pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31996 · v1 · pith:4DYXSVIKnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· quant-ph

Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics

Khushboo Dixit , Ritam Kundu , Papia Panda , Soebur Razzaque , Ramita Sarkar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exquant-ph
keywords neutrino oscillationsquantum informationconcurrenceNOvAT2KCP violationflavor statesparameter extraction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mapping three-flavor neutrino states to qubit representations and computing total concurrence identifies energy regions nearest separability that support cleaner extraction of oscillation parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps neutrino flavor states in long-baseline oscillations to qubit-like forms and measures their quantum correlations with total concurrence. Local minima of this quantity mark energies where the state is closest to separability, which the authors link to reduced degeneracies and more precise fits for mixing angles and the CP phase. They then shift the analysis windows of the NOνA and T2K experiments to overlap these minima, producing tighter joint bounds on sin²θ₂₃ and δ_CP for normal ordering. The work treats concurrence minima as a practical guide for choosing energy ranges that improve sensitivity to CP violation, octant resolution, and mass ordering.

Core claim

By representing three-flavor neutrino states in a qubit-like basis and evaluating total concurrence across energy, the authors locate local minima that correspond to states nearest separability; aligning the benchmark energy intervals of NOνA and T2K with these minima shifts the analysis toward higher-event regions and yields the joint constraints (0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150}, 195^{+38}_{-32}°) in the (sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP) plane and (0.580^{+0.0140}_{-0.0153}, 2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}×10^{-3} eV²) in the (sin²θ₂₃, Δm²₃₁) plane, while also altering the experiments’ reach for leptonic CP violation, θ₂₃ octant, and mass ordering.

What carries the argument

Total concurrence computed on qubit-mapped three-flavor neutrino states, which quantifies overall quantum correlations and locates local minima nearest to separability for parameter extraction.

If this is right

  • Aligning NOνA and T2K analysis regions with concurrence minima reduces tension arising from their differing energy regimes.
  • The same minima alter the experiments’ sensitivity to CP violation, θ₂₃ octant degeneracy, and mass-ordering determination.
  • Minimizing entanglement in the chosen energy windows produces the quoted joint constraints for normal ordering.
  • Quantum-correlation minima act as a complementary diagnostic alongside standard χ² analyses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same concurrence calculation could be applied to proposed experiments to pre-select energy spectra that minimize parameter degeneracies.
  • If the minima prove robust, global neutrino fits might incorporate concurrence as an additional weighting factor when combining datasets from different baselines.

Load-bearing premise

The qubit mapping and total-concurrence calculation capture the quantum correlations that actually govern how cleanly oscillation parameters can be extracted from data.

What would settle it

Repeating the GLoBES joint fit of NOνA and T2K data while deliberately avoiding the identified concurrence minima and checking whether the reported tightening of the (sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP) contours disappears.

read the original abstract

We present a quantum-information-theoretic study of three-flavor neutrino oscillations in long-baseline experiments by mapping flavor states to qubit-like representations and quantifying quantum correlations through total concurrence. The local minima of this entanglement measure identify energy regions where the flavor state is closest to separability, enabling cleaner extraction of oscillation parameters. We explain how these local minima offer opportunities for precision measurements and provide insight into the accurate determination of neutrino oscillation parameters. We then propose a strategy to improve parameter extraction by aligning the benchmark oscillation regions of NO$\nu$A and T2K with the minimum entanglement achievable in each experiment. This shifts the concurrence minima toward higher-event-count energy regions, leading to tighter constraints and reducing the tension arising from their different energy regimes. For normal ordering, we obtain $(0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150},,195^{+38}_{-32},^\circ)$ in the $(\sin^2\theta_{23},\delta_{\rm CP})$ plane and $(0.580^{+0.0140}_{-0.0153},,2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}\times10^{-3},\mathrm{eV}^2)$ in the $(\sin^2\theta_{23},\Delta m^2_{31})$ plane, yielding improved joint constraints. Using GLoBES simulations together with real data, we assess how local minima of quantum correlations influence leptonic CP-violation sensitivity, $\theta_{23}$ octant-degeneracy resolution, and mass-ordering determination. Our results show that minimizing entanglement can significantly affect these key sensitivities, highlighting quantum information measures as complementary probes of neutrino flavor oscillations and offering new insight into the role of quantum correlations in precision neutrino physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper maps three-flavor neutrino oscillation states to an effective qubit representation, computes total concurrence as a function of energy, and identifies its local minima as regions of near-separability. It claims that deliberately aligning the analysis energy windows of NOνA and T2K with these minima (via GLoBES simulations) yields tighter joint constraints on oscillation parameters, e.g., (0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150}, 195^{+38}_{-32}°) in the (sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP) plane for normal ordering, and improves sensitivity to CP violation, octant resolution, and mass ordering.

