Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Spintronic diodes can resonate at fractional pump frequencies as high as n=16.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Fractional parametric resonances with zone numbers up to at least 16 should appear in voltage-controlled spintronic diodes, with odd and even zones following distinct excitation rules.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection Genuinely new fractional parametric resonances in MTJs, with a strong internal logic, but the load-bearing derivation and micromagnetic parameters are hidden in a supplement that doesn't exist yet, and the odd/even selection rule is asserted rather than proven. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22150 v1 pith:VCANL2ZP submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mes-hall

Fractional parametric resonance in spintronic diodes

Andrea Grimaldi , Denys Slobodianiuk , Eleonora Raimondo , Raghav Sharma , Anna Giordano , Mario Carpentieri , Hyunsoo Yang , Riccardo Tomasello
show 2 more authors
Roman Verba Giovanni Finocchio
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fractional parametric resonancespintronic diodemagnetic tunnel junctionspin-transfer torquevoltage-controlled magnetic anisotropyVCMAMathieu oscillatorparametric pumping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that fractional parametric resonance — resonance at pump frequencies fp ≈ 2f0/n, not just the familiar fp ≈ 2f0 — is not an exotic or inaccessible effect in magnetic systems. Using micromagnetic simulations and an analytical model of a magnetic tunnel junction driven by ac spin-transfer torque plus voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA), it identifies resonance bands with n up to at least 16. It further claims the mechanism is different from the standard Mathieu parametric oscillator: odd-n zones are true parametric instabilities appearing only above a VCMA threshold, while even-n zones are thresholdless forced resonances that combine the linear STT force with VCMA-induced frequency modulation. If true, this gives a practical, low-power route to subharmonic generation, frequency conversion, and broadband microwave detection in nanoscale devices.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a magnetic tunnel junction under simultaneous microwave STT and VCMA pumping exhibits parametric resonances at fractional pumping frequencies fp ≈ 2f0/n for n well beyond 1, and that these resonances split into two physically distinct families. Odd-n resonances (n = 1, 3, 5, ...) are spontaneous parametric instabilities that require a threshold VCMA amplitude, which grows with n. Even-n resonances (n = 4, 6, 8, ...) are thresholdless, forced resonances that appear only because the linear STT force and the VCMA-induced frequency modulation act together; without the linear force they revert to thresholded instability zones, and without fr

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex amplitude c(t) of the ferromagnetic-resonance mode, governed by Eq. (1): dc/dt + i(ω0 + T|c|² − 2W b_p(t))c + Γc = 2iV b_p(t)c* + f_lin e^{-iωp t}. The two VCMA pumping terms play distinct roles: the parametric coupling term (coefficient V) couples the c and c* amplitudes and is necessary for spontaneous parametric instability in any zone, while the frequency-modulation term (coefficient W) shifts the mode frequency with the pump and enables forced even-zone resonances when combined with the linear STT force f_lin. The paper's classification of odd versus even zones is carried by harmonic interaction chains shown in Figure 4: in even zones the pump-frequency

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the harmonic interaction-chain selection rules presented schematically in Figure 4 — namely that the pump-frequency harmonic participates in the coupling chain for even zones but is excluded for odd zones — are correct; these rules are asserted rather than derived in the main text, and if they fail, the odd/even distinction and the forced-resonance classification would collapse even though the simulated resonance bands would remain.

