pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31540 · v1 · pith:LTHBUJEFnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Growth optimization of shallow Ge quantum wells grown by molecular beam epitaxy

J.T. Dong , J.P. Thompson , R. Card , K. Sardashti , C.J.K. Richardson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords germanium quantum wellsmolecular beam epitaxyhole mobilitygrowth temperature optimizationinterface roughness scatteringshallow quantum wellshybrid superconductor-semiconductor qubits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optimized MBE growth temperature produces shallow Ge quantum wells with 105,000 cm²/Vs hole mobility at 2 K.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that systematic tuning of molecular beam epitaxy conditions for shallow strained germanium quantum wells, especially growth temperature plus thick buffers, raises hole mobility to a peak of 105,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K. This value exceeds prior shallow MBE-grown samples. Modeling attributes the gain mainly to lower interface roughness scattering. The result supports easier integration with epitaxial superconducting contacts for hybrid qubits. Additional mobility gains are projected from better surface passivation.

Core claim

Thick buffer layers combined with an optimal growth temperature in MBE yield shallow Ge quantum wells whose hole mobility reaches 105,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K, the highest reported for such shallow MBE samples, with the mobility increase traced to reduced interface roughness scattering.

What carries the argument

Growth-temperature optimization with thick buffers that reduces interface roughness scattering.

If this is right

  • Higher hole mobility improves coherence and gate performance in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor qubits.
  • The MBE process becomes compatible with in-situ epitaxial superconductor deposition.
  • Interface roughness remains the dominant scattering mechanism after temperature optimization.
  • Surface passivation improvements are expected to produce still higher mobilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar temperature tuning may raise mobilities in other shallow quantum-well materials grown by MBE.
  • The emphasis on interface quality could guide comparisons between MBE and alternative growth techniques for the same wells.
  • Scalable qubit fabrication becomes more feasible if the same buffers and temperature window work across wafer sizes.

Load-bearing premise

The reported mobility rise comes chiefly from lower interface roughness caused by the chosen growth temperature rather than from measurement differences or other uncontrolled variables.

What would settle it

Growth runs at the reported optimal temperature that fail to exceed previous MBE shallow-well mobilities, or direct interface-roughness measurements that show no correlation with the mobility values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31540 by C.J.K. Richardson, J.P. Thompson, J.T. Dong, K. Sardashti, R. Card.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic layer structure of the Ge QWs. Layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Post iodine etch Nomarski micrographs of Ge QWs grown with a) 700-nm-thick reverse graded buffer and b) 2000-nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a)-d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) Hole mobility dependence on carrier density for Ge QWs grown with varying temperatures, T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimentally measured mobility and calculated mobility at varying carrier densities for the Ge QWs grown with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Shallow strained Ge quantum wells have gained recent attention for realizing scalable, high-performance hybrid superconductor/semiconductor-based qubits. Epitaxial superconducting contacts can improve the quality and consistency of the superconductor/semiconductor interface. The growth of Ge quantum wells by molecular beam epitaxy is then motivating due to the relative ease of integration with epitaxial superconductor growth. However, the performance of Ge quantum wells grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) has been limited. To improve the properties of MBE-grown Ge quantum wells, the growth conditions were systematically optimized. Thick buffer layers are utilized to eliminate certain defects, and an optimal growth temperature is found. A peak hole mobility of 105,000 cm\textsuperscript{2}/Vs at 2 K is obtained in a 22-nm deep Ge quantum well, demonstrating that the Ge quantum wells grown in this study represent the highest mobilities for shallow MBE-grown samples. Mobility modeling indicates that the increase in mobility due to growth temperature optimization are likely due to a reduction in interface roughness scattering, and further improvements in mobility are expected through improved surface passivation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports systematic optimization of MBE growth conditions (thick buffers, growth temperature) for shallow strained Ge quantum wells intended for hybrid superconductor-semiconductor qubits. A peak hole mobility of 105,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K is achieved in a 22-nm-deep well; the authors conclude this is the highest value reported for shallow MBE-grown samples and, via mobility modeling, attribute the gain from temperature optimization primarily to reduced interface roughness scattering, with further gains expected from improved surface passivation.

