pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01123 · v1 · pith:O5OW2TO6new · submitted 2026-07-01 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · eess.SP· physics.optics

Plenoptic imaging of particle interactions in scintillation detectors

Xiang Dai , Chi-Jui Ho , Kevin Tandi , Chang Lee , Alex Bocchieri , David Parra , Forrest Peterson , Talha Sultan
show 4 more authors
Felicia Sutanto Andreas Velten Jingke Xu Nicholas Antipa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 02:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det eess.SPphysics.optics
keywords plenoptic imagingscintillation detectors3D localizationmultifocal microlens arrayphoton-limited conditionsCramér-Rao boundradiation interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multifocal plenoptic system achieves millimeter 3D localization of particle interactions in scintillators under photon-limited conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces PRISM, a plenoptic imaging setup using a multifocal microlens array to reconstruct 3D positions of radiation interactions in a single scintillator volume. Analysis using the Cramér-Rao lower bound demonstrates that the multifocal approach enhances axial sensitivity compared to conventional unifocal plenoptic systems when photon counts are low. A built prototype, calibrated with a tunable light source, reconstructs locations for events with around 100 detected photons, achieving roughly 1 mm average error for isolated single-vertex interactions. This approach addresses the challenge of balancing light collection and resolution in detectors used for nuclear physics and medical imaging.

Core claim

PRISM employs a multifocal microlens array with diverse focal lengths and high effective numerical aperture to encode both lateral position and depth information while collecting more photons. The design improves axial sensitivity as shown by Cramér-Rao analysis in photon-starved regimes. Using an Alternating Descent Conditional Gradient-inspired algorithm on calibrated measurements, the prototype localizes sparse single-vertex events to about 1 mm accuracy in 3D, with initial results for double-vertex events showing better performance at larger axial separations.

What carries the argument

Multifocal microlens array with varying focal lengths that provides simultaneous spatial and depth encoding in photon collection.

If this is right

  • The multifocal design improves axial sensitivity over unifocal plenoptic systems under photon-limited conditions.
  • The prototype achieves an average 3D localization error of approximately 1 mm for sparse single-vertex events.
  • Localization accuracy for double-vertex events improves with increasing axial separation between interactions.
  • Multifocal plenoptic imaging mitigates the trade-off between light collection and spatial resolution in scintillation detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar multifocal designs could extend to other low-light imaging applications in particle detection.
  • Further development might enable reconstruction of more complex multi-scattering events beyond the initial double-vertex evaluation.
  • The method provides a foundation for photon-efficient 3D imaging that could integrate with existing detector systems.

Load-bearing premise

The optical response can be accurately calibrated and the ADCG-inspired reconstruction algorithm recovers true interaction locations from the measured photon patterns under the assumption of sparse single-vertex events.