Significance. If the qubit mapping and concurrence calculation are shown to be faithful and the reported improvements are demonstrated to arise specifically from reduced entanglement rather than from changes in event statistics or bin placement, the work would introduce quantum-information measures as a complementary diagnostic for optimizing long-baseline analyses. The GLoBES-based numerical results on real-data sensitivities constitute a concrete, falsifiable test of the proposed strategy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraphs describing the mapping: no explicit formula is supplied for the qubit-like representation of the three-flavor state or for the total-concurrence functional; without these definitions it is impossible to reproduce the location of the minima or to verify that they correspond to reduced parameter degeneracies rather than to the underlying oscillation probabilities themselves.
  2. [Abstract] The central claim that alignment with concurrence minima produces cleaner parameter extraction rests on the assumption that concurrence minima identify regions of reduced degeneracy; however, because concurrence is a deterministic function of the same unitary evolution and probabilities used in the GLoBES likelihood, a control comparison (e.g., random or statistics-matched bin shifts) is required to isolate the separability effect from incidental changes in event counts.
  3. [Abstract] No validation is presented against known analytic limits (e.g., two-flavor reduction or vacuum oscillation) that would confirm the concurrence calculation recovers expected separability behavior before applying it to the three-flavor long-baseline case.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a typographical error: double comma in the reported interval “(0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150},,195^{+38}_{-32}°)”.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments identify important gaps in explicit definitions, validation, and controls that we will address in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraphs describing the mapping: no explicit formula is supplied for the qubit-like representation of the three-flavor state or for the total-concurrence functional; without these definitions it is impossible to reproduce the location of the minima or to verify that they correspond to reduced parameter degeneracies rather than to the underlying oscillation probabilities themselves.

    Authors: We agree that explicit formulas must be supplied for reproducibility. Although the mapping and concurrence are defined in Sections II and III of the manuscript, they are not stated in the abstract or opening paragraphs. In the revision we will insert the explicit qubit-like representation of the three-flavor state and the total-concurrence functional directly into the abstract and the introductory description of the mapping. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that alignment with concurrence minima produces cleaner parameter extraction rests on the assumption that concurrence minima identify regions of reduced degeneracy; however, because concurrence is a deterministic function of the same unitary evolution and probabilities used in the GLoBES likelihood, a control comparison (e.g., random or statistics-matched bin shifts) is required to isolate the separability effect from incidental changes in event counts.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that concurrence is computed from the same probabilities that enter the GLoBES likelihood, so a control is required to isolate any separability-driven improvement. We will add such a control study in the revised manuscript, comparing the reported constraints against those obtained from random energy-window shifts and from statistics-matched placements that do not coincide with concurrence minima. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] No validation is presented against known analytic limits (e.g., two-flavor reduction or vacuum oscillation) that would confirm the concurrence calculation recovers expected separability behavior before applying it to the three-flavor long-baseline case.

