Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Towards on-chip nascent all-van-der-Waals polarization optical components for nanoscale photonic applications

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A twisted stack of two van der Waals crystals converts linearly polarized excitonic emission into circularly polarized light on a silicon chip, with simulations predicting above 95% conversion for optimized thicknesses.

desk verdict A real device and a credible 36.6% DoCP measurement, surrounded by a simulation that is honest about its approximations but too underdetermined to carry the 95% optimization claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21748 v1 pith:F3JUH47V submitted 2026-07-23 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dmitrii Litvinov , Ilia Begichev , Iakov Reznikov , Changyi Chen , Maksim Sargsyan , Sergey Y. Grebenchuk , Makars Siskins , Kostya S. Novoselov
show 3 more authors
Alexey I. Berdyugin Maciej Koperski Davit A. Ghazaryan
This is my paper
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vanderWaalsheterostructuresquarter-waveplateReSe2α-MoO3circularpolarizationdegreeofFDTDsimulationon-chipnanophotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that a twisted stack of two van der Waals crystals—ReSe2, which emits nearly 100% linearly polarized excitonic light, and biaxially anisotropic α-MoO3, which acts as a quarter-wave plate—can convert that emission into circularly polarized light entirely on a Si/SiO2 chip. In the proof-of-principle device, the measured mean degree of circular polarization (DoCP) is 36.6%, and finite-difference time-domain simulations reproduce it as 36.3%. The simulations identify layer thickness, twist angle, Fabry–Pérot interference, and the depth distribution of emitters as the parameters that control conversion efficiency, and show that DoCP above 95% is reachable with α-MoO3 layers thicker than 1.3 µm. If correct, this establishes a route to fully van der Waals integrated polarization components for near-infrared nanophotonics.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the in-plane birefringence of α-MoO3 (Δn_xy ≈ 0.08 at the emission wavelengths), which converts a linearly polarized field into a circularly polarized one after a π/2 phase retardance accumulated over the layer thickness, modified by Fabry–Pérot interference from the multilayer stack. The ReSe2 layer's low crystal symmetry forces its excitonic dipoles to align along a specific in-plane direction, giving nearly 100% linear polarization. The twist angle between these two axes sets how much of the linear polarization projects onto the fast and slow axes of the quarter-wave plate. A finite-difference time-domain model, fed with experimentally measured thicknesses, twist angle, a

What would settle it

Measure the dielectric tensor of the actual ReSe2 layer (e.g., by spectroscopic ellipsometry on the same flake) and re-run the FDTD simulation: if the DoCP match (36.6% vs 36.3%) or the >95% prediction for >1.3 µm α-MoO3 changes substantially, the paper's central quantitative claim fails. Alternatively, fabricate the predicted optimized 1.3+ µm stack and measure its DoCP directly; near-90%-or-higher circular polarization would confirm it, a clear lower value would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a deliberately twisted ReSe2/α-MoO3 heterostructure assembled on Si/SiO2 functions as an on-chip quarter-wave plate in the near-infrared. The low-symmetry ReSe2 multilayer provides a source of strongly linearly polarized excitonic emission; the birefringent α-MoO3 layer imparts the phase retardance that turns this linear polarization into elliptical/circular polarization. With a twist angle of 21° between the emission polarization and the fast axis of α-MoO3, the device achieves a mean DoCP of 36.6%, matched by FDTD simulations to 36.3%. The simulations further predict that optimization of the α-MoO3 thickness to above 1.3 µm raises the DoCP beyond 95%, pointing the