What would settle it

Experimental comparison of axial localization precision between the multifocal prototype and a conventional unifocal plenoptic system using identical scintillator and photon statistics would confirm or refute the sensitivity improvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01123 by Alex Bocchieri, Andreas Velten, Chang Lee, Chi-Jui Ho, David Parra, Felicia Sutanto, Forrest Peterson, Jingke Xu, Kevin Tandi, Nicholas Antipa, Talha Sultan, Xiang Dai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. PSF calibration and measurement with a multifo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Imaging configurations and corresponding responses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of Fisher Information across different systems and focal lengths. The plots compare the proposed multifocal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A flow diagram illustrating the main localization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustration of support selection with local shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Reconstruction performance under varying photon conditions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate 3D localization of radiation interactions in scintillation detectors is essential for nuclear and particle physics, safeguards, and medical imaging, but remains difficult in light-starved regimes with limited photon statistics. We present PRISM, a multifocal plenoptic imaging system designed for millimeter-scale 3D position reconstruction in a single-volume scintillator. PRISM uses a multifocal microlens array with diverse focal lengths and high effective numerical aperture to balance photon collection with spatial and depth encoding. A Cram'er--Rao lower bound analysis shows that the multifocal design improves axial sensitivity over conventional unifocal plenoptic systems under photon-limited conditions. We build a prototype system, calibrate its optical response with a tunable light source, and form photon-limited measurements with $\mathcal{O}(100)$ detected photons. For sparse single-vertex events, we reconstruct interaction locations using an Alternating Descent Conditional Gradient-inspired algorithm and demonstrate an average 3D localization error of approximately 1 mm. We also provide an initial evaluation of double-vertex events, showing that localization improves as the axial separation between interactions increases. These results demonstrate that multifocal plenoptic imaging can mitigate the traditional trade-off between light collection and spatial resolution, providing a photon-efficient approach to 3D reconstruction in scintillation detectors and a foundation for future multi-scattering event reconstruction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces PRISM, a multifocal plenoptic imaging system for 3D localization of radiation interactions in scintillation detectors. It claims that a Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) analysis demonstrates improved axial sensitivity for the multifocal design relative to conventional unifocal plenoptic systems under photon-limited conditions. A prototype is constructed and calibrated with a tunable light source; photon-limited measurements with O(100) detected photons are reconstructed via an Alternating Descent Conditional Gradient-inspired algorithm, yielding an average 3D localization error of approximately 1 mm for sparse single-vertex events. Initial results for double-vertex events are also reported, indicating improved localization with greater axial separation.

Significance. If the CRLB comparison and experimental localization accuracy are substantiated, the work would offer a meaningful advance in photon-efficient 3D position reconstruction for light-starved scintillation detectors. This directly addresses a persistent challenge in nuclear/particle physics, safeguards, and medical imaging by relaxing the traditional trade-off between light collection and spatial/depth resolution. The explicit statement of modeling assumptions (sparse events, calibrated response) and the combination of theoretical bound with prototype data are strengths that would support broader adoption if the quantitative gaps are closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [CRLB analysis (abstract and theoretical section)] The central CRLB claim (abstract) that the multifocal design improves axial sensitivity is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no derivation details, optical model parameters, photon statistics assumptions, or quantitative comparison metrics between multifocal and unifocal cases. Without these, the improvement cannot be verified or reproduced.
  2. [Prototype, calibration, and reconstruction (experimental section)] The experimental claim of ~1 mm average 3D localization error for sparse single-vertex events (abstract) depends on the calibration procedure, ADCG-inspired algorithm convergence, and error statistics, but no quantitative information is supplied on calibration accuracy, number of tested events, error distributions, or reconstruction fidelity metrics. These omissions directly affect assessment of the prototype result.
  3. [Double-vertex events evaluation] The double-vertex evaluation (abstract) states that localization improves with axial separation but supplies no supporting quantitative metrics, separation values, or error trends, leaving this extension of the central claim unsubstantiated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for photon count as ϴ(100) is clear but would benefit from a brief statement of the exact range or distribution observed in the prototype measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify areas where additional detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to supply the requested information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [CRLB analysis (abstract and theoretical section)] The central CRLB claim (abstract) that the multifocal design improves axial sensitivity is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no derivation details, optical model parameters, photon statistics assumptions, or quantitative comparison metrics between multifocal and unifocal cases. Without these, the improvement cannot be verified or reproduced.

    Authors: We agree that the CRLB section requires expanded detail for reproducibility. The revised manuscript will include the full CRLB derivation, the specific optical model parameters (microlens focal lengths, effective NA, sensor geometry), the photon-statistics model (Poisson with mean O(100)), and tabulated quantitative CRLB values comparing axial variance for the multifocal versus unifocal cases under identical photon budgets. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Prototype, calibration, and reconstruction (experimental section)] The experimental claim of ~1 mm average 3D localization error for sparse single-vertex events (abstract) depends on the calibration procedure, ADCG-inspired algorithm convergence, and error statistics, but no quantitative information is supplied on calibration accuracy, number of tested events, error distributions, or reconstruction fidelity metrics. These omissions directly affect assessment of the prototype result.

