Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 142 references

Demographics of planet-forming disks with the SKAO

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SKAO will enable the first large-scale high-resolution survey of centimeter emission from nearby planet-forming disks.

desk verdict This is a planning document that organizes the case for SKAO cm-wave disk surveys but adds no new calculations or results. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.28171 v1 pith:7QKQGEL3 submitted 2026-06-26 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

Antonio Garufi , Sebastián Pérez , John D. Ilee , Daniel J. Price , Paola Pinilla , Marion Villenave , Eleonora Bianchi , Luca Cacciapuoti
show 16 more authors
Greta Guidi Giovanni Sabatini Yinhao Wu Asmita Bhandare Claudio Codella Nicolás Cuello Liton Majumdar Mayank Narang Linda Podio Danae Polychroni Isaac Radley Jessica Speedie Leonardo Testi Claudia Toci Diego Turrini David Wilner
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR
keywords planet-formingdisksprotoplanetarycentimeter-sizedgrainsdustevolutionSKAOplanetformationdiskdemographicspebbles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that while ALMA has advanced understanding of micron-sized dust in disks, major uncertainties remain about the presence and role of centimeter-sized grains in planet formation. It establishes that the SKAO can address this by surveying disk emission at centimeter wavelengths across hundreds of targets in nearby star-forming regions. This approach would resolve the spatial distribution, spectral properties, and evolutionary trends of these grains. The resulting data would constrain dust growth, disk dynamics, and total dust masses while also offering chances to detect protoplanets and circumplanetary material.

What carries the argument

Centimeter-wavelength high-resolution imaging of protoplanetary disk emission to detect and map centimeter-sized grains.

What would settle it

A survey returning no detectable centimeter emission from a statistically large number of the targeted disks would show that the grains are either not abundant enough or do not emit as expected.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The SKAO will fill the observational gap by enabling the first large-scale, high-resolution survey of disk emission at centimeter wavelengths, allowing detection and characterization of pebbles through their spatial distribution, spectral properties, and evolutionary trends to provide essential constraints on dust growth and disk dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

Centimeter-sized grains exist in sufficient abundance and produce detectable emission at SKAO frequencies across a large sample of nearby disks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resolving pebble spatial distributions will constrain mechanisms of dust growth and radial drift in disks.
  • Spectral index measurements will reveal grain size distributions and compositions.
  • Comparing trends across multiple star-forming regions will map evolutionary stages of solid material.
  • Improved mass estimates will reduce uncertainties in the total solid content available for planet formation.
  • Detections of localized emission may identify protoplanets or their circumplanetary disks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Pairing SKAO centimeter data with ALMA millimeter maps could trace the full grain size spectrum from microns to centimeters in the same disks.
  • Demographic statistics from the survey might identify environmental factors that accelerate or suppress pebble formation.
  • If pebble emission proves common, it would support models in which these grains act as the main feedstock for core accretion.
  • Target selection strategies outlined here could be adapted to other facilities for multi-wavelength follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript outlines the scientific rationale for using the SKAO to perform the first large-scale, high-resolution surveys of planet-forming disks at centimeter wavelengths. It argues that this will enable characterization of centimeter-sized grains (pebbles), resolve their spatial distribution and spectral properties, and provide constraints on dust growth and disk dynamics in nearby star-forming regions. The text presents observational strategies, target selection criteria, predictions for detecting hundreds of disks, and potential applications to measuring actual dust masses, identifying protoplanets, and studying circumplanetary disks.

Significance. If the detectability assumptions and strategies prove robust, the work would offer timely guidance for SKAO early-science programs and help address a recognized gap in pebble evolution studies left by ALMA. It correctly identifies centimeter-wave observations as a key missing element for demographic studies of solids in disks. The absence of any quantitative sensitivity calculations or error budgets, however, limits the paper's immediate utility as a planning document.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introductory sections: the central claim that SKAO 'will enable the first large-scale, high-resolution survey' and 'predictions on the detectability of hundreds of nearby disks' is asserted without any sensitivity calculations, assumed flux densities, grain-size distributions, or SKAO performance parameters. These quantities are load-bearing for the prospective conclusions yet are not derived or referenced.
  2. [Observational strategies] Section on observational strategies and target selection: no error budget, confusion limits, or assumed centimeter-grain opacities are provided to support the assertion that a statistically useful sample can be observed. The weakest assumption (sufficient abundance and detectable emission from cm-sized grains) is stated as motivation rather than demonstrated.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript refers to itself as 'this chapter' in several places; clarify whether it is intended as a standalone journal article or a book chapter.
  2. Notation for SKAO versus SKA is used inconsistently; adopt a single acronym throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and agree that incorporating quantitative elements will improve the paper's utility as a planning document for SKAO observations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introductory sections: the central claim that SKAO 'will enable the first large-scale, high-resolution survey' and 'predictions on the detectability of hundreds of nearby disks' is asserted without any sensitivity calculations, assumed flux densities, grain-size distributions, or SKAO performance parameters. These quantities are load-bearing for the prospective conclusions yet are not derived or referenced.