Load-bearing premise

The simulations, and with them the claimed agreement and the >95% DoCP prediction, rest on using literature optical constants of ReS2 in place of the actual ReSe2 dielectric tensor, and on an exponential emitter depth distribution with a decay length (27 nm) determined by fitting; if either is wrong, the quantitative match is not reliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All-vdW quarter-wave plates operating in the near-infrared can be assembled on Si/SiO2 without any external polarizing optics.
  • The DoCP of the device can be tuned by adjusting the twist angle and the α-MoO3 thickness; thicker layers (>1.3 µm) are predicted to exceed 95% DoCP.
  • The approach extends to other biaxial and low-symmetry vdW crystals, and to converting single-photon linearly polarized emission.
  • The demonstration of on-chip polarization conversion is a step toward photonic circuits made entirely of layered materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 95% DoCP prediction holds for thicker α-MoO3, the same geometry could be adapted to operate at shorter wavelengths, where α-MoO3's anisotropy is larger, potentially yielding efficient components in the visible.
  • The reliance on approximate ReS2 optical constants for ReSe2 suggests that a direct measurement of ReSe2's dielectric tensor would either strengthen or revise the quantitative match; this is a natural next step, not made in the paper.
  • Because the conversion depends on Fabry–Pérot interference, the same stack could be tuned by changing the SiO2 thickness, enabling wavelength-selective polarization control without changing the crystal layers.
  • The device concept may be transferable to other emitter/birefringent pairs, but the 21° twist optimization would need to be re-established for each material combination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a twisted ReSe2/α-MoO3 heterostructure on Si/SiO2 that acts as a quarter-wave plate converting the linearly polarized excitonic emission of ReSe2 into partially circularly polarized light, with a measured mean DoCP of 36.6%. FDTD simulations that incorporate independently measured α-MoO3 optical constants, layer thicknesses, twist angle, and emission wavelengths reproduce this as 36.3%. The authors further predict that DoCP exceeding 95% is achievable for α-MoO3 thicknesses above 1.3 μm. The central claim is an all-van-der-Waals, on-chip polarization component operating in the near-infrared.

