Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 70 references

This paper claims that molecular chirality can be determined directly at the single-molecule level by measuring the symmetry-breaking spin dynamics of polarized nuclear spins near the chiral center.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-01 05:37 UTC pith:JR4JIZHH

load-bearing objection Solid proof-of-principle for chirality readout via MT symmetry breaking, but the link between the fitted phase and molecular handedness is assumed rather than demonstrated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22154 v1 pith:JR4JIZHH submitted 2026-07-24 quant-ph

Molecular chiral discrimination through symmetry-breaking spin dynamics

Tianyu Xie , Yucheng Hao , Mingzhe Liu , Mengqi Wang , Shaoyi Xu , Zhiyuan Zhao , Chang-Kui Duan , Ya Wang
show 2 more authors
Fazhan Shi Jiangfeng Du
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords chiralitymagnetic resonancesingle-molecule detectionnitrogen-vacancy centernuclear spin dynamicssymmetry breakingmirror-time-reversal symmetrydynamical decoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Conventional magnetic resonance cannot tell a left-handed from a right-handed molecule without adding a chiral reagent. The paper claims a direct route: when two nuclear spins near a chiral center are polarized, their quantum dynamics under dynamical decoupling become sensitive to the sign of a phase Φ(12) ≈ φ(2)−φ(1) that encodes handedness. For unpolarized spins, a joint mirror-and-time-reversal symmetry forces the two enantiomers to produce identical dynamics; polarization breaks that symmetry and selects a unique phase. Experiments on single nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond coupled to 13C nuclei demonstrate the predicted divergence, and reversing the magnetic field swaps the two enantiomer responses. If correct, the method is a reagent-free magnetic-resonance readout of chirality at the single-molecule scale.

Core claim

The central discovery is a symmetry-breaking identity for electron-spin coherence under dynamical decoupling: C(Φ,Azz,P1,P2)=Tr[U0†(−Φ,Azz)ρn(P1,P2)U1(−Φ,Azz)]*. Here Φ is the chirality phase from two azimuth angles and a flip-flop phase; Azz is the zz coupling; P1,P2 are polarizations. The mirror-time-reversal transformation yields this identity, giving C(Φ)=C(−Φ) for unpolarized spins and C(Φ)≠C(−Φ) for polarized spins. Single NV centers with two and three 13C spins show exactly this: unpolarized spins leave enantiomers indistinguishable, polarized spins yield a unique fitted Φ, and field reversal changes its sign. Absolute configuration is assigned by measuring the NV-axis direction via t

What carries the argument

Central is the chirality phase Φ(12)=φ(12)−φ(1)+φ(2), where φ(i) are azimuth angles of the two nuclear spins' hyperfine tensors and φ(12) is the flip-flop phase of the induced J-coupling; the paper argues φ(12) is negligible, so Φ(12)≈φ(2)−φ(1), the geometric angle distinguishing mirror images. This phase enters via the flip-flop term X[cosΦ(Ix1Ix2+Iy1Iy2)+sinΦ(−Ix1Iy2+Iy1Ix2)] in the mS=0 subspace, while the mS=+1 subspace keeps the individual azimuth angles. Dynamical decoupling sequences (XY4/XY8) on the NV electron spin turn the difference between the two subspace evolutions into observable electron coherence; the joint mirror-time-reversal transformation sends Φ to −Φ and conjugates the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fitted phase Φ(12) equals the geometric handedness angle φ(2)−φ(1), i.e. that the antisymmetric flip-flop phase φ(12) and the neglected terms (transverse fields, direct 13C–13C coupling, some zz couplings, simplified Hamiltonians) are all too small to bias the sign; if that fails, the enantiomer assignment fails.

