Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 59 references

Third-order nonlinear transport in a percolative two-dimensional superconductor

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Third-order nonlinear transport in a percolative 2D superconductor is shown to be a sensitive probe of superconducting coherence: the third-harmonic longitudinal voltage scales as current cubed below a threshold and disappears exactly…

desk verdict New third-order longitudinal transport data in a percolative 2D superconductor, plausibly linked to fluctuating Cooper pairs, but the key theory and thermal analysis sit in the supplement; send to referees with the supplement and a request to align abstract and summary. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27641 v1 pith:M3UZLJVG submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Wenjun Liu , Chenghe Wang , Xiubin Li , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Tao Zhang , Xiao-Xiao Zhang , Jing Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords third-ordernonlineartransportthird-harmonicvoltagepercolativesuperconductivitytime-dependentGinzburg-LandautheoryCooper-pairfluctuations1T'-MoTe2vanderWaalssuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that trilayer $1T'$-MoTe$_2$, a superconductor whose resistance falls only to about $2\,\Omega$ rather than to zero, produces a third-harmonic longitudinal voltage $V_{\parallel}^{3\omega}$ that grows as the cube of excitation current below a threshold. The signal's magnitude and coefficient track the superconducting state: they weaken with rising temperature, vanish at the perpendicular critical field $B_{c,\perp}\approx0.9$ T, and respond to back-gate voltage. The authors explain the response with time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, in which fluctuating Cooper pairs give a third-order conductivity $\sigma^{(3)}\propto\epsilon^{-4}$ with $\epsilon=\ln(T/T_c)$ and a third-order resistivity $\rho^{(3)} = -\sigma^{(3)}/(\sigma_n+\sigma^{(1)})^4$ that matches the data semiquantitatively without fine-tuning. They conclude that third-order nonlinear transport is a sensitive probe of superconducting coherence in percolative two-dimensional systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the third-order conductivity $\sigma^{(3)}$ generated by Gaussian fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter, obtained by extending the Aslamazov-Larkin-Schmid paraconductivity calculation to nonlinear order in the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau framework. For a centrosymmetric two-dimensional superconductor with $\epsilon=\ln(T/T_c)$, this gives $\sigma^{(3)}\propto\epsilon^{-4}$, and the measured nonlinear resistivity is $\rho^{(3)} = -\sigma^{(3)}/(\sigma_n+\sigma^{(1)})^4$, where $\sigma_n$ is the normal conductivity and $\sigma^{(1)}$ the linear fluctuation conductivity. The mechanism is the charge transport by transient Cooper pairs that form and decay continuously; their coupling to normal electrons produces the cubic current-voltage term whose coefficient sharpens as $T$ approaches $T_c$.

What would settle it

Measure $V_{\parallel}^{3\omega}$ on the same device under a perpendicular field above $B_{c,\perp}\approx0.9$ T at identical current and power: a thermal or contact origin would persist, whereas a Cooper-pair-fluctuation signal would vanish. Alternatively, compare the signal at a substantially different lock-in frequency; a heating-dominated response would show the characteristic frequency dependence of thermal diffusion, while the fluctuation signal should be nearly frequency-independent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a trilayer $1T'$-MoTe$_2$ device, the authors observe that $V_{\parallel}^{3\omega}$ is proportional to $I^3$ for currents up to a subcritical scale $I^*\approx3.2$ to $3.3\,\mu$A, with the coefficient $\alpha^* = V_{\parallel}^{3\omega}/I^3$ decreasing roughly linearly with temperature and extrapolating to zero at $T^*\approx2.1$ K, the onset of the percolative superconducting transition. The signal is non-monotonic in current: it grows as the current destabilizes the superconducting state, then falls as superconductivity is fully suppressed. Magnetic field suppresses $\alpha^*$ monotonically with a vanishing point at $B_{c,\perp}\approx0.9$ T, exactly where the superconducting transition disappears, and back-gate voltage modulates the signal systematically. The authors derive, from a low-energy $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ model and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, a third-order conductivity $\sigma^{(3)}\propto\epsilon^{-4}$ ($\epsilon=\ln(T/T_c)$) and a third-order resistivity $\rho^{(3)} = -\sigma^{(3)}/(\sigma_n+\sigma^{(1)})^4$ that diverges as $T\to T_c$, which reproduces the measured magnitudes without artificial parameter tuning. They conclude that fluctuating Cooper pairs, not band-geometric effects, drive the observed third-order response, and that the extended fluctuation window of percolative superconductors makes this signal experimentally accessible and useful as a probe.