What would settle it

Measure the power threshold of the n = 4 resonance (fp ≈ f0/2) in an MTJ with simultaneous ac STT and VCMA, then repeat with the ac STT removed while keeping the VCMA pump. The paper's model predicts the even zone should lose its thresholdless character and become odd-like when the linear force is absent; if the resonance remains thresholdless without STT, the forced-resonance explanation is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Even-order fractional resonances at fp ≈ f0/2, f0/3, f0/4 (n = 4, 6, 8) should appear in MTJs without any VCMA threshold, provided ac STT and VCMA are applied together.
  • Odd-order resonances (n = 3, 5, ...) should appear only above a VCMA threshold that increases with n, consistent with higher-order Mathieu instability zones.
  • An in-plane bias field tilting the static magnetization should enhance even-zone resonances and can expose resonances up to about n = 16, because VCMA itself contributes an additional linear force in a tilted state.
  • The mechanism should generalize beyond MTJs: forced even-zone fractional resonances require only frequency modulation plus a linear force, not the symmetry-restricted parametric coupling, so they should occur in a range of magnetic nanosystems.
  • Quantitative descriptions of parametric magnetization dynamics under VCMA pumping must include both the parametric coupling and the frequency-modulation terms; reducing the system to a forced Mathieu model misses the even-zone resonances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The harmonic-chain picture suggests a design rule: by choosing the symmetry of the pumping and the static magnetization tilt, one could selectively activate or suppress entire families of odd or even resonance zones, effectively programming a subharmonic frequency comb in a single nanoscale device.
  • Because the frequency-modulation coefficient W remains significant even where parametric coupling V vanishes — for example at high FMR frequencies where precession ellipticity approaches zero — forced fractional resonances may survive in systems where spontaneous parametric resonance is forbidden, offering a lower-barrier route to subharmonic generation in simpler VCMA-only structures.
  • If the forced-resonance mechanism holds, arrays of MTJs could be biased so that ambient low-frequency electromagnetic fields are downconverted through a cascade of even-n resonances, potentially improving broadband RF energy-harvesting efficiency beyond the single-band FMR response.
  • A direct experimental partition of the two mechanisms would be to drive the n = 4 zone while the ac STT is switched off; the model predicts the resonance should acquire a threshold and behave like an odd zone, which would cleanly separate forced from spontaneous parametric dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper predicts fractional parametric resonances at pumping frequencies fp ≈ 2f0/n with n up to at least 16 in MTJ-based spintronic diodes driven by ac STT and VCMA. Using micromagnetic simulations, the authors observe odd-n resonances (n=1,3,5,...) that appear only above a VCMA threshold, and even-n resonances (n=4,6,8,...) that are thresholdless and enhanced by an in-plane static field. They propose a complex-amplitude model, Eq. (1), containing both parametric coupling and frequency-modulation terms, and show by switching off these terms (V=0, W=0, f_lin=0) that the odd/even distinction arises from the interplay of these effects; the model reproduces the simulated amplitude trends. They conclude that fractional parametric dynamics in magnets is not captured by the Mathieu model and may enable signal processing and energy-harvesting applications.