What would settle it

Take a molecule whose absolute configuration is known independently (e.g., by X-ray crystallography), measure its spin-dynamical curves under the same DD protocol, and check whether the fitted sign of Φ matches the known handedness and whether field reversal gives exactly Φ→−Φ. A more quantitative falsifier is an independent determination of φ(1), φ(2), and φ(12) from high-resolution spectra or ab initio tensors: if Φ(12)−(φ(2)−φ(1)) is resolvably nonzero, the model is biased.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Chiral discrimination becomes possible without any chiral reagent, using ordinary dipolar hyperfine interactions instead of weak higher-order effects.
  • Polarization of the nuclear spins is the switch that breaks mirror-time-reversal symmetry and makes the two enantiomers dynamically distinguishable at the single-molecule level.
  • Reversing the magnetic field flips the sign of Φ and swaps the spin dynamics of the two enantiomers, a testable enantiospecific signature reproduced in the experiments.
  • The same mechanism extends to three or more nuclear spins, where multiple phases from multi-body dynamics determine the configuration.
  • With NV-based single-molecule magnetic resonance, the approach can probe chirality of individual molecules, and with residual dipolar coupling it can be adapted to macroscopic low-field NMR samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Φ(12)≈φ(2)−φ(1) survives in real molecules, the same dynamical readout could serve as a quantitative structural probe of azimuth-angle differences, not just an enantiomer label.
  • Because the signal is local and repeated on one NV center, the method might track handedness changes in a single molecule over time, such as conformational flips or chemical reactions, rather than averaging an ensemble.
  • The MT-symmetry identity is general enough to be tested in other spin-coupled systems—e.g., surface-bound molecules or defect-center probes—where the sign of Φ should still be the observable handedness parameter.
  • A cautious validation on molecules with independently known absolute configuration would isolate whether the fitted phase remains purely geometric when the antisymmetric flip-flop phase φ(12) is non-negligible.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a magnetic-resonance method for direct chiral discrimination that avoids chiral auxiliaries, based on symmetry-breaking dynamics of nuclear spins coupled to the NV center. The central theoretical ingredient is Eq. (2), which states that the electron-spin coherence satisfies C(Φ, Azz, P1, P2) = Tr[U0†(−Φ, Azz) ρn(P1, P2) U1(−Φ, Azz)]* under joint mirror-plus-time-reversal, so that for unpolarized nuclear spins the dynamics is even in the chiral phase Φ, while a nonzero polarization breaks the degeneracy and yields a unique sign. Experiments on NV-center pseudomolecules with two and three 13C spins show the predicted ±Φ degeneracy, its lifting under polarization, and the sign flip of Φ upon magnetic-field reversal. The fitted phase Φ(12) is identified with the azimuth-angle difference φ(2)−φ(1), and the absolute configuration is assigned using electric-field determination of the NV-axis direction together with DFT calculations. The abstract and conclusion claim direct experimental single-molecule chiral determination.

