pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31658 · v1 · pith:HUOQLLOJnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ physics.space-ph · astro-ph.EP

Cometary ion dynamics at a weakly outgassing comet

Victor Steinwand , Peter Stephenson , Zoe Lewis , Esa Kallio , Arnaud Beth , Marina Galand This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.space-ph astro-ph.EP
keywords comet 67Pion dynamicselectron coolingexobaseambipolar fieldRosettaplasma densitytest particle model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accounting for cometary electron cooling is necessary to model ion dynamics within 100 km of the nucleus.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the transition in ion behavior after the final diamagnetic cavity detection at comet 67P, where models underpredict densities. It runs a 3D collisional test-particle ion simulation driven by hybrid electromagnetic fields to test which parameters control the outcome. Including electron cooling raises ion densities by changing the ambipolar field, and the location of the resulting cooling exobase matches the observed shift between accelerated ions and ions that co-move with the neutrals. This places Rosetta below the exobase for most of the post-perihelion phase and justifies using uniform ionization rates down to the surface.

Core claim

Considering cometary electron cooling is necessary to model cometary ion dynamics within 100 km of the surface. Electron temperatures derived from collisional electron modeling affect ion dynamics via the ambipolar electric field, increasing ion number densities. The cometary electron cooling exobase organizes Rosetta plasma density observations; different ion dynamics regimes are linked to the position of Rosetta relative to the exobase. These findings demonstrate that Rosetta was below this exobase for much of the post-perihelion period and justify the absence of ion acceleration in plasma density assessments.

What carries the argument

The cometary electron cooling exobase, which marks where electron temperature drops enough to alter the ambipolar electric field that accelerates ions.

If this is right

  • Ion number densities increase when electron cooling is included via the ambipolar field.
  • Different ion acceleration regimes are organized by spacecraft position relative to the exobase.
  • Rosetta remained below the exobase during most of the post-perihelion period.
  • Uniform electron-impact ionization frequencies apply between the spacecraft and the surface in that period.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same exobase criterion may govern ion behavior at other low-activity comets observed by future missions.
  • Targeted measurements that cross the exobase would directly test whether the density jump and ion regime change occur together.

Load-bearing premise

The electromagnetic fields supplied by the hybrid model are sufficiently accurate that the test-particle ion trajectories and the derived ambipolar field correctly capture the real ion acceleration.