Load-bearing premise

The measured $V_{\parallel}^{3\omega}$ is an intrinsic bulk nonlinear transport signal, with Joule heating, contact nonlinearity, and geometric mixing either negligible or fully corrected; if heating or contact artifacts dominate, the Cooper-pair-fluctuation interpretation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Third-harmonic longitudinal voltage can serve as a sensitive probe of superconducting transitions in percolative 2D systems, where the linear resistance shows only a broad drop and never reaches zero.
  • The nonlinear coefficient $\alpha^*$ vanishes at the same temperature and magnetic-field scales as the superconducting state, so higher-order transport tracks superconducting coherence even without a zero-resistance state.
  • Because the mechanism is a general property of two-dimensional percolative superconductors and does not rely on material-specific band structure, similar third-order responses should appear in other van der Waals superconductors with broad transitions.
  • The subcritical current scale $I^*$, although defined as a fit descriptor, evolves with temperature and field like a superconducting current scale, and coincides with the current at which the differential resistance peaks at base temperature.
  • Gate tunability of $\alpha^*$ shows the nonlinear probe can resolve modulation of superconducting coherence by small carrier-density changes in a compensated semimetal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $\sigma^{(3)}\propto\epsilon^{-4}$ diverges faster than the linear paraconductivity as $T\to T_c$, third-harmonic measurements could provide a sharper temperature probe of the fluctuation window than resistance alone; a direct test is to compare the temperature width of $\alpha^*(T)$ with that of the fluctuation correction to resistance.
  • A clean, non-percolative two-dimensional superconductor with a sharp transition should show a much narrower window for the cubic signal; observing a comparably broad signal there would indicate the percolative (inhomogeneous) character, not the fluctuation theory alone, is what sets the temperature range.
  • The non-monotonic current dependence suggests that in the deep superconducting state, the third-harmonic channel may count vortex-pair unbinding events, so measuring $\alpha(I)$ at fixed temperature below $T_{KT}$ could test whether the peak current tracks the KT depairing current.
  • The quantitative, fine-tuning-free match in the window $T_c\lesssim T$ gives a falsifiable target: if the same prefactor and $\epsilon^{-4}$ law do not hold in another percolative superconductor with independently known $\sigma_n$, the fluctuation explanation would need revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports measurements of the third-harmonic longitudinal voltage (V∥^{3ω}) in a trilayer 1T'-MoTe2 device, which the authors identify as a percolative two-dimensional superconductor. They observe a cubic dependence of V∥^{3ω} on excitation current below a threshold I*, with a coefficient α* that tracks the superconducting transition: it increases at low temperature, is suppressed by perpendicular magnetic field, vanishes near the upper critical field, and varies systematically with back-gate voltage. The authors interpret the signal as intrinsic third-order nonlinear transport arising from superconducting fluctuations, and they derive a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) result σ^(3)∝ε^{-4} and ρ^(3)=-σ^(3)/(σ_n+σ^(1))^4, with ε=ln(T/T_c). They claim semiquantitative agreement with the experimental data across the fluctuation-dominated window (T_c≲T) without artificial parameter tuning.

