Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 82 references

Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single learned activation vector can replace a full instruction prompt, with under 2% accuracy loss versus processing every token.

desk verdict Clean empirical demo that a lightweight weighted-sum of mid-layer activations, injected early, recovers near full-prompt accuracy on short instruction and ARC-Easy tasks; the under-2% number is real but tightly scoped. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08399 v1 pith:JOHQCJCM submitted 2026-07-09 cs.CL cs.LG

Thibaud Ardoin , Semira Einsele , Evis Bregu , Gerhard Wunder This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords promptcompressionactivationaggregationweightedsumpatchingLLMefficiencyrepresentationengineeringcross-layertransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Large language models often recompute the same fixed instruction or system prompt on every query. This paper asks whether the useful information in such a prompt can be squeezed into one activation vector and plugged back into the model instead of reprocessing the tokens. The authors train a small network to weight mid-layer activations, sum them into a patch vector, and overwrite a placeholder token’s early-layer activation so the model answers without seeing the original prompt. On controlled knowledge tasks and ARC-Easy questions, this recovers nearly the full-prompt accuracy—within about 2%. The result also points to structure in activation space: mid-layer states remain usable when injected early, a single vector can carry recoverable semantic content, and a weighted sum is enough to compress it.

What carries the argument

The Weighting MLP (W-MLP): a small feed-forward net that maps each mid-layer token activation to a scalar weight; the patch vector is the weighted sum of those activations. That vector replaces the hidden state of a neutral placeholder at an early layer so the frozen LLM continues its forward pass without the original prompt tokens.

What would settle it

Train and evaluate the same weighted-sum patch setup on longer multi-hop or dense reasoning prompts (for example multi-paragraph instructions or harder multi-choice suites); if accuracy collapses far below the full-prompt baseline while a masked placeholder stays near chance, a single patch vector does not preserve task-relevant information beyond the short-prompt regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Task-relevant information from an instruction prompt can be compressed into a single activation vector by a learned weighted sum of hidden states taken from an intermediate layer, then re-injected by overwriting a placeholder token’s activation at an early layer, keeping accuracy within roughly 2% of full prompt processing on the evaluated tasks.

Load-bearing premise

Everything the model needs from the prompt is concentrated enough in one mid-layer activation sequence to survive compression into a single vector and early-layer injection—shown so far only on short knowledge and multiple-choice prompts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fixed system prompts can be pre-compressed once and reused without re-encoding the original token sequence on every query.
  • Mid-layer representations transfer meaningfully into early layers, indicating cross-layer compatibility of how information is encoded.
  • A single activation vector can encode a quantifiable and recoverable amount of semantic task information.
  • A simple weighted sum of activations can serve as a robust compressor and can outperform a more expressive end-to-end transformer compressor on the same task.
  • Compression quality appears to improve as the model’s hidden dimension grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Amortized over many queries with the same instruction, this could cut compute more aggressively than KV-caching alone because the sequence length itself shrinks at inference.
  • The same patch vectors could double as compact semantic keys for retrieval systems that share a representation between search and generation.
  • Segmenting a long prompt into several patch tokens (one per semantic block) is a natural next step to raise fidelity without leaving activation space.
  • The learned token weights give a built-in importance signal that could be compared directly to post-hoc feature-attribution scores.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes compressing fixed instruction prompts into a single activation-space 'patch' vector via a learned weighted sum of mid-layer hidden states (Weighting MLP), then re-injecting that vector at an early layer through a placeholder token so the frozen LLM can answer queries without the original token sequence. A more expressive Transformer Compressor baseline is also trained. On short instruction-style Toy Tasks with Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, W-MLP recovers nearly full-prompt accuracy (85.35% vs 86.92% test; Table 2), while ARC-Easy and OOD tasks show larger gaps. Ablations identify mid-layer extraction with early-layer injection as best, and qualitative analyses show the learned weights concentrate on semantically salient tokens. The authors argue this reveals cross-layer compatibility and linearity of task information in activation space, with potential reuse benefits for fixed system prompts.