Significance. If the quantitative agreement and the 95% optimization projection are robust, this is a meaningful step toward integrated all-vdW polarization optics. The paper has clear strengths: α-MoO3 optical constants are obtained from Mueller-matrix ellipsometry, layer thicknesses and twist angle are measured, and the polarization-resolved PL experiment shows a clear contrast between bare ReSe2 and the twisted stack. The measured 36.6% DoCP is credible experimental evidence of polarization conversion. However, the quantitative validation and the >95% projection rest on two model inputs that are not independently measured — the ReSe2 dielectric tensor (approximated by ReS2 constants) and the exponential emitter depth profile with fitted decay length z0=27 nm. The significance of the paper depends on whether these inputs can be constrained or shown not to materially affect the conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 3E,F; Methods, FDTD calculations] The claimed quantitative agreement (measured 36.6% vs simulated 36.3% DoCP) is used to validate the model and to justify the >95% prediction in Supplementary Figure S2. However, the two inputs that are not experimentally determined are exactly those that control the polarization conversion: the ReSe2 optical constants (approximated by ReS2) and the emitter depth profile (exponential with z0 'found from a fit'). With essentially one scalar observable (mean DoCP), the match is non-unique: different combinations of ReSe2 constants and z0 could reproduce the same value. The paper itself warns that the substitution 'may give rise to a mixture among the fitting parameters.' The statement that z0=27 nm is 'coherent with' the attenuation coefficient using k=2.6 does not resolve this, because that k value comes from the same assumed ReS2 constants. Please provide a sensitivity analysis sweeping R
  2. [Supplementary Figure S2; Conclusion] The claim that 'DoCP exceeding 95% can be achieved for quarter-wave plate thicknesses above 1.3 μm' is a direct extrapolation of the same unvalidated model. The optimal thickness depends on the phase retardance Δn_xy d and the Fabry–Pérot contribution, both of which shift if the true ReSe2 tensor or emitter distribution differs from the assumed ReS2 constants and exponential profile. Please demonstrate that the >95% region is robust to the uncertainties described above, e.g., by plotting DoCP versus thickness for the upper and lower bounds of the ReSe2 literature values and for z0=27±δ nm. As written, the abstract's 'yields up to 95%' overstates the evidence, since this is a simulated projection based on unverified inputs.
  3. [Methods, Polarization-resolved PL spectroscopy vs FDTD calculations] PL experiments are collected with an objective of N.A. = 0.82, so the measured DoCP is an angular average over a wide collection cone. The FDTD DoCP is evaluated from the electric-field trajectory at a single monitor point placed 3 μm above the stack. It is unclear whether this monitor represents only the normally emitted field or an angle-integrated far-field projection. Since the phase retardance of the α-MoO3 layer and the Fabry–Pérot phase depend on angle, a single-point monitor may not correspond to the measured quantity. Please clarify the angular treatment; if only normal emission is considered, an angular integration over the collection cone should be performed to make the 36.3% vs 36.6% comparison meaningful.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, text near Fig. 3] The text refers to 'in-plane anisotropic optical constants (see Figure 1E)' but Figure 1 has panels ending at 1C; correct the cross-reference to Figure 1C (bottom).
  2. [Abstract] 'which yields up to 95 %' should specify that this is a simulated optimized result, not a measured value, to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Throughout] Degree symbols are missing in several places, e.g., '60o', '0o', '20o', '50o'; these should be formatted as '60°', etc.
  4. [Methods, FDTD calculations] The time step is written as '6.6 10−19 s'; please format as '6.6×10⁻¹⁹ s'.
  5. [Title] The word 'nascent' in the title is unusual and potentially confusing; consider 'emerging' or removing it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the FDTD match is not forced by fitting to the measured DoCP; the ReS2-proxy caveat is a validity concern, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central result is experimental: a twisted ReSe2/alpha-MoO3 stack on Si/SiO2 produces mean DoCP of 36.6% from the ReSe2 excitonic PL, while bare ReSe2 gives near-zero DoCP. The FDTD simulation is a forward calculation using independently measured inputs: layer thicknesses (AFM), twist angle (polarization-resolved PL/Raman), emission wavelength, and alpha-MoO3 dielectric tensor from Mueller-matrix ellipsometry. The only material input not independently measured for ReSe2 is its optical constants, which are approximated by literature ReS2 values; the paper says this explicitly and warns it 'may give rise to a mixture among the fitting parameters, including the out-of-plane distribution of emitters.' That is an acknowledged underdetermination of the quantitative validation, but it is not circular: the text ties the emitter decay length z0=27 nm to the attenuation coefficient from k=2.6 of the approximate material, rather than reporting that z0 was adjusted to reproduce the measured DoCP. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to an input by construction, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the only overlapping-author citation ([23], MoOCl2 background) is not load-bearing. Therefore the score is 0; the modeling caveats belong to correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on measured inputs (alpha-MoO3 birefringence, thicknesses, twist angle, emission wavelengths) plus two load-bearing modeling choices: substitution of ReS2 optical constants for ReSe2 and an exponential emitter-depth profile with fitted decay length z0=27 nm. These are transparently acknowledged in the text but mean the FDTD agreement and optimization are not fully parameter-free. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Emitter depth decay length z0 = 27 nm
    Exponential emitter distribution w proportional to exp(-z/z0) with z0 'found from a fit'; directly controls FDTD DoCP and is acknowledged to mix with other fitting parameters.
  • Optical constants of ReSe2 = Using vdW ReS2 values from literature as proxy
    The authors did not measure ReSe2 optical constants due to spread and non-Hermitian tensor complications; FDTD agreement and 95% projection depend on this substitution.
  • alpha-MoO3 Sellmeier coefficients (B_i, C_i) = Supplementary Table S2 (not in provided text)
    Fitted to Mueller-matrix ellipsometry data; used as lossless biaxial optical constants in TMM and FDTD. This is independent characterization, but still fitted to sample data.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper ReS2 optical constants lie close enough to ReSe2 at 870-920 nm for quantitative DoCP prediction
    Explicitly stated: 'we used ... optical constants of vdW ReS2, expecting them to lie in the vicinity to that of vdW ReSe2'; no direct validation of this proximity is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Emitter distribution in ReSe2 follows an exponential decay with fitted z0
    Chosen because optical excitation is expected to attenuate; the shape and z0 are fitted, so simulation agreement is partly constructed rather than independently measured.
  • domain assumption alpha-MoO3 is lossless biaxial with Sellmeier dispersion in the measured spectral range
    Used in ellipsometric fitting (Methods); consistent with prior literature and low visible absorption, but a modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption ReSe2 excitonic dipoles are fully linearly polarized along a single in-plane axis
    Based on low-symmetry crystal structure and prior reports; needed for the linearly polarized source.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards on-chip nascent all-van-der-Waals polarization optical components for nanoscale photonic applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F3JUH47V

@misc{pith2026260721748,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards on-chip nascent all-van-der-Waals polarization optical components for nanoscale photonic applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F3JUH47V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21748}
}
read the original abstract