What would settle it

Rosetta plasma density measurements taken at known distances from the predicted exobase would fail to show the reported regime transition if the electron-cooling effect is omitted from the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31658 by Arnaud Beth, Esa Kallio, Marina Galand, Peter Stephenson, Victor Steinwand, Zoe Lewis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A comparison between modeled cometary ion number densities and measured RPC-MIP/LAP electron number densities for (a) 20 April 2015 to 17 February 2016 and (b) 17 February 2016 to end of mission. Electron number density data from MIP/LAP were binned radially and are shown in red. Bins in blue contain values of 𝑛𝑖 calculated using Equation (2) with 𝑢𝑖 = 𝑢𝑛 for each neutral number density data point 𝑛𝑛 from … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Modeled and measured electron number density 𝑛𝑒; (b) total ion production rate 𝜈𝑄, with the band in 𝜈𝑄 we consider to be the transition between regimes indicated; (c) and outgassing 𝑄 across time. The band of 𝜈𝑄 chosen corresponds to conditions immediately following the last detection of the diamagnetic cavity. The 𝑢𝑖 = 𝑢𝑛 model overestimates number densities during this transition. Maneuvers and dust … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A schematic describing the interaction of the different models and quantities used in this study. The electron test particle model is only used as an input to the hybrid model for the cases where collisional electrons are considered. on the ambipolar electric field. While the ambipolar field has been shown to be the strongest driver of acceleration close to the comet (Madanian et al. 2016; Lewis et al. 202… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Electron temperatures and (b) ambipolar electric fields, averaged across radial bins in the terminator plane (which was probed by Rosetta). The ambipolar field calculated from the total ion number density produced by Case 4 as described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ion densities (left column) and bulk radial speeds (right column) for each species for (a) adiabatic electrons and (b) the imposed electron temperature profile. The only species shown for the collisionless case is H2O + (blue) as there was no production of other species via chemistry; however, the collisional model shows that close to the nucleus H3O + (orange) and NH+ 4 (green) are the dominant ion specie… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ion number densities for each of the four cases of the ion test particle model. Model runs are shown in black. RPC-MIP/LAP data is shown in red, binned by cometocentric distance. The error region is the interquartile range of the data in each bin. The highest of the three data bins mainly contains data from the two weeks following the last appearance of the diamagnetic cavity on 17 February 2016, with 2949… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two-dimensional histograms of post-perihelion MIP/LAP datapoints from 17 February 2016 to 30 September 2016, for 19.85 ≤ log10 (𝜈𝑄[s −2 ] ) ≤ 20.15, showing the organization of the data in the parameter space 𝑟/𝑟𝑒𝑥𝑜 against 𝑢𝑖𝑟/𝑟𝑒𝑥𝑜 = (𝜈/100𝜎𝑛𝑖 ) (1 − 𝑟𝑐/𝑟 ) (Eqn. 9). The red boxes and points are values of (𝜈/100𝜎𝑛𝑖 ) (1 − 𝑟𝑐/𝑟 ) binned in 𝑟/𝑟𝑒𝑥𝑜. The straight line represents the 𝑢𝑖 = 𝑢𝑛 model. As shown by… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The location of Rosetta and the location of the electron cooling exobase calculated from ROSINA-COPS data during the post-perihelion period. Markers in red are exobase locations for the band in 𝜈𝑄 considered in this study, with the majority of the datapoints above the exobase associated with acceleration coming from the two week transition period. Rosetta did not observe cometary ion acceleration at lower … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A schematic of various physical quantities at a low outgassing comet as a function of cometocentric distance, comparing the case of collisional and collisionless electrons. The trapping of electrons by the ambipolar electric field leads to enhanced electron collisionality and cooling. The temperature 𝑇𝑒 of the overall electron population is reduced by inelastic collisions close to the cometary nucleus. Thi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The ESA/Rosetta mission escorted comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko for two years, exploring its plasma environment across diverse outgassing conditions. Plasma density observations from the Rosetta Plasma Consortium (RPC) are broadly categorized into two regimes for the ion dynamics, linked to the presence of a diamagnetic cavity at Rosetta's location. With a diamagnetic cavity present, ions detected by Rosetta are accelerated with respect to the neutral coma. Without a diamagnetic cavity present, at lower outgassing, and nearer the nucleus, ions co-move with the neutrals. We examine the transition between regimes following Rosetta's last detection of the cavity in February 2016. During this transition, global 3D plasma models of the cometary ionosphere underestimate plasma densities. To investigate this underestimation, we assess the sensitivity of cometary ion densities to different parameters using a 3D collisional ion test particle model, driven by electromagnetic fields from hybrid modeling. We show that considering cometary electron cooling is necessary to model cometary ion dynamics within 100 km of the surface. Electron temperatures derived from collisional electron modeling affect ion dynamics via the ambipolar electric field, increasing ion number densities. We further show that the cometary electron cooling exobase organizes Rosetta plasma density observations; different ion dynamics regimes are linked to the position of Rosetta relative to the exobase. These findings demonstrate that Rosetta was below this exobase for much of the post-perihelion period. They justify the absence of ion acceleration in plasma density assessments and the use of uniform electron-impact ionization frequencies between Rosetta and the surface during post-perihelion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the transition in cometary ion dynamics at 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko following the last detection of the diamagnetic cavity in February 2016. Using a 3D collisional ion test-particle model driven by electromagnetic fields from hybrid simulations, it argues that cometary electron cooling (via a separate collisional electron model) is required to reproduce observed plasma densities within ~100 km of the surface, as lower T_e modifies the ambipolar electric field and increases ion densities. The cometary electron cooling exobase is presented as an organizing feature for Rosetta RPC plasma density data, with ion acceleration regimes tied to spacecraft position relative to this exobase; the work concludes that Rosetta was below the exobase for much of the post-perihelion period, justifying the absence of ion acceleration and uniform electron-impact ionization frequencies in density assessments.