Significance. If the result holds beyond the evaluated regime, the work offers a lightweight, no-LLM-finetuning route to amortize fixed instruction prefixes in activation space, complementary to KV/prefix caching and distinct from token-level compressors (Gisting, ICAE) that require heavy model-specific training. The finding that a simple weighted sum outperforms an end-to-end Transformer compressor, together with the mid-extract/early-inject pattern and interpretable token weights, is a concrete contribution to activation engineering and the linearity/superposition literature. Strengths include a clear two-pass framework, multi-model checks (including 1B–8B scales), layer/placeholder ablations, a multi-task capacity probe in Appendix C, and promised code/Toy Task release. The practical efficiency story and the structural claims about activation space would be more compelling with broader prompt regimes and quantified compute savings.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §3.2 Table 2; Figure 4] Abstract and §3.2 headline: the claim of an accuracy drop 'under 2% relative to full prompt processing' is supported only for in-distribution Toy Tasks (Table 2: 85.35% vs 86.92%). On ARC-Easy the same W-MLP drops ~15 points on Llama-3.1-8B (Figure 4: 77% vs 92%), and OOD Toy Tasks fall to 63.01% vs 94.95% full-prompt. The abstract should qualify the regime (short fixed-template knowledge instructions) or report the full range of gaps; otherwise the central empirical claim overstates what the experiments establish.
  2. [§3.4 Figure 5; Limitations] The load-bearing assumption that mid-layer activations remain linearly recoverable after early injection is tested almost exclusively on short knowledge-retrieval and MCQ prompts (Limitations; §3.1). Layer pair (m=12, e=2) is chosen from a 1-epoch heatmap on a Toy Task subset (Figure 5, §3.4). Without at least one longer-context or multi-hop setting, or a stress test where information density is deliberately increased, it is unclear whether the compression mechanism and the practical reuse story transfer outside the current regime. A targeted experiment or a sharply narrowed claim is needed.
  3. [Table 2; Figure 4; Appendix E] Tables 2–results and Figure 4 report point accuracies with no error bars, multiple random seeds, or variance across prompt templates. Given that free parameters include extraction/injection layers, W-MLP architecture, and training hyperparameters (Appendix E), and that TC shows clear train/test overfitting, statistical reliability of the <2% gap and of the W-MLP vs TC comparison cannot be assessed. At minimum, multi-seed means and standard deviations on the main Toy Task and ARC-Easy splits should be reported.
  4. [§1; §5; Limitations] Practical implications (§5) assert reduced per-query computation for fixed instruction prompts, yet the method still requires a partial forward pass through roughly half the layers at compression time (Limitations) and no wall-clock, FLOP, or latency comparison against KV/prefix caching is given. Without a quantitative efficiency comparison on a realistic reuse workload, the engineering motivation remains speculative relative to existing exact-reuse mechanisms cited in the introduction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption and legend use 'Antonymes' (French spelling); standardize to 'Antonyms' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  2. [§2.1; Appendix E Table 9] In §2.1 the W-MLP is described as having hidden dimensions [2048, 1024, 512, 256], while Appendix E Table 9 lists 4096→2048→…→1; reconcile the architecture description.
  3. [§3.1; Figure 6] Placeholder is rendered as '¿' in places and described as U+FFFD; ensure consistent rendering and that the token identity is unambiguous for reproduction.
  4. [§6] Related Work could more explicitly contrast sequence-length and attention-cost implications of activation-level vs token-level compression (Gisting, AutoCompressors, ICAE) in one comparative paragraph.
  5. [Appendix A] Appendix A hand-made experiment uses λ=100,000 replacement scaling on the base (non-Instruct) model and reports ~5.9% on Instruct; a brief note on why scaling differs so sharply between base and Instruct would help readers.
  6. [§2; §5] Typos/style: 'W eighting MLP' / 'T ransformer Compressor' appear with odd spacing in headings (§2.1–2.2); 'F uture Extensions' in §5; fix for camera-ready.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the under-2% accuracy claim and weighted-sum compressor are ordinary empirical measurements against frozen-LLM baselines, not forced by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: extract mid-layer activations H^(m)(p), learn a compressor f (W-MLP weights or TC) by cross-entropy on the frozen target LLM's post-injection logits, inject the resulting patch v at an early layer via a placeholder, and measure exact-match / multiple-choice accuracy versus full-prompt and masked-prompt baselines (Tables 2, Figure 4). Layer pair (m=12, e=2) and architecture are selected by ablation heatmaps (Figure 5, §3.4), not by a uniqueness theorem or self-referential definition. The headline 'under 2%' is simply the observed test gap on the short Toy-Task suite (85.35% vs 86.92%); it is not a fitted constant renamed as a prediction, nor is it derived from any equation that equates output accuracy to the training objective by construction. Self-citations (Ardoin et al. 2025 on confabulation, Cai et al. 2025 on GEFA) appear only in related-work and interpretability discussion and do not underwrite the compression result. Linearity motivation cites external work (Mikolov, Liu, Elhage). The paper is therefore self-contained against its own external baselines; any limitations on longer prompts are openly stated and do not create circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central empirical claim rests on standard transformer residual-stream mechanics, the linear-representation hypothesis drawn from prior work, and a handful of fitted architectural and layer choices selected by grid search/ablation. No new physical entities are postulated; the 'patch vector' is an operational construct defined by the extraction-compression-injection pipeline.