Significance. If the central identification is sound, this is a significant advance: conventional MR cannot directly distinguish enantiomers without chiral reagents, while the proposed route uses ordinary dipolar interactions and could in principle be combined with single-molecule NV sensing. The paper's strengths are the explicit MT-symmetry relation, the concrete field-reversal prediction that is experimentally confirmed, the careful measurement of hyperfine parameters, and the DFT-based modeling of the NV-carbon clusters. However, the load-bearing mapping from a fitted parameter in a reduced spin model to a molecular chirality angle is not yet validated to the precision claimed, and the experiments do not include a true pair of enantiomeric molecular species. The significance is therefore conditional on closing these gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM Eqs. (S32)–(S38); main text Φ(12)=φ(12)−φ(1)+φ(2)] The crisp symmetry relation Eq. (2) shows that a parameter Φ exists and becomes unique under polarization, but it does not by itself establish that the fitted Φ equals the geometric chirality angle φ(2)−φ(1). That identification requires the antisymmetric flip-flop phase φ(12) to be negligible, and also requires all omitted terms (transverse b⊥ fields in the mS=0 subspace, direct 13C–13C dipolar coupling, and the zz terms left out of the three-body Hamiltonian) to be too small to affect the sign or magnitude of Φ. The paper's only test of the reduction is Fig. S6, which simulates two-body dynamics from a DFT natural Hamiltonian and fits it with Eq. (S34)–(S35); it does not include a systematic error budget for nonzero φ(12) or for the three-body omissions. Since a sign error in Φ assigns the wrong enantiomer, the authors should bound these omitted effects quantitatively (e.g., by DFT cal
  2. [Abstract/Conclusion; Figs. 1–3] The abstract and conclusion state that direct chiral determination is achieved experimentally at the single-molecule level. What is actually measured is a single NV-center pseudomolecule: the 'two enantiomer' curves in Figs. 1–3 are obtained by fitting the same NV data with +Φ and −Φ, not by measuring two mirror-image molecular species. The absolute-configuration assignment in the SM is made by combining the measured NV-axis direction with DFT, but no independent chiral standard is applied. The method may well generalize, but as written the experimental demonstration stops at a proof-of-principle on NV-carbon clusters. The claims in the abstract and conclusion should be tempered accordingly, or a genuine enantiomeric pair should be measured.
  3. [SM Eq. (S36) and main-text sentence on φ(12)] The main text says the flip-flop phase φ(12) 'is too small to be ignored in this study,' which either is a typo or contradicts the approximation Φ(12)≈φ(2)−φ(1). If the intended meaning is that φ(12) is negligible, the statement should be reworded. Beyond wording, the claim that φ(12) is near zero is asserted from the smallness of the antisymmetric J-coupling rather than demonstrated for this particular NV-carbon system; this is part of the model-validation issue raised above.
minor comments (4)
  1. [SM text and references] The Supplemental Material contains several typographical issues: 'relevent theoretical derivations' (SM Introduction), 'the experimetns' (SM approximate models), and the citation labels for Refs. [44–54] in the SM text are not fully resolved. These do not affect the science but should be cleaned.
  2. [Eqs. (1)–(2) and notation] The notation U0†(Φ, Azz) and U1(−Φ, Azz) could be clarified: it would help to state explicitly that U0 and U1 are the propagators in the mS=0 and mS=+1 subspaces, and that the trace is over nuclear-spin states. A short sentence after Eq. (2) defining the conjugation convention would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Fig. 2(c) and field reversal] The field-reversal data are presented as evidence that the chiral dynamics are exchanged; it would be useful to state explicitly the expected relation between the fitted Φ in (b) and (c) (sign change) and to show the fit uncertainty on the reversed-field phase in the figure or caption.
  4. [Generalization to real molecules] The discussion of Fig. 4(a) is illustrative but not quantitative; if the method is to be applied to molecules in solution, the authors should at least estimate the required spin-spin coupling strength and the polarization time budget, since the rotating-molecule case will average dipolar tensors and may remove the azimuthal information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the chiral phase is measured by fitting, and the MT-symmetry relation, field-reversal sign flip, and DFT-based gap dependence provide independent falsifiable checks.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing chain is not circular. The central symmetry result, Eq. (2) (derived in SM Eqs. S40-S54), follows from the explicit two-spin Hamiltonian and predicts that unpolarized spin dynamics are degenerate under Phi -> -Phi while polarized dynamics lift that degeneracy. Both behaviors are confirmed experimentally by fitting. The chiral angle is not claimed to be predicted from first principles; it is estimated by least-squares fitting of the measured DD coherence, which is a measurement rather than a renaming of the input. The sign flip of Phi under magnetic-field reversal is an independent falsifiable check and is confirmed in Fig. 2(c). The mapping from the fitted phase to the geometric azimuth difference phi(2)-phi(1) relies on the model assumption phi(12) near zero and on neglecting several small terms (SM Eqs. S34-S36); this is a systematic-error risk, not a circular reduction, because DFT-computed hyperfine tensors and the agreement of measured gap-dependent phases with perturbation curves (SM Fig. S7) provide an external benchmark. Self-citations such as [36] and [41] are to standard hyperfine/ZFS characterization protocols and are not used to force the chiral conclusion. Hence the derivation has independent empirical and DFT-anchored content; only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation prevents a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitted phases and couplings in a reduced spin model, plus several physical approximations (GSLAC truncation, negligible φ(12), simplified H0/H1). No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The most significant contribution is the symmetry-based relation Eq. (2), which is derived rather than assumed. The main circularity-pressure point is that the chiral observable is a fitted parameter, though the symmetry predictions are cross-validated independently.