    Authors: We agree that the current version presents these claims at a high level without explicit derivations. The predictions draw on standard literature values for cm-grain opacities and SKAO sensitivity estimates, but we acknowledge the need for transparency. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection with sensitivity calculations, assumed flux densities, grain-size distributions, and direct references to SKAO performance parameters to support the detectability predictions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Observational strategies] Section on observational strategies and target selection: no error budget, confusion limits, or assumed centimeter-grain opacities are provided to support the assertion that a statistically useful sample can be observed. The weakest assumption (sufficient abundance and detectable emission from cm-sized grains) is stated as motivation rather than demonstrated.

    Authors: We accept this point. The manuscript motivates the science case but does not include the requested error budgets, confusion limits, or explicit opacity assumptions. We will revise the observational strategies section to incorporate these quantitative elements, including an error budget and demonstration of detectable cm-grain emission under realistic assumptions, to better support the claim of a statistically useful sample. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is an observational strategy paper outlining planned SKAO surveys of planet-forming disks at centimeter wavelengths. It presents scientific motivation, target selection criteria, and detectability estimates but contains no derivations, fitted parameters, equations, or predictions that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All claims are prospective and framed as motivations for new data rather than self-referential results. No self-citations serve as load-bearing premises for any asserted theorem or uniqueness result. The central claim (SKAO enabling large-scale cm-wave disk surveys) is independent of any internal fitting or renaming of known patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review of observational strategies and does not introduce new parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demographics of planet-forming disks with the SKAO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7QKQGEL3

@misc{pith2026260628171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demographics of planet-forming disks with the SKAO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7QKQGEL3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.28171}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding how solid material in planet-forming disks evolves from micron-sized dust to planetary cores is a central challenge in modern astrophysics. This study has advanced dramatically in the past decade, largely driven by ALMA and high-contrast imaging facilities. However, major uncertainties remain regarding the presence, evolution, and role of centimeter-sized grains (the pebbles) in planet formation. The SKAO will fill this gap by enabling the first large-scale, high-resolution survey of disk emission at centimeter wavelengths. This chapter presents the scientific rationale and observational strategies to detect and characterize pebbles in the planet-forming disks of nearby star-forming regions. By resolving their spatial distribution, spectral properties, and evolutionary trends, SKA will offer essential constraints on dust growth and disk dynamics. This work provides observational strategies, target selection, and predictions on the detectability of hundreds of nearby disks. The chapter also explores SKA's potential to uncover the actual dust mass in disks, protoplanets and their circumplanetary disks, and other aspects of the planet formation. Together, these capabilities will establish SKAO as a cornerstone facility for planet formation science in the coming decade.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28171 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of the dust grain growth and disk structure. The physical processes, observational tech￾niques, and disk components depicted are described in Sect. 1. The horizontal axis in the upper panel repre￾sents increasing particle size (and implicitly evolutionary time), from micron-sized grains to planetary cores. The disk in the sketch coarsely extends to 30–100 au. The inner part highlights the motion of the ionize… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Disk demographics from ALMA. The left panel highlights the observed decrease of dust mass as YSOs transition from Class I to Class II, and as we observe older star-forming regions such as Upper Sco (older than 5 Myr – in contrast to Ophiuchus, Chamaleon, Lupus, and Taurus of 1–3 Myr). To the right, an illustrative gallery of disks with different size from various star-forming regions is shown. Very extended disks su… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sketch of SED from a young stellar object. The dust emission is optically thick up to 3 mm. After 1 cm, the contribution from the free-free emission surpasses that from the dust. The result is an abrupt flattening for the observed photometry with wavelength. In case of gyro-synchrotron emission, the trend becomes positive after a few cm. With SKA in Band 5b, we expect the ionized gas contribution to be dominant over… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicted disk flux versus extent for the explored sample. The various lines indicate the 3𝜎 observ￾ability for different disk extent, integration time, and weighting parameters (red lines for Briggs weighting with Robust 1, orange for a tapered Natural weight, and blu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number of disks detected and resolved with different weighting schemes and integration times. The bars indicate the range of detected or resolved objects depending on the disk extent in Band 5b (from 25% to 100% of the continuum extent measured by ALMA). and thus allow…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spitzer map of the Ophiuchus molecular cloud from the ’Cores to Disks’ Legacy Project. Cyan circles indicate the locations of planet-forming disks detected in the ODISEA survey (Cieza et al., 2019). The large white circle shows the SKA-Mid primary beam at 1.4 GHz (∼1 d…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 141 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/62. A. Alaguero et al. A&A, 687:A311, July

