Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 104 references

A platform for nuclear symmetry-violation searches with laser-coolable molecules carrying spinful nuclei

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a full laser-cooling, trapping, state-preparation, and Stark-interferometry toolbox for 137Ba19F, projecting a sub-0.1% statistical measurement of the nuclear-spin-dependent parity-violating coupling, roughly two…

desk verdict A credible roadmap, not a demonstrated result: the 137BaF NSD-PV toolbox is thoughtfully constructed, but the sub-0.1% headline rests on an assumed molecule number after unmodeled lattice transport. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06138 v1 pith:GB47USEL submitted 2026-08-06 physics.atom-ph nucl-exquant-ph

Tatsam Garg , Jakob Wei{ss} , Tesse Tiemens , Charly Beulenkamp , Andreas Schindewolf , Tim Langen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phnucl-exquant-ph
keywords nuclear-spin-dependentparityviolation137BaFlaser-cooledmoleculesanapolemomentconveyor-beltmagneto-opticaltrapStarkinterferometryopticallatticemagicwavelengthnuclearsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the extra hyperfine complexity of fermionic, odd-isotopologue molecules—the species that actually carry the nuclear spins needed for nuclear symmetry-violation searches—does not stand in the way of full laser cooling and coherent control. Using $^{137}$Ba$^{19}$F as the representative molecule and nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation (NSD-PV) as the benchmark, it develops a complete sequence: bichromatic-force slowing, a triple conveyor-belt magneto-optical trap, optical pumping of more than 99% of the population into a stretched science state, transport in a moving optical lattice, and a Stark-interferometry readout at a Zeeman-tuned level crossing near 3215 G. With roughly $10^3$ trapped $^{137}$BaF molecules per shot and a 4.8 ms coherence time, the paper projects $\delta\kappa_{\rm Ba}/|\kappa_{\rm Ba}| \le 7.2 \times 10^{-4}$ for the anapole-dominated barium coupling, and sufficient sensitivity in $^{138}$BaF to resolve the fluorine contribution. If these projections hold, molecular measurements could move from proof-of-principle beam studies to sub-0.1% benchmarks of nuclear structure theory in heavy nuclei, with a route to second-scale coherence at a predicted magic wavelength of about 930.4 nm. The same toolbox is argued to transfer to Schiff-moment and magnetic-quadrupole-moment searches in molecules with deformed nuclei.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Zeeman-tuned opposite-parity rotational level crossing in a molecule with two nuclear spins, probed by Stark interferometry. In $^{137}$BaF the $N=0$ and $N=1$ rotational manifolds have opposite parity, and a magnetic field near 3215 G brings one stretched state from each manifold to near-degeneracy, so the pseudoscalar operator $(S\times \hat n)\cdot I/I$ of the NSD-PV Hamiltonian connects them with a dimensionless matrix element $\tilde C\approx -0.44i$. Around this crossing the paper builds the experimental chain: bichromatic-force slowing, whose stimulated photon exchange covers the hyperfine structure in parallel; a triple conveyor-belt MOT whose blue-detuned dark-state forces restore trapping in the odd isotopologue; dark-state optical pumping that funnels more than 99% of the population into the stretched science state; adiabatic transport in a moving 1064-nm lattice; and magic-angle or magic-wavelength trapping to suppress differential light shifts. The differential detuning uncertainty $\delta\Delta = 2\pi\times33$ Hz, combining trap-induced light shifts ($\delta\nu'_I\approx10$ Hz, $\delta\nu'_\beta\approx15$ Hz) and magnetic-field instability ($\delta\nu'_B\approx28$ Hz), sets the coherence time $\tau=1/\delta\Delta\approx4.8$ ms that enters the standard quantum limit $\delta W=1/(\tau\sqrt{R N T})$.

What would settle it

Measure the delivered 137BaF molecule number and the differential-light-shift-limited coherence time in a 1-MHz-deep 1064-nm lattice under the stated field and polarization stabilities; if fewer than roughly $10^{3}$ useful molecules per shot survive or the coherence time stays below 4.8 ms, the projected sub-0.1% sensitivity fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spinful, fermionic isotopologue can be turned into a precision nuclear-symmetry instrument by engineering its hyperfine-split optical cycle rather than avoiding it. In $^{137}$BaF the paper identifies a science pair of opposite-parity states—$|0,0\rangle|1/2,+1/2\rangle|3/2,+3/2\rangle|1/2,+1/2\rangle$ and $|1,+1\rangle|1/2,-1/2\rangle|3/2,+3/2\rangle|1/2,+1/2\rangle$ in the decoupled basis—that cross near $B\approx 3215$ G with an NSD-PV matrix element $\tilde C\approx -0.44i$ and a Stark dipole $d/h = 1.742$ kHz/(V/cm). At this crossing the weak-interaction matrix element $\hbar W = \langle\psi_-|H_{\rm eff}^P|\psi_+\rangle$ is enhanced by the near-degeneracy, and the readout is the electric-field-reversal asymmetry $A \simeq 2(W/\Delta)(\hbar\omega/dE)$ of a Stark-interferometry sequence. The paper combines this with slowing, trapping, state preparation, transport, and magic-angle or magic-wavelength trapping and projects $\delta W/2\pi \le 0.0036$ Hz in 24 h, hence $\delta\kappa_{\rm Ba}/|\kappa_{\rm Ba}|\le 7.2\times10^{-4}$ for a theoretical $\kappa_{\rm Ba}=0.07$, and $\delta\kappa_F/|\kappa_F|\le 0.34$ for the fluorine coupling in $^{138}$BaF.