free parameters (4)
  • extraction layer m / injection layer e = m=12, e=2 (Llama-3.1-8B)
    Chosen by 1-epoch heatmap ablation (Fig. 5) then refined; treated as model-dependent hyperparameters (m=12, e=2 for Llama-3.1-8B).
  • W-MLP architecture and learning rate = 4096→2048→1024→512→256→1, lr=1e-3
    4-layer MLP [2048,1024,512,256], lr=1e-3, 5 epochs, batch 8; selected by grid search (Appendix E).
  • hand-made amplification factors α, λ = α=6, λ=1e5
    Used only in the Appendix A proof-of-concept; α=6, λ=100000 for the base model capital task.
  • Transformer Compressor capacity (d_model, heads, layers) = d_model≈64–512, 2h, 2L
    Small encoder (d=64 or 512, 2 heads, 2 layers) chosen to contrast expressivity; still overfits.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Linear representation hypothesis: high-level concepts can be manipulated by arithmetic on activations
    Invoked in §2.1 and Related Work to motivate weighted-sum compression; taken from Mikolov et al. and subsequent steering literature.
  • domain assumption Intermediate layers encode richer task-relevant semantics than early or late layers
    Cited from Panickssery et al. / Marks & Tegmark and used to justify mid-layer extraction (§2, §3.4).
  • ad hoc to paper Early injection leaves enough subsequent layers for the model to integrate the patch before prediction
    Stated as a possible explanation for the observed early-injection advantage; supported only by the same ablation that selected the layers.
  • domain assumption Cross-entropy on the frozen LLM's output logits is a sufficient training signal for a faithful compressor
    Training objective in §2; standard for the field but assumes the logits fully reflect the desired task behavior.
invented entities (2)
  • patch vector (single compressed activation)
    purpose: Serves as the sole carrier of prompt information that replaces the original token sequence via residual-stream overwrite.
    Operational construct defined by f(H^(m)(p)); no independent existence claimed outside the pipeline.
  • Weighting MLP compressor
    purpose: Learns per-token scalar weights so that a linear combination of mid-layer activations reconstructs task behavior.
    New lightweight architecture introduced for this compression task; evaluated against a transformer baseline.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOHQCJCM

@misc{pith2026260708399,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOHQCJCM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08399}
}
abstract