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/62

  2. [2]

    ALMA Partnership et al

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449683. ALMA Partnership et al. ApJ, 808:L3, July

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449683

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L3. S. M. Andrews. ARA&A, 58:483–528, Aug

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/l3

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302. S. M. Andrews and J. P . Williams. ApJ, 631:1134–1160, Oct

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1086/432712. S. M. Andrews et al. ApJ, 820(2):L40, Apr

    work page doi:10.1086/432712

  6. [6]

    22 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L40. 22 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. S. M. Andrews et al. ApJ, 869(2):L41, Dec

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/l40

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741. M. Ansdell et al. ApJ, 828:46, Sept

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/46. M. Ansdell et al. AJ, 153(5):240, May

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/1/46

Show all 142 references
  1. [9]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa69c0. M. Ansdell et al. ApJ, 859:21, May

    doi

  2. [10]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab890. M. Audard et al. In H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P . Dullemond, and T. Henning, editors, Protostars and Planets VI, pages 387–410, Jan

    doi

  3. [11]

    doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch017. J. Bae et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors, Protostars and Planets VII, volume 534 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 423, July

    doi

  4. [12]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314. S. A. Barenfeld, J. M. Carpenter, L. Ricci, and A. Isella. ApJ, 827(2):142, Aug

    doi

  5. [13]

    doi: 10.1086/115385. M. Benisty et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, volume 534 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 605, July

    doi

  6. [14]

    doi: 10.1038/nature11805. L. M. Bernabò et al. ApJ, 927(2):L22, Mar

    doi

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac574e. A. Bhandare et al. A&A, 687:A158, July

    doi

  8. [16]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449594. T. Birnstiel et al. ApJ, 869(2):L45, Dec

    doi

  9. [17]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743. I. Bonnell and P . Bastien. ApJ, 401:L31, Dec

    doi

  10. [18]

    doi: 10.1086/186663. E. M. A. Borchert, D. J. Price, C. Pinte, and N. Cuello. MNRAS, 510(1):L37–L41, Feb. 2022a. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab123. E. M. A. Borchert, D. J. Price, C. Pinte, and N. Cuello. MNRAS, 517(3):4436–4446, Dec. 2022b. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2872. J. M. Brown ...

    doi

  11. [19]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/496. L. Cacciapuoti et al. ApJ, 961(1):90, Jan

    doi

  12. [20]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f17. L. Cacciapuoti et al. A&A, 700:A188, Aug

    doi

  13. [21]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554645. J. M. Carpenter et al. ApJ, 978(1):117, Jan

    doi

  14. [22]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ebc. C. Carrasco-González et al. ApJ, 821(1):L16, Apr

    doi

  15. [23]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L16. C. Carrasco-González et al. ApJ, 883(1):71, Sept

    doi

  16. [24]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33. D. Carrera et al. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2504.13246, Apr

    doi

  17. [25]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504. 13246. S. Casassus et al. ApJ, 754:L31, Aug

    doi

  18. [26]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L31. S. Casassus et al. ApJ, 812(2):126, Oct

    doi

  19. [27]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/126. P . Cazzoletti et al. A&A, 626:A11, June

    doi

  20. [28]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935273. L. A. Cieza et al. Nature, 535(7611):258–261, July

    doi

  21. [29]

    doi: 10.1038/nature18612. L. A. Cieza et al. MNRAS, 474(4):4347–4357, Mar

    doi

  22. [30]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3059. L. A. Cieza et al. MNRAS, 482(1):698–714, Jan

    doi

  23. [31]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2653. L. A. Cieza et al. MNRAS, 501(2):2934–2953, Feb

    doi

  24. [32]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3787. L. I. Cleeves, E. A. Bergin, and T. J. Harries. ApJ, 807(1):2, July

    doi

  25. [33]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 807/1/2. M. S. Connelley and B. Reipurth. ApJ, 861(2):145, July

    doi

  26. [34]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaba7b. C. Contreras Peña et al. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2504.21237, Apr

    doi

  27. [35]