Significance. If the reported third-order signal is an intrinsic electronic nonlinear response, the work would demonstrate a sensitive probe of fluctuating Cooper pairs in percolative superconductors and extend third-order nonlinear transport studies to a new class of materials. The main strengths are the systematic data set spanning temperature, magnetic field, and gate voltage; the simultaneous measurement of longitudinal and transverse voltages to correct for probe misalignment; and the use of a concrete theoretical framework based on Aslamazov-Larkin and Schmid paraconductivity. The paper also makes a quantitative prediction (ε^{-4} divergence) that, if confirmed, would be a nontrivial test of fluctuation theory. However, the two most load-bearing validations—the thermal artifact analysis and the quantitative TDGL comparison—are deferred to the Supplemental Material and are not visible in the main text; the main-text temperature dependence does not itself display the ε^{-4} form. These gaps currently prevent the central claim from being fully assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Last paragraph of Results (thermal analysis)] The main text states only that 'detailed analysis (see Section IX of [42]) confirms that Joule heating is not the dominant mechanism behind the observed third-order responses in our system,' without showing the analysis or a key control. Because dR/dT is sharply peaked at the superconducting transition, a heating-induced third harmonic would exhibit the same correlations with temperature, magnetic field, and gate voltage as those presented in Figs. 2–4. The single-frequency measurement (177.77 Hz) and the cited frequency-dependent check (Fig. S4(a)) are also not shown. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the signal is intrinsic; the thermal control must be presented in the main text or the claim weakened.
  2. [Fig. 2(d) and discussion of α*(T)] The main-text temperature dependence of α* shows an approximately linear decrease and an extrapolated zero near T*≈2.1 K, not the TDGL prediction σ^(3)∝ε^{-4} with ε=ln(T/T_c). The stated Gaussian fluctuation window is T_c≲T, so only the T=2 and 3 K points in Fig. 2(d) fall in this regime. The claimed semiquantitative agreement is relegated to Fig. S23. To support the central theoretical interpretation, the main text should show the comparison of α* (or the underlying V∥^{3ω}) with the ε^{-4} form in the accessible window, including the fitted prefactor.
  3. [Theoretical derivation (Section XVI of [42])] The full TDGL derivation is deferred to the Supplemental Material; the main text gives only the final forms σ^(3)∝ε^{-4} and ρ^(3)=-σ^(3)/(σ_n+σ^(1))^4. The theoretical framework is derived for homogeneous superconducting fluctuations, whereas the experimental system is explicitly percolative with a residual resistance of about 2 Ω at base temperature. The manuscript asserts, but does not demonstrate, that the homogeneous fluctuation theory applies to this percolative state. Since this is the basis for the 'parameter-free quantitative agreement' claim, the derivation's scope and the percolative generalization need to be stated in the main text.
  4. [Definition of α* (Fig. 2(c)-(d), Fig. S6)] The coefficient α* is extracted from a cubic fit over a window that excludes the low-current regime where the signal 'becomes extremely weak,' and the fits show large deviations (Fig. 3(e)). The sensitivity of α* and I* to the chosen fit window is not quantified in the main text. Without this, the comparison between the experimental α* and the theoretical coefficient is not compelling, especially given the 'no artificial parameter tuning' claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, second paragraph] The text contains typographical errors, e.g., 'e–einteractions' should be 'e–e interactions'.
  2. [Fig. 2(c) caption] The meaning of the blue shaded boxes (their width and height) should be defined in the caption; the current text describes them only in the body.
  3. [Reference [42]] Reference [42] is cited as 'See Supplemental Materials at [URL]' with a placeholder; a working link should be provided.
  4. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 4 text] The symbol 'I <∼4µA' appears with a missing space, and the value T*≈2.1 K in the text is written as 'T* ~ 2 K' in the Fig. 4 caption; these should be made consistent.
  5. [Comparison with WTe2 and CoNb3S6] The statement that the longitudinal nonlinear response is 'substantially larger than in WTe2 [19] and CoNb3S6 [31]' is not quantified; please provide the comparison values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured third-order coefficient is compared against an external Aslamazov–Larkin–Schmid/TDGL theory using independently extracted experimental parameters, and the few self-references are to the paper's own Supplemental analyses rather than load-bearing external citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The third-order longitudinal voltage V∥^{3ω} is an independently measured quantity; the coefficient α* is defined by a cubic fit to the raw V–I data (Fig. 2, 'The characteristic coefficient α* is obtained from a simple cubic fit to the V∥^{3ω}–I data'). This fitted coefficient is then compared, semi-quantitatively, with the TDGL/Aslamazov–Larkin–Schmid expression σ^(3)∝ε^(−4) and ρ^(3) = −σ^(3)/(σn+σ^(1))^4, where the only inputs are experimentally extracted T_c and σ_n. The theoretical relation is an external, established framework (Refs. [43,44]), not an ansatz imported from the authors' prior work, and the paper explicitly states that agreement is achieved 'without artificial parameter fine-tuning.' The temperature and magnetic-field correlations are empirical comparisons between the extracted α* and independently determined superconducting-transition scales; no equation is shown to reduce to its own input. The paper is also transparent that I* is a fitting descriptor, not an independently defined critical current, and that the Joule-heating exclusion rests on a deferred Supplemental analysis (Section IX of [42]). Those are stated limitations and robustness concerns, not definitional or self-referential reductions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work, and no known result is relabeled as a new mechanism. The central content—a measured third-order nonlinear response correlated with the superconducting transition and captured by an external fluctuation theory—stands on independent experimental and theoretical grounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative comparison relies on experimentally extracted quantities (T_c, σ_n) and on the fitted coefficient α*, while the theoretical framework is an extension of established AL-Schmid paraconductivity. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unstated burden is the assumption that the measured third-harmonic signal is intrinsic and that homogeneous TDGL theory captures a percolative, inhomogeneous system.

free parameters (5)
  • T_c (superconducting transition temperature) = ≈1.4 K
    Determined as the temperature at 50% of the normal-state resistance from R(T) in Fig. 1(b); enters ε=ln(T/T_c) in the TDGL comparison.
  • σ_n (normal-state conductivity) = not stated in main text
    Extracted from normal-state resistance; appears in the denominator of ρ^(3)=-σ^(3)/(σ_n+σ^(1))^4.
  • α* (third-order nonlinear coefficient) = ≈2.8×10^18 μV/A^3 at 0.25 K (Fig. 2d)
    Obtained by cubic fit to V_∥^(3ω) vs I; it is the quantity compared with TDGL theory and extrapolated to define T*.
  • I* (subcritical current scale) = 3.2-3.3 μA from gate dependence
    Explicitly described as a fitting parameter defining the current range where cubic scaling holds; not an independently defined critical current.
  • ξ_GL (Ginzburg-Landau coherence length) = ≈19.4 nm
    From the B_c2 vs T fit using the 2D GL relation; supports the percolative fluctuation interpretation but is not central to the nonlinear transport claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The third-harmonic voltage measured by lock-in reflects intrinsic bulk nonlinear transport; Joule heating, contact nonlinearity, and probe misalignment are negligible or corrected.
    Thermal analysis is deferred to Supplemental Section IX, and a 6% misalignment correction is applied. If these artifacts dominate, the Cooper-pair fluctuation interpretation collapses.
  • domain assumption Gaussian time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory with a single T_c applies to the spatially inhomogeneous percolative film.
    The derivation in Supplemental Section XVI assumes a homogeneous GL description; percolative disorder is not explicitly modeled in σ^(3) ∝ ε^(-4).
  • domain assumption The trilayer 1T'-MoTe2 is centrosymmetric in the measured regime, so Berry-connection-polarizability and crystal nonlinearity contributions do not dominate.
    Raman and second-harmonic generation measurements are used to exclude the T_d phase; inversion symmetry is assumed when assigning the fluctuation mechanism.
  • standard math Aslamazov-Larkin and Schmid paraconductivity formulas are valid inputs for the fluctuation calculation.
    Refs [43,44] are standard results in superconducting fluctuation theory; the paper generalizes these to third order.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Third-order nonlinear transport in a percolative two-dimensional superconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M3UZLJVG