Significance. If the mobility value, its attribution, and the literature comparison hold under scrutiny, the result would be a useful incremental advance for MBE-grown shallow Ge wells, facilitating better integration with epitaxial superconductors. The systematic growth-parameter study is a methodological strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the headline claim that 105,000 cm²/Vs represents the highest mobility for shallow MBE-grown samples is unsupported because no table or explicit list of prior literature values (with matched well depth, carrier density, and measurement temperature) is provided; without this, the assertion that prior MBE samples were limited by suboptimal conditions cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Modeling] Modeling subsection: the statement that mobility modeling 'indicates' the temperature-induced gain is due to reduced interface roughness scattering supplies no model equations, scattering-rate expressions, fitted parameters, or sensitivity analysis showing that other mechanisms (e.g., temperature-dependent impurity incorporation) were ruled out or held constant; this attribution is load-bearing for the optimization conclusion.
  3. [Results] Results section: the reported peak mobility is given as a single value without error bars, number of samples, or statistics on reproducibility, which is required to substantiate the central experimental claim when the abstract itself notes the absence of raw data and sample statistics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: growth rates, buffer thicknesses, and exact temperature set-points should be tabulated for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: mobility vs. density or temperature plots would benefit from explicit labeling of the optimized vs. non-optimized samples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the headline claim that 105,000 cm²/Vs represents the highest mobility for shallow MBE-grown samples is unsupported because no table or explicit list of prior literature values (with matched well depth, carrier density, and measurement temperature) is provided; without this, the assertion that prior MBE samples were limited by suboptimal conditions cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, matched comparison table is needed to support the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (in the Results section or as supplementary material) listing prior MBE-grown shallow Ge quantum-well mobilities together with well depth, carrier density, and measurement temperature. This will allow direct evaluation of the literature comparison and the statement that our optimized growth yields the highest reported value for such samples. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Modeling] Modeling subsection: the statement that mobility modeling 'indicates' the temperature-induced gain is due to reduced interface roughness scattering supplies no model equations, scattering-rate expressions, fitted parameters, or sensitivity analysis showing that other mechanisms (e.g., temperature-dependent impurity incorporation) were ruled out or held constant; this attribution is load-bearing for the optimization conclusion.

    Authors: The modeling relies on standard 2D scattering-rate expressions, but we acknowledge that the current text does not present the equations or parameter values. We will expand the Modeling subsection (or move the details to supplementary information) to include the relevant scattering-rate formulas, the fitted parameters, and a short discussion of why interface-roughness scattering is the dominant temperature-dependent term while other mechanisms remain comparatively constant under the growth conditions explored. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section: the reported peak mobility is given as a single value without error bars, number of samples, or statistics on reproducibility, which is required to substantiate the central experimental claim when the abstract itself notes the absence of raw data and sample statistics.

    Authors: The reported peak is the highest value obtained on an optimized wafer. We will revise the Results section to state the number of samples grown and measured under the final optimized conditions and to note the range of mobilities observed, thereby providing context on reproducibility. Because the abstract already flags the absence of full raw datasets, we will keep the presentation concise while adding this clarification; full device-level statistics remain outside the scope of the present optimization-focused study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental optimization with mobility reporting and qualitative modeling attribution

full rationale

The paper reports experimental growth optimization of Ge quantum wells via MBE, including buffer layer use and temperature tuning, culminating in a measured peak hole mobility of 105,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K. The abstract states that mobility modeling 'indicates' the gain is likely due to reduced interface roughness scattering, but this is a post-hoc attribution rather than a derivation or prediction that reduces to fitted inputs by construction. No equations, self-definitional parameters, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim is an empirical result with literature comparison; the modeling is described only as indicative and does not form a closed loop equivalent to the inputs. This is a standard experimental materials report with no circular structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials optimization study. No free parameters in a derivation, no new axioms invoked beyond standard semiconductor growth assumptions, and no invented entities postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5740 in / 1089 out tokens · 46048 ms · 2026-07-01T04:33:12.800581+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, L. Petit, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, A single-hole spin qubit, Nature Communications11, 3478 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    N. W. Hendrickx, D. P. Franke, A. Sammak, G. Scap- pucci, and M. Veldhorst, Fast two-qubit logic with holes in germanium, Nature577, 487 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    N. W. Hendrickx, L. Massai, M. Mergenthaler, F. J. Schupp, S.Paredes, S.W.Bedell, G.Salis,andA.Fuhrer, Sweet-spot operation of a germanium hole spin qubit with highly anisotropic noise sensitivity, Nature Mate- rials23, 920 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    van Riggelen-Doelman, C.-A