    2504.21237

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2504.21237. 23 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. A. Coutens et al. A&A, 631:A58, Nov

    doi

  28. [36]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935340. N. Cuello, F. Ménard, and D. J. Price. European Physical Journal Plus, 138(1):11, Jan

    doi

  29. [37]

    doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03602-w. N. Cuello, A. Alaguero, and P . P . Poblete. Symmetry, 17(3):344, Feb

    doi

  30. [38]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347042. E. Dartois et al. Nature Astronomy, 8:359–367, Mar

    doi

  31. [39]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02155-x. M. de Juan Ovelar et al. MNRAS, 459(1):L85–L89, June

    doi

  32. [40]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw051. G. Dipierro et al. MNRAS, 453(1):L73–L77, Oct

    doi

  33. [41]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv105. K. Doi and A. Kataoka. ApJ, 912(2):164, May

    doi

  34. [42]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a6. K. Doi and A. Kataoka. ApJ, 957(1):11, Nov

    doi

  35. [43]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf5df. B. T. Draine. ARA&A, 41:241–289, Jan

    doi

  36. [44]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840. B. T. Draine and A. Lazarian. ApJ, 508(1):157–179, Nov

    doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    doi: 10.1086/306387. J. Drążkowska and J. Szulágyi. ApJ, 866(2):142, Oct

    doi

  38. [46]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0fd. B. Dubrulle, G. Morfill, and M. Sterzik. Icarus, 114(2):237–246, Apr

    doi

  39. [47]

    1995.1058

    doi: 10.1006/icar. 1995.1058. G. Duchêne, C. McCabe, A. M. Ghez, and B. A. Macintosh. ApJ, 606(2):969–982, May

    1995 doi

  40. [48]

    doi: 10.1086/383126. C. P . Dullemond et al. ApJ, 869(2):L46, Dec

    doi

  41. [49]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742. M. M. Dunham et al. ApJ, 710(1):470–502, Feb

    doi

  42. [50]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/470. D. Fedele et al. A&A, 600:A72, Apr

    doi

  43. [51]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629860. R. Franceschi et al. A&A, 657:A74, Jan

    doi

  44. [52]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141705. L. Francis and N. van der Marel. ApJ, 892(2):111, Apr

    doi

  45. [53]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b63. F. Fressin et al. ApJ, 766(2):81, Apr

    doi

  46. [54]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/81. S. Fromang and R. P . Nelson. A&A, 496(3):597–608, Mar

    doi

  47. [56]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb. M. Galametz et al. A&A, 632:A5, Dec

    doi

  48. [57]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936342. A. Garufi et al. A&A, 620:A94, Dec

    doi

  49. [58]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833872. A. Garufi et al. A&A, 658:A104, Feb

    doi

  50. [59]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141264. A. Garufi et al. A&A, 694:A290, Feb

    doi

  51. [60]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496. S. Giacalone et al. ApJ, 882(1):33, Sept

    doi

  52. [61]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab311a. J. S. Greaves et al. Nature Astronomy, 2:662–667, June

    doi

  53. [62]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0495-z. O. Gressel, R. P . Nelson, N. J. Turner, and U. Ziegler. ApJ, 779(1):59, Dec

    doi

  54. [63]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349046. G. Guidi et al. A&A, 664:A137, Aug

    doi

  55. [64]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142303. G. Guidi et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  56. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf853. I. Han et al. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2506.16569, June

    doi

  57. [66]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.16569. G. H. Herbig. ApJ, 214:747–758, Jun

    doi

  58. [67]

    doi: 10.1086/155304. M. Hoare et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 115, 24 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. Apr

    doi

  59. [68]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0115. J. Huang et al. ApJ, 976(1):132, Nov

    doi

  60. [69]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84df. L. A. Hühn et al. A&A, 696:A162, Apr

    doi

  61. [70]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452689. A. Isella et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 117:251101, Dec

    doi

  62. [71]

    URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251101

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251101. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251101. S. Jin et al. ApJ, 818(1):76, Feb

    doi

  63. [72]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/76. A. Johansen, S. Ida, and R. Brasser. A&A, 622:A202, Feb

    doi

  64. [74]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957. Á. Kóspál et al. ApJS, 256(2):30, Oct

    doi

  65. [75]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac0f09. M. Lambrechts and A. Johansen. A&A, 544:A32, Aug

    doi

  66. [76]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219127. C.-F. Lee, Z.- Y . Li, and N. J. Turner. Nature Astronomy, page 466, Oct

    doi

  67. [77]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd5c9. H. B. Liu. ApJ, 914(1):25, June

    doi

  68. [78]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf8b6. H. B. Liu et al. ApJ, 972(2):163, Sept

    doi

  69. [79]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5dab. G. Lodato et al. MNRAS, 518(3):4481–4493, Jan

    doi

  70. [80]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3223. D. Lommen et al. A&A, 495(3):869–879, Mar

    doi

  71. [81]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810999. F. Long et al. ApJ, 869(1):17, Dec

    doi

  72. [82]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1. F. Long et al. ApJ, 915(2):131, July

    doi

  73. [83]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff53. F. Long et al. ApJ, 937(1):L1, Sept

    doi

  74. [84]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8b10. W. Lyra, A. Johansen, M. H. Cañas, and C.-C. Y ang. ApJ, 946(2):60, Apr

    doi

  75. [85]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/1. E. Macías et al. ApJ, 865(1):37, Sept

    doi

  76. [86]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad811. C. F. Manara, A. Morbidelli, and T. Guillot. A&A, 618:L3, Oct

    doi

  77. [88]

    doi: 10.1086/155591. A. Miotello et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors, Protostars and Planets VII, volume 534 of Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , page 501, July

    doi

  78. [89]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203. 09818. M. Montesinos et al. ApJ, 806:253, June

    doi

  79. [90]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/253. D. Mouillet, A. M. Lagrange, J. C. Augereau, and F. Ménard. A&A, 372:L61–L64, June

    doi

  80. [91]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010660. J. R. Najita and S. J. Kenyon. MNRAS, 445(3):3315–3329, Dec

    doi

  81. [92]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1994. B. J. Norfolk et al. MNRAS, 502(4):5779–5796, Apr

    doi

  82. [93]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab313. S. S. R. Offner et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference 25 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. Series, volume 534 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 275, July

    doi

  83. [94]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014903. E. Pantin, C. Waelkens, and P . O. Lagage. A&A, 361:L9–L12, Sept

    doi

  84. [95]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/125. L. M. Pérez et al. ApJ, 813(1):41, Nov

    doi

  85. [96]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/41. S. Perez et al. ApJ, 811(1):L5, Sept

    doi

  86. [97]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/811/1/L5. V . Piétu, A. Dutrey, and S. Guilloteau. A&A, 467(1):163–178, May

    doi

  87. [98]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20066537. J. E. Pineda et al. Nature Astronomy, 4:1158–1163, Jan

    doi

  88. [99]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z. J. E. Pineda et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors, Protostars and Planets VII, volume 534 of Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , page 233, July

    doi

  89. [100]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205. 03935. P . Pinilla, T. Birnstiel, and C. Walsh. A&A, 580:A105, Aug

    doi

  90. [102]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa816f. P . Pinilla et al. ApJ, 878(1):16, June

    doi

  91. [103]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1cb8. C. Pinte et al. ApJ, 816(1):25, Jan

    doi

  92. [104]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/25. C. Pinte et al. Nature Astronomy, 3:1109–1114, Aug

    doi

  93. [105]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0852-6. E. Pizzati, G. P . Rosotti, and B. Tabone. MNRAS, 524(2):3184–3200, Sept

    doi

  94. [106]

    doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0190. D. Powell et al. ApJ, 878(2):116, June