Significance. If the central modeling result holds, the work provides a physically motivated explanation for the observed shift between accelerated and co-moving ion regimes at low outgassing. It offers a concrete interpretive framework (the cooling exobase) for post-perihelion Rosetta data and demonstrates the value of coupling hybrid fields with test-particle ions for sensitivity studies. The approach of deriving T_e from explicit collisional modeling and feeding it into the ambipolar term is a clear methodological strength when the consistency issues are resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model setup] Model setup (likely §3 or equivalent): The hybrid-supplied electromagnetic fields already contain an ambipolar component based on the hybrid code's electron closure. The manuscript then derives a separate T_e profile from the collisional cooling model and states that this T_e 'affects ion dynamics via the ambipolar electric field.' It is not shown how the hybrid ambipolar term is removed, overridden, or consistently merged with the new profile; any mismatch would make the reported density increase an artifact of inconsistent forcing rather than a physical effect of cooling. This is load-bearing for the claim that cooling is 'necessary.'
  2. [Results on density sensitivity] Results on density sensitivity (likely §4 or figures comparing runs): The quantitative impact of including versus excluding the cooling module on ion number density within 100 km must be shown explicitly, including the magnitude of the increase and direct comparison against the specific RPC observations that global models underestimate. Without this, the assertion that cooling resolves the underestimation remains unverified.
  3. [Exobase definition and organization claim] Exobase definition and organization claim (likely §5): The exobase radius is stated to organize the observations and link regimes, yet the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive this radius is to the free parameter 'electron cooling rates' or to uncertainties in the hybrid fields. A modest shift in the exobase location would alter the conclusion that Rosetta was 'below this exobase for much of the post-perihelion period.'
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction could more clearly distinguish the hybrid model's native ambipolar field from the post-processed ambipolar field used in the test-particle runs.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the ambipolar field (E_amb or equivalent) should be introduced once and used consistently when describing how it is updated from the collisional T_e profile.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model setup] Model setup (likely §3 or equivalent): The hybrid-supplied electromagnetic fields already contain an ambipolar component based on the hybrid code's electron closure. The manuscript then derives a separate T_e profile from the collisional cooling model and states that this T_e 'affects ion dynamics via the ambipolar electric field.' It is not shown how the hybrid ambipolar term is removed, overridden, or consistently merged with the new profile; any mismatch would make the reported density increase an artifact of inconsistent forcing rather than a physical effect of cooling. This is load-bearing for the claim that cooling is 'necessary.'

    Authors: We agree that the procedure for incorporating the new T_e profile into the ambipolar field must be described explicitly to rule out inconsistencies. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 detailing that the ambipolar electric field is recomputed from the collisional-model T_e (replacing the hybrid electron closure) inside ~200 km while the hybrid magnetic field and convection electric field are retained unchanged. We will also show that the resulting total E field matches the hybrid solution outside this region, confirming that the reported density increase arises from the physical effect of electron cooling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on density sensitivity] Results on density sensitivity (likely §4 or figures comparing runs): The quantitative impact of including versus excluding the cooling module on ion number density within 100 km must be shown explicitly, including the magnitude of the increase and direct comparison against the specific RPC observations that global models underestimate. Without this, the assertion that cooling resolves the underestimation remains unverified.

