Pith. sign in

REVIEW

GhostPrompt: Cross-Image Adversarial Prompt for Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2607.19683 v1 pith:PAIUGJU2 submitted 2026-07-22 cs.CR

GhostPrompt: Cross-Image Adversarial Prompt for Vision-Language Models

classification cs.CR
keywords adversarialpromptghostpromptimagesattackattacksconditionscross-image
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where subtle perturbations to images or texts induce erroneous outputs. However, most text-based attacks are adapted from language-model-centric methods, in which the visual input is fixed during optimization, resulting in adversarial prompts that are tied to specific images and thus limiting their attack effectiveness. To this end, we first introduce a new research perspective: cross-image transferability for adversarial prompts. We then propose GhostPrompt, an adversarial prompt that is optimized once and reused to steer VLM outputs toward attacker-specified responses across diverse images. GhostPrompt employs a joint optimization that distills image-invariant adversarial features into the prompt by "worst-case" generation. Specifically, it alternates between constructing hard visual conditions for the current prompt and updating the prompt to remain effective under these conditions. Extensive experiments on prevalent VLMs verify that \ourmethod achieves an improvement of over 30% in attack success rates compared to state-of-the-art (SoTA) baselines, while reducing computation time by ~70%. Our code is avalable at https://github.com/Ye-ze-yu/GhostPrompt.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.