Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Charge Tunable Optical Nonlinearity of Moir\'e Exciton-Polaritons

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A small gate voltage lowers by tenfold the polariton density needed to saturate moiré exciton-polaritons in a MoTe2-MoSe2 heterobilayer, a nonlinearity the authors trace to Pauli blocking of hole-occupied moiré sites.

desk verdict Real first demonstration of gate-tunable moiré exciton-polariton saturation, but the 10x claim needs error bars and the trion alternative needs ruling out. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02165 v1 pith:7KHIADWL submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhijie Li , Kok Wee Song , Jens-Christian Drawer , Vita Solovyeva , Martin Esmann , Niklas Nilius , Muhammad Sufyan Ramzan , Caterina Cocchi
show 11 more authors
Falk Eilenberger Takashi Taniguchi Kenji Watanabe Atanu Patra Subhamoy Sahoo Simon Betzold Sven Höfling Alexander Högele Oleksandr Kyriienko Christian Schneider Bo Han
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords moiréexciton-polaritonsPauliblockingphase-spacefillingRabisplittingelectrostaticgatingMoTe2-MoSe2heterobilayeropticalnonlinearitystronglight-mattercoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports in-situ electrical control of the optical nonlinearity of moiré exciton-polaritons. In a dual-gated MoTe2-MoSe2 heterobilayer inside an open microcavity, applying a small gate voltage reduces by about one order of magnitude the polariton density required to produce the same Rabi-gap saturation seen at charge neutrality. The authors interpret the enhancement as phase-space restriction: holes partially fill moiré lattice sites, so fewer empty sites remain for excitons, making Pauli blocking effective at lower densities. If correct, this gives a practical electrical knob for nonlinear photonic devices.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the moiré superlattice acting as an array of phase-space cells. The theory starts from the non-bosonic correction to exciton commutators—Pauli blocking between the constituent electrons and holes—and encodes it in a density-dependent Rabi splitting formula. Hole doping introduces a local Fermi energy within each moiré cell, shrinking the effective phase space available to excitons. The model's central quantity is the hole filling fraction n_h/n_M, which the authors extract from gate-dependent photoluminescence and use to predict saturation curves in good qualitative agreement with experiment.

What would settle it

Measure trion photoluminescence or absorption at V_G = -1.6 V: if trion spectral weight appears at that voltage, the Rabi-gap drop could be trion-induced and the Pauli-blocking model would need revision; a cleaner test would vary twist angle at fixed hole filling to see whether saturation density tracks the moiré-site filling fraction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a modest gate voltage, V_G = -1.6 V, makes the Rabi splitting of moiré exciton-polaritons saturate roughly ten times faster with polariton density than in the same device at charge neutrality. The effect is reversible, tracks the hole filling of moiré cells, and is captured by a microscopic model of nonlinear phase-space filling in which the available moiré sites are partially preoccupied by holes. The same model also explains why undoped moiré exciton-polaritons saturate at lower densities than ordinary monolayer exciton-polaritons.

Load-bearing premise

The central load-bearing premise is that at V_G = -1.6 V the enhanced saturation comes from holes partially filling moiré sites and Pauli-blocking excitons, rather than from trion formation reducing the exciton oscillator strength by a different route.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At V_G = -1.6 V, the polariton density needed for a 10% Rabi-gap saturation drops by roughly an order of magnitude compared with the charge-neutral case.
  • Moiré exciton-polaritons in the heterobilayer saturate at lower densities than ungated MoTe2 monolayers, indicating that the moiré lattice itself enhances nonlinearity.
  • The saturation curves shift monotonically as hole filling increases from 0 to 1/7 of the moiré density, matching the Pauli-blocking model.
  • The gate control is reversible and operates in a cryogenic open cavity, making the nonlinearity electrically programmable during an experiment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Pauli-blocking picture is correct, the same saturation curve should collapse onto a universal function of n_X/n_M across devices with different twist angles; this could be tested directly by comparing heterobilayers with different moiré periods.
  • The same gating approach could be transferred to other moiré exciton systems to build low-power all-optical switches or nonlinear elements whose operating point is set by voltage rather than by high excitation flux.
  • A caveat the paper leaves open is that at V_G = -1.6 V the local Fermi energy equals the trion binding energy, so independently measuring trion spectral weight would clarify whether the enhanced saturation is purely Pauli blocking or partly trion-mediated oscillator-strength reduction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports electrostatic tuning of the optical nonlinearity of moiré exciton-polaritons in a dual-gated MoTe2-MoSe2 heterobilayer embedded in an open microcavity. At charge neutrality the moiré exciton-polariton Rabi splitting saturates more rapidly with polariton density than in ungated MoTe2 monolayers, and applying a small gate voltage V_G=-1.6 V further reduces the density needed for a given saturation by about one order of magnitude. The authors attribute this enhancement to nonlinear phase-space filling (Pauli blocking) of moiré sites that are partially occupied by holes, and support this with a microscopic theory based on the non-bosonic commutator of exciton operators, using parameters that include an effective moiré-cell area renormalization. The experimental observation of gate-tunable Rabi-gap saturation is plausible and interesting, but the quantitative central claim lacks error bars, and the specific mechanism attribution is weakened by the proximity of the operating point to the trion-instability boundary and by the use of an ad hoc area renormalization.