Large language models process prompts by propagating activations through dozens of layers before generating a response. We ask whether the task-relevant information contained in an instruction prompt can be compressed into a single activation vector and re-injected into the model, replacing the original token sequence? We show this is achievable using a learned weighted sum of activations extracted at an intermediate layer and injected at an early layer of the target LLM. The compressed vector preserves task-relevant information, incurring an accuracy drop of under $2\%$ relative to full prompt processing. Beyond its practical implications, including reducing per-query computation for fixed instruction prompts without reprocessing the original token sequence, our analysis reveals structure in the activation space of LLMs: (i) mid-layer representations transfer meaningfully to early layers, suggesting a degree of cross-layer compatibility in how information is encoded; (ii) a single activation vector encodes a quantifiable and recoverable amount of semantic information; (iii) a weighted sum of activations is a robust representation compressor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08399 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed three-step framework: extract hidden states from an input prompt, compress them into a patch vector, and inject the patch vector into a placeholder token to answer a query without direct access to the original prompt. prefix. These methods provide exact or near-exact reuse: the prefix computation is retained so that it does not need to be recomputed. In contrast, we ask a more restrictive qu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of our two activation￾compression methods: the Weighting MLP and the Transformer Compressor. The W-MLP scores each contextualized activation separately, while the TC consumes the full sequence H(m) (p) to produce a patch vector in R d . hypothesize that the information contained in multi￾ple activation vectors can be compressed through a weighted sum. These weights can be hand-designed, as explored in a c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of test performance for a sub-sample of the in-distribution Tasks and out-of￾distribution Tasks. that much of the task-relevant information can be manipulated through simple linear operations in representation space. On in-distribution tasks, W￾MLP performs within 2% of the full-prompt base￾line, suggesting that a single compressed vector can preserve most of the prompt instruction. As shown in [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ARC-Easy test accuracy across LLMs, comparing the Transformer Compressor (TC), the Weighting MLP (W-MLP), and the full- and masked-prompt baselines 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Heatmap of the W-MLP accuracy on the Toy Tasks as a function of the placeholder token and patching position. The y-axis indicates the token position at which the patch vector is injected, relative to the placeholder position. The absence of a placeholder token is denot…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Multi-task encoding capacity of a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative token-level visualizations. Interpretation Across the examples, the learned weights tend to assign larger values to tokens that are semantically relevant for the task, such as task words, relation words, or answer-format cues. For example, high weights ofte…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative token-level visualizations. Ocean animals Cosine similarity Give me a list of 5 animals that live in the ocean . W-MLP weights Give me a list of 5 animals that live in the ocean . KL divergence Give me a list of 5 animals that live in the ocean . Moon quest…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the capital prompt with and without chat-template tokens. The short [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Qualitative token-level visualization for a longer prompt, split into two lines for readability. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , year =

    Where Confabulation Lives: Latent Feature Discovery in LLMs , author =. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , year =

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of machine learning and systems , volume=

    Efficiently scaling transformer inference , author=. Proceedings of machine learning and systems , volume=

    work page

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles , pages =

    Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention , author =. Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles , pages =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Axiomatic attribution for deep networks , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    2025 , organization=

    Cai, Yi and Ardoin, Thibaud and Wunder, Gerhard , booktitle=. 2025 , organization=

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    Transformer feed-forward layers build predictions by promoting concepts in the vocabulary space , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Layerskip: Enabling early exit inference and self-speculative decoding , author=. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    work page

  8. [8]

    2020 , howpublished =

    Interpreting GPT: The Logit Lens , author =. 2020 , howpublished =

    work page 2020

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    2023 , eprint =

    Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens , author =. 2023 , eprint =

    2023

  2. [10]

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , volume=

    A Primer in BERTology: What We Know About How BERT Works , author=. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  3. [11]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages =

    In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectors , author =. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages =. 2023 , publisher =

    2023

  4. [12]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Confident Adaptive Language Modeling , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  5. [13]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficulty , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

  6. [14]

    and Wakhare, Tanay and Kim, Yejin and Huang, H

    Melamed, Rimon and McCabe, Lucas H. and Wakhare, Tanay and Kim, Yejin and Huang, H. Howie and Boix-Adsera, Enric , keywords =. Prompts have evil twins , publisher =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2311.07064 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    How Well do LLMs Compress Their Own Chain-of-Thought? A Token Complexity Approach , publisher =

    Lee, Ayeong and Che, Ethan and Peng, Tianyi , keywords =. How Well do LLMs Compress Their Own Chain-of-Thought? A Token Complexity Approach , publisher =. 2025 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2503.01141 , url =

    2025 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    Adapting language models to compress contexts , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    2023

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06945 , year=

    In-context autoencoder for context compression in a large language model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06945 , year=

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Learning to compress prompts with gist tokens , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06668 , year =

    Sheng Liu and Haotian Ye and Lei Xing and James Zou , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06668 , year =

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 , pages=

    Extracting latent steering vectors from pretrained language models , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 , pages=

    2022

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06681 , year =

    Nina Panickssery and Nick Gabrieli and Julian Schulz and Meg Tong and Evan Hubinger and Alexander Matt Turner , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06681 , year =

    arXiv

  14. [23]