    Authors: We agree that analytic validation is necessary. The revised manuscript will include a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that recovers the expected concurrence behavior in the two-flavor limit and in vacuum oscillations before presenting the three-flavor long-baseline results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines total concurrence from the standard three-flavor oscillation probabilities (via the qubit mapping of flavor states) and uses its energy-dependent minima only to suggest a choice of analysis windows for subsequent GLoBES fits. The reported constraints on (sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP) and (sin²θ₂₃, Δm²₃₁) are produced by ordinary likelihood fits inside those windows; concurrence itself does not appear in the likelihood or get fitted as a parameter. No equation reduces to another by construction, no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests solely on a self-citation. The procedure is therefore an independent post-processing suggestion rather than a definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard three-flavor neutrino oscillation formalism and the validity of mapping flavor states to a qubit-like representation; no additional free parameters beyond the usual oscillation parameters are introduced, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard three-flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities via the PMNS matrix
    The concurrence calculation presupposes the usual oscillation Hamiltonian and mixing matrix used in long-baseline phenomenology.
  • domain assumption Qubit-like representation of three-flavor states is a faithful encoding of quantum correlations
    The mapping from flavor states to qubits is invoked without derivation or justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5859 in / 1511 out tokens · 73020 ms · 2026-07-01T04:08:05.831807+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024) 104134, [arXiv:2402.07972]. – 24 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in $\tau^+ \tau^-$ at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction

    Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, T. A. Wu, S. Li, T. Han, S.-C. Hsu, and M. Low, Entanglement and Bell nonlocality inτ +τ − at the LHC using machine learning for neutrino reconstruction,JHEP04(2026) 190, [arXiv:2504.01496]. [3]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector,Nature633(2024), no. 8...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Cosmological Neutrino Entanglement and Quantum Pressure

    D. Pfenniger and V. M. G. Observatory,Cosmological Neutrino Entanglement and Quantum Pressure,Astron. Astrophys.456(2006) 45, [astro-ph/0605354]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Dixit, J

    K. Dixit, J. Naikoo, B. Mukhopadhyay, and S. Banerjee,Quantum correlations in neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 5 055021, [arXiv:1903.05664]

    work page arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    A. B. Balantekin,Quantum Entanglement and Neutrino Many-Body Systems,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2191(2022), no. 1 012004

    2022

  6. [6]

    Roggero, E

    A. Roggero, E. Rrapaj, and Z. Xiong,Entanglement and correlations in fast collective neutrino flavor oscillations,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 4 043022, [arXiv:2203.02783]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Dixit, S

    K. Dixit, S. S. Haque, and S. Razzaque,Spread Complexity of High Energy Neutrino Propagation over Astrophysical Distances,Int. J. Theor. Phys.64(2025), no. 1 9, [arXiv:2406.07491]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Singh Koranga and B

    B. Singh Koranga and B. W. Farooq,Entanglement Signatures of CPT Violation in Neutrino Oscillations,arXiv:2603.28841

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Banerjee, H

    S. Banerjee, H. P¨ as, and E. Rani,Tripartite entanglement of oscillating and decohering neutrinos,arXiv:2606.14454

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Dixit,A study of quantum mechanical aspects in neutrino oscillations

    K. Dixit,A study of quantum mechanical aspects in neutrino oscillations. PhD thesis, IIT, Jodhpur, 2021

    2021

  11. [11]

    Dixit, S

    K. Dixit, S. S. Haque, and S. Razzaque,Measure of Quantum Complexity in Neutrino Oscillations,PoSICHEP2024(2025) 229

    2025

  12. [12]

    Quantum Entanglement in Fermionic Lattices

    P. Zanardi,Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices,Phys. Rev. A65(2002), no. 4 042101, [quant-ph/0104114]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Quantum Entanglement of Identical Particles

    Y. Shi,Quantum entanglement of identical particles,Phys. Rev. A67(2003) 024301, [quant-ph/0205069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    Hessmo, P

    B. Hessmo, P. Usachev, H. Heydari, and G. Bj¨ ork,Experimental demonstration of single photon nonlocality,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(May, 2004) 180401

    2004

  15. [15]

    Lombardi, F

    E. Lombardi, F. Sciarrino, S. Popescu, and F. De Martini,Teleportation of a vacuum–one-photon qubit,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(Jan, 2002) 070402

    2002

  16. [16]

    A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller,Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon fock state,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(Jul, 2001) 050402

    2001

  17. [17]