Significance. If correct, the results substantially extend parametric resonance studies in magnetic systems beyond the conventional n=1 zone. The identification of thresholdless even-order forced resonances and thresholded odd-order spontaneous resonances is a concrete, falsifiable prediction that can be tested in existing MTJs; the parameter ranges are experimentally accessible. The paper's internal consistency checks—setting V=0, W=0, or f_lin=0—cleanly separate the contributions of parametric coupling, frequency modulation, and linear drive, and the simulations show clear spectral signatures (peaks at fp, qfp, f0±qfp). The main limitations are the absence of the supplement (derivation and parameters) and the schematic nature of the selection-rule explanation; these prevent the present version from being verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary Notes 1 & 4 (refs [30], [36])] Eq. (1) is stated without derivation and all micromagnetic parameters are deferred to supplementary notes whose URLs are placeholders ('will be inserted by publisher'). This is load-bearing: the central existence claim rests on micromagnetic simulations, and the analytical model is used to explain the odd/even mechanism. Without the derivation of Eq. (1) from the Hamiltonian formalism and without the simulation parameters (damping, anisotropy, cell size, VCMA model), neither the model nor the simulations can be checked. The manuscript should include the derivation or the supplement, and at least a parameter table in the main text.
  2. [Figure 4 / Eq. (1)] The classification of even-n resonances as thresholdless forced resonances and odd-n as spontaneous parametric instabilities rests on the interaction-chain graphs in Fig. 4. These graphs are asserted schematically rather than derived. The micromagnetic FFT in Fig. 2(c) shows that fp and its multiples 2fp,3fp,... are always present in the spectrum, so in principle an interaction chain containing fp could couple the ±f0 modes in an odd zone; whether such chains exist is a symmetry-specific statement. Please provide a perturbative derivation (from Eq. (1)) or numerical identification of the dominant pathways; otherwise the central spontaneous/forced distinction is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Fig. 2(d)] The claim 'n > 10' is supported by f0/8 (n=16) under B_ext=5 mT, but the highest observable n is not discussed. Please state the limiting factor (damping, low-frequency noise, VCMA range) or clarify that no systematic upper bound was found.
  2. [Eq. (2) and surrounding text] The symbols θ, ε, g_T should be defined in the main text, and the sign convention of the imaginary term in f_lin should be explained. Currently the reader must go to the unavailable supplement to understand the phases of the linear drive.
  3. [Fig. 3(d)–(f), caption] The caption states that the legend is shared with (c), but it does not give the parameter values used in the numerical solution of Eq. (1). Please state the VCMA range, damping, and numerical grid for the frequency sweep.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. 'In summary'] The word 'thresholdless' is used for even-zone resonances, but at B_VCMA=0 there is no even-zone response at all; even zones still require nonzero VCMA for frequency conversion. Suggest rewording to 'no parametric instability threshold' or 'no spontaneous threshold' to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: simulation provides the existence claim; Eq. (1) is a structurally derived reduced model, not fit to the resonance peaks; odd/even decomposition comes from model term-switch analysis.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—fractional resonances at fp ≈ 2f0/n with n > 10—is a direct output of micromagnetic simulations, not of a parameter fitted to those simulations. The analytical model Eq. (1) is presented as derived via spin-wave perturbation and Hamiltonian formalism (Supplementary Note 4), rather than as an empirical fit to the simulated resonance bands. Its coefficients V, W, and f_lin are structural expressions (Eqs. 2–4). The causal attribution of odd zones to parametric instability and even zones to forced dynamics is supported by switching model terms off (f_lin→0, V→0, W→0) in Fig. 3(d–f); these are model-internal control removals, not fitted outputs or renamed predictions. Self-citations [16]–[18] support only background statements about lowest-order VCMA parametric pumping and are not load-bearing for the fractional-resonance claim; no uniqueness theorem or author-imported ansatz is invoked. The main caveats are that the full derivation of Eq. (1) and the Fig. 4 interaction-chain selection rules are deferred to supplementary notes whose URLs are placeholders ('URL will be inserted by publisher'), and the even/odd chain rules are presented schematically rather than derived in the main text. These are completeness/correctness risks—if a chain through a pump harmonic existed in odd zones, the classification could change—but they are not instances of a prediction reducing to its input by construction. No equation in the paper is equivalent to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the agreement in Fig. 3(c) is a consistency check between a derived reduced model and full micromagnetics, not a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters are declared; the model coefficients V, W, and f_lin are expressed in terms of micromagnetic inputs. The main postulates are the single-mode approximation and the interaction-chain selection rules. The latter, being schematic, are the most ad hoc element.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The free-layer magnetization dynamics of an MTJ can be described by a single collective FMR mode (macrospin approximation) in the analytical model.
    The analytical model Eq. (1) is derived via spin-wave perturbation theory, which assumes a single dominant mode; micromagnetic simulations include nonuniform modes but are compared to the single-mode model.
  • ad hoc to paper The interaction-chain selection rules (Figure 4) — that the pumping harmonic is included in the even-zone chain and excluded from the odd-zone chain — correctly describe the harmonic mixing that couples the FMR modes.
    These rules are presented schematically and are not derived in the main text; they are used to explain the odd/even threshold asymmetry.
  • standard math The Floquet/Mathieu theory of parametric instability zones is valid for the system under consideration.
    The authors classify resonances by zone number n consistent with Mathieu oscillator terminology, and rely on the general structure of parametric resonance theory.
  • domain assumption The micromagnetic material parameters and excitation amplitudes used in the simulations are representative of experimental MTJs.
    The parameters are said to be realistic and within experimental range, citing prior experimental works; details are in the deferred supplement.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional parametric resonance in spintronic diodes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VCANL2ZP