Significance. If the mechanism attribution is confirmed, the paper would demonstrate a new and practically useful axis of control for moiré polariton nonlinearities: a small gate voltage can strongly enhance saturable nonlinearity, relevant for low-power polaritonic devices. The experimental dataset is substantial: gate-dependent PL, differential reflectivity, Rabi splitting, density-dependent saturation, and theory modeling. The theoretical framework, based on a composite-boson Pauli-blocking formalism, is physically motivated and connects to prior work. However, the central quantitative claim ('one order of magnitude') and the specific microscopic explanation (hole-preoccupied moiré sites) are not yet established with the required rigor; the paper itself notes the comparison is qualitative. Thus the significance is conditional: the experimental observation is potentially important, but the interpretation remains underdetermined.

major comments (4)
  1. [Optical Nonlinearity of Moiré Exciton-Polaritons; Fig. 3(b)] The central quantitative claim — that at V_G=-1.6 V the polariton density needed for a given Rabi-gap saturation is one order of magnitude lower than at charge neutrality — is presented without error bars or statistical uncertainty estimates on the normalized Rabi splittings or on the inferred polariton densities. The density conversion is deferred to Supplementary S2, but the main text should provide at least the uncertainty propagation from pump power, spot size, and cavity mode area. Without this, the apparent 10x enhancement could be within systematic uncertainties of the density calibration, especially at low densities where the normalized Rabi gap is close to 1.
  2. [Theoretical modeling; text near Eq. (3) and Ref. [52]] The key operating point V_G=-1.6 V is placed exactly at the trion-instability boundary: the text states that ε_F=21 meV 'also equals the trion binding energy E_b' and 'marks the onset of trion instability' [52]. This is a load-bearing ambiguity. The PL data in Fig. 2(a) show an exciton-to-trion crossover below V_G=-2 V, and at V_G=-1.6 V the zero-density Rabi splitting is already 1.1 meV smaller than at neutrality. A trion channel at or near this voltage would reduce the exciton oscillator strength and could mimic or enhance the saturation without invoking Pauli blocking of hole-preoccupied moiré sites. The paper should address this alternative quantitatively, e.g., by fitting the density-dependent Rabi splitting with a trion contribution, or by demonstrating that the saturation enhancement persists at voltages away from the trion boundary (e.g., with a different hole density and larger
  3. [Theoretical modeling; effective moiré cell area renormalization] The area renormalization (a_M/2.54)^2 is introduced 'to account for this discrepancy' and immediately leads to n*_h ≈ n_M. This is an ad hoc rescaling that is not independently justified, and it directly sets the Fermi energy ε_F used to select the theoretical saturation curves in Fig. 3(c). Because ε_F is computed from the renormalized density, the agreement between theory and experiment in Fig. 3(c) is not a parameter-free test of the Pauli-blocking model. The authors should provide independent evidence for the 2.54 factor (e.g., from scanning probe measurements, ab initio charge distribution, or a sensitivity analysis over a plausible range of effective areas) or show that the qualitative conclusion is robust to this choice.
  4. [Conclusions] The conclusion states that the theoretical model 'successfully explains the observed phenomena' and that Pauli blockade 'indeed plays a crucial role,' but the main text characterizes the theory-experiment comparison as qualitative ('capture the qualitatively enhanced optical saturation effects'). There is no quantified goodness-of-fit or model selection between Pauli-blocking and trion-mediated saturation. This overstatement should be tempered, or the model should be tested against a discrimination threshold that separates the two mechanisms.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Experimental setup; Fig. 2(b) caption/ text] In the text near Fig. 2(b), 'complete dateset' is a typo for 'complete dataset'.
  2. [Fig. 3(c)] The top axis is labeled n_X/n_M and the bottom axis n_X, but the experimental curves in Fig. 3(b) are plotted versus d_{ex-pol}. The relation between d_{ex-pol} and n_X should be stated in the main text to allow a direct comparison.
  3. [Methods/Supplementary references] The manuscript relies heavily on Supplementary S1, S2, S3B and Ref. [45]. For a stand-alone reading, at least the density conversion and the area renormalization procedure should be summarized in the main text, and the supplementary material should be clearly cited with section titles.
  4. [General] The phrase 'lay a solid foundation' in the Conclusions should be 'lays a solid foundation'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The theoretical explanation uses a renormalized moiré-cell area chosen to make the effective hole density match n_M; the Pauli-blocking 'prediction' at V_G=-1.6 V is therefore partly calibrated, while the experimental saturation claim itself is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Theoretical modeling, paragraph after Eq. (3) (area renormalization and ε_F setting)]
    "The carrier density previously estimated for the 2D case is thus subject to a renormalization by assuming an effective moiré cell area of (a_M/2.54)^2 rather than a_M^2, reflecting the charge inhomogeneity across the moiré landscape. The effective hole density within moiré cells n*_h ≈ 2.54^2 × n_h ≈ 5.2×10^4 µm^-2 at V_G=-1.6 V thus agrees well with n_M, thereby accounting for the enhanced optical saturation."