Load-bearing premise

The entire sensitivity projection rests on the assumption that roughly $10^{3}$ useful 137BaF molecules per shot reach the interaction region after bichromatic slowing, trapping, optical pumping, and lattice transport, together with a 4.8 ms coherence time—both quantities are estimated from related species and stated field and polarization stabilities rather than demonstrated in this molecule.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measurement at the projected sensitivity would put the barium anapole-dominated coupling $\kappa_{\rm Ba}$ below 0.1% statistical uncertainty, making it a quantitative benchmark for nuclear ab initio theory.
  • The same platform projects enough sensitivity in $^{138}$BaF to resolve the fluorine-nucleus NSD-PV contribution, separating the mass-dependent anapole term of the valence neutron from the mass-independent vector-electron–axial-nucleon term of the proton.
  • The level-crossing catalogue and science-state selection procedure transfer directly to $^{223}$RaF and other molecules with $I=3/2$ and $I_F=1/2$ nuclear spins, up to a rescaling of molecular constants.
  • The toolbox transfers to searches for nuclear magnetic quadrupole and Schiff moments in molecules with deformed nuclei, establishing a general platform for nuclear symmetry-violation searches.
  • Molecular-beam NSD-PV experiments would gain up to two orders of magnitude in usable molecule number from the transverse cooling, slowing, and state preparation developed here.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's own numbers, a useful experimental milestone would be to measure the delivered $^{137}$BaF molecule number after the full slowing-to-lattice sequence; the sensitivity degrades only as $\sqrt{N}$, so a factor of ten shortfall in $N_{137}$ would still give a sub-1% measurement.
  • The predicted magic wavelength near 930.4 nm can be tested before the full platform exists by measuring the dynamic tensor polarizability of BaF on the $X \to A'{}^2\Delta$ transition, which would confirm or reject the second-scale coherence route.
  • The dark-state optical pumping developed for stretched states would need to be combined with coherent Raman or microwave transfer before it can serve non-stretched science states, such as those proposed for field-insensitive clocks or co-magnetometry in CP-violation searches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a detailed design study for a laser-cooled molecular experiment aimed at measuring nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation (NSD-PV) in 137BaF. The authors work out a complete sequence: bichromatic-force slowing, a triple conveyor-belt MOT for the odd isotopologue, dark-state optical pumping into a stretched state, adiabatic transport in a 1064 nm optical lattice, Stark-interferometric interrogation at a 3215 G level crossing, and magic-angle/magic-wavelength trapping to suppress differential light shifts. They tabulate 192 level crossings, evaluate NSD-PV matrix elements, and combine the coherence-time and molecule-number estimates to project a statistical sensitivity of δκ_Ba/|κ_Ba| ≤ 7.2×10^-4 after 24 h for 137BaF and a first measurement of the 19F contribution using 138BaF. The paper frames this as a general platform for nuclear symmetry-violation searches with spinful molecules.