free parameters (5)
  • chiral phase Φ(12) (two-body) = ±0.33(4)π (unpolarized, Δ=99.81 MHz); 0.32(3)π (P2=0.44, Δ=25.45 MHz); −0.27(3)π (field reversed, Δ=−15.03 MHz)
    Central observable; obtained by nonlinear fitting of the electron-spin coherence to the model in SM Eqs. (S34–S35). Its sign is assigned to enantiomer handedness.
  • flip-flop strengths X(12), X(23), X(31) = X(12)=2.49(3) kHz (two-body); 3.60(3), −2.94(4), −4.25(3) kHz (three-body, unpolarized); −17.24(11), 14.46(12), 21.03(11
    Indirect J-coupling amplitudes fitted from the dynamical profiles; they set the timescale of the flip-flop dynamics that encodes the chiral phase.
  • nuclear spin polarizations P1, P2, P3 = 0.06(4), 0.44(4); 0.49(4), 0.47(4); 0.42(2), 0.48(3), 0.42(2)
    Measured via Ramsey fits (SM Eq. S31); the symmetry-breaking effect depends on these values.
  • effective field shifts b_z(i) in subspace |mS=0> = not reported
    Included in H0 of the two-body and three-body models and fitted; not independently measured.
  • zz coupling A(12)_zz = not reported
    Included in two-body fits (SM Eq. S34) though its effect is described as small.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Standard quantum-mechanical evolution and trace readout of electron coherence (SM Eq. S17)
    All dynamic predictions follow from unitary evolution and the coherence trace formula.
  • domain assumption Canonical transformation truncated at second order gives the indirect J-coupling (SM Eq. S10)
    The flip-flop interaction between nuclear spins is derived by a perturbative Schrieffer-Wolff-style transformation near GSLAC; higher-order terms are assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption Near GSLAC only |mS=0> and |mS=−1> electron-spin subspaces matter; |mS=+1> is ignored
    The energy gap to |mS=+1> is ~5.7 GHz and is discarded; this is standard near GSLAC but still an approximation.
  • domain assumption Reduced models (SM Eqs. S34–S38) capture the dynamics; transverse effective fields, direct 13C–13C dipolar coupling, and three-body zz terms are neglected
    The authors test the reduced models against DFT-based numerical simulations (Fig. S6), but the simplifications are load-bearing for the fitted chiral angle.
  • domain assumption The antisymmetric flip-flop phase φ(12) is negligible, so Φ(12)=φ(2)−φ(1)
    This identification is stated in the main text and SM Eq. (S36). If φ(12) is not negligible, the fitted Φ is not purely the azimuth-angle difference.
  • domain assumption Spin-space operators M=σy⊗σy and T=σy⊗σy κ represent real-space mirror reflection and time reversal for the molecular/pseudomolecule configuration
    The mapping from real-space chirality to spin-space MT symmetry is the conceptual bridge of the paper; it is argued, not derived from molecular structure.
  • domain assumption Optically pumped initial nuclear state is a diagonal polarization state (SM Eq. S56)
    The density matrix after optical pumping is assumed to have only diagonal populations with polarizations P_i; coherence terms are neglected.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Molecular chiral discrimination through symmetry-breaking spin dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JR4JIZHH

@misc{pith2026260722154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Molecular chiral discrimination through symmetry-breaking spin dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JR4JIZHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22154}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Molecular chirality plays a crucial role in physics, chemistry, life sciences and pharmacology. Nowadays, the chiral discrimination and control at the single-molecule level is urgently needed to reveal the origin of the chirality-relevant phenomena by recovering the information disturbed by the ensemble averaging. The method of magnetic resonance (MR), as one of powerful tools for structure analysis, is blind to the molecular chirality in the absence of a chiral reagent. Here we propose and experimentally demonstrate a direct MR-based method for determining the chirality at the single-molecule level through constructing the symmetry-breaking dynamics of nearby nuclear spins. In principle, the mirror asymmetry of two enantiomers in real space is manifested by breaking the joint symmetry of the mirror reflection and time reversal in spin space under spin dynamics. Experimentally, two enantiomers are indistinguishable from the dynamics of strongly-coupled but unpolarized nuclear spins, but diverge evidently in the dynamical results that break the field-inversion symmetry after spins are polarized. Our method and results will benefit the study of chirality-induced properties in the fields of chemistry and biology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22154 by Chang-Kui Duan, Fazhan Shi, Jiangfeng Du, Mengqi Wang, Mingzhe Liu, Shaoyi Xu, Tianyu Xie, Ya Wang, Yucheng Hao, Zhiyuan Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Chiral molecules, chiral discrimination and dynamics of the nearby nuclear spins. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Chiral discrimination through symmetry-breaking dynamics of two nuclear spins under spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quantum three-body dynamics for chiral discrimination. (a) Three-body dynamics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Generalization and the underlying principle. (a) Setup for chiral discrimination of single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Pasteur, Recherches sur les relations qui peuvent exister entre la forme cristalline, la com- position chimique et les sens de la polarisation rotatoire, Ann

    L. Pasteur, Recherches sur les relations qui peuvent exister entre la forme cristalline, la com- position chimique et les sens de la polarisation rotatoire, Ann. Chim. Phys.3, 442–460 (1848)

  2. [2]

    Lee and C

    T.-D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Question of parity conservation in weak interactions, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956)