    Entanglement in neutrino oscillations

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, and F. Illuminati,Entanglement in neutrino oscillations,EPL85(2009) 50002, [arXiv:0707.4476]. [19]MINOS, MINOS+Collaboration, J. Evans,New results from MINOS and MINOS+,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.888(2017), no. 1 012017. [20]MINOS+Collaboration, P. Adamson et al.,Precision Constraints for Three-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations f...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    A quantum information theoretic analysis of three flavor neutrino oscillations

    S. Banerjee, A. K. Alok, R. Srikanth, and B. C. Hiesmayr,A quantum information theoretic analysis of three flavor neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 10 487, [arXiv:1508.03480]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    J. A. Formaggio, D. I. Kaiser, M. M. Murskyj, and T. E. Weiss,Violation of the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Neutrino Oscillations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 5 050402, [arXiv:1602.00041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Study of coherence and mixedness in meson and neutrino systems

    K. Dixit, J. Naikoo, S. Banerjee, and A. Kumar Alok,Study of coherence and mixedness in meson and neutrino systems,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 2 96, [arXiv:1809.09947]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    M. M. Ettefaghi, Z. S. Tabatabaei Lotfi, and R. Ramezani Arani,Quantum correlations in neutrino oscillation: Coherence and entanglement,EPL132(2020), no. 3 31002, [arXiv:2011.13010]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Li, L.-J

    Y.-W. Li, L.-J. Li, X.-K. Song, D. Wang, and L. Ye,Geuine tripartite entanglement in three-flavor neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 9 799, [arXiv:2205.11058]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    M. Alam, V. Brdar, and D. S. Chattopadhyay,Exploring quantumness at long-baseline neutrino experiments,JHEP06(2026) 221, [arXiv:2601.15375]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Quantum Correlations in Two-Fermion Systems

    J. Schliemann, J. I. Cirac, M. Ku´ s, M. Lewenstein, and D. Loss,Quantum correlations in two-fermion systems,Phys. Rev. A64(2001), no. 2 022303, [quant-ph/0012094]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Dixit and A

    K. Dixit and A. Kumar Alok,New physics effects on quantum coherence in neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021), no. 3 334, [arXiv:1909.04887]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Sarkar and K

    T. Sarkar and K. Dixit,Effects of nonstandard interaction on temporal and spatial correlations in neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 1 88, [arXiv:2010.02175]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Effect of Off-diagonal NSI Parameters on Entanglement Measurements in Neutrino Oscillations

    L. Konwar, P. Panda, and R. Mohanta,Effect of off-diagonal NSI parameters on entanglement measurements in neutrino oscillations,J. Phys. G53(2026), no. 3 035002, [arXiv:2507.04885]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Open system approach to neutrino oscillations

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini,Open system approach to neutrino oscillations,JHEP02 (2000) 032, [hep-ph/0002221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    N. Fiza, M. Masud, and M. Mitra,Exploring the new physics phases in 3+1 scenario in neutrino oscillation experiments,JHEP09(2021) 162, [arXiv:2102.05063]. – 26 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    W. K. Wootters,Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 2245–2248, [quant-ph/9709029]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    Cherchiglia, P

    A. Cherchiglia, P. Pasquini, O. L. G. Peres, F. F. Rodrigues, R. R. Rossi, and E. S. Souza, Alleviating the present tension between T2K and NOνA with nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 9 093004, [arXiv:2310.18401]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Rahaman, S

    U. Rahaman, S. Razzaque, and S. U. Sankar,A Review of the Tension between the T2K and NOνA Appearance Data and Hints to New Physics,Universe8(2022), no. 2 109, [arXiv:2201.03250]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Rahaman and S

    U. Rahaman and S. K. Raut,On the tension between the latest NOνA and T2K data,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 10 910, [arXiv:2112.13186]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo,Status of tension between NOvA and T2K after Neutrino 2024 and possible role of nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 113002, [arXiv:2409.10599]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Nizam, S

    M. Nizam, S. Bharti, S. Prakash, U. Rahaman, and S. Uma Sankar,Tensions between the appearance data of T2K and NOνA,Mod. Phys. Lett. A35(2019), no. 06 06, [arXiv:1811.01210]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Prakash, S