Significance. The proposal addresses an important gap: most laser-cooled molecules used in precision searches have effectively spin-zero nuclei, whereas NSD-PV requires a spinful heavy nucleus. The end-to-end integration of cooling, state preparation, and coherent interrogation is a valuable contribution, and the paper provides substantial technical detail: optical Bloch equation simulations for bichromatic slowing and the conveyor-belt MOT, rate-equation modeling for optical pumping, hyperfine-resolved calculations of all level crossings, and a candidate magic wavelength near 930.4 nm. These calculations are concrete and reproducible in principle, and the level-crossing tables will be useful to the community. However, the headline sensitivity rests on two assumptions that are not derived from models or measurements: the useful trapped-molecule number N_137≈10^3 and the coherence time τ≈4.8 ms. Since the projected precision scales as 1/(τ√N), the 'under-0.1%' and 'two-orders-of-magnitude improvement' claims are only as strong as these assumptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VII C] The useful molecule numbers N_138≈10^4 and N_137≈10^3 are assumed, not derived. The text states that 'dipole-trap hand-off and transport efficiencies still remain sub-optimal in molecules' and gives no efficiency model, simulation, or cited experimental efficiency for the MOT-to-lattice hand-off and transport chain. The justification 'roughly in the ratio of their natural abundances' does not account for any loss processes. Because δW=1/(τ√(R N T)), the projected precision of δκ_Ba/|κ_Ba|≤7.2×10^-4 scales as 1/√N_137; a factor-of-100 reduction in N_137 (e.g., a 1% transport efficiency) degrades the precision by 10× to about 0.7%, which would eliminate the 'under-0.1%' claim and substantially weaken the 'two orders of magnitude beyond molecular beams' claim. Please provide a quantitative model for the full transport chain, or present the sensitivity as a function of N_137 and identify a conservative value.
  2. [Secs. VI B and VII A] The coherence time τ=4.8 ms used in the SQL formula δW=1/(τ√(R N T)) is obtained from δ∆=2π×33 Hz, which combines δν'_I≈10 Hz, δν'_β≈15 Hz, and δν'_B≈28 Hz. These estimates depend on ab initio polarizabilities (α_∥=288 a.u., α_⊥=671 a.u.) at 1064 nm, an assumed polarization uncertainty δβ/β=10^-4, a lattice depth U/h=1 MHz, and an assumed magnetic-field stability δB<1 nT over a (250 µm)^3 volume, none of which have been demonstrated for 137BaF in the cited experiments. Since δW is inversely proportional to τ, the headline precision is directly sensitive to these values. Please state which inputs are experimentally established and which are extrapolated, and provide a sensitivity scan (e.g., δκ as a function of δB and δβ) so the reader can judge how robust the projection is to uncertainties in these parameters.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. VII C] The sentence 'These estimates mark an improvement of roughly two orders of magnitude from previous beam experiments [17]' is not quantified. Please state the reference beam sensitivity and the assumptions used for the comparison (molecule number, interaction time, detection efficiency) so that the improvement factor can be verified.
  2. [Sec. VI C] The magic-wavelength estimate at 930.4 nm is based on an assumed natural linewidth Γ=2π×30 kHz and a transition dipole moment of 0.272 a.u. from ab initio theory; the sensitivity of the predicted magic wavelength and the resulting coherence-time limit to these values should be discussed.
  3. [Sec. IV B] The MOT simulations are performed with a specific intensity distribution [0.2,0.2,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15]×I_tot; the sensitivity of the capture velocity to this intensity splitting and to the two-photon detuning δ is not reported. A short discussion of the robustness of the triple conveyor-belt scheme would strengthen the proposal.
  4. [Sec. IV C] The statement 'We expect a similar temperature range for 137BaF' after citing 138BaF results should be explicitly flagged as an extrapolation in the sensitivity analysis, since the lattice depth and hence the differential light shifts depend on the molecular temperature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NSD-PV sensitivity projection follows a standard error-propagation formula from stated external inputs and measured or simulated benchmark quantities.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The central NSD-PV precision estimate in Sec. VII C is obtained by inserting assumed experimental parameters (R = 1 Hz, T = 24 h, tau = 4.8 ms, N_137 = 10^3) into the standard quantum-limit formula delta_W = 1/(tau sqrt(R N T)), then dividing by |C~| = 0.44 and W_P,Ba/2pi = 160 Hz from Ref. [21] and normalizing by the theoretical kappa_Ba = 0.07 from Refs. [17,25,27]. None of these inputs is fitted to the target observable, and kappa_Ba appears only as a normalization denominator, so the projection does not reduce by construction to its inputs. The coherence time tau is derived from differential light-shift calculations using ab initio polarizabilities from Ref. [80] and an assumed magnetic-field stability; these are external or explicitly stated assumptions, not quantities extracted from a measurement that the paper claims to predict. The MOT and slowing simulations use the authors' prior numerical framework (Ref. [36]), but that framework is benchmarked against the independent 138BaF conveyor-belt MOT experiment (Ref. [51]) and against the authors' own 137BaF transverse-cooling experiment (Ref. [14]); these are external falsifiable benchmarks rather than circular self-support. The magic-wavelength candidate comes from a new calculation using external transition data and polarizabilities. No uniqueness theorem is invoked to force a choice, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The hand-assumed N_137 = 10^3 is indeed an unvalidated input that directly affects the headline precision, but an assumption-based projection is not circularity: it is a sensitivity forecast whose robustness can be questioned on experimental grounds, not a derivation that equates output to input. Self-citations occur (Refs. [13,14,36,48,65]), but they support tooling and prior experimental demonstrations, not the NSD-PV prediction itself. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary standard of Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central sensitivity claims rest on measured molecular constants and ab initio inputs from prior literature (Hamiltonian parameters, g-factors from 138BaF, W_P values, kappa theory), plus several hand-assumed experimental parameters (molecule number, repetition rate, field stability). No new physical entities are postulated. The strongest dependencies are the N_137 = 10^3 estimate and the assumption that 138BaF g-factors describe 137BaF level crossings to within a few Gauss.