@misc{pith2026260722150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional parametric resonance in spintronic diodes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VCANL2ZP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22150}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Parametric pumping is a powerful tool for the excitation, amplification, and processing of oscillations and waves of different nature. In general, parametric resonance can occur when the pumping frequency $f_p$ and eigenfrequency of a linear mode (or wave) $f_0$ satisfy the relation $f_p$=2$f_0$/n (n=1,2,3,...). While such parametric resonance is well known in mechanical, superconductive, and quantum systems, in magnetic and spintronic systems only the lowest (n=1) parametric resonance at double the spin wave mode frequency $f_p$=2$f_0$ was thoroughly studied and explored. Here, using a theoretical analysis based on both micromagnetic simulations and an analytical model, we show the emergence of resonances at fractional frequencies $f_p$=2$f_0$/n (with n>10) in spintronic diodes driven by the simultaneous action of ac spin-transfer torque (STT, current densities < $10^6$ A/cm2) and voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA, effective anisotropy fields < 50 mT). The analytical model shows that parametric magnetization dynamics is irreducible to the standard Mathieu model of a parametric oscillator and demonstrates the crucial role of VCMA-driven mode frequency modulation: together with parametric coupling, it results in higher-order odd (n=3,5,7,...) fractional resonances, observed above certain VCMA pumping threshold, while simultaneous action with linear STT drive produces thresholdless even (n=4,6,8,...) resonances. This higher-order parametric dynamics is not restricted to VCMA pumping and opens new directions for the application of spintronic diodes for nonlinear signal processing and electromagnetic energy harvesting.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Finocchio, R

    G. Finocchio, R. Tomasello, B. Fang, A. Giordano, V. Puliafito, M. Carpentieri, and Z. Zeng, Perspectives on Spintronic Diodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 160502 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    P. N. Skirdkov and K. A. Zvezdin, Spin‐Torque Diodes: From Fundamental Research to Applications, Ann. Phys. 532, 1900460 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Grollier, D

    J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, K. Y. Camsari, K. Everschor-Sitte, S. Fukami, and M. D. Stiles, Neuromorphic Spintronics, Nat. Electron. 3, 360 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Raimondo, A

    E. Raimondo, A. Giordano, A. Grimaldi, V. Puliafito, M. Carpentieri, Z. Zeng, R. Tomasello, and G. Finocchio, Reliability of Neural Networks Based on Spintronic Neurons , IEEE Magn. Lett. 12, 10 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Raimondo et al., High-Performance and Reliable Probabilistic Ising Machine Based on Simulated Quantum Annealing, Phys

    E. Raimondo et al., High-Performance and Reliable Probabilistic Ising Machine Based on Simulated Quantum Annealing, Phys. Rev. X 15, 041001 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    L. Fu, W. Lu, D. Rodriguez Herrera, D. Flores Tapia, Y. S. Gui, S. Pistorius, and C.-M. Hu, Microwave Radar Imaging Using a Solid State Spintronic Microwave Sensor , Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 122406 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Phys

    C. Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Phys. Rev. 73, 155 (1948)

    1948

  8. [8]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamentals and Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  9. [9]

    A. Meo, C. Sha, E. Darwin, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, I. N. Krivorotov, and G. Finocchio, Spin- Wave Eigenmodes in Nanoscale Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 034086 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Fang et al., Giant Spin -Torque Diode Sensitivity in the Absence of Bias Magnetic Field , Nat

    B. Fang et al., Giant Spin -Torque Diode Sensitivity in the Absence of Bias Magnetic Field , Nat. Commun. 7, 11259 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Miwa et al., Highly Sensitive Nanoscale Spin-Torque Diode, Nat

    S. Miwa et al., Highly Sensitive Nanoscale Spin-Torque Diode, Nat. Mater. 13, 50 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    Matsukura, Y

    F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, Control of Magnetism by Electric Fields , Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 209 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    S. Miwa, M. Suzuki, M. Tsujikawa, T. Nozaki, T. Nakamura, M. Shirai, S. Yuasa, and Y. Suzuki, Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy and Its Electric -Field-Induced Change at Metal -Dielectric Interfaces, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 52, 063001 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Sharma et al., Nanoscale Spin Rectifiers for Harvesting Ambient Radiofrequency Energy , Nat

    R. Sharma et al., Nanoscale Spin Rectifiers for Harvesting Ambient Radiofrequency Energy , Nat. Electron. 7, 653 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Liu et al., A CMOS-Compatible, Scalable and Compact Magnetoelectric Spin -Torque Microwave Detector, Nat

    S. Liu et al., A CMOS-Compatible, Scalable and Compact Magnetoelectric Spin -Torque Microwave Detector, Nat. Nanotechnol. 21, 546 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    Verba, M