    The factor 2.54 is not independently measured; it is introduced to remove the discrepancy between the 2D hole density and the moiré density, and is chosen so that n*_h ≈ n_M at the headline voltage V_G=-1.6 V. This value then fixes ε_F = 21 meV, the parameter that controls the theoretical saturation curves in Fig. 3(c). Therefore the agreement of the ε_F=21 meV curve with the enhanced saturation is not an independent prediction: the input was calibrated to make the effective hole density match the moiré density, and the saturation enhancement is then attributed to that calibrated input.

full rationale

The central experimental result—that the Rabi gap saturates about an order of magnitude faster at V_G=-1.6 V than at charge neutrality—is a direct measurement (Fig. 3(b)) and is not itself circular. The circularity concern lies in the supporting theoretical interpretation. To apply the NPSF model, the paper converts the gate-voltage-derived hole density into a local Fermi energy via an effective moiré-cell area (a_M/2.54)^2. The factor 2.54 is an ad hoc renormalization introduced precisely so that n*_h ≈ n_M at V_G=-1.6 V, which in turn sets ε_F=21 meV, the value used in the curve that 'captures' the enhanced saturation. Thus the theory's main quantitative input at the headline voltage is calibrated to the same phenomenon it is invoked to explain; the agreement in Fig. 3(c) is therefore not a parameter-free confirmation of the Pauli-blocking mechanism. In addition, the chosen ε_F coincides with the trion binding energy at the onset of trion instability, so the data cannot uniquely discriminate Pauli blocking from trion-induced oscillator-strength reduction; this is a missing support for the attribution rather than an additional derivation circularity. The published NPSF formalism [17] is external and not itself the problem; the issue is the fitted area renormalization. Because the experimental claim stands independently and the theory retains predictive content for the shape of the saturation curves across densities, the overall circularity is moderate, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental observation rests on DR/PL measurements and a density conversion described in Supplementary S2. The theoretical explanation imports the NPSF formalism from the authors' prior work (Refs. [17,40]) and adds hand-tuned ingredients: the effective moiré cell area factor 2.54, a_X = 1.5 nm, L = 2 nm, and literature masses. The hole filling factors are extracted from the same gate-voltage data, so the theory is not an independent prediction.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective moiré cell area renormalization factor = 2.54 (area scaled by 2.54^2 ≈ 6.45)
    Introduced in the Theoretical modeling section to convert the 2D hole density n_h ≈ 8.1×10^3 µm^-2 into an effective local density n*_h ≈ 5.2×10^4 µm^-2 matching the moiré density n_M. No independent derivation is given; without it, ε_F would not reach the trion-binding scale and the theory would not show the claimed enhancement.
  • Moiré exciton localization length L = 2 nm
    Chosen by hand for the trial wavefunction Ψ0 in Eq. (1). It sets the σ_n and χ_n coefficients in the phase-space-filling recurrence and therefore affects the theoretical saturation curves.
  • Moiré exciton size a_X = 1.5 nm
    Chosen due to screening effects (Ref. [50]). It enters Eq. (3) through k_F^2 a_X^2 χ_n and the σ_n coefficients. Not independently measured for this sample.
  • Effective band masses m_c, m_v = 0.6 m_0
    Taken from k·p literature (Ref. [51]) and used to map hole filling to ε_F. This determines the claimed 0-21 meV Fermi-energy window.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The nonlinear phase-space-filling recurrence for Ω_N (Eq. 2, with the F_N recurrence) is valid for localized moiré excitons.
    Imported from Refs. [17,48,49] rather than derived here. The central theoretical curves depend on this composite-boson framework.