free parameters (6)
  • Useful 137BaF molecule number in interaction region (N_137) = ~10^3
    Order-of-magnitude estimate based on an assumed 10^4 directly loaded 137BaF MOT and unspecified hand-off and transport losses; directly sets the SQL sensitivity claim in Sec. VII C.
  • Useful 138BaF molecule number in interaction region (N_138) = ~10^4
    Same estimate for 138BaF; taken equal to the demonstrated MOT number from Ref. [51] with no explicit transport efficiency model (Sec. VII C).
  • Repetition rate R = 1 Hz
    Assumed modest repetition rate encompassing ablation, slowing, trapping, cooling, transport, measurement, and detection cycles (Sec. VII C).
  • Magnetic-field stability delta_B = <1 nT over ~(250 um)^3
    Required stability assumed from commercial superconducting solenoid performance; yields delta_nu'_B = 28 Hz and dominates the coherence-time budget (Sec. VII A).
  • Lattice depth U/h = 1 MHz
    Design choice for the 1064-nm conveyor lattice; determines differential light shifts and scattering limits (Secs. VI and VII).
  • Polarization uncertainty delta_beta/beta = 10^-4
    Assumed modern Glan-type polarizer performance; yields delta_nu'_beta = 15 Hz (Sec. VI B).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The effective Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) with constants from Refs. [41-43] fully describes the X2Sigma+ ground state of 137BaF; additional spin-rotation-nuclear couplings are negligible.
    Used to compute all level structure and crossings in Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Zeeman g-factors measured for 138BaF [34] and the NIST barium g-factor approximate those of 137BaF.
    Level-crossing survey and science-state selection in Sec. III and App. A rely on this; the text acknowledges a few-Gauss shift in crossing fields.
  • domain assumption The NSD-PV interaction is of the form H_P^eff = kappa hbar W_P (S x n)-hat dot I / I, with kappa and W_P taken from Refs. [16,17,21,25].
    Defines the observable W and the conversion from W to kappa in Sec. III and Sec. VII C.
  • domain assumption The two-level Stark-interferometry model of Eq. (5) with alpha' = 0 describes the measurement; differential polarizability and multilevel mixing are negligible.
    Signal formulas Eq. (6)-(7) and sensitivity projections depend on this; the neglect of alpha' is cited to Ref. [34].
  • domain assumption The reduced three-transition optical Bloch equation model captures the dominant 3D force dynamics of the 137BaF MOT.
    MOT capture-velocity and force estimates in Sec. IV B use this reduction from the ~896-state manifold; validated only indirectly against 138BaF experiments.
  • domain assumption The magic-angle and magic-wavelength shift estimates are based on dynamic polarizabilities from Refs. [80,86] with rotational corrections omitted.
    Coherence-time projection in Secs. VI B and VI C; the text defers a full state-pair treatment to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A platform for nuclear symmetry-violation searches with laser-coolable molecules carrying spinful nuclei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GB47USEL

@misc{pith2026260806138,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A platform for nuclear symmetry-violation searches with laser-coolable molecules carrying spinful nuclei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GB47USEL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06138}
}
abstract

Cold heavy molecules are promising systems for exploring nuclear $\mathcal{P}$- and $\mathcal{CP}$-violating phenomena in search of new physics beyond the Standard Model. However, most proposed experimental strategies and their early realizations to date have been limited to proof-of-principle molecular species with effectively spin-zero nuclei that are not sensitive to nuclear symmetry-violating phenomena. Here, we introduce a comprehensive experimental toolbox that integrates cooling, trapping, coherent state manipulation, and a complete precision-measurement protocol that is applicable to molecules carrying relevant nuclear spins. Using ${}^{137}$Ba${}^{19}$F and nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation (NSD-PV) as representative species and benchmark application, respectively, our approach achieves a projected statistical sensitivity roughly two orders of magnitude beyond comparable molecular beams by combining techniques already demonstrated individually in current experiments. This level of precision could provide realistic experimental access not only to the enhanced NSD-PV signals arising from the heavy ${}^{137}$Ba nucleus within this molecule but also to the contributions from the lighter ${}^{19}$F nucleus, bringing direct benchmarks of nuclear \textit{ab initio} theory within reach. We further identify a candidate magic wavelength as a route to second-scale rotational coherence in future experiments. The techniques developed here can be transferred to measurements of nuclear Schiff and magnetic quadrupole moments in molecules containing deformed nuclei, establishing a general platform for laboratory searches for nuclear symmetry violations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06138 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the proposed experimental apparatus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Bichromatic forces as a tool for efficient slowing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Triple conveyor-belt MOT scheme for cooling and trapping of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results of the MOT simulations using the triple conveyor-belt scheme proposed in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Science-state preparation by optical pumping. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Magic angle trapping of NSD-PV science state-pair in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Calculated wavelength dependence of the scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [101]

    S. Yang, S. Deng, Z. Zeng, and B. Yan, Capture veloci- ties for direct loading of heavy molecules into conveyor- belt magneto-optical traps (2026), arXiv:2606.21944 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  2. [1]

    DeMille, J

    D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, and A. O. Sushkov, Probing the frontiers of particle physics with tabletop-scale ex- periments, Science357, 990 (2017)

    2017

  3. [2]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kim- ball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  4. [3]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevin- sky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  5. [4]

    N. R. Hutzler, Polyatomic molecules as quantum sensors for fundamental physics, Quantum Science and Technol- ogy5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  6. [5]

    J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and E. A. Hinds, Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature473, 493 (2011)

    2011

  7. [6]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisenhelder, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, X. Wu, and A. Collaboration, Im- 16 proved limit on the electric dipole moment of the elec- tron, Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  8. [7]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science381, 46 (2023)

    2023

Show all 104 references
  1. [8]

    Arrowsmith-Kron, M

    G. Arrowsmith-Kron, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M. Au, J. Ballof, R. Berger, A. Borschevsky, A. A. Breier, F. Buchinger, D. Budker, L. Caldwell, C. Charles, N. Dattani, R. P. de Groote, D. De- Mille, T. Dickel, J. Dobaczewski, C. E. D¨ ullmann, E. Eliav, J. Engel, M. Fan, V. ...