    1956

  3. [3]

    C.-S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay, Phys. Rev.105, 1413 (1957)

    1957

  4. [4]

    Akiyama and I

    T. Akiyama and I. Ojima,Catalytic asymmetric synthesis(John Wiley & Sons, 2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Guijarro and M

    A. Guijarro and M. Yus,The origin of chirality in the molecules of life: a revision from awareness to the current theories and perspectives of this unsolved problem(Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    L. A. Nguyen, H. He, and C. Pham-Huy, Chiral drugs: an overview, Int. J. Med. Sci.2, 85 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    A. F. Zahrt, S. V. Athavale, and S. E. Denmark, Quantitative structure–selectivity relation- ships in enantioselective catalysis: past, present, and future, Chem. Rev.120, 1620 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Pinus, J

    S. Pinus, J. Genzling, M. Burai-Patrascu, and N. Moitessier, Computational methods for asymmetric catalysis, Nat. Catal. , 1 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Brimioulle, D

    R. Brimioulle, D. Lenhart, M. M. Maturi, and T. Bach, Enantioselective catalysis of photo- chemical reactions, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.54, 3872 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Zi and F

    W. Zi and F. D. Toste, Recent advances in enantioselective gold catalysis, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 4567 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Mondal, F

    S. Mondal, F. Dumur, D. Gigmes, M. P. Sibi, M. P. Bertrand, and M. Nechab, Enantioselective radical reactions using chiral catalysts, Chem. Rev.122, 5842 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    K. Ray, S. P. Ananthavel, D. H. Waldeck, and R. Naaman, Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules, Science283, 814 (1999)

    1999

  13. [13]

    Göhler, V

    B. Göhler, V. Hamelbeck, T. Markus, M. Kettner, G. Hanne, Z. Vager, R. Naaman, and H. Zacharias, Spin selectivity in electron transmission through self-assembled monolayers of double-stranded dna, Science331, 894 (2011). 8

    2011

  14. [14]

    B. P. Bloom, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral induced spin selectivity, Chem. Rev.124, 1950 (2024)

    1950

  15. [15]

    M. Sun, X. Wang, X. Guo, L. Xu, H. Kuang, and C. Xu, Chirality at nanoscale for bioscience, Chem. Sci.13, 3069 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    G. A. Hembury, V. V. Borovkov, and Y. Inoue, Chirality-sensing supramolecular systems, Chem. Rev.108, 1 (2008)

    2008

  17. [17]

    M. Liu, L. Zhang, and T. Wang, Supramolecular chirality in self-assembled systems, Chem. Rev.115, 7304 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    R. Bast, A. Koers, A. S. P. Gomes, M. Iliaš, L. Visscher, P. Schwerdtfeger, and T. Saue, Analysis of parity violation in chiral molecules, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 864 (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    Eills, J

    J. Eills, J. W. Blanchard, L. Bougas, M. G. Kozlov, A. Pines, and D. Budker, Measuring molecular parity nonconservation using nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A96, 042119 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    Quack, G

    M. Quack, G. Seyfang, and G. Wichmann, Perspectives on parity violation in chiral molecules: theory, spectroscopic experiment and biomolecular homochirality, Chem. Sci.13, 10598 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    A. D. Buckingham, Chirality in NMR spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett.398, 1 (2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    A. D. Buckingham and P. Fischer, Direct chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy, Chem. Phys.324, 111 (2006)

    2006

  23. [23]

    J. D. Walls, R. A. Harris, and C. J. Jameson, Measuring chirality in NMR in the presence of a static electric field, J. Chem. Phys.128(2008)

    2008

  24. [24]

    T. J. Wenzel and C. D. Chisholm, Using NMR spectroscopic methods to determine enan- tiomeric purity and assign absolute stereochemistry, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.59, 1 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    M.S.Silva,RecentadvancesinmultinuclearNMRspectroscopyforchiralrecognitionoforganic compounds, Molecules22, 247 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    T. J. Ward and K. D. Ward, Chiral separations: a review of current topics and trends, Anal. Chem.84, 626 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Ranjbar and P

    B. Ranjbar and P. Gill, Circular dichroism techniques: biomolecular and nanostructural analyses-a review, Chem. Biol. Drug Des.74, 101 (2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    H. D. Flack and G. Bernardinelli, The use of X-ray crystallography to determine absolute configuration, Chirality20, 681 (2008). 9