    Authors: We will augment the experimental section with the missing quantitative information: measured calibration accuracy (RMS residual from the tunable-source grid), total number of single-vertex events reconstructed, full error distributions (histograms and standard deviations in x, y, z), and algorithm metrics (convergence tolerance, iteration count, and residual norm for the ADCG-inspired solver). revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Double-vertex events evaluation] The double-vertex evaluation (abstract) states that localization improves with axial separation but supplies no supporting quantitative metrics, separation values, or error trends, leaving this extension of the central claim unsubstantiated.

    Authors: We will add a quantitative subsection on double-vertex performance, reporting the specific axial separations tested, the corresponding 3D localization errors (mean and spread), and the observed trend of improving accuracy with increasing separation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of a standard Cramér-Rao lower bound comparison (external statistical bound on photon-limited axial sensitivity) and direct experimental calibration plus reconstruction on measured photon patterns from a prototype. Neither reduces to a self-defined quantity, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, nor a self-citation chain; the modeling assumptions (sparse single-vertex events, calibrated response) are stated explicitly and the results are falsifiable against independent measurements. No load-bearing step matches any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes the Cramér-Rao lower bound as a standard statistical tool and an ADCG-inspired optimizer; no numerical free parameters fitted to data or new physical entities are described.

axioms (1)
  • standard math The Cramér-Rao lower bound supplies a valid lower limit on the variance of unbiased estimators for interaction position parameters under the stated photon statistics.
    Used to demonstrate improved axial sensitivity of the multifocal versus unifocal design.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5802 in / 1339 out tokens · 67591 ms · 2026-07-02T02:42:02.462689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Calibration light source and control380 The calibration system uses a motorized three-axis381 translation stage (X-LSM100A-E03, Zaber Technologies)382 with a travel range of 101.6 mm along each axis, sufficient383 to cover the full scanning volume. The stage provides a384 positioning accuracy of approximately 35µm, enabling385 reproducible placement of th...

  2. [2]

    This prop-402 erty reduces the number of calibration measurements, al-403 lowing the PSF dictionary to be sampled on a sparse spa-404 6 tial grid

    HDR PSF calibration398 The imaging system exhibits approximate local shift399 invariance, meaning that small lateral changes in source400 position produce PSFs that can be approximated as spa-401 tial translations of nearby calibrated PSFs. This prop-402 erty reduces the number of calibration measurements, al-403 lowing the PSF dictionary to be sampled on...

  3. [3]

    Search for neutrino oscillations on a long base-line at the CHOOZ nuclear power station

    M. Apollonioet al.(CHOOZ), Eur. Phys. J.C27, 331850 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0301017 [hep-ex].851

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion

    T. Arakiet al.(KamLAND), Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 081801852 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0406035 [hep-ex].853

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    N. S. Bowdenet al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A572, 985854 (2007).855

    2007

  6. [6]

    Spectroscopy of geo-neutrinos from 2056 days of Borexino data

    M. Agostiniet al.(Borexino), Phys. Rev.D92, 031101856 (2015), arXiv:1506.04610 [hep-ex].857

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Abreu, Y

    Y. Abreu, Y. Amhis, L. Arnold,et al., Journal of Instru-858 mentation16(02), P02025.859

  8. [8]

    Ashenfelteret al., Nucl

    J. Ashenfelteret al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A922, 287860 (2019).861

    2019

  9. [9]

    Andriamirado, A

    M. Andriamirado, A. B. Balantekin, H. R. Band,et al.862 (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D103, 032001863 (2021).864

    2021

  10. [10]

    S. A. Dazeley, O. A. Akindele, M. Bergevin, A. Bernstein,865 P. C. Haugen, V. A. Li, and A. F. Papatyi, Nuclear In-866 struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:867 Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated868 Equipment1082, 170915 (2026).869

    2026

  11. [11]

    D. S. Akerib, S. Alsum, H. M. Ara´ ujo, X. Bai,et al.(LUX870 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 131301 (2019).871

    2019

  12. [12]