    S. Prakash, S. K. Raut, and S. Uma Sankar,Getting the best out of T2K and NOvA,PoS ICHEP2012(2013) 394

    2013

  37. [37]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata,Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,Prog. Theor. Phys.28(1962) 870–880

    1962

  38. [38]

    Pontecorvo,Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo,Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Sov. Phys. JETP26(1968) 984–988

    1968

  39. [39]

    Giunti and C

    C. Giunti and C. W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics. 2007

    2007

  40. [40]

    Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

    L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369–2374

    1978

  41. [41]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov,Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42(1985) 913–917

    1985

  42. [42]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov,Resonant amplification ofνoscillations in matter and solar-neutrino spectroscopy,Il Nuovo Cimento C9(Jan, 1986) 17–26

    1986

  43. [43]

    Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter

    H. Minakata and S. J. Parke,Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,JHEP01(2016) 180, [arXiv:1505.01826]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    P. B. Denton, H. Minakata, and S. J. Parke,Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,JHEP06(2016) 051, [arXiv:1604.08167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits

    S. Hill and W. K. Wootters,Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 5022–5025, [quant-ph/9703041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  46. [46]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  47. [47]

    Sarkar, S

    R. Sarkar, S. Banerjee, S. Bag, and P. K. Panigrahi,Geometry of distributive multiparty entanglement in 4-qubit hypergraph states,IET Quantum Communication3(November,

  48. [48]

    Dutta, R

    S. Dutta, R. Sarkar, and P. K. Panigrahi,Permutation symmetric hypergraph states and multipartite quantum entanglement,International Journal of Theoretical Physics58(Nov,

  49. [49]

    Distributed Entanglement

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters,Distributed entanglement,Phys. Rev. A61 (2000) 052306, [quant-ph/9907047]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  50. [50]

    G. J. Feldman, J. Hartnell, and T. Kobayashi,Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments,Adv. High Energy Phys.2013(2013) 475749, [arXiv:1210.1778]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [51]

    S. K. Agarwalla,Physics Potential of Long-Baseline Experiments,Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014(2014) 457803, [arXiv:1401.4705]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    M. V. Diwan, V. Galymov, X. Qian, and A. Rubbia,Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiments, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.66(2016) 47–71, [arXiv:1608.06237]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Leptogenesis and Low Energy CP Violation in Neutrino Physics

    S. Pascoli, S. T. Petcov, and A. Riotto,Leptogenesis and Low Energy CP Violation in Neutrino Physics,Nucl. Phys. B774(2007) 1–52, [hep-ph/0611338]. [62]T2KCollaboration, K. Abe et al.,Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations,Nature580(2020), no. 7803 339–344, [arXiv:1910.03887]. [Erratum: Nature 583, E16 (2020)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash, S. K. Raut, and S. Uma Sankar,Potential of optimized NOvA for largeθ 13 and combined performance with a LArTPC and T2K,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.237-238(2013) 193–195

    2013

  55. [55]

    Can atmospheric neutrino experiments provide the first hint of leptonic CP violation?

    M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, and S. K. Raut,Can atmospheric neutrino experiments provide the first hint of leptonic CP violation?,Phys. Rev. D89(2014), no. 1 011301, [arXiv:1306.2500]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash, and S. U. Sankar,Resolving the octant of theta23 with T2K and NOvA,JHEP07(2013) 131, [arXiv:1301.2574]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    S. K. Agarwalla, R. Kundu, S. Prakash, and M. Singh,A close look on 2-3 mixing angle with DUNE in light of current neutrino oscillation data,JHEP03(2022) 206, [arXiv:2111.11748]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NO$\nu$A and ICAL

    M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, N. Nath, and S. K. Raut,New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NOνA and ICAL, Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 1 013013, [arXiv:1504.06283]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Quantum correlations and the neutrino mass degeneracy problem

    K. Dixit, J. Naikoo, S. Banerjee, and A. K. Alok,Quantum correlations and the neutrino mass degeneracy problem,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 11 914, [arXiv:1807.01546]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    S. T. Petcov and T. Schwetz,Determining the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos,Nucl. Phys. B740(2006) 1–22, [hep-ph/0511277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  61. [61]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash, and W. Wang,High-precision measurement of atmospheric mass-squared splitting with T2K and NOvA,arXiv:1312.1477