    The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying , journal =

    Azaria, Amos and Mitchell, Tom , keywords =. The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2304.13734 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  15. [24]

    The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets , journal =

    Marks, Samuel and Tegmark, Max , keywords =. The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.06824 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  16. [25]

    Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision , journal =

    Burns, Collin and Ye, Haotian and Klein, Dan and Steinhardt, Jacob , keywords =. Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision , journal =. 2022 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2212.03827 , url =

    2022 doi arXiv

  17. [26]

    Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model , journal =

    Li, Kenneth and Patel, Oam and Viégas, Fernanda and Pfister, Hanspeter and Wattenberg, Martin , keywords =. Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2306.03341 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  18. [27]

    Do Androids Know They ' re Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?

    CH-Wang, Sky and Van Durme, Benjamin and Eisner, Jason and Kedzie, Chris. Do Androids Know They ' re Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.260

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query , journal =

    Ji, Ziwei and Chen, Delong and Ishii, Etsuko and Cahyawijaya, Samuel and Bang, Yejin and Wilie, Bryan and Fung, Pascale , keywords =. LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2407.03282 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01405 , year =

    Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01405 , year =

    arXiv

  21. [30]

    Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models , journal =

    Skean, Oscar and Arefin, Md Rifat and LeCun, Yann and Shwartz-Ziv, Ravid , keywords =. Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2412.09563 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026 , pages=

    Punctuations and Predicates in Language Models , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026 , pages=

    2026

  23. [32]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

    Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

  24. [33]

    and Mini, Ulisse and MacDiarmid, Monte , keywords =

    Turner, Alexander Matt and Thiergart, Lisa and Leech, Gavin and Udell, David and Vazquez, Juan J. and Mini, Ulisse and MacDiarmid, Monte , keywords =. Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2308.10248 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  25. [34]

    Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition , journal =

    Panickssery, Nina and Gabrieli, Nick and Schulz, Julian and Tong, Meg and Hubinger, Evan and Turner, Alexander Matt , keywords =. Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2312.06681 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  26. [35]

    In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steering , journal =

    Liu, Sheng and Ye, Haotian and Xing, Lei and Zou, James , keywords =. In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steering , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2311.06668 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  27. [36]

    2024 , howpublished =

    Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet , author =. 2024 , howpublished =

    2024

  28. [37]

    May 24th, 2023 , journal=

    Interpretability Dreams , author=. May 24th, 2023 , journal=

    2023

  29. [38]

    2022 , howpublished =

    Toy Models of Superposition , author =. 2022 , howpublished =

    2022

  30. [39]

    2023 , journal=

    Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language Models With Dictionary Learning , author=. 2023 , journal=

    2023

  31. [40]

    2020 , howpublished =

    Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuits , author =. 2020 , howpublished =

    2020

  32. [41]

    Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review , journal=

    Bereska, Leonard and Gavves, Efstratios , keywords =. Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review , journal=. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2404.14082 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models , author=. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  34. [43]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Transcoders find interpretable llm feature circuits , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  35. [44]

    The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models , journal=

    Park, Kiho and Choe, Yo Joong and Veitch, Victor , keywords =. The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models , journal=. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2311.03658 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  36. [45]

    Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations

    Mikolov, Tomas and Yih, Wen-tau and Zweig, Geoffrey. Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2013

    2013

  37. [46]

    Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , journal =

    Mikolov, Tomas and Chen, Kai and Corrado, Greg and Dean, Jeffrey , keywords =. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , journal =. 2013 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1301.3781 , url =

    2013 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    Ailon, Nir and Chazelle, Bernard , title =. Commun. ACM , month = feb, pages =. 2010 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/1646353.1646379 , abstract =

    2010 doi

  39. [48]

    , year =

    Johnson, William and Lindenstrauss, J. , year =. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space , volume =

  40. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08584 , year=

    Ministral 3 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08584 , year=

    arXiv

  41. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671 , year=

    Qwen2 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671 , year=

    arXiv

  42. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05355 , year =

    Falcon Mamba: The First Competitive Attention-free 7B Language Model , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05355 , year =

    arXiv

  43. [52]

    Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models , journal =

    Touvron, Hugo and Martin, Louis and Stone, Kevin and Albert, Peter and Almahairi, Amjad and Babaei, Yasmine and Bashlykov, Nikolay and Batra, Soumya and Bhargava, Prajjwal and Bhosale, Shruti and Bikel, Dan and Blecher, Lukas and Ferrer, Cristian Canton and Chen, Moya and Cucu...