    F. van Riggelen-Doelman, C.-A. Wang, S. L. de Snoo, W. I. L. Lawrie, N. W. Hendrickx, M. Rimbach-Russ, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, C. Déprez, and M. Veldhorst, Coherent spin qubit shuttling through germanium quan- tum dots, Nature Communications15, 5716 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    O. Sagi, A. Crippa, M. Valentini, M. Janik, L.Baghumyan, G.Fabris, L.Kapoor, F.Hassani, J.Fink, S. Calcaterra, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, A gate tunable transmon qubit in planar Ge, Nature Com- munications15, 6400 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Kiyooka, C

    E. Kiyooka, C. Tangchingchai, L. Noirot, A. Leblanc, B. Brun, S. Zihlmann, R. Maurand, V. Schmitt, E. Du- mur, J.-M. Hartmann, F. Lefloch, and S. De Franceschi, Gatemon qubit on a germanium quantum-well het- erostructure, Nano Letters25, 562 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Sammak, D

    A. Sammak, D. Sabbagh, N. W. Hendrickx, M. Lodari, B. Paquelet Wuetz, A. Tosato, L. R. Yeoh, M. Bollani, M. Virgilio, M. A. Schubert, P. Zaumseil, G. Capellini, M. Veldhorst, and G. Scappucci, Shallow and Undoped Germanium Quantum Wells: A Playground for Spin and Hybrid Quantum Technology, Advanced Functional Ma- terials29, 1807613 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Zhang, J.Lu, Z

    D. Zhang, J.Lu, Z. Liu, F. Wan, X. Liu, Y. Pang, Y. Zhu, B. Cheng, J. Zheng, Y. Zuo, and C. Xue, Sharp interface of undoped Ge/SiGe quantum well grown by ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition, Applied Physics Let- ters121, 022102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Z. Kong, Z. Li, G. Cao, J. Su, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Liu, Y. Ren, H. Li, L. Wei, G.-p. Guo, Y. Wu, H. H. Radam- son, J. Li, Z. Wu, H.-o. Li, J. Yang, C. Zhao, T. Ye, and G. Wang, Undoped Strained Ge Quantum Well with Ul- trahigh Mobility of Two Million, ACS Applied Electronic Materials15, 28799 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Myronov, J

    M. Myronov, J. Kycia, P. Waldron, W. Jiang, P. Bar- rios, A. Bogan, P. Coleridge, and S. Studenikin, Holes Outperform Electrons in Group IV Semiconductor Ma- terials, Small Science3, 2200094 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    L. E. Stehouwer, A. Tosato, D. Degli Esposti, D. Costa, M. Veldhorst, A. Sammak, and G. Scappucci, Germa- nium wafers for strained quantum wells with low disor- der, Applied Physics Letters123, 092101 (2023), arXiv: 2305.08971

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Vigneau, R

    F. Vigneau, R. Mizokuchi, D. C. Zanuz, X. Huang, S. Tan, R. Maurand, S. Frolov, A. Sammak, G. Scap- pucci, F. Lefloch, and S. De Franceschi, Germanium quantum-well josephson field-effect transistors and inter- ferometers, Nano Letters19, 1023 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Tosato, V

    A. Tosato, V. Levajac, J.-Y. Wang, C. J. Boor, F. Bor- soi, M. Botifoll, C. N. Borja, S. Martí-Sánchez, J. Arbiol, A. Sammak, M. Veldhorst, and G. Scappucci, Hard su- perconducting gap in germanium, Communications Ma- terials4, 23 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Valentini, O

    M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gi- jsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguil- era Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, T. Adletzberger, R. Seoane Souto, M. Leijnse, J. Danon, C. Schrade, E. Bakkers, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, Parity-conserving Cooper-pair transport and ideal super- conducting diode in planar germanium, Natur...

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Y. H. Xie, D. Monroe, E. A. Fitzgerald, P. J. Silver- man, F. A. Thiel, and G. P. Watson, Very high mobility two-dimensional hole gas in Si/GexSi1-x/Ge structures 7 grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Applied Physics Let- ters2264, 2263 (1993)

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    Sigle, D

    E. Sigle, D. Weißhaupt, M. Oehme, H. S. Funk, D. Schwarz, F. Berkmann, and J. Schulze, Strained Ge Channels with High Hole Mobility Grown on Si Sub- strates by Molecular Beam Epitaxy, 2021 44th Interna- tional Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO) , 40 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Zhang, M