@misc{pith2026260727641,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Third-order nonlinear transport in a percolative two-dimensional superconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M3UZLJVG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27641}
}
abstract

Percolative superconductivity frequently arises in two-dimensional van der Waals materials due to reduced dimensionality, enhanced quantum fluctuations, and complex electron-phonon interactions, providing a unique platform where normal electrons coexist with Cooper pairs. We report the observation of substantial third-order nonlinear transport in a trilayer $1T^\prime$-MoTe$_2$ superconductor within its percolative transition regime. The third-harmonic longitudinal voltage ($V_{\|}^{3\omega}$) exhibits a clear cubic dependence on excitation current below a threshold, with both its magnitude and nonlinear coefficient strongly correlated with the superconducting state. This nonlinear response is semiquantitatively captured by the superconducting fluctuation within the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, where nonlinear transport arises due to fluctuating Cooper pairs. Our results demonstrate that third-order nonlinear transport serves as a sensitive probe of superconducting transitions in percolative systems and establish a foundation for exploring higher-order transport phenomena in strongly correlated systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27641 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Setup of experiments. (a) Device schematic. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of third-order nonlinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Magnetic field effects on superconductivity and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Gate-tunable superconductivity critical transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    [44, 46–48, 50–59]

    See Supplemental Materials at [URL] for device fabrica- tion details, additional experimental data, data analysis procedures, and details of theoretical analysis, which in- cludes Refs. [44, 46–48, 50–59]

    work page

  2. [1]

    Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications.Physical Review Letters, 112(16):166601, 2014

    Yang Gao, Shengyuan A Yang, and Qian Niu. Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications.Physical Review Letters, 112(16):166601, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [2]

    Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time- reversal invariant materials.Physical Review Letters, 115(21):216806, 2015

    Inti Sodemann and Liang Fu. Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time- reversal invariant materials.Physical Review Letters, 115(21):216806, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Band sig- natures for strong nonlinear Hall effect in bilayer WTe 2

    ZZ Du, CM Wang, Hai-Zhou Lu, and XC Xie. Band sig- natures for strong nonlinear Hall effect in bilayer WTe 2. Physical Review Letters, 121(26):266601, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semimetal materials: an ab initio study

    Yang Zhang, Yan Sun, and Binghai Yan. Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semimetal materials: an ab initio study. Physical Review B, 97(4):041101, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    Engineering nonlinear Hall effect in bilayer graphene/black phospho- rus heterostructures.Physical Review B, 111(4):L041403, 2025

    Xing-Guo Ye, Zhen-Tao Zhang, Peng-Fei Zhu, Wen- Zheng Xu, An-Qi Wang, and Zhi-Min Liao. Engineering nonlinear Hall effect in bilayer graphene/black phospho- rus heterostructures.Physical Review B, 111(4):L041403, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [6]

    Electrically switchable Berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator WTe 2.Nature Physics, 14(9):900–906, 2018

    Su-Yang Xu, Qiong Ma, Huitao Shen, Valla Fatemi, Sanfeng Wu, Tay-Rong Chang, Guoqing Chang, Andr´ es M Mier Valdivia, Ching-Kit Chan, Quinn D Gibson, et al. Electrically switchable Berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator WTe 2.Nature Physics, 14(9):900–906, 2018

    2018

  8. [7]

    Ob- servation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal- symmetric conditions.Nature, 565(7739):337–342, 2019

    Qiong Ma, Su-Yang Xu, Huitao Shen, David MacNeill, Valla Fatemi, Tay-Rong Chang, Andr´ es M Mier Valdivia, Sanfeng Wu, Zongzheng Du, Chuang-Han Hsu, et al. Ob- servation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal- symmetric conditions.Nature, 565(7739):337–342, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few- layer WTe2.Nature Materials, 18(4):324–328, 2019

    Kaifei Kang, Tingxin Li, Egon Sohn, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few- layer WTe2.Nature Materials, 18(4):324–328, 2019

    2019

  2. [9]

    Non- centrosymmetric topological phase probed by non-linear Hall effect.National Science Review, 11(6):nwad103, 2024