  • domain assumption The heterobilayer has type-II band alignment with hole doping localized around the A point of each moiré cell.
    Used to justify the effective-area renormalization and the hole-filling picture. Based on PL signatures and Ref. [46], not directly measured in this work.
  • domain assumption Average pump power can be converted to polariton density d_ex-pol as described in Supplementary S2.
    The density axis of the central saturation comparison (Fig. 3(b)) relies on this conversion; no main-text derivation or error budget is given.
  • domain assumption The trial wavefunction Ψ0 in Eq. (1), Gaussian in center-of-mass R and relative coordinate r, represents the localized moiré exciton.
    Theory outputs (σ_n, χ_n) and saturation curves depend on this analytic form; the actual moiré potential is not solved.
  • domain assumption At V_G = -1.6 V the system sits at the onset of trion instability rather than in a regime where trions dominate the optical response.
    ε_F is set equal to the trion binding energy and 'marks the onset of trion instability' [52]. If trions are already forming, the Pauli-blockade interpretation is weakened.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge Tunable Optical Nonlinearity of Moir\'e Exciton-Polaritons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KHIADWL

@misc{pith2026260802165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge Tunable Optical Nonlinearity of Moir\'e Exciton-Polaritons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KHIADWL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02165}
}
abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides represent a versatile platform to study strong light-matter interactions based on excitons and electrons in ordered lattices. Twist-engineering of moir\'e structures further enables the manipulation of the polaritonic nonlinearities via engineering the exciton landscape on the nanoscale. In this work, we demonstrate in-situ control of the optical saturation-based nonlinearity of moir\'e exciton-polaritons by phase space restriction via charge doping. Strong exciton-photon coupling is established in a gate-controllable MoTe$_2$-MoSe$_2$ heterobilayer, embedded in a spectrally-tunable open cavity. A small gate voltage can effectively lower the necessary polariton density by one order of magnitude to achieve a similar nonlinear saturation effect as in the charge-neutral case. Our microscopic description successfully explains the observed phenomena in the framework of Pauli blocking for the moir\'e superlattices with charge preoccupation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02165 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Top panel: schematics of open optical micro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Gate tunable PL of MoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Density dependent zero-detuning DR spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [52]

    Korm´ anyos, G

    A. Korm´ anyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko, k·p the- ory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, 2D Materials2, 022001 (2015)

    2015

  2. [1]

    Weisbuch, M

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode split- ting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314 (1992)

    1992

  3. [2]

    Ballarini, M

    D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdr´ e, E. Giacobino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, All-optical polariton transistor, Nat. Com- mun.4, 1778 (2013)

    2013

  4. [3]

    Timmer, M

    D. Timmer, M. Gittinger, T. Quenzel, A. R. Cadore, B. L. Rosa, W. Li, G. Soavi, D. C. L¨ unemann, S. Stephan, L. Greten,et al., Ultrafast transition from coherent to incoherent polariton nonlinearities in a hybrid 1L- WS2/plasmon structure, Nat. Nanotechnol.21, 216 (2026)

    2026

  5. [4]

    Z. Wang, B. Kim, B. Zhen, and L. He, Strongly nonlinear nanocavity exciton polaritons in gate-tunable monolayer semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 146901 (2026)