    D. S. Akerib, S. Alsum, H. M. Ara´ ujo, X. Bai,et al.(LUX872 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D100, 022002 (2019).873

    2019

  13. [13]

    Smy, inInternational Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol

    M. Smy, inInternational Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 5874 (2008) pp. 1279–1282.875

    2008

  14. [14]

    A. S. Wilhelm, G. Wendel, B. Collins, D. Cowen,876 and I. Jovanovic, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in877 Physics Research Section A1049, 168085 (2023).878

    2023

  15. [15]

    Apillueloet al.(LiquidO Collaboration), Nuclear In-879 struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A880 1071, 170075 (2025).881

    J. Apillueloet al.(LiquidO Collaboration), Nuclear In-879 struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A880 1071, 170075 (2025).881

    2025

  16. [16]

    Sutanto, T

    F. Sutanto, T. Classen, S. Dazeley, M. Duvall, I. Jo-882 vanovic, V. Li, A. Mabe, E. Reedy, and T. Wu, Nuclear883 Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:884 Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated885 Equipment1006, 165409 (2021).886

    2021

  17. [17]

    H. Gong, X. Huang, S. Fang, Z. Wang, X. Zeng, J. Zhai,887 X. Liang, H. Yuan, S. Yang, Z. Zhang, and L. Wei, Re-888 view of Scientific Instruments96, 053102 (2025).889 12

    2025

  18. [18]

    Vetter, M

    K. Vetter, M. Burks, C. Cork, M. Cunningham,890 D. Chivers, E. Hull, T. Krings, H. Manini, L. Mihailescu,891 K. Nelson, D. Protic, J. Valentine, and D. Wright, Nu-892 clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec-893 tion A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and As-894 sociated Equipment579, 363 (2007), proceedings of the895 11th Symposium on...

    2007

  19. [19]

    Vetter, R

    K. Vetter, R. Barnowksi, A. Haefner, T. H. Joshi,898 R. Pavlovsky, and B. J. Quiter, Nuclear Instruments899 and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler-900 ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip-901 ment878, 159 (2018), radiation Imaging Techniques and902 Applications.903

    2018

  20. [20]

    C. G. Wahl, S. Brown, W. Kaye, K. Moran, F. Zhang,904 J. Sowers, J. M. Jaworski, Y. A. Boucher, H. Yang,905 T. Slatina, and Z. He, in2018 IEEE Nuclear Science906 Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings907 (NSS/MIC)(2018) pp. 1–5.908

    2018

  21. [21]

    Goodman, D

    D. Goodman, D. Chichester, and Z. He, in2019 IEEE909 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Con-910 ference (NSS/MIC)(2019) pp. 1–3.911

    2019

  22. [22]

    Hecla, K

    J. Hecla, K. Knecht, D. Gunter, A. Haefner, D. Hellfeld,912 T. H. Y. Joshi, A. Moran, V. Negut, R. Pavlovsky, and913 K. Vetter, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science68,914 2539 (2021).915

    2021

  23. [23]

    Single-Volume Neutron Scatter Camera for High-Efficiency Neutron Imaging and Spectroscopy

    J. Braverman, J. Brennan, E. Brubaker, B. Cabrera-916 Palmer, S. Czyz, P. Marleau, J. Mattingly, A. Nowack,917 J. Steele, M. Sweany,et al., arXiv preprint918 arXiv:1802.05261 (2018).919

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    V. A. Li, T. M. Classen, S. A. Dazeley, M. J. Duvall,920 I. Jovanovic, A. N. Mabe, E. T. Reedy, and F. Sutanto,921 Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A942, 162334 (2019).922

    2019

  25. [25]

    T. Wu, F. Sutanto, V. Li, T. Classen, S. Dazeley,923 and I. Jovanovic, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in924 Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrome-925 ters, Detectors and Associated Equipment1057, 168699926 (2023).927

    2023

  26. [26]

    V. Li, F. Sutanto, T. Classen, S. Dazeley, I. Jovanovic,928 and T. Wu, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics929 Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detec-930 tors and Associated Equipment1046, 167624 (2023).931