    Naizhou Wang, Jing-Yang You, Aifeng Wang, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Zhaowei Zhang, Shen Lai, Yuan-Ping Feng, Hsin Lin, Guoqing Chang, and Wei-bo Gao. Non- centrosymmetric topological phase probed by non-linear Hall effect.National Science Review, 11(6):nwad103, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Graphene moir´ e superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral Bloch electrons.Na- ture Nanotechnology, 17(4):378–383, 2022

    Pan He, Gavin Kok Wai Koon, Hiroki Isobe, Jun You Tan, Junxiong Hu, Antonio H Castro Neto, Liang Fu, and Hyunsoo Yang. Graphene moir´ e superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral Bloch electrons.Na- ture Nanotechnology, 17(4):378–383, 2022

    2022

  4. [11]

    Berry cur- vature dipole senses topological transition in a moir´ e superlattice.Nature Physics, 18(7):765–770, 2022

    Subhajit Sinha, Pratap Chandra Adak, Atasi Chakraborty, Kamal Das, Koyendrila Debnath, LD Varma Sangani, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Umesh V Waghmare, Amit Agarwal, et al. Berry cur- vature dipole senses topological transition in a moir´ e superlattice.Nature Physics, 1...

    2022

  5. [12]

    Nonlinear Hall effect and scaling law analysis in twisted bilayer WSe 2

    Zheng-Yang Cao, An-Qi Wang, Xing-Yu Liu, Tong-Yang Zhao, Dapeng Yu, and Zhi-Min Liao. Nonlinear Hall effect and scaling law analysis in twisted bilayer WSe 2. Physical Review B, 111(12):125407, 2025

    2025

  6. [13]

    Gi- ant second-order nonlinear Hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene.Physical Review Letters, 129(18):186801, 2022

    Junxi Duan, Yu Jian, Yang Gao, Huimin Peng, Jin- rui Zhong, Qi Feng, Jinhai Mao, and Yugui Yao. Gi- ant second-order nonlinear Hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene.Physical Review Letters, 129(18):186801, 2022

    2022

  7. [14]

    Giant nonlinear Hall ef- fect in twisted bilayer WSe2.National Science Review, 10(4):nwac232, 2023

    Meizhen Huang, Zefei Wu, Jinxin Hu, Xiangbin Cai, En Li, Liheng An, Xuemeng Feng, Ziqing Ye, Nian Lin, Kam Tuen Law, et al. Giant nonlinear Hall ef- fect in twisted bilayer WSe2.National Science Review, 10(4):nwac232, 2023

    2023

  8. [15]

    Effective Manipulation of a Colossal Second-Order Transverse Response in an Electric-Field-Tunable Graphene Moir´ e System.Nano Letters, 24(19):5791–5798, 2024

    Jinrui Zhong, Shihao Zhang, Junxi Duan, Huimin Peng, Qi Feng, Yuqing Hu, Qinsheng Wang, Jinhai Mao, Jianpeng Liu, and Yugui Yao. Effective Manipulation of a Colossal Second-Order Transverse Response in an Electric-Field-Tunable Graphene Moir´ e System.Nano Letters, 24(19):5791...

    2024

  9. [16]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection po- larizability tensor.Nature Nanotechnology, 16(8):869– 873, 2021

    Shen Lai, Huiying Liu, Zhaowei Zhang, Jianzhou Zhao, Xiaolong Feng, Naizhou Wang, Chaolong Tang, Yuanda Liu, KS Novoselov, Shengyuan A Yang, et al. Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection po- larizability tensor.Nature Nanotechnology, 16(8):869– 873, 2021

    2021

  10. [17]

    Berry connection polarizability tensor and third-order Hall effect.Physical Review B, 105(4):045118, 2022

    Huiying Liu, Jianzhou Zhao, Yue-Xin Huang, Xiaolong Feng, Cong Xiao, Weikang Wu, Shen Lai, Wei-bo Gao, and Shengyuan A Yang. Berry connection polarizability tensor and third-order Hall effect.Physical Review B, 105(4):045118, 2022

    2022

  11. [18]

    Room- temperature third-order nonlinear Hall effect in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4.National Science Review, 9(12):nwac020, 2022

    Cong Wang, Rui-Chun Xiao, Huiying Liu, Zhaowei Zhang, Shen Lai, Chao Zhu, Hongbing Cai, Naizhou Wang, Shengyao Chen, Ya Deng, et al. Room- temperature third-order nonlinear Hall effect in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4.National Science Review, 9(12):nwac020, 2022

    2022

  12. [19]

    Orbital polarization and third-order anomalous Hall effect in WTe 2.Physical Review B, 106(4):045414, 2022

    Xing-Guo Ye, Peng-Fei Zhu, Wen-Zheng Xu, Zhihao Zang, Yu Ye, and Zhi-Min Liao. Orbital polarization and third-order anomalous Hall effect in WTe 2.Physical Review B, 106(4):045414, 2022

    2022

  13. [20]

    Gate-Tunable Berry Curvature Dipole Polarizability in Dirac Semimetal Cd3As2.Physical Review Letters, 131(18):186302, 2023