    Authors: We accept that explicit quantitative comparisons are required. The revised manuscript will include a new panel (or supplementary figure) that directly compares ion density profiles from otherwise identical runs with and without the cooling module, reporting the factor by which densities increase within 100 km. We will also overlay these profiles on the specific post-perihelion RPC density measurements cited in the introduction to demonstrate the reduction in the underestimation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Exobase definition and organization claim] Exobase definition and organization claim (likely §5): The exobase radius is stated to organize the observations and link regimes, yet the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive this radius is to the free parameter 'electron cooling rates' or to uncertainties in the hybrid fields. A modest shift in the exobase location would alter the conclusion that Rosetta was 'below this exobase for much of the post-perihelion period.'

    Authors: The referee is correct that a sensitivity study is missing. In the revised version we will add a short subsection (or appendix) that varies the electron cooling rate coefficient by ±50 % and perturbs the hybrid fields within their reported uncertainties, showing the resulting range of exobase radii. We will demonstrate that the conclusion that Rosetta remained below the exobase for most of the post-perihelion interval is robust across this range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: modeling chain uses independent hybrid fields plus separate collisional T_e to derive ambipolar E

full rationale

The paper's central result—that electron cooling via collisional modeling raises ion densities inside ~100 km by modifying the ambipolar field—is presented as an output of a test-particle simulation driven by external hybrid EM fields and a separate electron model. No equation reduces the claimed density increase or exobase location to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, and no parameter is renamed as a prediction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into parameters; the hybrid fields and electron-collision rates are treated as inputs whose accuracy is assumed rather than derived within the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • electron cooling rates
    Collisional electron modeling supplies temperatures that set the ambipolar field; rates are not stated to be derived from first principles in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hybrid-model electromagnetic fields are accurate enough to drive test-particle ion motion
    The test-particle model is driven by these fields; any error directly affects the claimed density increase.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5841 in / 1397 out tokens · 30643 ms · 2026-07-01T02:09:33.800956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

156 extracted references · 141 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Science , author =

    Time variability and heterogeneity in the coma of. Science , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.aaa0276 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa0276 2015

  2. [2]

    and De Zeeuw, Darren L

    Tóth, Gábor and van der Holst, Bart and Sokolov, Igor V. and De Zeeuw, Darren L. and Gombosi, Tamas I. and Fang, Fang and Manchester, Ward B. and Meng, Xing and Najib, Dalal and Powell, Kenneth G. and Stout, Quentin F. and Glocer, Alex and Ma, Ying-Juan and Opher, Merav , month = feb, year =. Adaptive numerical algorithms in space weather modeling , volum...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.02.006 2011

  3. [3]

    Bhardwaj, Anil , month = dec, year =. On the. Geophysical Research Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1029/2003GL018495 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2003gl018495

  4. [4]

    and Rème, Henri and Rubin, Martin and Tenishev, Valeriy and Tóth, Gábor and Tzou, Chia-Yu and Wurz, Peter , month = nov, year =

    Bieler, Andre and Altwegg, Kathrin and Balsiger, Hans and Berthelier, Jean-Jacques and Calmonte, Ursina and Combi, Michael and De Keyser, Johan and Fiethe, Björn and Fougere, Nicolas and Fuselier, Stephen and Gasc, Sébastien and Gombosi, Tamas and Hansen, Kenneth and Hässig, Myrtha and Huang, Zhenguang and Jäckel, Annette and Jia, Xianzhe and Le Roy, Lena...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526178

  5. [6]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Variations in. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452479 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452479 2025

  6. [7]

    Impact of radial interplanetary magnetic fields on the inner coma of comet

    Gunell, Herbert and Goetz, Charlotte and Fatemi, Shahab , month = feb, year =. Impact of radial interplanetary magnetic fields on the inner coma of comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348186 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348186

  7. [8]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , author =

    The. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0262 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0262 2017

  8. [9]

    and Henri, P

    Gilet, N. and Henri, P. and Wattieaux, G. and Traoré, N. and Eriksson, A. I. and Vallières, X. and Moré, J. and Randriamboarison, O. and Odelstad, E. and Johansson, F. L. and Rubin, M. , month = aug, year =. Observations of a mix of cold and warm electrons by. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937056 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937056