The integration of polarization-control elements into nanoscale photonic circuits remains a central challenge for modern on-chip optical technologies, which call for continuous miniaturization. Van der Waals (vdW) crystals provide a versatile platform for the creation of such components owing to their strong optical anisotropy, high-refractive indices and atomically precise heterostructure assembly capabilities. In this work, we demonstrate an approach towards the creation of all-vdW on-chip polarization optical components, exemplified with quarter-wave plates operating in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region, realized in specifically twisted ReSe2/alpha-MoO3 vdW heterostructures on a Si/SiO2 platform. Here, low-symmetry ReSe2 layer serves as a source of exceptionally high linearly polarized excitonic emission, whereas in-plane birefringent alpha-MoO_3 provides polarization-state conversion. Furthermore, our finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations quantitatively reproduce the experimental observations with high accuracy revealing the critical roles of layer thicknesses, twist-angle, Fabry-Perot interference and emitter distribution effects in the determination of polarization conversion efficiency, which yields up to 95 % degrees of circular polarization (DoCP) for the optimized parametrization. Our findings establish a practical route towards fully integrated all-vdW polarization optical components, providing a foundation for nanoscale photonic architectures based entirely on layered materials.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films

    Novoselov Kostya S, Andre K Geim, Sergei V Morozov, et al. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306 (5696): 666–69 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Van Der Waals Heterostructures

    Geim Andre K, and Irina V Grigorieva. Van Der Waals Heterostructures. Nature 499 (7459): 419–25 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Unconventional Superconductivity in Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices

    Cao Yuan, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, et al. Unconventional Superconductivity in Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices. Nature 556 (7699): 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor.” Physical Review Letters 105 (13): 136805 (2010)

    Mak Kin Fai, Changgu Lee, James Hone, Jie Shan, and Tony F Heinz. Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor.” Physical Review Letters 105 (13): 136805 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in a van Der Waals Crystal down to the Monolayer Limit.” Nature 546 (7657): 270–73 (2017)

    Huang Bevin, Genevieve Clark, Efrén Navarro-Moratalla, et al. Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in a van Der Waals Crystal down to the Monolayer Limit.” Nature 546 (7657): 270–73 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Evidence for Moiré Excitons in van Der Waals Heterostructures.” Nature 567 (7746): 71–75 (2019)

    Tran Kha, Galan Moody, Fengcheng Wu, et al. Evidence for Moiré Excitons in van Der Waals Heterostructures.” Nature 567 (7746): 71–75 (2019). 10

    2019

  7. [7]

    Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Wang Qing Hua, Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh, Andras Kis, Jonathan N Coleman, and Michael S Strano. Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotechnology 7 (11): 699–712 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Polaritons in Layered Two-Dimensional Materials

    Low Tony, Andrey Chaves, Joshua D Caldwell, et al. Polaritons in Layered Two-Dimensional Materials. Nature Materials 16 (2): 182–94 (2017)

    2017

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Polaritons in van Der Waals Materials

    Basov D N, M M Fogler, and F J Garcı ́a de Abajo. Polaritons in van Der Waals Materials. Science 354 (6309): aag1992 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Photodetectors Based on Graphene, Other Two-Dimensional Materials and Hybrid Systems

    Koppens Frank H L, Thomas Mueller, Ph Avouris, Andrea C Ferrari, M Serena Vitiello, and Marco Polini. Photodetectors Based on Graphene, Other Two-Dimensional Materials and Hybrid Systems. Nature Nanotechnology 9 (10): 780–93 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Strong Light-Matter Interactions in Heterostructures of Atomically Thin Films

    Britnell Liam, Ricardo Mendes Ribeiro, Axel Eckmann, et al. Strong Light-Matter Interactions in Heterostructures of Atomically Thin Films. Science 340 (6138): 1311–14 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Photonics and Optoelectronics of 2D Semiconductor Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Mak Kin Fai, and Jie Shan. Photonics and Optoelectronics of 2D Semiconductor Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nature Photonics 10 (4): 216–26 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Antosiewicz, and Timur O

    Munkhbat Battulga, Piotr Wróbel, Tomasz J. Antosiewicz, and Timur O. Shegai. Optical Constants of Several Multilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Measured by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm Range: High Index, Anisotropy, and Hyperbolicity. ACS Photonics 9 (7)...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Javier García de, D

    Abajo F. Javier García de, D. N. Basov, Frank H. L. Koppens, et al. Roadmap for Photonics with 2D Materials. ACS Photonics 12 (8): 3961–4095 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    The 2D Materials Roadmap

    Ren Wencai, Peter Bøggild, Joan Redwing, et al. The 2D Materials Roadmap. 2D Materials 13 (2): 021501 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    In-Plane Anisotropic and Ultra-Low-Loss Polaritons in a Natural van Der Waals Crystal