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Prakash, S

    S. Prakash, S. Raut, and S. U. Sankar,Mass hierarchy determination using current and upcoming neutrino experiments,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.408(2013) 012035

    2013

  63. [63]

    Determining neutrino mass hierarchy from electron disappearance at a Low energy neutrino factory

    R. Dutta, N. Sinha, and S. K. Raut,Determining neutrino mass hierarchy from electron disappearance at a Low energy neutrino factory,Phys. Rev. D89(2014), no. 7 073011, [arXiv:1210.6479]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Unveiling Neutrino Mixing and Leptonic CP Violation

    O. Mena,Unveiling neutrino mixing and leptonic CP violation,Mod. Phys. Lett. A20 (2005) 1–17, [hep-ph/0503097]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  65. [65]

    Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola,Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions,Front. in Phys.6(2018) 10, [arXiv:1710.09360]. – 28 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES

    P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter,Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator),Comput. Phys. Commun.167(2005) 195, [hep-ph/0407333]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  67. [67]

    New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0

    P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, and W. Winter,New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator,Comput. Phys. Commun.177(2007) 432–438, [hep-ph/0701187]. [77]T2K, NOvACollaboration, V. Mikola,Results from the T2K+NOvA Joint Analysis,EPJ Web Conf.312(2024) 02002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    Wolcott,New NOvA Results with 10 Years of Data, inProceedings of the XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Aug,

    J. Wolcott,New NOvA Results with 10 Years of Data, inProceedings of the XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Aug,

    2024

  69. [69]

    Abubakaret al.(T2K, NOvA), Joint neutrino oscil- lation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments, Nature646, 818 (2025), arXiv:2510.19888 [hep-ex]

    Presented on behalf of the NOvA Collaboration. [79]T2K, NOvACollaboration, S. Abubakar et al.,Joint neutrino oscillation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments,Nature646(2025), no. 8086 818–824, [arXiv:2510.19888]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP 12(2024) 216, [arXiv:2410.05380]. [81]DUNECollaboration, B. Abi et al.,Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 10 978...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Banerjee, P

    R. Banerjee, P. Panda, R. Mohanta, and S. Patra,Analysis of neutrino oscillation parameters in the light on quantum entanglement,arXiv:2410.05727

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    E. C. Nogueira, G. de Souza, A. D. Varizi, and M. D. Sampaio,Quantum estimation in neutrino oscillations,Int. J. Quant. Inf.15(2017), no. 06 1750045, [arXiv:1610.05388]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Baker and R

    S. Baker and R. D. Cousins,Clarification of the Use of Chi Square and Likelihood Functions in Fits to Histograms,Nucl. Instrum. Meth.221(1984) 437–442

    1984

  74. [74]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, [arXiv:1007.1727]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering

    M. Blennow, P. Coloma, P. Huber, and T. Schwetz,Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering,JHEP03(2014) 028, [arXiv:1311.1822]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [76]

    Superbeams versus Neutrino Factories

    P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter,Superbeams versus neutrino factories,Nucl. Phys. B 645(2002) 3–48, [hep-ph/0204352]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  77. [77]

    G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, and A. Palazzo,Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 053010, [hep-ph/0206162]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  78. [78]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Atmospheric neutrino oscillations and new physics, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 033010, [hep-ph/0404085]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  79. [79]

    Sarker, A

    A. Sarker, A. Medhi, D. Bezboruah, M. M. Devi, and D. Dutta,Impact of scalar NSI on the neutrino mass ordering sensitivity at DUNE, HK and KNO,JHEP06(2024) 128, [arXiv:2309.12249]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Sarker, D

    A. Sarker, D. Bezboruah, A. Medhi, M. M. Devi, and D. Dutta,Scalar NSI and Neutrino – 29 – Mass Ordering Sensitivities in Long-Baselineν-Experiments,Springer Proc. Phys.432 (2026) 1240–1243

    2026

Showing first 80 references.