    2026

  6. [5]

    M. Saba, C. Ciuti, J. Bloch, V. Thierry-Mieg, R. Andr´ e, L. S. Dang, S. Kundermann, A. Mura, G. Bongiovanni, J. Staehli,et al., High-temperature ultrafast polariton parametric amplification in semiconductor microcavities, Nature414, 731 (2001)

    2001

  7. [6]

    J. Zhao, A. Fieramosca, R. Bao, W. Du, K. Dini, R. Su, J. Feng, Y. Luo, D. Sanvitto, T. C. Liew,et al., Nonlin- ear polariton parametric emission in an atomically thin semiconductor based microcavity, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 396 (2022)

    2022

  8. [7]

    Verger, C

    A. Verger, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, Polariton quantum blockade in a photonic dot, Phys. Rev. B73, 193306 (2006)

    2006

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Munoz-Matutano, A

    G. Munoz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues,et al., Emergence of quantum cor- relations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nat. Mater.18, 213 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Delteil, T

    A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schneider, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Towards polariton blockade of con- fined exciton–polaritons, Nat. Mater.18, 219 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photonics3, 687 (2009)

    2009

  4. [11]

    Kuriakose, P

    T. Kuriakose, P. M. Walker, T. Dowling, O. Kyriienko, I. A. Shelykh, P. St-Jean, N. C. Zambon, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, L. Legratiet, A. Harouri, S. Ravets, M. S. Skol- nick, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Few- photon all-optical phase rotation in a quantum-well ...

    2022

  5. [12]

    Kavokin, T

    A. Kavokin, T. C. Liew, C. Schneider, P. G. Lagoudakis, S. Klembt, and S. Hoefling, Polariton condensates for 6 classical and quantum computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 435 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Ciuti, V

    C. Ciuti, V. Savona, C. Piermarocchi, A. Quattropani, and P. Schwendimann, Role of the exchange of carriers in elastic exciton-exciton scattering in quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B58, 7926 (1998)

    1998

  7. [14]

    Shahnazaryan, I

    V. Shahnazaryan, I. Iorsh, I. A. Shelykh, and O. Kyri- ienko, Exciton-exciton interaction in transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B96, 115409 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Schmitt-Rink, D

    S. Schmitt-Rink, D. S. Chemla, and D. A. B. Miller, The- ory of transient excitonic optical nonlinearities in semi- conductor quantum-well structures, Phys. Rev. B32, 6601 (1985)

    1985

  9. [16]

    Huang, J.-I

    D. Huang, J.-I. Chyi, and H. Morko¸ c, Carrier effects on the excitonic absorption in GaAs quantum-well struc- tures: Phase-space filling, Phys. Rev. B42, 5147 (1990)

    1990

  10. [17]

    K. W. Song, S. Chiavazzo, and O. Kyriienko, Microscopic theory of nonlinear phase space filling in polaritonic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023033 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    Makhonin, A

    M. Makhonin, A. Delphan, K. W. Song, P. Walker, T. Isoniemi, P. Claronino, K. Orfanakis, S. K. Rajen- dran, H. Ohadi, J. Heck¨ otter,et al., Nonlinear Ryd- berg exciton-polaritons in Cu2O microcavities, Light Sci. Appl.13, 47 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Imamo¯ glu, H

    A. Imamo¯ glu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1467 (1997)

    1997

  13. [20]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  14. [21]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Schneider, M

    C. Schneider, M. M. Glazov, T. Korn, S. H¨ ofling, and B. Urbaszek, Two-dimensional semiconductors in the regime of strong light-matter coupling, Nat. Commun. 9, 2695 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Emmanuele, M

    R. Emmanuele, M. Sich, O. Kyriienko, V. Shahnazaryan, F. Withers, A. Catanzaro, P. Walker, F. Benimetskiy, M. Skolnick, A. Tartakovskii,et al., Highly nonlin- ear trion-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nat. Commun.11, 3589 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    L. B. Tan, O. Cotlet, A. Bergschneider, R. Schmidt, P. Back, Y. Shimazaki, M. Kroner, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Interacting polaron-polaritons, Phys. Rev. X10, 021011 (2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    L. B. Tan, O. K. Diessel, A. Popert, R. Schmidt, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and M. Kroner, Bose polaron interactions in a cavity-coupled monolayer semiconductor, Phys. Rev. X13, 031036 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Datta, M