    Tong-Yang Zhao, An-Qi Wang, Xing-Guo Ye, Xing-Yu Liu, Xin Liao, and Zhi-Min Liao. Gate-Tunable Berry Curvature Dipole Polarizability in Dirac Semimetal Cd3As2.Physical Review Letters, 131(18):186302, 2023

    2023

  14. [21]

    Quantum- metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological anti- ferromagnet.Nature, 621(7979):487–492, 2023

    Naizhou Wang, Daniel Kaplan, Zhaowei Zhang, Tobias Holder, Ning Cao, Aifeng Wang, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Feifei Zhou, Zhengzhi Jiang, Chusheng Zhang, et al. Quantum- metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological anti- ferromagnet.Nature, 621(7979):487–492, 2023

    2023

  15. [22]

    Trevisan, Yugo Onishi, Chaowei Hu, Tiema Qian, Hung-Ju Tien, Shao-Wen Chen, et al

    Anyuan Gao, Yu-Fei Liu, Jian-Xiang Qiu, Barun Ghosh, Tha´ ıs V. Trevisan, Yugo Onishi, Chaowei Hu, Tiema Qian, Hung-Ju Tien, Shao-Wen Chen, et al. Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromag- netic heterostructure.Science, 381(6654):181–186, 2023

    2023

  16. [23]

    Unifica- tion of nonlinear anomalous Hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetoresistance in metals by the quantum geometry

    Daniel Kaplan, Tobias Holder, and Binghai Yan. Unifica- tion of nonlinear anomalous Hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetoresistance in metals by the quantum geometry. Physical Review Letters, 132(2):026301, 2024

    2024

  17. [24]

    Experimental Evidence for a Berry Curvature Quadrupole in an Anti- ferromagnet.Physical Review X, 14(2):021046, 2024

    Soumya Sankar, Ruizi Liu, Cheng-Ping Zhang, Qi-Fang Li, Caiyun Chen, Xue-Jian Gao, Jiangchang Zheng, Yi- Hsin Lin, Kun Qian, Ruo-Peng Yu, et al. Experimental Evidence for a Berry Curvature Quadrupole in an Anti- ferromagnet.Physical Review X, 14(2):021046, 2024

    2024

  18. [25]

    Higher-order non- linear anomalous Hall effects induced by Berry curvature 7 multipoles.Physical Review B, 107(11):115142, 2023

    Cheng-Ping Zhang, Xue-Jian Gao, Ying-Ming Xie, Hoi Chun Po, and Kam Tuen Law. Higher-order non- linear anomalous Hall effects induced by Berry curvature 7 multipoles.Physical Review B, 107(11):115142, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Giant third-order non- linearity induced by the quantum metric quadrupole in few-layer WTe2.Physical Review Letters, 134(2):026305, 2025

    Xing-Yu Liu, An-Qi Wang, Dong Li, Tong-Yang Zhao, Xin Liao, and Zhi-Min Liao. Giant third-order non- linearity induced by the quantum metric quadrupole in few-layer WTe2.Physical Review Letters, 134(2):026305, 2025

    2025

  20. [27]

    Magnetic field induced quantum metric dipole in dirac semimetal Cd3As2.Physical Review Letters, 135(2):026601, 2025

    Tong-Yang Zhao, An-Qi Wang, Zhen-Tao Zhang, Zheng- Yang Cao, Xing-Yu Liu, and Zhi-Min Liao. Magnetic field induced quantum metric dipole in dirac semimetal Cd3As2.Physical Review Letters, 135(2):026601, 2025

    2025

  21. [28]

    Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors.Science Advances, 3(4):e1602390, 2017

    Ryohei Wakatsuki, Yu Saito, Shintaro Hoshino, Yuki M Itahashi, Toshiya Ideue, Motohiko Ezawa, Yoshihiro Iwasa, and Naoto Nagaosa. Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors.Science Advances, 3(4):e1602390, 2017

    2017

  22. [29]

    Nonreciprocal superconduct- ing NbSe2 antenna.Nature Communications, 11(1):5634, 2020

    Enze Zhang, Xian Xu, Yi-Chao Zou, Linfeng Ai, Xiang Dong, Ce Huang, Pengliang Leng, Shanshan Liu, Yuda Zhang, Zehao Jia, et al. Nonreciprocal superconduct- ing NbSe2 antenna.Nature Communications, 11(1):5634, 2020

    2020

  23. [30]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in topological kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5.npj Quan- tum Materials, 7(1):105, 2022

    Yueshen Wu, Qi Wang, Xiang Zhou, Jinghui Wang, Peng Dong, Jiadian He, Yifan Ding, Bolun Teng, Yiwen Zhang, Yifei Li, et al. Nonreciprocal charge transport in topological kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5.npj Quan- tum Materials, 7(1):105, 2022

    2022

  24. [31]

    Third order nonlinear transport prop- erties in topological chiral antiferromagnetic semimetal CoNb3S6.arXiv:2312.05824, 2023