    Ma Weiliang, Pablo Alonso-González, Shaojuan Li, et al. In-Plane Anisotropic and Ultra-Low-Loss Polaritons in a Natural van Der Waals Crystal. Nature 562 (7728): 557–62 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Oscurato, et al

    Zheng Zebo, Ningsheng Xu, Stefano L. Oscurato, et al. A Mid-Infrared Biaxial Hyperbolic van Der Waals Crystal. Science Advances 5 (5): eaav8690 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Ermolaev, Mikhail K

    Slavich Aleksandr S., Georgy A. Ermolaev, Mikhail K. Tatmyshevskiy, et al. Exploring van Der Waals Materials with High Anisotropy: Geometrical and Optical Approaches. Light: Science & Applications 13: 1 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Low-Symmetry 𝛼-MoO3 Heterostructures for Wave Plate Applications in Visible Frequencies

    Abedini Dereshgi, Sina, Yea-Shine Lee, Maria Cristina Larciprete, Marco Centini, Vinayak P Dravid, and Koray Aydin. Low-Symmetry 𝛼-MoO3 Heterostructures for Wave Plate Applications in Visible Frequencies. Advanced Optical Materials 11 (7): 2202603 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Optical Waveplates Based on Birefringence of Anisotropic Two-Dimensional Layered Materials

    Yang He, Henri Jussila, Anton Autere, et al. Optical Waveplates Based on Birefringence of Anisotropic Two-Dimensional Layered Materials. ACS Photonics 4 (12): 3023–30 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    As-Grown Miniaturized True Zero-Order Waveplates Based on Low-Dimensional Ferrocene Crystals

    Li Zhipeng, Xuezhi Ma, Fengxia Wei, et al. As-Grown Miniaturized True Zero-Order Waveplates Based on Low-Dimensional Ferrocene Crystals. Advanced Materials 35 (32): 2302468 (2023). 11

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ermolaev, Ilya A

    Slavich Aleksandr S., Georgy A. Ermolaev, Ilya A. Zavidovskiy, et al. Germanium Disulfide as an Alternative High Refractive Index and Transparent Material for UV-Visible Nanophotonics. Light: Science & Applications 14: 213 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Margaryan A. V., M. L. Sargsyan, M. H. Hayrapetyan, D. A. Karakhanyan, K. S. Novoselov, and D. A. Ghazaryan. Dynamic Dielectric Permittivity Tensor of in-Plane Hyperbolic van Der Waals MoOCl2 and Emergent Chiral Photonic Applications. Npj 2D Materials and Applications 10: 42 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    Ultrathin, High-Performance Circular Wave Plate Based on Natural van Der Waals Crystals

    Huang Shuxin, Guanyu Zhang, Yaolong Li, et al. Ultrathin, High-Performance Circular Wave Plate Based on Natural van Der Waals Crystals. Research Square (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    Mid-Infrared Chirality and Chiral Thermal Emission from Twisted 𝛼-MoO3

    Enders Michael T., Mitradeep Sarkar, Evgenia Klironomou, et al. Mid-Infrared Chirality and Chiral Thermal Emission from Twisted 𝛼-MoO3. Nature Communications 16: 1 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Topological Polaritons and Photonic Magic Angles in Twisted 𝛼-MoO3 Bilayers

    Hu Guangwei, Qingdong Ou, Guangyuan Si, et al. Topological Polaritons and Photonic Magic Angles in Twisted 𝛼-MoO3 Bilayers. Nature 582 (7811): 209–13 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    On-Chip Light Trapping in Bilayer Moiré Photonic Crystal Slabs

    Tang Haoning, Xueqi Ni, Fan Du, Vishantak Srikrishna, and Eric Mazur. On-Chip Light Trapping in Bilayer Moiré Photonic Crystal Slabs. Applied Physics Letters 121 (23): 231702 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Molas, Zhiheng Huang, et al

    Du Luojun, Maciej R. Molas, Zhiheng Huang, et al. Moiré Photonics and Optoelectronics. Science 379 (6639): eadg0014 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Dielectric Photonic Moiré Metamaterials

    Zhang Mingjie, and Eric Mazur. Dielectric Photonic Moiré Metamaterials. Npj Metamaterials 2: 20 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Rediscovering Black Phosphorus as an Anisotropic Layered Material for Optoelectronics and Electronics