    2008

  29. [29]

    F. Shi, Q. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Sun, J. Wang, X. Rong, M. Chen, C. Ju, F. Reinhard, H. Chen, et al., Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions, Science347, 1135 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Lovchinsky, A

    I. Lovchinsky, A. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K. De Greve, R. Evans, R. Gert- ner, E. Bersin, C. Müller,et al., Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quantum logic, Science351, 836 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    Lovchinsky, J

    I. Lovchinsky, J. Sanchez-Yamagishi, E. Urbach, S. Choi, S. Fang, T. Andersen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Bylinskii, E. Kaxiras,et al., Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of an atomically thin material using a single-spin qubit, Science355, 503 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    F. Shi, F. Kong, P. Zhao, X. Zhang, M. Chen, S. Chen, Q. Zhang, M. Wang, X. Ye, Z. Wang, et al., Single-DNA electron spin resonance spectroscopy in aqueous solutions, Nat. Methods 15, 697 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    J. Du, F. Shi, X. Kong, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025001 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    De Lange, Z.-H

    G. De Lange, Z.-H. Wang, D. Riste, V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solid-state spin from a spin bath, Science330, 60 (2010)

    2010

  35. [38]

    Nizovtsev, A

    A. Nizovtsev, A. Pushkarchuk, S. Kuten, D. Michels, D. Lyakhov, N. Kargin, and S. Kilin, Indirect interaction of 13C nuclear spins in diamond with NV centers: simulation of the full J-coupling tensors, Front. Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 1332264 (2024)

    2024

  36. [39]

    F. A. Bovey, P. A. Mirau, and H. S. Gutowsky,Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Elsevier, 1988)

    1988

  37. [40]

    See Supplemental Material for additional details on experimental methods, relevent theoretical derivations, polarization measurements, approximate models and fitting, symmetry analysis, 10 determination of the absolute configuration, and the DFT calculations, which includes Refs. [44−54]

  38. [49]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  39. [51]

    Neese, The ORCA program system, WIREs Computational Molecular Science2, 73 (2012)

    F. Neese, The ORCA program system, WIREs Computational Molecular Science2, 73 (2012)

    2012

  40. [52]

    Garbacz and A

    P. Garbacz and A. D. Buckingham, Chirality-sensitive nuclear magnetic resonance effects in- duced by indirect spin-spin coupling, J. Chem. Phys.145(2016)

    2016

  41. [53]

    J. P. King, T. F. Sjolander, and J. W. Blanchard, Antisymmetric couplings enable direct observation of chirality in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.8, 710 (2017)

    2017

  42. [54]

    D. A. Broadway, J. D. A. Wood, L. T. Hall, A. Stacey, M. Markham, D. A. Simpson, J.-P. Tetienne, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Anticrossing spin dynamics of diamond nitrogen-vacancy 11 centers and all-optical low-frequency magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Appl.6, 064001 (2016)

    2016

  43. [55]

    J. D. A. Wood, J.-P. Tetienne, D. A. Broadway, L. T. Hall, D. A. Simpson, A. Stacey, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Microwave-free nuclear magnetic resonance at molecular scales, Nat. Commun.8, 15950 (2017)

    2017

  44. [56]

    D. A. Broadway, J.-P. Tetienne, A. Stacey, J. D. A. Wood, D. A. Simpson, L. T. Hall, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Quantum probe hyperpolarisation of molecular nuclear spins, Nat. Com- mun.9, 1246 (2018)

    2018

  45. [57]

    Zhao, J.-L

    N. Zhao, J.-L. Hu, S.-W. Ho, J. T. K. Wan, and R. B. Liu, Atomic-scale magnetometry of distant nuclear spin clusters via nitrogen-vacancy spin in diamond, Nat. Nanotechnol.6, 242 (2011)

    2011

  46. [58]

    F. Shi, X. Kong, P. Wang, F. Kong, N. Zhao, R.-B. Liu, and J. Du, Sensing and atomic-scale structure analysis of single nuclear-spin clusters in diamond, Nat. Phys.10, 21 (2014)

    2014

  47. [59]

    M. H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M. A. Bakker, N. Kalb, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment, Nat. Commun.9, 2552 (2018)

    2018

  48. [60]

    Jacques, P

    V. Jacques, P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, J. Meijer, F. Kaiser, G. Bala- subramanian, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Dynamic polarization of single nuclear spins by optical pumping of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in diamond at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 057403 (2009)