    Junjian Mi, Jialin Li, Miaocong Li, Sheng Xu, Shuang Yu, Zheng Li, Xinyi Fan, Huanfeng Zhu, Qian Tao, Lin- jun Li, et al. Third order nonlinear transport prop- erties in topological chiral antiferromagnetic semimetal CoNb3S6.arXiv:2312.05824, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Charge density wave modulated third-order non- linear Hall effect in 1T-VSe2 nanosheets.Physical Review B, 110(23):235135, 2024

    Zhao-Hui Chen, Xin Liao, Jing-Wei Dong, Xing-Yu Liu, Tong-Yang Zhao, Dong Li, An-Qi Wang, and Zhi-Min Liao. Charge density wave modulated third-order non- linear Hall effect in 1T-VSe2 nanosheets.Physical Review B, 110(23):235135, 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in a quantum Hall system.Nature Nanotechnology, 19(10):1460–1465, 2024

    Pan He, Hiroki Isobe, Gavin Kok Wai Koon, Jun You Tan, Junxiong Hu, Jingru Li, Naoto Nagaosa, and Jian Shen. Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in a quantum Hall system.Nature Nanotechnology, 19(10):1460–1465, 2024

    2024

  27. [34]

    Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2

    JM Lu, O Zheliuk, Inge Leermakers, Noah FQ Yuan, Uli Zeitler, Kam Tuen Law, and JT Ye. Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2. Science, 350(6266):1353–1357, 2015

    2015

  28. [35]

    Gate-induced superconductivity in atomically thin MoS 2 crystals.Nature Nanotechnology, 11(4):339–344, 2016

    Davide Costanzo, Sanghyun Jo, Helmuth Berger, and Al- berto F Morpurgo. Gate-induced superconductivity in atomically thin MoS 2 crystals.Nature Nanotechnology, 11(4):339–344, 2016

    2016

  29. [36]

    Gated tuned superconductivity and phonon softening in monolayer and bilayer MoS 2

    Yajun Fu, Erfu Liu, Hongtao Yuan, Peizhe Tang, Biao Lian, Gang Xu, Junwen Zeng, Zhuoyu Chen, Yaojia Wang, Wei Zhou, et al. Gated tuned superconductivity and phonon softening in monolayer and bilayer MoS 2. npj Quantum Materials, 2(1):52, 2017

    2017

  30. [37]

    Ising pairing in superconduct- ing NbSe2 atomic layers.Nature Physics, 12(2):139–143, 2016

    Xiaoxiang Xi, Zefang Wang, Weiwei Zhao, Ju-Hyun Park, Kam Tuen Law, Helmuth Berger, L´ aszl´ o Forr´ o, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Ising pairing in superconduct- ing NbSe2 atomic layers.Nature Physics, 12(2):139–143, 2016

    2016

  31. [38]

    Na- ture of the quantum metal in a two-dimensional crys- talline superconductor.Nature Physics, 12(3):208–212, 2016

    AW Tsen, B Hunt, YD Kim, ZJ Yuan, S Jia, RJ Cava, J Hone, Philip Kim, CR Dean, and AN Pasupathy. Na- ture of the quantum metal in a two-dimensional crys- talline superconductor.Nature Physics, 12(3):208–212, 2016

    2016

  32. [39]

    Enhanced superconductivity in atomically thin TaS 2.Nature Communications, 7(1):11043, 2016

    Efr´ en Navarro-Moratalla, Joshua O Island, Samuel Manas-Valero, Elena Pinilla-Cienfuegos, Andres Castellanos-Gomez, Jorge Quereda, Gabino Rubio- Bollinger, Luca Chirolli, Jose Angel Silva-Guill´ en, Nicol´ as Agra¨ ıt, et al. Enhanced superconductivity in atomically thin TaS ...

    2016

  33. [40]

    Tuning Ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides.Nature Communica- tions, 9(1):1427, 2018

    Sergio C De la Barrera, Michael R Sinko, Devashish P Gopalan, Nikhil Sivadas, Kyle L Seyler, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Adam W Tsen, Xiaodong Xu, Di Xiao, et al. Tuning Ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional transition-metal dic...

    2018

  34. [41]

    Disor- der enhanced superconductivity toward TaS2 monolayer

    Jing Peng, Zhi Yu, Jiajing Wu, Yuan Zhou, Yuqiao Guo, Zejun Li, Jiyin Zhao, Changzheng Wu, and Yi Xie. Disor- der enhanced superconductivity toward TaS2 monolayer. ACS Nano, 12(9):9461–9466, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin. Effect of fluctuations on the properties of a superconductor above the critical temperature.Soviet physics-solid state, 10(4):1104–1111, 1968

    1968

  36. [44]

    Diamagnetic susceptibility at the tran- sition to the superconducting state.Physical Review, 180(2):527, 1969

    Albert Schmid. Diamagnetic susceptibility at the tran- sition to the superconducting state.Physical Review, 180(2):527, 1969

    1969

  37. [45]