  9. [10]

    and Gilet, N

    Wattieaux, G. and Gilet, N. and Henri, P. and Vallières, X. and Bucciantini, L. , month = oct, year =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834872 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834872

  10. [11]

    Cravens, T. E. , month = jan, year =. Theory and observations of cometary ionospheres , volume =. Advances in Space Research , publisher =. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(87)90212-2 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(87)90212-2

  11. [12]

    and Eparvier, Francis G

    Woods, Thomas N. and Eparvier, Francis G. and Bailey, Scott M. and Chamberlin, Phillip C. and Lean, Judith and Rottman, Gary J. and Solomon, Stanley C. and Tobiska, W. Kent and Woodraska, Donald L. , month = jan, year =. Solar. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , publisher =. doi:10.1029/2004JA010765 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2004ja010765

  12. [13]

    and Glassmeier, K.-H

    Koenders, C. and Glassmeier, K.-H. and Richter, I. and Motschmann, U. and Rubin, M. , month = oct, year =. Revisiting cometary bow shock positions , volume =. Planetary and Space Science , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2013.08.009 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2013.08.009 2013

  13. [14]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , author =

    Wave. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , author =. 2010 , note =. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2010-4 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2010-4 2010

  14. [15]

    Space Science Reviews , author =

    The. Space Science Reviews , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00931-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00931-1 2022

  15. [16]

    and Galand, M

    Stephenson, P. and Galand, M. and Feldman, P. D. and Beth, A. and Rubin, M. and Bockelée-Morvan, D. and Biver, N. and Cheng, Y.-C. and Parker, J. and Burch, J. and Johansson, F. L. and Eriksson, A. , month = mar, year =. Multi-instrument analysis of far-ultraviolet aurora in the southern hemisphere of comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:1...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039155

  16. [17]

    and Cravens, T

    Madanian, H. and Cravens, T. E. and Rahmati, A. and Goldstein, R. and Burch, J. and Eriksson, A. I. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Henri, P. and Mandt, K. and Clark, G. and Rubin, M. and Broiles, T. and Reedy, N. L. , month = jun, year =. Suprathermal electrons near the nucleus of comet. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , publisher =. doi:10.1002...

    work page doi:10.1002/2016ja022610

  17. [18]

    Itikawa, Yukikazu and Mason, Nigel , month = mar, year =. Cross. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data , publisher =. doi:10.1063/1.1799251 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1799251

  18. [19]

    , month = nov, year =

    Saur, Joachim and Duling, Stefan and Grayver, Alexander and Szalay, Jamey R. , month = nov, year =. Analysis of. The Planetary Science Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad8130 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad8130

  19. [20]

    and Gombosi, Tamas I

    Jia, Xianzhe and Slavin, James A. and Gombosi, Tamas I. and Daldorff, Lars K. S. and Toth, Gabor and Holst, Bart , month = jun, year =. Global. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , publisher =. doi:10.1002/2015JA021143 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/2015ja021143

  20. [21]

    Change of outgassing pattern of

    Gasc, Sébastien and Altwegg, Kathrin and Balsiger, Hans and Berthelier, Jean-Jacques and Bieler, André and Calmonte, Ursina and Fiethe, Björn and Fuselier, Stephen and Galli, André and Gombosi, Tamas and Hoang, Margaux and De Keyser, Johan and Korth, Axel and Le Roy, Léna and Mall, Urs and Rème, Henri and Rubin, Martin and Sémon, Thierry and Tzou, Chia-Yu...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1412

  21. [22]

    and Galand, M

    Stephenson, P. and Galand, M. and Deca, J. and Henri, P. , month = apr, year =. Cold electrons at a weakly outgassing comet , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae695 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae695

  22. [23]