    J.-y. Zhang, M. Ming, J.-h. Wang, D.-m. Huang, H. Gao, Y.-x. Chu, B.-x. Fu, H. Q. Xu, and J.-j. Zhang, High- quality Ge/SiGe heterostructure with atomically sharp interface grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Applied Physics Letters125, 122106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    V. Shah, A. Dobbie, M. Myronov, and D. Leadley, High quality relaxed Ge layers grown directly on a Si(001) sub- strate, Solid-State Electronics62, 189 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Shiraki, Elimination of Stacking Faults in Silicon Wafers by HCl Added Dry O2 Oxidation, Japanese Jour- nal of Applied Physics14, 747 (1975)

    H. Shiraki, Elimination of Stacking Faults in Silicon Wafers by HCl Added Dry O2 Oxidation, Japanese Jour- nal of Applied Physics14, 747 (1975)

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    V. A. Shah, A. Dobbie, M. Myronov, and D. R. Leadley, Reverse graded SiGe/Ge/Si buffers for high-composition virtual substrates, Journal of Applied Physics107, 064304 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    J. C. Bean, L. C. Feldman, A. T. Fiory, S. Nakahara, and I. K. Robinson, GexSi1-x/Si strained-layer superlat- tice grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Journal of Vac- uum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films2, 436 (1984)

    work page 1984

  22. [22]

    Y.-H. Su, Y. Chuang, C.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Li, and T.-M. Lu, Effects of surface tunneling of two-dimensional hole gases in undoped Ge/GeSi heterostructures, Physical Review Materials1, 044601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Das Sarma and E

    S. Das Sarma and E. H. Hwang, Universal density scaling of disorder-limited low-temperature conductivity in high- mobilitytwo-dimensionalsystems,PhysicalReviewB88, 035439 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Shimura, C

    Y. Shimura, C. Godfrin, A. Hikavyy, R. Li, J. Aguilera, G. Katsaros, P. Favia, H. Han, D. Wan, K. De Greve, and R. Loo, Compressively strained epitaxial Ge layers for quantum computing applications, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing174, 108231 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Stern and W

    F. Stern and W. E. Howard, Properties of Semiconductor Surface Inversion Layers in the Electric Quantum Limit, Physical Review163, 816 (1967)

    work page 1967

  26. [26]

    Debdeep, A

    J. Debdeep, A. C. Gossard, and U. K. Mishra, Disloca- tion scattering in a two-dimensional electron gas, Applied Physics Letters76, 1707 (2000)

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    Vurgaftman, M

    I. Vurgaftman, M. P. Lumb, and J. R. Meyer,Bands and Photons in III-V Semiconductor Quantum Struc- tures(Oxford University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    J. T. Dong, Y. Gul, A. N. Engel, T. A. J. van Schijn- del, C. P. Dempsey, M. Pepper, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Enhanced mobility of ternary InGaAs quantum wells through digital alloying, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 64601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    F. F. Fang and W. E. Howard, Negative Field-Effect Mo- bility on (100) Si Surfaces, Physical Review Letters16, 797 (1966)

    work page 1966

  30. [30]

    Gold, Mobility of the two-dimensional electron gas in AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures at low electron densities, Applied Physics Letters54, 2100 (1989)

    A. Gold, Mobility of the two-dimensional electron gas in AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures at low electron densities, Applied Physics Letters54, 2100 (1989)

    work page 1989

  31. [31]

    Gold, Metal-insulator transition in AlxGa1-xAs/GaAs heterostructures with large spacer width, Physical Re- view B44, 8818 (1991)

    A. Gold, Metal-insulator transition in AlxGa1-xAs/GaAs heterostructures with large spacer width, Physical Re- view B44, 8818 (1991)

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    Gold, Metal–insulator transition in Si/SiGe het- erostructures: mobility, spin polarization and Dingle temperature, Semiconductor Science and Technology26, 045017 (2011)

    A. Gold, Metal–insulator transition in Si/SiGe het- erostructures: mobility, spin polarization and Dingle temperature, Semiconductor Science and Technology26, 045017 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Gold, Alloy-disorder scattering of the interacting electron gas in quantum wells and heterostructures of AlxGa1-xAs, JETP Letters98, 416 (2013)

    A. Gold, Alloy-disorder scattering of the interacting electron gas in quantum wells and heterostructures of AlxGa1-xAs, JETP Letters98, 416 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Sakaki, T

    H. Sakaki, T. Noda, K. Hirakawa, M. Tanaka, and T. Matsusue, Interface roughness scattering in GaAs/AlAs quantum wells, Applied Physics Letters51, 1934 (1987)

    work page 1934