    1996 doi

  95. [107]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ce. B. Reipurth and C. Aspin. ApJ, 608(1):L65–L68, June

    doi

  96. [108]

    doi: 10.1086/422250. B. Reipurth et al. In H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P . Dullemond, and T. Henning, editors,Protostars and Planets VI, pages 267–290, Jan

    doi

  97. [109]

    doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch012. Á. Ribas, C. C. Espaillat, E. Macías, and L. M. Sarro. A&A, 642:A171, Oct

    doi

  98. [110]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201015039. A. Riols and G. Lesur. A&A, 617:A117, Sept

    doi

  99. [111]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833212. J. Rodmann et al. A&A, 446(1):211–221, Jan

    doi

  100. [112]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054038. G. Sabatini et al. A&A, 684:L12, Apr

    doi

  101. [113]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449616. G. Sabatini et al. A&A, 698:L16, June

    doi

  102. [114]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554750. P . D. Sheehan et al. ApJ, 934(2):95, Aug

    doi

  103. [115]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a3b. A. Sierra and S. Lizano. ApJ, 892(2):136, Apr

    doi

  104. [116]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7d32. S.-i. Sirono and D. Turrini. Scientific Reports , 15(1):30919, Aug

    doi

  105. [117]

    doi: 10.1038/ s41598-025-12643-x. M. Tazzari et al. MNRAS, 506(2):2804–2823, Sept. 2021a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1808. M. Tazzari et al. MNRAS, 506(4):5117–5128, Oct. 2021b. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1912. 26 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. R. Teague et...

    doi

  106. [118]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0117. L. Testi et al. A&A, 663:A98, July

    doi

  107. [119]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141380. J. J. Tobin et al. ApJ, 890(2):130, Feb

    doi

  108. [120]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6f64. J. J. Tobin et al. Nature, 615(7951):227–230, Mar

    doi

  109. [121]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05676-z. A. Tripathi, S. M. Andrews, T. Birnstiel, and D. J. Wilner. ApJ, 845(1):44, Aug

    doi

  110. [122]

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/ac2b2f. D. Turrini, F. Marzari, D. Polychroni, and L. Testi. ApJ, 877(1):50, May

  111. [123]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037851. C. Ubach et al. MNRAS, 425:3137–3161, Oct

    doi

  112. [124]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21603.x. H. Uchimura, T. Kudoh, and Y . Tsukamoto. ApJ, 984(2):143, May

    2012 doi

  113. [125]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ adc806. R. F. van Capelleveen et al. ApJ, 990(1):L8, Sept

    doi

  114. [126]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf721. H. Vedantham et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  115. [127]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038087. M. Villenave et al. A&A, 653:A46, Sept

    doi

  116. [128]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140496. M. Villenave et al. ApJ, 930(1):11, May

    doi

  117. [129]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5fae. M. Villenave et al. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2503.05872, Mar

    doi

  118. [130]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503. 05872. E. I. Vorobyov and S. Basu. ApJ, 805(2):115, June

    doi

  119. [131]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/115. E. I. Vorobyov et al. A&A, 683:A202, Mar

    doi

  120. [132]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348023. P . Weber et al. ApJ, 952(1):L17, July

    doi

  121. [133]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace186. S. J. Weidenschilling. MNRAS, 180:57–70, July

    doi

  122. [134]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/180.1.57. D. J. Wilner, P . T. P . Ho, and L. F. Rodriguez. ApJ, 470:L117, Oct

    doi

  123. [135]

    doi: 10.1086/310307. D. J. Wilner, P . T. P . Ho, J. H. Kastner, and L. F. Rodríguez. ApJ, 534(1):L101–L104, May

    doi

  124. [136]

    doi: 10.1086/312642. D. J. Wilner et al. ApJ, 626(2):L109–L112, June

    doi

  125. [137]

    doi: 10.1086/431757. F. Windmark et al. A&A, 540:A73, Apr

    doi

  126. [138]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118475. C. M. Wright et al. MNRAS, 453:414–438, Oct

    doi

  127. [139]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1619. Y . Wu et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  128. [140]

    doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07

    2007 doi

  129. [141]

    27 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al

    doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03616-4. 27 Demographics of planet-forming disks Antonio Garufi et al. W. Zakri et al. ApJ, 924(2):L23, Jan

    doi

  130. [142]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ae. K. Zhang, G. A. Blake, and E. A. Bergin. ApJ, 806:L7, June

    doi

  131. [143]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/806/ 1/L7. B. Zhao et al. Space Sci. Rev., 216(3):43, Apr

    doi

  132. [144]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00664-z. Z. Zhu. MNRAS, 483:4221–4241, Mar

    doi

  133. [145]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3358. Z. Zhu, S. M. Andrews, and A. Isella. MNRAS, 479(2):1850–1865, Sept

    doi

  134. [146]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348526. 28

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.