    Johansson, F. L. and Eriksson, A. I. and Vigren, E. and Bucciantini, L. and Henri, P. and Nilsson, H. and Bergman, S. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Stenberg Wieser, G. and Odelstad, E. , month = sep, year =. Plasma densities, flow, and solar. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039959 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039959

  23. [24]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author =

    On nonlinear. Journal of Plasma Physics , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1017/S0022377810000541 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377810000541 2011

  24. [25]

    Space Science Reviews , author =

    The. Space Science Reviews , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9142-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9142-6 2007

  25. [26]

    Space Science Reviews , author =

    The. Space Science Reviews , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1007/s11214-023-01035-0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-023-01035-0 2024

  26. [27]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Physical. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1942 , note =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.14.164 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.14.164 1942

  27. [28]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , author =

    Helligkeitsschwankungen der. Astronomische Nachrichten , author =. 1949 , note =. doi:10.1002/asna.19492770103 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.19492770103 1949

  28. [29]

    and Morbidelli, A

    Brasser, R. and Morbidelli, A. , month = jul, year =. Oort cloud and. Icarus , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.012 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.012 2013

  29. [30]

    Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands , author =

    The structure of the cloud of comets surrounding the. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands , author =. 1950 , note =

    1950

  30. [31]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , author =

    Beobachtungen uber die physische. Astronomische Nachrichten , author =. 1836 , note =. doi:10.1002/asna.18360131302 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.18360131302

  31. [32]

    Aristotle's

    Heidarzadeh, Tofigh , editor =. Aristotle's. A. 2008 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8323-5_1 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8323-5_1 2008

  32. [33]

    Yeomans, D. K. and Kiang, T. , month = nov, year =. The long-term motion of comet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/197.3.633 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/197.3.633

  33. [34]

    , editor =

    Izzo, Jesse W. , editor =. The. The. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58786-3_10 , language =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58786-3_10 2024

  34. [35]

    Journal for the History of Astronomy , author =

    Astronomical. Journal for the History of Astronomy , author =. 1992 , note =. doi:10.1177/002182869202300103 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1177/002182869202300103 1992

  35. [36]

    and Gombosi, T

    Rubin, M. and Gombosi, T. I. and Hansen, K. C. and Ip, W. -H. and Kartalev, M. D. and Koenders, C. and Tóth, G. , month = dec, year =. Modeled. Earth Moon and Planets , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s11038-015-9476-8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11038-015-9476-8

  36. [37]

    Journal of Computational Physics , author =

    A. Journal of Computational Physics , author =. 1999 , note =. doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6299 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6299 1999

  37. [38]

    Nature , author =

    Ion composition and dynamics at comet. Nature , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1038/321330a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/321330a0 1986

  38. [39]

    Divin, Andrey and Deca, Jan and Eriksson, Anders and Henri, Pierre and Lapenta, Giovanni and Olshevsky, Vyacheslav and Markidis, Stefano , month = feb, year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab6662 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab6662 2041

  39. [40]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Polarisation of a small-scale cometary plasma environment. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936004 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936004 2019

  40. [41]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Suprathermal electron environment of comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526351 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526351 2015

  41. [42]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    First investigation of the diamagnetic cavity boundary layer with a. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243209 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243209 2022

  42. [43]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    A fully kinetic perspective on weakly active comets:. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2025.106064 , language =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2025.106064 2025

  43. [44]

    Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , author =

    Multi-scale simulations of plasma with. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.038 , language =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.038 2010

  44. [45]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Influence of collisions on ion dynamics in the inner comae of four comets , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834828 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834828 2019

  45. [46]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Energy conversion in cometary atmospheres. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732353 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732353 2018

  46. [47]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Hybrid modeling of cometary plasma environments. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834863 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834863 2019

  47. [48]

    Engelhardt, I. A. D. and Eriksson, A. I. and Vigren, E. and Valliéres, X. and Rubin, M. and Gilet, N. and Henri, P. , month = aug, year =. Cold electrons at comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833251 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833251

  48. [49]