    2023

  27. [27]

    Weinfurther, J

    K. Weinfurther, J. Mattingly, E. Brubaker, and J. Steele,932 Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research933 Section A883, 115 (2018).934

    2018

  28. [28]

    J. J. Manfredi, E. Adamek, J. A. Brown, E. Brubaker,935 B. Cabrera-Palmer, J. Cates, R. Dorrill, A. Druetzler,936 J. Elam, P. L. Feng,et al., inHard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray,937 and Neutron Detector Physics XXII, Vol. 11494 (SPIE,938

  29. [29]

    Galindo-Tellez, K

    A. Galindo-Tellez, K. Keefe, E. Adamek, E. Brubaker,940 B. Crow, R. Dorrill, A. Druetzler, C. Felix, N. Kaneshige,941 J. Learned,et al., Journal of Instrumentation16(04),942 P04013.943

  30. [30]

    Folsom,A Compact Neutron Scatter Camera Using944 Optical Coded-Aperture Imaging, Ph.D

    M. Folsom,A Compact Neutron Scatter Camera Using944 Optical Coded-Aperture Imaging, Ph.D. thesis, University945 of Tennessee, Knoxville (2020).946

    2020

  31. [31]

    Ziock and M

    K. Ziock and M. Blackston, Nuclear Instruments and947 Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators,948 Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment949 916, 56 (2019).950

    2019

  32. [32]

    Harvey and A

    T. Harvey and A. Enqvist, inEPJ Web of Conferences,951 Vol. 253 (EDP Sciences, 2021) p. 07008.952

    2021

  33. [33]

    R. Ng, M. Levoy, M. Br´ edif, G. Duval, M. Horowitz, and953 P. Hanrahan,Light Field Photography with a Hand-Held954 Plenoptic Camera, Stanford Computer Science Technical955 Report CSTR 2005-02 (Stanford University, 2005).956

    2005

  34. [34]

    Dalmasson, G

    J. Dalmasson, G. Gratta, A. Jamil, S. Kravitz, M. Malek,957 K. Wells, J. Bentley, S. Steven, and J. Su, Phys. Rev. D958 97, 052006 (2018).959

    2018

  35. [35]

    Dieminger, S

    T. Dieminger, S. Alonso-Monsalve, C. Alt, C. Brus-960 chini, N. B¨ uhrer, E. Charbon, K. Kaneyasu, M. Franks,961 T. Weber, and D. Sgalaberna, An ultrafast plenoptic-962 camera system for high-resolution 3d particle tracking963 in unsegmented scintillators (2026), arXiv:2511.09442964 [physics.ins-det].965

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Cram´ er,Mathematical methods of statistics, Vol

    H. Cram´ er,Mathematical methods of statistics, Vol. 9966 (Princeton university press, 1999).967

    1999

  37. [37]

    M. K. Stevenet al., PTR Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,968 NJ10, 148 (1993).969

    1993

  38. [38]

    J. Chao, E. S. Ward, and R. J. Ober, Journal of the970 Optical Society of America A33, B36 (2016).971

    2016

  39. [39]

    C. Wang, N. Chen, and W. Heidrich, IEEE Transactions972 on Computational Imaging8, 905 (2022).973

    2022

  40. [40]

    C.-J. Ho, Y. Belhe, S. Rotenberg, R. Ramamoorthi, T.-974 M. Li, and N. Antipa, inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF975 International Conference on Computer Vision(2025) pp.976 28042–28051.977

    2025

  41. [41]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury,978 G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga,979 et al., Advances in neural information processing systems980 32(2019).981

    2019

  42. [42]

    X. Dai, K. Yanny, K. Monakhova, and N. Antipa, ACM982 Transactions on Graphics44, 1 (2025).983

    2025

  43. [43]

    N. Boyd, G. Schiebinger, and B. Recht, SIAM Journal984 on Optimization27, 616 (2017).985

    2017

  44. [44]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical optimization986 (Springer, 2006).987