    B. Datta, M. Khatoniar, P. Deshmukh, F. Thouin, R. Bushati, S. De Liberato, S. K. Cohen, and V. M. Menon, Highly nonlinear dipolar exciton-polaritons in bi- layer MoS2, Nat. Commun.13, 6341 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Louca, A

    C. Louca, A. Genco, S. Chiavazzo, T. P. Lyons, S. Ran- derson, C. Trovatello, P. Claronino, R. Jayaprakash, X. Hu, J. Howarth,et al., Interspecies exciton interac- tions lead to enhanced nonlinearity of dipolar excitons and polaritons in MoS2 homobilayers, Nat. Commun.14, 3818 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    Xiang, Y

    B. Xiang, Y. Wang, G. Wen, Y. Li, H. Wen, Z. She, H. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. C. Liew,et al., Electrically tunable dipolar polaritons with giant non- linearity in a homobilayer microcavity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02273 (2026)

    2026

  22. [29]

    J. Gu, V. Walther, L. Waldecker, D. Rhodes, A. Raja, J. C. Hone, T. F. Heinz, S. K´ ena-Cohen, T. Pohl, and V. M. Menon, Enhanced nonlinear interaction of polari- tons via excitonic Rydberg states in monolayer WSe 2, Nat. Commun.12, 2269 (2021)

    2021

  23. [30]

    Shang, K

    Q. Shang, K. Dini, H. Jiang, N. W. E. Seet, X. Cai, S. Ru, X. Lu, W. C. Yu, J. Zhao, Q. Xiong,et al., On-chip photonic crystal dressed Rydberg exciton polaritons with enhanced nonlinearity in monolayer WS2, Nat. Commun. 16, 10352 (2025)

    2025

  24. [31]

    Zhang, F

    L. Zhang, F. Wu, S. Hou, Z. Zhang, Y.-H. Chou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. R. Forrest, and H. Deng, Van der waals heterostructure polaritons with moir´ e- induced nonlinearity, Nature591, 61 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Bar- mak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan,et al., Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 (2020)

    2020

  26. [33]

    Shimazaki, I

    Y. Shimazaki, I. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Strongly correlated elec- trons and hybrid excitons in a moir´ e heterostructure, Na- ture580, 472 (2020)

    2020

  27. [34]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta,et al., Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    X. Wang, C. Xiao, H. Park, J. Zhu, C. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. Xiao, D. R. Gamelin,et al., Light-induced ferromagnetism in moir´ e superlattices, Nature604, 468 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    A. J. Campbell, M. Brotons-Gisbert, H. Baek, V. Vi- tale, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Lischner, and B. D. Gerardot, Exciton-polarons in the presence of strongly correlated electronic states in a MoSe 2/WSe2 moir´ e su- perlattice, npj 2D Mater. Appl.6, 79 (2022)

    2022

  30. [37]

    Polovnikov, J

    B. Polovnikov, J. Scherzer, S. Misra, X. Huang, C. Mohl, Z. Li, J. G¨ oser, J. F¨ orste, I. Bilgin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H¨ ogele, and A. S. Baimuratov, Field- induced hybridization of moir´ e excitons in MoSe2/WS2 heterobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 076902 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Scherzer, L

    J. Scherzer, L. Lackner, B. Han, B. Polovnikov, L. Husel, J. G¨ oser, Z. Li, J.-C. Drawer, M. Esmann, C. Bennen- hei, F. Eilenberger, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Baimuratov, C. Schneider, and A. H¨ ogele, Correlated magnetism of moir´ e exciton-polaritons on a triangular ...

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    D. S. Kim, C. Xiao, R. C. Dominguez, Z. Liu, H. Abu- dayyeh, K. Lee, R. Mayorga-Luna, H. Kim, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Moir´ e ferroelectricity modulates light emission from a semiconductor monolayer, Sci. Adv. 11, eadt7789 (2025)

    2025

  33. [40]

    K. W. Song and O. Kyriienko, Electrically tunable and enhanced nonlinearity of moir´ e exciton polaritons in tran- sition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036901 (2025)

    2025

  34. [41]

    Drawer, V

    J.-C. Drawer, V. N. Mitryakhin, H. Shan, S. Stephan, M. Gittinger, L. Lackner, B. Han, G. Leibeling, F. Eilen- 7 berger, R. Banerjee,et al., Monolayer-based single- photon source in a liquid-helium-free open cavity featur- ing 65% brightness and quantum coherence, Nano Lett. 2...