    Xia Fengnian, Han Wang, and Yichen Jia. Rediscovering Black Phosphorus as an Anisotropic Layered Material for Optoelectronics and Electronics. Nature Communications 5, 1: 4458 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Highly Anisotropic and Robust Excitons in Monolayer Black Phosphorus

    Wang Xiaomu, Aaron M Jones, Kyle L Seyler, et al. Highly Anisotropic and Robust Excitons in Monolayer Black Phosphorus. Nature Nanotechnology 10 (6): 517–21 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    In-Plane Anisotropy in Mono-and Few-Layer ReS2 Probed by Raman Spectroscopy and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

    Chenet Daniel A, Burak Aslan, Pinshane Y Huang, et al. In-Plane Anisotropy in Mono-and Few-Layer ReS2 Probed by Raman Spectroscopy and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy. Nano Letters 15 (9): 5667–72 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Highly Anisotropic in-Plane Excitons in Atomically Thin and Bulklike 1T’-ReSe2

    Arora Ashish, Jonathan Noky, Matthias Drüppel, et al. Highly Anisotropic in-Plane Excitons in Atomically Thin and Bulklike 1T’-ReSe2. Nano Letters 17 (5): 3202–7 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Three-Dimensional Optical Anisotropy of Low-Symmetry Layered GeS

    Li Zongbao, Yusi Yang, Xia Wang, Wei Shi, Ding-Jiang Xue, and Jin-Song Hu. Three-Dimensional Optical Anisotropy of Low-Symmetry Layered GeS. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 11 (27): 24247–53 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Extreme in-Plane Thermal Conductivity Anisotropy in Titanium Trisulfide Caused by Heat-Carrying Optical Phonons

    Liu Huili, Xiaoxia Yu, Kedi Wu, et al. Extreme in-Plane Thermal Conductivity Anisotropy in Titanium Trisulfide Caused by Heat-Carrying Optical Phonons. Nano Letters 20 (7): 4891–98 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Quantitative Determination of in-Plane Optical Anisotropy by Surface Plasmon Resonance Holographic Microscopy

    Zhang Jiwei, Wenrui Li, Jiahao Li, et al. Quantitative Determination of in-Plane Optical Anisotropy by Surface Plasmon Resonance Holographic Microscopy. Light: Science & Applications 15 (1): 152 (2026)

    2026

  29. [37]

    In-Plane Anisotropic Optical and Mechanical Properties of Two- Dimensional MoO3

    Puebla Sergio, Roberto D’Agosta, Gabriel Sanchez-Santolino, Riccardo Frisenda, Carmen Munuera, and Andres Castellanos-Gomez. In-Plane Anisotropic Optical and Mechanical Properties of Two- Dimensional MoO3. Npj 2D Materials and Applications 5 (1): 37 (2021). 12

    2021

  30. [38]

    Boucher, R

    Lajaunie L., F. Boucher, R. Dessapt, and P. Moreau. Strong Anisotropic Influence of Local-Field Effects on the Dielectric Response of 𝛼-MoO3. Physical Review B 88 (11): 115141 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Ultrathin Quarter- Waveplates Based on Two-Dimensional Anisotropic NbOCl2

    Gao Jia, Caokun Wang, Chorng Haur Sow, Qi Zhang, and Eng Tuan Poh. Ultrathin Quarter- Waveplates Based on Two-Dimensional Anisotropic NbOCl2. Nature Communications 17: 4118 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    Deep-Subwavelength and Broadband Quarter-Wave Retardation in Ultrathin Hyperbolic MoOCl2

    Ermolaev Georgy, Adilet Toksumakov, Valeria Maslova, et al. Deep-Subwavelength and Broadband Quarter-Wave Retardation in Ultrathin Hyperbolic MoOCl2. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2604.05236 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Voronin, Adilet N

    Ermolaev Georgy A., Kirill V. Voronin, Adilet N. Toksumakov, et al. Wandering Principal Optical Axes in van Der Waals Triclinic Materials. Nature Communications 15 (1): 1552 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Colossal in-Plane Optical Anisotropy in a Two- Dimensional van Der Waals Crystal

    Guo Qiangbing, Qiuhong Zhang, Tan Zhang, et al. Colossal in-Plane Optical Anisotropy in a Two- Dimensional van Der Waals Crystal. Nature Photonics 18: 1170–75 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Giant Optical Anisotropy and Visible- Frequency Epsilon-Near-Zero in Hyperbolic van Der Waals MoOCl2