    2024

  2. [9]

    Jadbabaie, S

    A. Jadbabaie, S. Ebadi, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Jayich, and J. T. Singh, Radioac- tive molecules as laboratories of fundamental physics, Nature Reviews Physics 10.1038/s42254-026-00950-9 (2026)

    2026 doi

  3. [10]

    T. E. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and J. T. Singh, Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015001 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    M. G. Kozlov and L. N. Labzowsky, Parity violation ef- fects in diatomics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics28, 1933 (1995)

    1995

  5. [12]

    Fitch and M

    N. Fitch and M. Tarbutt, Laser-cooled molecules, Ad- vances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics70, 157 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    Kogel, M

    F. Kogel, M. Rockenh¨ auser, R. Albrecht, and T. Lan- gen, A laser cooling scheme for precision measure- ments using fermionic barium monofluoride (137Ba19F) molecules, New Journal of Physics23, 095003 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    Kogel, T

    F. Kogel, T. Garg, M. Rockenh¨ auser, and T. Langen, Laser-cooled 137BaF molecules for measuring nuclear- spin-dependent parity violation, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022041 (2025)

    2025

  8. [15]

    Y. Zeng, A. Jadbabaie, A. N. Patel, P. Yu, T. C. Steimle, and N. R. Hutzler, Optical cycling in poly- atomic molecules with complex hyperfine structure, Phys. Rev. A108, 012813 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Khriplovich, On the en- hancement of parity nonconserving effects in diatomic molecules, Physics Letters A110, 121 (1985)

    1985

  10. [17]

    DeMille, S

    D. DeMille, S. B. Cahn, D. Murphree, D. A. Rahmlow, and M. G. Kozlov, Using molecules to measure nuclear spin-dependent parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 023003 (2008)

    2008

  11. [18]

    E. B. Norrgard, D. S. Barker, S. Eckel, J. A. Fedchak, N. N. Klimov, and J. Scherschligt, Nuclear-spin depen- dent parity violation in optically trapped polyatomic molecules, Communications Physics2, 77 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Karthein, S

    J. Karthein, S. M. Udrescu, S. B. Moroch, I. Belose- vic, K. Blaum, A. Borschevsky, Y. Chamorro, D. De- Mille, J. Dilling, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, N. R. Hutzler, L. F. Paˇ steka, and R. Ringle, Electroweak nuclear properties from single molecular ions in a penning trap, Phys. Rev. ...

    2024

  13. [20]

    Borschevsky, M

    A. Borschevsky, M. Iliaˇ s, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flam- baum, and P. Schwerdtfeger, Relativistic study of nuclear-anapole-moment effects in diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A88, 022125 (2013)

    2013

  14. [21]

    Y. Hao, M. Iliaˇ s, E. Eliav, P. Schwerdtfeger, V. V. Flam- baum, and A. Borschevsky, Nuclear anapole moment interaction in BaF from relativistic coupled-cluster the- ory, Phys. Rev. A98, 032510 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Y. Hao, P. Navr´ atil, E. B. Norrgard, M. Iliaˇ s, E. Eliav, R. G. E. Timmermans, V. V. Flambaum, and A. Borschevsky, Nuclear spin-dependent parity- violating effects in light polyatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A102, 052828 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    T. A. Isaev, S. Hoekstra, and R. Berger, Laser-cooled RaF as a promising candidate to measure molecular par- ity violation, Phys. Rev. A82, 052521 (2010)

    2010

  17. [24]

    Altunta¸ s, J

    E. Altunta¸ s, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. De- Mille, Demonstration of a Sensitive Method to Measure Nuclear-Spin-Dependent Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 142501 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    V. V. Flambaum and D. W. Murray, Anapole moment and nucleon weak interactions, Phys. Rev. C56, 1641 (1997)

    1997

  19. [26]

    W. C. Haxton and C. E. Wieman, Atomic parity non- conservation and nuclear anapole moments, Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science51, 261 (2001)

    2001

  20. [27]

    W. C. Haxton, C.-P. Liu, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Nu- clear anapole moments, Phys. Rev. C65, 045502 (2002)

    2002

  21. [28]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, Axion-induced ef- fects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: Parity noncon- servation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings, Phys. Rev. D89, 043522 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    K. Gaul, L. Cong, and D. Budker, Constraints on new vector boson mediated electron-nucleus interactions from spectroscopy data of polar diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 181805 (2026)

    2026

  23. [30]

    Gardner, J

    S. Gardner, J. Karthein, U.-G. Meißner, G. Muralid- hara, P. Navratil, and W. M. Snow, Hadronic parity violation: successes, challenges, and future prospects (2026), arXiv:2605.07826 [nucl-th]