    R. Verba, M. Carpentieri, G. Finocchio, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, Excitation of Propagating Spin Waves in Ferromagnetic Nanowires by Microwave Voltage-Controlled Magnetic Anisotropy, Sci. Rep. 6, 1 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    Y. J. Chen, H. K. Lee, R. Verba, J. A. Katine, I. Barsukov, V. Tiberkevich, J. Q. Xiao, A. N. Slavin, and I. N. Krivorotov, Parametric Resonance of Magnetization Excited by Electric Field, Nano Lett. 17, 572 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Tomasello, R

    R. Tomasello, R. Verba, V. Lopez -Dominguez, F. Garesci, M. Carpentieri, M. Di Ventra, P. Khalili Amiri, and G. Finocchio, Antiferromagnetic Parametric Resonance Driven by Voltage -Controlled Magnetic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034004 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    A. G. Gurevich and G. A. Melkov, Magnetization Oscillations and Waves (CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996)

    1996

  20. [20]

    Brächer, P

    T. Brächer, P. Pirro, and B. Hillebrands, Parallel Pumping for Magnon Spintronics: Amplification and Manipulation of Magnon Spin Currents on the Micron-Scale, Phys. Rep. 699, 1 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Urazhdin, V

    S. Urazhdin, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, Parametric Excitation of a Magnetic Nanocontact by a Microwave Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 1 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    Geilen et al., Parametric Excitation and Instabilities of Spin Waves Driven by Surface Acoustic Waves, Adv

    M. Geilen et al., Parametric Excitation and Instabilities of Spin Waves Driven by Surface Acoustic Waves, Adv. Phys. Res. 4, 2400086 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    E. I. Butikov, Parametric Resonance, Comput. Sci. Eng. 1, 76 (1999)

    1999

  24. [24]

    T. I. Fossen and H. (Hendrik) Nijmeijer, Parametric Resonance in Dynamical Systems (Springer New York, New York, NY, 2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    D. K. Arrowsmith and R. J. Mondrag óon, Stability Region Control for a Parametrically Forced Mathieu Equation, Meccanica 34, 401 (1999)

    1999

  26. [26]

    E. I. Butikov, Subharmonic Resonances of the Parametrically Driven Pendulum , J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 35, 301 (2002)

    2002

  27. [27]

    M. V. Denisenko, V. O. Munyayev, and A. M. Satanin, Quantum Fractional Resonances in Superconducting Circuits with an Embedded Josephson Junction , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 681, 012018 (2016)

    2016

  28. [28]

    M. A. N. Razvi, X. Z. Chu, R. Alheit, G. Werth, and R. Bl ümel, Fractional Frequency Collective Parametric Resonances of an Ion Cloud in a Paul Trap, Phys. Rev. A 58, R34-R37 (1998)

    1998

  29. [29]

    H. G. Bauer, P. Majchrak, T. Kachel, C. H. Back, and G. Woltersdorf, Nonlinear Spin-Wave Excitations at Low Magnetic Bias Fields, Nat. Commun. 6, 8274 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    See Supplemental Materia l at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on the micromagnetic model and parameters

  31. [31]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for a systematic FFT study as a function of VCMA

  32. [32]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for a systematic study on the effect of the external field

  33. [33]

    Fang et al., Experimental Demonstration of Spintronic Broadband Microwave Detectors and Their Capability for Powering Nanodevices, Phys

    B. Fang et al., Experimental Demonstration of Spintronic Broadband Microwave Detectors and Their Capability for Powering Nanodevices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014022 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Verba, V

    R. Verba, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, Damping of Linear Spin -Wave Modes in Magnetic Nanostructures: Local, Nonlocal, and Coordinate -Dependent Damping , Phys. Rev. B 98, 104408 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Krivosik and C

    P. Krivosik and C. E. Patton, Hamiltonian Formulation of Nonlinear Spin -Wave Dynamics: Theory and Applications, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184428 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for the complete derivation of the spin wave perturbative model and parameters

  37. [37]

    Y. Shao, V. Lopez-Dominguez, N. Davila, Q. Sun, N. Kioussis, J. A. Katine, and P. Khalili Amiri, Sub- Volt Switching of Nanoscale Voltage-Controlled Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions, Commun. Mater. 3, 87 (2022)

    2022

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.