    2006

  45. [45]

    See supplemental material.988

  46. [46]

    Llopart, J

    X. Llopart, J. Alozy, R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell,989 R. Casanova, V. Gromov, E. Heijne, T. Poikela,990 E. Santin, V. Sriskaran, L. Tlustos, and A. Vitkovskiy,991 Journal of Instrumentation17(01), C01044.992

  47. [47]

    Pozzi, R

    S. Pozzi, R. Lopez, P. Marleau, and S. Clarke, Nuclear993 Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:994 Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated995 Equipment1064, 169307 (2024).996

    2024

  48. [48]

    W. M. Steinberger, M. L. Ruch, N. Giha, A. DiFulvio,997 P. Marleau, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Scientific Re-998 ports10, 1855 (2020).999

    2020

  49. [49]

    Kneale, M

    L. Kneale, M. Smy, and M. Malek, Nuclear Instruments1000 and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler-1001 ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip-1002 ment1053, 168375 (2023).1003

    2023

  50. [50]

    Akindele, A

    O. Akindele, A. Bernstein, M. Bergevin, S. Dazeley,1004 F. Sutanto, A. Mullen, and J. Hecla, Phys. Rev. Appl.1005 19, 034060 (2023).1006

    2023

  51. [51]

    Limits on Neutrino Oscillations from the CHOOZ Experiment

    M. Apollonioet al.(CHOOZ), Phys. Lett.B466, 4151007 (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9907037 [hep-ex].1008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Determination of neutrino incoming direction in the CHOOZ experiment and Supernova explosion location by scintillator detectors

    M. Apollonioet al.(CHOOZ), Phys. Rev.D61, 0120011009 (2000), arXiv:hep-ex/9906011 [hep-ex].1010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [53]

    Phys.4, 273 (2021).1011

    Commun. Phys.4, 273 (2021).1011

    2021

  54. [54]

    Ashenfelteret al.(PROSPECT), Phys

    J. Ashenfelteret al.(PROSPECT), Phys. Rev. Lett.121,1012 251802 (2018).1013

    2018

  55. [55]

    Abreuet al.(SoLid), JINST12, P04024.1014

    Y. Abreuet al.(SoLid), JINST12, P04024.1014

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Abreuet al.(SoLid), JINST13(05), P05005.1015 13

    Y. Abreuet al.(SoLid), JINST13(05), P05005.1015 13

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    First Results from KamLAND: Evidence for Reactor Anti-Neutrino Disappearance

    K. Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), Phys. Rev. Lett.90,1016 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212021 [hep-ex].1017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    H. Seo, S. H. Lee, J. H. Jeong,et al., in2007 IEEE1018 Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 41019 (2007) pp. 2972–2975.1020

    work page arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    R. Ng, M. Levoy, M. Br´ edif, G. Duval, M. Horowitz,1021 and P. Hanrahan,Light field photography with a hand-1022 held plenoptic camera, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford university1023 (2005).1024

    2005

  60. [60]

    Lumsdaine and T

    A. Lumsdaine and T. Georgiev, inProceedings of the1025 IEEE International Conference on Computational Pho-1026 tography (ICCP)(IEEE, 2009) pp. 1–8.1027

    2009

  61. [61]

    Perwass and L

    C. Perwass and L. Wietzke, inHuman vision and elec-1028 tronic imaging XVII, Vol. 8291 (SPIE, 2012) pp. 45–59.1029

    2012

  62. [62]

    Georgiev and A

    T. Georgiev and A. Lumsdaine, Journal of Electronic1030 Imaging19, 021106 (2010).1031

    2010

  63. [63]

    Bocchieri, E

    A. Bocchieri, E. Charbon, and A. Velten, Communica-1032 tions Engineering3, 135 (2024).1033 Supplemental Material for Plenoptic imaging of particle interactions in scintillation detectors I. ADDITIONAL RECONSTRUCTION RESUL TS Fig. S1 provides a detailed decomposition of the 3D localization error presented in the main text. Specifically, we report the reco...

    2024