    2023 doi arXiv

  44. [53]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models , journal =

    Grattafiori, Aaron and Dubey, Abhimanyu and Jauhri, Abhinav and Pandey, Abhinav and Kadian, Abhishek and Al-Dahle, Ahmad and Letman, Aiesha and Mathur, Akhil and Schelten, Alan and Vaughan, Alex and Yang, Amy and Fan, Angela and Goyal, Anirudh and Hartshorn, Anthony and Yang, ...

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [54]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  46. [55]

    and Varoquaux, G

    Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. and Gramfort, A. and Michel, V. and Thirion, B. and Grisel, O. and Blondel, M. and Prettenhofer, P. and Weiss, R. and Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J. and Passos, A. and Cournapeau, D. and Brucher, M. and Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. , journal=. S...

  47. [56]

    and Zhang, Hao and Gonzalez, Joseph E

    Zheng, Lianmin and Chiang, Wei-Lin and Sheng, Ying and Zhuang, Siyuan and Wu, Zhanghao and Zhuang, Yonghao and Lin, Zi and Li, Zhuohan and Li, Dacheng and Xing, Eric P. and Zhang, Hao and Gonzalez, Joseph E. and Stoica, Ion , keywords =. Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench an...

    2023 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    , keywords =

    Wei, Jerry and Huang, Da and Lu, Yifeng and Zhou, Denny and Le, Quoc V. , keywords =. Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2308.03958 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  49. [58]

    Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models , journal =

    Wei, Jason and Wang, Xuezhi and Schuurmans, Dale and Bosma, Maarten and Ichter, Brian and Xia, Fei and Chi, Ed and Le, Quoc and Zhou, Denny , keywords =. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models , journal =. 2022 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2...

    2022 doi arXiv

  50. [59]

    and Stiennon, Nisan and Wu, Jeffrey and Brown, Tom B

    Ziegler, Daniel M. and Stiennon, Nisan and Wu, Jeffrey and Brown, Tom B. and Radford, Alec and Amodei, Dario and Christiano, Paul and Irving, Geoffrey , keywords =. Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences , journal =. 2019 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1909.0859...

    2019 doi arXiv

  51. [60]

    Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Models , journal =

    Goddard, Charles and Siriwardhana, Shamane and Ehghaghi, Malikeh and Meyers, Luke and Karpukhin, Vlad and Benedict, Brian and McQuade, Mark and Solawetz, Jacob , keywords =. Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Models , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.4...

    2024 doi arXiv

  52. [61]

    LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This , journal =

    Banerjee, Sourav and Agarwal, Ayushi and Singla, Saloni , keywords =. LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2409.05746 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  53. [62]

    On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization , url =

    Maynez, Joshua and Narayan, Shashi and Bohnet, Bernd and McDonald, Ryan , year =. On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization , url =. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173 , booktitle =

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    Alignment for Honesty , journal =

    Yang, Yuqing and Chern, Ethan and Qiu, Xipeng and Neubig, Graham and Liu, Pengfei , keywords =. Alignment for Honesty , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2312.07000 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  55. [64]

    Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs , journal =

    Xiong, Miao and Hu, Zhiyuan and Lu, Xinyang and Li, Yifei and Fu, Jie and He, Junxian and Hooi, Bryan , keywords =. Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs , journal =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2306.13063 , url =

    2023 doi arXiv

  56. [65]

    Hallucination

    Berberette, Elijah and Hutchins, Jack and Sadovnik, Amir , keywords =. Redefining "Hallucination" in LLMs: Towards a psychology-informed framework for mitigating misinformation , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2402.01769 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  57. [66]

    Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF , journal =

    Sun, Zhiqing and Shen, Sheng and Cao, Shengcao and Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Shen, Yikang and Gan, Chuang and Gui, Liang-Yan and Wang, Yu-Xiong and Yang, Yiming and Keutzer, Kurt and Darrell, Trevor , keywords =. Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmente...