    2009

  49. [61]

    Barron, Symmetry and molecular chirality, Chem

    L. Barron, Symmetry and molecular chirality, Chem. Soc. Rev.15, 189 (1986)

    1986

  50. [62]

    Luo and P

    J. Luo and P. Hore, Chiral-induced spin selectivity in the formation and recombination of radical pairs: cryptochrome magnetoreception and EPR detection, New J. Phys.23, 043032 (2021)

    2021

  51. [63]

    A. D. Buckingham, Communication: Permanent dipoles contribute to electric polarization in chiral NMR spectra, J. Chem. Phys.140(2014)

    2014

  52. [64]

    J. D. Walls and R. A. Harris, Measuring chirality in NMR in the presence of a time-dependent electric field, J. Chem. Phys.140(2014)

    2014

  53. [65]

    P.Garbacz, J.Cukras,andM.Jaszuński,Atheoreticalstudyofpotentiallyobservablechirality- sensitive NMR effects in molecules, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17, 22642 (2015)

    2015

  54. [66]

    S. A. Riley and M. P. Augustine, Extracting residual NMR coupling constants from electrically aligned liquids, J. Phys. Chem. A.104, 3326 (2000). 12

    2000

  55. [67]

    D. A. Barskiy, J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, J. Eills, S. Pustelny, K. F. Sheberstov, M. C. Tayler, and A. H. Trabesinger, Zero-to ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.148-149, 101558 (2025). 13 Original Mirror V N Right-handed A0 A1 A2 C Left-handed A1A2 C A0 0 10 20 30 40 50 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Init Read X Y X Y ...

    2025

  56. [68]

    S8(b) to measure the deviation from the ZFSD

    Next, we employ the pulse sequence [7] in Fig. S8(b) to measure the deviation from the ZFSD. Theπ/2pulse prepares a superposition state of|m S = 0⟩and|m S = +⟩, while the2πpulse in the middle swaps|m S = +1⟩and |mS =−1⟩so that the magnetic fluctuation is cancelled out. Finally, the sequence measures S16 the difference between the average of two microwave ...

  57. [69]

    T. Xie, Z. Zhao, M. Guo, M. Wang, F. Shi, and J. Du, Identity test of single NV− centers in diamond at Hz-precision level, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 053601 (2021)

    2021

  58. [70]

    M. V. G. Dutt, L. Childress, L. Jiang, E. Togan, J. Maze, F. Jelezko, A. S. Zibrov, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum register based on individual electronic and nuclear spin qubits in diamond, Science316, 1312 (2007)

    2007

  59. [71]

    Childress, M

    L. Childress, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Zibrov, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond, Science314, 281 (2006)

    2006

  60. [72]

    T. H. Taminiau, J. J. T. Wagenaar, T. Van der Sar, F. Jelezko, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Detection and control of individual nuclear spins using a weakly coupled electron spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 137602 (2012)

    2012

  61. [73]

    T.Xie, Z.Zhao, S.Xu, X.Kong, Z.Yang, M.Wang, Y.Wang, F.Shi,andJ.Du,99.92%-fidelity CNOT gates in solids by noise filtering, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 030601 (2023)

    2023

  62. [74]

    Van Oort and M

    E. Van Oort and M. Glasbeek, Electric-field-induced modulation of spin echoes of NV centers in diamond, Chem. Phys. Lett.168, 529 (1990)

    1990

  63. [75]

    Kucsko, P

    G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y. Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell, Nature500, 54 (2013)

    2013

  64. [76]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  65. [77]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  66. [78]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal– amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B49, 14251 (1994)

    1994

  67. [79]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  68. [80]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003). S20

    2003

  69. [81]

    Takács and V

    I. Takács and V. Ivády, Accurate hyperfine tensors for solid state quantum applications: case of the NV center in diamond, Commun. Phys.7, 178 (2024)

    2024

  70. [82]

    Neese, The ORCA program system, WIREs Computational Molecular Science2, 73 (2012)

    F. Neese, The ORCA program system, WIREs Computational Molecular Science2, 73 (2012). S21 MW Amplifier Signal Generator DAQS N Temperature Controller 532 nm Laser Optical fiber Dichroic Pinhole ObjectiveCPW NV APD Arbitrary Signal Generator PC AOM RF Switch FIG. S1. Experimental setup for optically detected magnetic resonance. The setup is mainly comprise...

    2012

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.