    2017 , note =

    Journal of Physics Conference Series , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/837/1/012017 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/837/1/012017 2017

  49. [50]

    , month = oct, year =

    Alho, Markku and Jarvinen, Riku and Simon Wedlund, Cyril and Nilsson, Hans and Kallio, Esa and Pulkkinen, Tuija I. , month = oct, year =. Remote sensing of cometary bow shocks: modelled asymmetric outgassing and pickup ion observations , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1940 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1940

  50. [51]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    Dynamical features and spatial structures of the plasma interaction region of. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.014 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.014 2015

  51. [52]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    The infant bow shock: a new frontier at a weak activity comet , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834225 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834225 2018

  52. [53]

    Mandt, K. E. and Eriksson, A. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Koenders, C. and Broiles, T. and Fuselier, S. A. and Henri, P. and Nemeth, Z. and Alho, M. and Biver, N. and Beth, A. and Burch, J. and Carr, C. and Chae, K. and Coates, A. J. and Cupido, E. and Galand, M. and Glassmeier, K. -H. and Goetz, C. and Goldstein, R. and Hansen, K. C. and Haiducek, J. and Ka...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1736

  53. [54]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Hybrid modelling of cometary plasma environments. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730514 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730514 2017

  54. [55]

    and Glocer, A

    Toth, G. and Glocer, A. and Ma, Y. and Najib, D. and Gombosi, T. , month = sep, year =. Multi-

  55. [56]

    and André, M

    Vigren, E. and André, M. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Engelhardt, I. A. D. and Eriksson, A. I. and Galand, M. and Goetz, C. and Henri, P. and Heritier, K. and Johansson, F. L. and Nilsson, H. and Odelstad, E. and Rubin, M. and Stenberg-Wieser, G. and Tzou, C. -Y. and Vallières, X. , month = jul, year =. Effective ion speeds at. Monthly Notices of the Royal As...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1472

  56. [57]

    Building a

    Deca, Jan and Henri, Pierre and Divin, Andrey and Eriksson, Anders and Galand, Marina and Beth, Arnaud and Ostaszewski, Katharina and Horányi, Mihály , month = aug, year =. Building a. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.055101 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.055101

  57. [58]

    Heritier, K. L. and Henri, P. and Vallières, X. and Galand, M. and Odelstad, E. and Eriksson, A. I. and Johansson, F. L. and Altwegg, K. and Behar, E. and Beth, A. and Broiles, T. W. and Burch, J. L. and Carr, C. M. and Cupido, E. and Nilsson, H. and Rubin, M. and Vigren, E. , month = jul, year =. Vertical structure of the near-surface expanding ionospher...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1459

  58. [59]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Ion composition at comet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1912 , language =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1912 2017

  59. [60]

    and Galand, M

    Beth, A. and Galand, M. , month = jul, year =. Effects of the convective field on weakly outgassing comets , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty430 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty430

  60. [61]

    and Edberg, N

    Vigren, E. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Eriksson, A. I. and Galand, M. and Henri, P. and Johansson, F. L. and Odelstad, E. and Rubin, M. and Valliéres, X. , month = aug, year =. The. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29f7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29f7

  61. [62]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Cold and warm electrons at comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630159 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630159 2017

  62. [63]

    and Eriksson, A

    Odelstad, E. and Eriksson, A. I. and Johansson, F. L. and Vigren, E. and Henri, P. and Gilet, N. and Heritier, K. L. and Vallières, X. and Rubin, M. and André, M. , month = jul, year =. Ion. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , publisher =. doi:10.1029/2018JA025542 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ja025542

  63. [64]

    Ion bulk speeds and temperatures in the diamagnetic cavity of comet

    Bergman, Sofia and Stenberg Wieser, Gabriella and Wieser, Martin and Johansson, Fredrik Leffe and Vigren, Erik and Nilsson, Hans and Nemeth, Zoltan and Eriksson, Anders and Williamson, Hayley , month = may, year =. Ion bulk speeds and temperatures in the diamagnetic cavity of comet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab584