    2023 doi arXiv

  58. [67]

    and Lian, Qing and Wang, Xingyao and Chen, Yangyi and Ji, Heng and Zhang, Tong , keywords =

    Zhang, Hanning and Diao, Shizhe and Lin, Yong and Fung, Yi R. and Lian, Qing and Wang, Xingyao and Chen, Yangyi and Ji, Heng and Zhang, Tong , keywords =. R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know' , publisher =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2311...

    2023 doi arXiv

  59. [68]

    Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey , url =

    Agrawal, Garima and Kumarage, Tharindu and Alghamdi, Zeyad and Liu, Huan , year =. Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey , url =. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.219 , booktitle =

    2024 doi

  60. [69]

    Artificial intelligence hallucinatMarks2023ions in anaesthesia: Causes, consequences and countermeasures , volume =

    Gondode, Prakash and Duggal, Sakshi and Mahor, Vaishali , year =. Artificial intelligence hallucinatMarks2023ions in anaesthesia: Causes, consequences and countermeasures , volume =. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia , publisher =. doi:10.4103/ija.ija_203_24 , number =

    doi

  61. [70]

    Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals , volume =

    Choudhury, Avishek and Chaudhry, Zaira , year =. Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals , volume =. doi:10.2196/56764 , journal =

    doi

  62. [71]

    , keywords =

    Dahl, Matthew and Magesh, Varun and Suzgun, Mirac and Ho, Daniel E. , keywords =. Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models , publisher =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2401.01301 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  63. [72]

    A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law , journal =

    Chen, Zhiyu Zoey and Ma, Jing and Zhang, Xinlu and Hao, Nan and Yan, An and Nourbakhsh, Armineh and Yang, Xianjun and McAuley, Julian and Petzold, Linda and Wang, William Yang , keywords =. A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, a...

    2024 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Quantifying the Uncertainty of LLM Hallucination Spreading in Complex Adaptive Social Networks , author =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66708-4 , url =

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 , year=

    Measuring massive multitask language understanding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 , year=

    2009 arXiv

  66. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457 , year=

    Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457 , year=

    arXiv

  67. [76]

    TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods , journal =

    Lin, Stephanie and Hilton, Jacob and Evans, Owain , keywords =. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods , journal =. 2021 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2109.07958 , url =

    2021 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    Mitigating Entity-Level Hallucination in Large Language Models , publisher =

    Su, Weihang and Tang, Yichen and Ai, Qingyao and Wang, Changyue and Wu, Zhijing and Liu, Yiqun , keywords =. Mitigating Entity-Level Hallucination in Large Language Models , publisher =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2407.09417 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  69. [78]

    MedHEval: Benchmarking Hallucinations and Mitigation Strategies in Medical Large Vision-Language Models , journal =

    Chang, Aofei and Huang, Le and Bhatia, Parminder and Kass-Hout, Taha and Ma, Fenglong and Xiao, Cao , keywords =. MedHEval: Benchmarking Hallucinations and Mitigation Strategies in Medical Large Vision-Language Models , journal =. 2025 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2503.02...

    2025 doi arXiv

  70. [79]

    Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages =

    Knowledge-Centric Hallucination Detection , author =. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  71. [80]

    Investigating the Role of Prompting and External Tools in Hallucination Rates of Large Language Models , journal =

    Barkley, Liam and van der Merwe, Brink , keywords =. Investigating the Role of Prompting and External Tools in Hallucination Rates of Large Language Models , journal =. 2024 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2410.19385 , url =

    2024 doi arXiv

  72. [81]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Models , url =

    Sahoo, Pranab and Meharia, Prabhash and Ghosh, Akash and Saha, Sriparna and Jain, Vinija and Chadha, Aman , year =. A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Models , url =. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.685 , booktitle =

    2024 doi

  73. [82]

    Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models , journal =

    Zhang, Yue and Li, Yafu and Cui, Leyang and Cai, Deng and Liu, Lemao and Fu, Tingchen and Huang, Xinting and Zhao, Enbo and Zhang, Yu and Chen, Yulong and Wang, Longyue and Luu, Anh Tuan and Bi, Wei and Shi, Freda and Shi, Shuming , keywords =. Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A ...

    2023 doi arXiv

  74. [83]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05232 , year =

    A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05232 , year =

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.