    The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films

    Petter Minnhagen. The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films. Rev. Mod. Phys., 59:1001–1066, Oct 1987

    1987

  38. [46]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors

    Shintaro Hoshino, Ryohei Wakatsuki, Keita Hamamoto, and Naoto Nagaosa. Nonreciprocal charge transport in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors. Physical Review B, 98(5):054510, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Enhanced superconductivity in mono- layer Td-MoTe2.Nano Letters, 21(6):2505–2511, 2021

    Daniel A Rhodes, Apoorv Jindal, Noah FQ Yuan, Younghun Jung, Abhinandan Antony, Hua Wang, Bumho Kim, Yu-che Chiu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, et al. Enhanced superconductivity in mono- layer Td-MoTe2.Nano Letters, 21(6):2505–2511, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Ambipolar Superconductivity with Strong Pairing Interaction in Monolayer 1T ′-MoTe2

    Fangdong Tang, Peipei Wang, Qixing Wang, Yuan Gan, Jian Lyu, Xinrun Mi, Mingquan He, Liyuan Zhang, and Jurgen H Smet. Ambipolar Superconductivity with Strong Pairing Interaction in Monolayer 1T ′-MoTe2. Nano Letters, 23(16):7516–7523, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Coupled ferroelectricity and superconductivity in bilayer Td-MoTe2.Nature, 613(7942):48–52, 2023

    Apoorv Jindal, Amartyajyoti Saha, Zizhong Li, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, James C Hone, Turan Birol, Rafael M Fernandes, Cory R Dean, Abhay N Pasupathy, et al. Coupled ferroelectricity and superconductivity in bilayer Td-MoTe2.Nature, 613(7942):48–52, 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candi- date MoTe2.Nature Communications, 7(1):11038, 2016

    Yanpeng Qi, Pavel G Naumov, Mazhar N Ali, Cather- ine R Rajamathi, Walter Schnelle, Oleg Barkalov, Michael Hanfland, Shu-Chun Wu, Chandra Shekhar, Yan Sun, et al. Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candi- date MoTe2.Nature Communications, 7(1):11038, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Transport evidence of asymmetric spin–orbit coupling in few-layer superconducting 1T d − MoTe2.Nature Communications, 10(1):2044, 2019

    Jian Cui, Peiling Li, Jiadong Zhou, Wen-Yu He, Xiangwei Huang, Jian Yi, Jie Fan, Zhongqing Ji, Xiunian Jing, Fanming Qu, et al. Transport evidence of asymmetric spin–orbit coupling in few-layer superconducting 1T d − MoTe2.Nature Communications, 10(1):2044, 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Emergent layer stacking arrangements in c-axis confined 8 MoTe2.Nature Communications, 14(1):4803, 2023

    James L Hart, Lopa Bhatt, Yanbing Zhu, Myung-Geun Han, Elisabeth Bianco, Shunran Li, David J Hynek, John A Schneeloch, Yu Tao, Despina Louca, et al. Emergent layer stacking arrangements in c-axis confined 8 MoTe2.Nature Communications, 14(1):4803, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Raman signatures of inversion sym- metry breaking and structural phase transition in type- II Weyl semimetal MoTe 2.Nature Communications, 7(1):13552, 2016

    Kenan Zhang, Changhua Bao, Qiangqiang Gu, Xiao Ren, Haoxiong Zhang, Ke Deng, Yang Wu, Yuan Li, Ji Feng, and Shuyun Zhou. Raman signatures of inversion sym- metry breaking and structural phase transition in type- II Weyl semimetal MoTe 2.Nature Communications, 7(1):13552, 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    Structural phase transition and in- terlayer coupling in few-layer 1T′ and T d MoTe2.ACS Nano, 15(2):2962–2970, 2021

    Yeryun Cheon, Soo Yeon Lim, Kangwon Kim, and Hyeonsik Cheong. Structural phase transition and in- terlayer coupling in few-layer 1T′ and T d MoTe2.ACS Nano, 15(2):2962–2970, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Second harmonic generation in atomically thin MoTe 2.Advanced Optical Materials, 6(17):1701334, 2018

    Yu Song, Ruijuan Tian, Jiulong Yang, Rui Yin, Jian- lin Zhao, and Xuetao Gan. Second harmonic generation in atomically thin MoTe 2.Advanced Optical Materials, 6(17):1701334, 2018

    2018

  48. [56]

    Quan- tum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Science, 346(6215):1344–1347, 2014

    Xiaofeng Qian, Junwei Liu, Liang Fu, and Ju Li. Quan- tum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Science, 346(6215):1344–1347, 2014

    2014

  49. [57]

    Cam- bridge University Press, 2015

    Piers Coleman.Introduction to many-body physics. Cam- bridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  50. [58]

    OUP Oxford, 2005

    Anatoly Larkin and Andrei Varlamov.Theory of fluc- tuations in superconductors, volume 127. OUP Oxford, 2005

    2005

  51. [59]

    The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films

    Petter Minnhagen. The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films. Reviews of modern physics, 59(4):1001, 1987

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.