompt alignment and character consistency, including in multi-character scenes.

Significance. If the quantitative gains hold under broader evaluation, the work would address a practically important limitation of current diffusion models for narrative applications such as comics and storyboards. The construction of a large-scale character-centric dataset is a concrete contribution that could support future research even if the proposed mechanisms require refinement.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section (and abstract): all reported quantitative results are confined to the held-out 1K test split of the synthetic LCCD; no cross-evaluation on external real-world comic, storyboard, or multi-image narrative datasets is described. Because the RCC relies on identity-aware masks derived from the same synthetic construction, this leaves the generalization claim load-bearing and untested.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Routing Consistency Constraint): the description of how identity-aware masks are generated and how the alignment loss is formulated is not accompanied by an ablation that isolates the contribution of RCC versus SRA alone, making it impossible to determine whether the reported consistency improvements are attributable to the proposed constraint or to other training choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that experiments demonstrate outperformance but supplies no numerical metrics, baseline names, or statistical details; these should be added to the abstract or a results table for immediate readability.
  2. [§3.1] Notation for the sparse attention mask in SRA is introduced without an explicit equation reference; adding a numbered equation would improve clarity when the mechanism is first described.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The comments correctly identify limitations in our current experimental scope and the need for component ablations. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section (and abstract): all reported quantitative results are confined to the held-out 1K test split of the synthetic LCCD; no cross-evaluation on external real-world comic, storyboard, or multi-image narrative datasets is described. Because the RCC relies on identity-aware masks derived from the same synthetic construction, this leaves the generalization claim load-bearing and untested.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of evaluation on external real-world datasets leaves the generalization claim untested. The LCCD was constructed specifically to enable controlled, large-scale study of long-sequence consistency challenges that are difficult to annotate at scale in real data. We will revise the manuscript to (1) explicitly qualify the scope of our claims to the synthetic setting and (2) add a dedicated limitations paragraph discussing the challenges and potential avenues for real-world transfer. We do not plan to add new cross-dataset experiments in this revision, as they would require substantial new data collection and annotation effort beyond the current work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Routing Consistency Constraint): the description of how identity-aware masks are generated and how the alignment loss is formulated is not accompanied by an ablation that isolates the contribution of RCC versus SRA alone, making it impossible to determine whether the reported consistency improvements are attributable to the proposed constraint or to other training choices.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised manuscript will include a new ablation table that trains and evaluates (a) SRA alone and (b) SRA + RCC under identical training settings. This will isolate the incremental effect of the Routing Consistency Constraint on the reported metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical claims rest on held-out synthetic test split without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, derivations, or first-principles claims that reduce to inputs by construction. LCG is presented as a framework with SRA and RCC mechanisms whose performance is evaluated empirically on a held-out 1K test split of the separately constructed LCCD (600K training sequences). This is standard train/test separation on synthetic data and does not equate the reported outperformance to a fitted parameter or self-definition. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the visible text. The central claims remain independent of the evaluation protocol itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the implicit assumption that the synthetic dataset matches real consistency needs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5753 in / 1066 out tokens · 18688 ms · 2026-06-26T01:10:56.420052+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

3 extracted references

  1. [1]

    InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1931–1941. Yaowei Li, Xiaoyu Li, Zhaoyang Zhang, Yuxuan Bian, Gan Liu, Xinyuan Li, Jiale Xu, Wenbo Hu, Yating Liu, Lingen Li, Jing Cai, Yuexian Zou, Yancheng He, and Ying Shan. 2025. IC-Custom: Diverse Image Customiz...

    arXiv 1931

  2. [2]

    arXiv preprint(2023)

    Photomaker: Customizing realistic human photos via stacked id embedding. arXiv preprint(2023). Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, Baiqi Li, Jiayao Li, Xide Xia, Graham Neubig, Pengchuan Zhang, and Deva Ramanan. 2024. Evaluating text-to-visual generation with image- to-text generation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 366–384. Chang Liu, Haoning...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    belt" appearing only in specific frames. • Weakened Prompt Fidelity: Incomplete realization of com- plex actions, such as

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 10684–10695. Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. 2023. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject- driven generation. InProceedi...

    arXiv 2023