    2026 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Bouchiat and C

    M.-A. Bouchiat and C. Bouchiat, Parity violation in atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics60, 1351 (1997)

    1997

  25. [32]

    C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Mea- surement of Parity Nonconservation and an Anapole Moment in Cesium, Science275, 1759 (1997)

    1997

  26. [33]

    Antypas, A

    D. Antypas, A. Fabricant, J. E. Stalnaker, K. Tsigutkin, V. V. Flambaum, and D. Budker, Isotopic variation of parity violation in atomic ytterbium, Nature Physics15, 120 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    S. B. Cahn, J. Ammon, E. Kirilov, Y. V. Gurevich, D. Murphree, R. Paolino, D. A. Rahmlow, M. G. Ko- zlov, and D. DeMille, Zeeman-tuned rotational level- crossing spectroscopy in a diatomic free radical, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 163002 (2014)

    2014

  28. [35]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 17 637 (2015)

    2015

  29. [36]

    Kogel, T

    F. Kogel, T. Garg, P. Groß, L. Leczek, M. Rock- enh¨ auser, N. Shah, J. Weiß, A. Schindewolf, and T. Lan- gen, Numerical modeling of laser cooling in molecules: From simple diatomics to polyatomics and radioac- tive species, Computer Physics Communications327, 110235 (2026)

    2026

  30. [37]

    C. J. Ho, J. Lim, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Measuring the nuclear magnetic quadrupole moment in heavy polar molecules, Frontiers in Physics11, 1086980 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    V. V. Flambaum, D. DeMille, and M. G. Kozlov, Time- reversal symmetry violation in molecules induced by nu- clear magnetic quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103003 (2014)

    2014

  32. [39]

    Bucher, S

    B. Bucher, S. Zhu, C. Y. Wu, R. V. F. Janssens, D. Cline, A. B. Hayes, M. Albers, A. D. Ayangeakaa, P. A. Butler, C. M. Campbell, M. P. Carpenter, C. J. Chiara, J. A. Clark, H. L. Crawford, M. Cromaz, H. M. David, C. Dickerson, E. T. Gregor, J. Harker, C. R. Hoffman, B. P. Kay...

    2016

  33. [40]

    S. M. Udrescu, A. J. Brinson, R. F. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bis- sell, A. A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, K. T. Flanagan, T. F. Giesen, R. P. de Groote, S. Franchoo, F. P. Gustafsson, T. A. Isaev, A. Koszor´ us...

    2021

  34. [41]

    Kogel, Y

    F. Kogel, Y. Chamorro, M. Bhattarai, M. Rock- enh¨ auser, T. Garg, D. DeMille, A. Borschevsky, and T. Langen, High-resolution spectroscopy of barium monofluoride: Odd isotopologues, hyperfine structure, and isotope shifts, Phys. Rev. A112, 042807 (2025)

    2025

  35. [42]

    Ryzlewicz, H.-U

    C. Ryzlewicz, H.-U. Sch¨ utze-Pahlmann, J. Hoeft, and T. T¨ orring, Rotational spectrum and hyperfine struc- ture of the 2σradicals BaF and BaCl, Chemical Physics 71, 389 (1982)

    1982

  36. [43]

    Preston, G

    A. Preston, G. Aufderheide, W. Ballard, R. Mawhorter, and J.-U. Grabow, Global isotopic analysis of hyperfine- resolved rotational spectroscopic data for barium monofluoride, BaF, Phys. Rev. A113, 042801 (2026)

    2026

  37. [44]

    Brown and A

    J. Brown and A. Carrington,Rotational Spectroscopy of Diatomic Molecules, Cambridge molecular science series (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  38. [45]

    R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binners- ley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, A. J. Brinson, K. Chrysa- lidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, K. T. Flanagan, T. F. Giesen, R. P. de Groote, S. Franchoo, F. P. Gustafsson, T. A. Isaev, ´A. Koszor´ us, G. Neyens, H. A...

    2020

  39. [46]

    N. R. Hutzler, H.-I. Lu, and J. M. Doyle, The Buffer Gas Beam: An Intense, Cold, and Slow Source for Atoms and Molecules, Chemical Reviews112, 4803 (2012)

    2012

  40. [47]

    Albrecht, M

    R. Albrecht, M. Scharwaechter, T. Sixt, L. Hofer, and T. Langen, Buffer-gas cooling, high-resolution spec- troscopy, and optical cycling of barium monofluoride molecules, Phys. Rev. A101, 013413 (2020)

    2020

  41. [48]

    Kogel, T

    F. Kogel, T. Garg, M. Rockenh¨ auser, S. A. Morales- Ram ´ ırez, and T. Langen, Molecular laser cooling us- ing serrodynes: implementation, characterization and prospects, New Journal of Physics27, 055001 (2025)