    Ermolaev Georgy, Adilet Toksumakov, Aleksandr Slavich, et al. Giant Optical Anisotropy and Visible- Frequency Epsilon-Near-Zero in Hyperbolic van Der Waals MoOCl2. Nano Letters 26 (13): 4329–38 (2026)

    2026

  36. [44]

    Chenet, Arend M

    Aslan Ozgur Burak, Daniel A. Chenet, Arend M. van der Zande, James C. Hone, and Tony F. Heinz. Linearly Polarized Excitons in Single- and Few-Layer ReS2 Crystals. ACS Photonics 3 (1): 96–101 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Near-Infrared Self-Powered Linearly Polarized Photodetection and Digital Incoherent Holography Using WSe2/ReSe2 van Der Waals Heterostructure

    Ahn Jongtae, Kyul Ko, Ji-Hoon Kyhm, et al. Near-Infrared Self-Powered Linearly Polarized Photodetection and Digital Incoherent Holography Using WSe2/ReSe2 van Der Waals Heterostructure. ACS Nano 15 (11): 17917–25 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Sánchez-Royo, and Brian D

    Andres-Penares Daniel, Mauro Brotons-Gisbert, Cristian Bonato, Juan F. Sánchez-Royo, and Brian D. Gerardot. Optical and Dielectric Properties of MoO3 Nanosheets for van Der Waals Heterostructures. Applied Physics Letters 119 (22): 223104 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Ribeiro-Palau Rebeca, Changjian Zhang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, James Hone, and Cory R. Dean. Twistable Electronics with Dynamically Rotatable Heterostructures. Science 361 (6403): 690–93 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    In Situ Manipulation of van Der Waals Heterostructures for Twistronics

    Yang Yaping, Jidong Li, Jun Yin, et al. In Situ Manipulation of van Der Waals Heterostructures for Twistronics. Science Advances 6 (49): eabd3655 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Polarized Raman Scattering of in-Plane Anisotropic Phonon Modes in 𝛼-MoO3

    Gong Yong, Yuxuan Zhao, Zhen Zhou, et al. Polarized Raman Scattering of in-Plane Anisotropic Phonon Modes in 𝛼-MoO3. Advanced Optical Materials 10 (10): 2200038 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Optics in Stratified and Anisotropic Media: 44-Matrix Formulation

    Berreman Dwight W. Optics in Stratified and Anisotropic Media: 44-Matrix Formulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62 (4): 502–10 (1972)

    1972

  43. [51]

    Generalized 4 4 Matrix Formalism for Light Propagation in Anisotropic Stratified Media: Study of Surface Phonon Polaritons in Polar Dielectric Heterostructures

    Passler Nikolai Christian, and Alexander Paarmann. Generalized 4 4 Matrix Formalism for Light Propagation in Anisotropic Stratified Media: Study of Surface Phonon Polaritons in Polar Dielectric Heterostructures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34 (10): 2128–39 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Oskooi Ardavan F., David Roundy, Mihai Ibanescu, Peter Bermel, J. D. Joannopoulos, and Steven G. Johnson. Meep: A Flexible Free-Software Package for Electromagnetic Simulations by the FDTD Method.” Computer Physics Communications 181 (3): 687–702 (2010). 13

    2010

  45. [53]

    Polozkov, Ivan A

    Shubnic Anton A., Roman G. Polozkov, Ivan A. Shelykh, and Ivan V. Iorsh. High Refractive Index and Extreme Biaxial Optical Anisotropy of Rhenium Diselenide for Applications in All-Dielectric Nanophotonics. Nanophotonics 9 (16): 4737–42 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Samusev, and Ivan Iorsh

    Mikhin Alexey, Anton Shubnic, Tatiana Ivanova, Ivan Shelykh, Anton K. Samusev, and Ivan Iorsh. Bulk ReSe2: Record High Refractive Index and Biaxially Anisotropic Material for All-Dielectric Nanophotonics.” ACS Photonics 10 (6): 1769–74 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Anisotropic Exciton-Polaritons Reveal Non-Hermitian Topology in van Der Waals Materials

    Chakrabarty Devarshi, Avijit Dhara, Pritam Das, Kritika Ghosh, Ayan Roy Chaudhuri, and Sajal Dhara. Anisotropic Exciton-Polaritons Reveal Non-Hermitian Topology in van Der Waals Materials. Nano Letters 26 (12): 4089–95 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.