  64. [65]

    and Eriksson, A

    Vigren, E. and Eriksson, A. I. , month = apr, year =. A. The Astronomical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6006 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6006

  65. [66]

    and Beth, A

    Stephenson, P. and Beth, A. and Deca, J. and Galand, M. and Goetz, C. and Henri, P. and Heritier, K. and Lewis, Z. and Moeslinger, A. and Nilsson, H. and Rubin, M. , month = nov, year =. The source of electrons at comet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2168 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2168

  66. [67]

    Science , author =

    The nonmagnetic nucleus of comet. Science , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.aaa5102 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa5102 2015

  67. [68]

    and Vallières, X

    Henri, P. and Vallières, X. and Hajra, R. and Goetz, C. and Richter, I. and Glassmeier, K. -H. and Galand, M. and Rubin, M. and Eriksson, A. I. and Nemeth, Z. and Vigren, E. and Beth, A. and Burch, J. L. and Carr, C. and Nilsson, H. and Tsurutani, B. and Wattieaux, G. , month = jul, year =. Diamagnetic region(s): structure of the unmagnetized plasma aroun...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1540

  68. [69]

    and Koenders, C

    Goetz, C. and Koenders, C. and Hansen, K. C. and Burch, J. and Carr, C. and Eriksson, A. and Frühauff, D. and Güttler, C. and Henri, P. and Nilsson, H. and Richter, I. and Rubin, M. and Sierks, H. and Tsurutani, B. and Volwerk, M. and Glassmeier, K. H. , month = nov, year =. Structure and evolution of the diamagnetic cavity at comet. Monthly Notices of th...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3148

  69. [70]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    First detection of a diamagnetic cavity at comet. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527728 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527728 2016

  70. [71]

    and Combi, M

    Shou, Y. and Combi, M. and Jia, Y. -D. and Gombosi, T. and Toth, G. and Rubin, M. , month = aug, year =. The. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/156 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/156

  71. [72]

    Nature , author =

    Comet. Nature , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1038/321349a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/321349a0 1986

  72. [73]

    and Cotin, F

    Reme, H. and Cotin, F. and Cros, A. and Medale, J. L. and Sauvaud, J. A. and d'Uston, C. and Anderson, K. A. and Carlson, C. W. and Curtis, D. W. and Lin, R. P. and Korth, A. and Richter, A. K. and Loidl, A. and Mendis, D. A. , month = jun, year =. The. Journal of Physics E Scientific Instruments , publisher =. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/20/6/031 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3735/20/6/031

  73. [74]

    Nature , author =

    Ion flow at comet. Nature , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1038/321344a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/321344a0 1986

  74. [75]

    Johnstone, A. D. and Coates, A. J. and Wilken, B. and Studemann, W. and Weiss, W. and Cerulli Irelli, R. and Formisano, V. and Borg, H. and Olsen, S. and Winningham, J. D. and Bryant, D. A. and Kellock, S. J. , month = jun, year =. The. Journal of Physics E Scientific Instruments , publisher =. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/20/6/038 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3735/20/6/038

  75. [76]

    Nature , author =

    In situ gas and ion measurements at comet. Nature , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1038/321326a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/321326a0 1986

  76. [77]

    2015 , note =

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526210 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526210 2015

  77. [78]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Solar wind sputtering of dust on the surface of. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525980 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525980 2015

  78. [79]

    Nature , author =

    First results from the. Nature , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1038/321352a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/321352a0 1986

  79. [80]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Giotto magnetic-field results on the boundaries of the pile-up region and the magnetic cavity , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 1987 , note =

    1987

  80. [81]

    and Galand, M

    Vigren, E. and Galand, M. and Eriksson, A. I. and Edberg, N. J. T. and Odelstad, E. and Schwartz, S. J. , month = oct, year =. On the. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/54 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/54

Showing first 80 references.