    2025

  42. [49]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nature Physics20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Z. Zeng, S. Deng, S. Yang, and B. Yan, Three- dimensional magneto-optical trapping of barium monofluoride, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 143404 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Z. Zeng, S. Yang, S. Deng, and B. Yan, Direct loading of baf molecules with a conveyor-belt magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 073402 (2026)

    2026

  45. [52]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Synthesizing optical spectra using computer-generated holography techniques, New Journal of Physics23, 033028 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    Partlow, X

    M. Partlow, X. Miao, J. Bochmann, M. Cashen, and H. Metcalf, Bichromatic slowing and collimation to make an intense helium beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 213004 (2004)

    2004

  47. [54]

    Aldridge, S

    L. Aldridge, S. E. Galica, and E. E. Eyler, Simulations of the bichromatic force in multilevel systems, Physical Review A93, 1 (2016), arXiv:1509.05350

    2016 arXiv

  48. [55]

    M. A. Chieda and E. E. Eyler, Bichromatic slowing of metastable helium, Phys. Rev. A86, 53415 (2012)

    2012

  49. [56]

    S¨ oding, R

    J. S¨ oding, R. Grimm, Y. B. Ovchinnikov, P. Bouyer, and C. Salomon, Short-distance atomic beam deceleration with a stimulated light force, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1420 (1997)

    1997

  50. [57]

    Kozyryev, L

    I. Kozyryev, L. Baum, L. Aldridge, P. Yu, E. E. Eyler, and J. M. Doyle, Coherent Bichromatic Force Deflection of Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 63205 (2018)

    2018

  51. [58]

    S. E. Galica, L. Aldridge, D. J. McCarron, E. E. Eyler, and P. L. Gould, Deflection of a molecular beam us- ing the bichromatic stimulated force, Phys. Rev. A98, 23408 (2018)

    2018

  52. [59]

    Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, G

    M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, G. Peng, S. Li, H. Septien-Gonzalez, C. Debavelaere, A. D. White, S. Popa, J. Lim, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Slow- ing ybf molecules using radiation pressure, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043235 (2025)

    2025

  53. [60]

    S. S. Yu, J. You, Y. Bao, L. Anderegg, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, D. Lim, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, A conveyor-belt magneto-optical trap of caf, Na- ture Communications17, 1175 (2026)

    2026

  54. [61]

    Lyu and M

    Q. Lyu and M. R. Tarbutt, Trapping and cooling mechanisms in blue-detuned magneto-optical traps of molecules, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023259 (2026)

    2026

  55. [62]

    M. Yeo, M. T. Hummon, A. L. Collopy, B. Yan, B. Hem- merling, E. Chae, J. M. Doyle, and J. Ye, Rotational state microwave mixing for laser cooling of complex di- atomic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 223003 (2015)

    2015

  56. [63]

    A. L. Collopy, S. Ding, Y. Wu, I. A. Finneran, L. An- deregg, B. L. Augenbraun, J. M. Doyle, and J. Ye, 3D Magneto-Optical Trap of Yttrium Monoxide, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213201 (2018)

    2018

  57. [64]

    S. Deng, S. Yang, Z. Zeng, and B. Yan, Optical pumping and laser slowing of a heavy molecule, Communications Physics8, 489 (2025). 18

    2025

  58. [65]

    Rockenh¨ auser, F

    M. Rockenh¨ auser, F. Kogel, T. Garg, S. A. Morales- Ram ´ ırez, and T. Langen, Laser cooling of barium monofluoride molecules using synthesized optical spec- tra, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043161 (2024)

    2024

  59. [66]

    J. J. Burau, P. Aggarwal, K. Mehling, and J. Ye, Blue- detuned magneto-optical trap of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 193401 (2023)

    2023

  60. [67]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Λ-enhanced imaging of molecules in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 083201 (2018)

    2018

  61. [68]

    Takahashi, C

    Y. Takahashi, C. Zhang, A. Jadbabaie, and N. R. Hut- zler, Engineering field-insensitive molecular clock tran- sitions for symmetry violation searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183003 (2023)

    2023

  62. [69]

    X. Wu, Z. Han, J. Chow, D. G. Ang, C. Meisenhelder, C. D. Panda, E. P. West, G. Gabrielse, J. M. Doyle, and D. DeMille, The metastable q 3δ2 state of ThO: a new resource for the ACME electron edm search, New Journal of Physics22, 023013 (2020)

    2020

  63. [70]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  64. [71]

    H. J. Williams, L. Caldwell, N. J. Fitch, S. Truppe, J. Rodewald, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tar- butt, Magnetic trapping and coherent control of laser- cooled molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 163201 (2018)

    2018

  65. [72]

    Schmid, G

    S. Schmid, G. Thalhammer, K. Winkler, F. Lang, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Long distance transport of ultra- cold atoms using a 1d optical lattice, New Journal of Physics8, 159 (2006)

    2006

  66. [73]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, D. Gonzalez-Acevedo, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Fast optical transport of ultracold molecules over long distances, New Journal of Physics 24, 093028 (2022)

    2022

  67. [74]

    Lasner and D

    Z. Lasner and D. DeMille, Statistical sensitivity of phase measurements via laser-induced fluorescence with opti- cal cycling detection, Phys. Rev. A98, 053823 (2018)