    2023

  35. [42]

    B. Han, C. C. Palekar, F. Lohof, S. Stephan, V. N. Mit- ryakhin, J.-C. Drawer, A. Steinhoff, L. Lackner, M. Silies, B. Rosa,et al., In situ spontaneous emission control of MoSe 2-WSe2 interlayer excitons with high quantum yield, Photonics Res.13, 210 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    Profes- sorinnen f¨ ur Niedersachsen

    also agrees with a previous report for R-type MoTe2- MoSe2 HBL, suggesting highly intralayer contribution to the moir´ e excitons in our HBL [Fig. S2(d) [45]]. We fit the PL spectra by Lorentzian function, and summarize VG-dependent moir´ e exciton energies in Fig. 2(c). In th...

    2025

  37. [44]

    B. Han, J. M. Fitzgerald, L. Lackner, R. Rosati, M. Es- mann, F. Eilenberger, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Syperek, E. Malic, and C. Schneider, Infrared mag- netopolaritons in MoTe 2 monolayers and bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 076902 (2025)

    2025

  38. [45]

    B. Han, H. Shan, K. W. Song, M. Sun, A. Bulavin, I. G. Savenko, M. Esmann, M. Struve, V. Solovyeva, L. Lack- ner,et al., Exciton-polariton condensate in the van der waals magnet CrSBr, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18233 (2025)

    2025

  39. [46]

    [53, 54] for MoSe 2 and MoTe2 lattice constants used in calculating the moir´ e constant, and Refs

    See Supplemental Material at [url], which includes Refs. [53, 54] for MoSe 2 and MoTe2 lattice constants used in calculating the moir´ e constant, and Refs. [55–63] for the methods used in the ab-initio calculation of MoTe 2 re- fractive index

  40. [47]

    S. Zhao, X. Huang, R. Gillen, Z. Li, S. Liu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Maultzsch, J. Hone, A. H¨ ogele, et al., Hybrid moir´ e excitons and trions in twisted MoTe2- MoSe2 heterobilayers, Nano Lett.24, 16 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Chernikov, C

    A. Chernikov, C. Ruppert, H. M. Hill, A. F. Rigosi, and T. F. Heinz, Population inversion and giant bandgap renormalization in atomically thin WS2 layers, Nat. Pho- tonics9, 466 (2015)

    2015

  42. [49]

    Combescot, O

    M. Combescot, O. Betbeder-Matibet, and F. Dubin, The many-body physics of composite bosons, Phys. Rep.463, 215 (2008)

    2008

  43. [50]

    F. P. Laussy, M. M. Glazov, A. Kavokin, D. M. Whit- taker, and G. Malpuech, Statistics of excitons in quan- tum dots and their effect on the optical emission spectra of microcavities, Phys. Rev. B73, 115343 (2006)

    2006

  44. [51]

    Shahnazaryan, V

    V. Shahnazaryan, V. K. Kozin, I. A. Shelykh, I. V. Iorsh, and O. Kyriienko, Tunable optical nonlinearity for tran- sition metal dichalcogenide polaritons dressed by a Fermi sea, Phys. Rev. B102, 115310 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald, Many-body theory of trion absorption features in two-dimensional semicon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B95, 035417 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Banu S, V

    L. Banu S, V. Veerapandy, H. Fjellv ˚ ag, and P. Vajeeston, First-principles insights into the relative stability, phys- ical properties, and chemical properties of MoSe 2, ACS Omega8, 13799 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Ohtake, X

    A. Ohtake, X. Yang, and J. Nara, Structure and mor- phology of 2H-MoTe2 monolayer on GaAs (111) B grown by molecular-beam epitaxy, npj 2D Mater. Appl.6, 35 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  49. [57]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic exci- tations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s- function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 601 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  51. [59]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  52. [60]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  53. [61]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  54. [62]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 ele- ments H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Shishkin and G

    M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Implementation and perfor- mance of the frequency-dependent GW method within the PA W framework, Phys. Rev. B74, 035101 (2006)

    2006

  56. [64]

    E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev.84, 1232 (1951)

    1951

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.