    2018

  68. [75]

    M. V. Romalis and E. N. Fortson, Zeeman frequency shifts in an optical dipole trap used to search for an electric-dipole moment, Phys. Rev. A59, 4547 (1999)

    1999

  69. [76]

    K. Zhu, N. Solmeyer, C. Tang, and D. S. Weiss, Abso- lute polarization measurement using a vector light shift, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 243006 (2013)

    2013

  70. [77]

    N. J. Fitch, J. Lim, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Methods for measuring the electron’s electric dipole moment using ultracold YbF molecules, Quan- tum Science and Technology6, 14006 (2021)

    2021

  71. [78]

    Q. Guan, S. L. Cornish, and S. Kotochigova, Magic conditions for multiple rotational states of bialkali molecules in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A103, 043311 (2021)

    2021

  72. [79]

    Caldwell and M

    L. Caldwell and M. R. Tarbutt, Sideband cooling of molecules in optical traps, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013251 (2020)

    2020

  73. [80]

    B. J. Schellenberg, E. H. Prinsen, J. Nauta, L. c. v. F. Paˇ steka, A. Borschevsky, and S. Hoekstra, Single- photon loading of polar molecules into an optical trap, Phys. Rev. A113, 013113 (2026)

    2026

  74. [81]

    Burchesky, L

    S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Rotational co- herence times of polar molecules in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 123202 (2021)

    2021

  75. [82]

    Kotochigova and D

    S. Kotochigova and D. DeMille, Electric-field-dependent dynamic polarizability and state-insensitive conditions for optical trapping of diatomic polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A82, 063421 (2010)

    2010

  76. [83]

    Bause, M

    R. Bause, M. Li, A. Schindewolf, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, S. Kotochigova, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Tune-out and magic wavelengths for ground-state 23Na40K molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 023201 (2020)

    2020

  77. [84]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic-wavelength optical tweezers, Nature637, 827 (2025)

    2025

  78. [85]

    P. D. Gregory, L. M. Fernley, A. L. Tao, S. L. Brom- ley, J. Stepp, Z. Zhang, S. Kotochigova, K. R. A. Haz- zard, and S. L. Cornish, Second-scale rotational coher- ence and dipolar interactions in a gas of ultracold polar molecules, Nature Physics20, 415 (2024)

    2024

  79. [86]

    Y. Hao, L. F. Paˇ steka, L. Visscher, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Boeschoten, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann, V. R. Marshall, T. B. Meijknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmer- mans, A. Touwen, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, Y. Yin, and A. Zapara, High ...

    2019

  80. [87]

    Humphreys, A

    B. Humphreys, A. J. Matthies, and H. J. Williams, Dipolmol-py: A python package for calculations for 2σ ground-state molecules, Computer Physics Communica- tions316, 109813 (2025)

    2025

  81. [88]

    B. L. Augenbraun, Z. D. Lasner, A. Frenett, H. Sawaoka, C. Miller, T. C. Steimle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser-cooled polyatomic molecules for improved elec- tron electric dipole moment searches, New Journal of Physics22, 022003 (2020)

    2020

  82. [89]

    Mehling, J

    K. Mehling, J. J. Burau, L. E. Hillberry, M. Chen, P. Aggarwal, L. Cheng, J. Ye, and S. Scheidegger, Nar- rowline laser cooling and spectroscopy of molecules via stark states, PRX Quantum6, 040370 (2025)

    2025

  83. [90]

    S. Popa, S. Schaller, A. Fielicke, J. Lim, B. G. Sartakov, M. R. Tarbutt, and G. Meijer, Understanding inner- shell excitations in molecules through spectroscopy of the 4fhole states of ybf, Phys. Rev. X14, 021035 (2024)

    2024

  84. [91]

    Altunta¸ s, J

    E. Altunta¸ s, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. DeMille, Measuring nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation with molecules: Experimental methods and analysis of sys- tematic errors, Phys. Rev. A97, 042101 (2018)

    2018

  85. [92]

    Marie-Jeanne, J

    M. Marie-Jeanne, J. Alonso, K. Blaum, S. Dje- kic, M. Dworschak, U. Hager, A. Herlert, S. Nagy, R. Savreux, L. Schweikhard, S. Stahl, and C. Yazidjian, Towards a magnetic field stabilization at isoltrap for high-accuracy mass measurements on exotic nuclides, Nuclear Instrument...

    2008

  86. [93]

    E. G. Myers, The most precise atomic mass measure- ments in penning traps, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry349-350, 107 (2013)

    2013

  87. [94]

    Hanneke, S

    D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell Hoogerheide, and G. Gabrielse, Cavity control of a single-electron quantum cyclotron: Measuring the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. A83, 052122 (2011)

    2011

  88. [95]

    Y. Wu, J. J. Burau, K. Mehling, J. Ye, and S. Ding, High phase-space density of laser-cooled molecules in 19 an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 263201 (2021)

    2021

  89. [96]

    Jorapur, T

    V. Jorapur, T. K. Langin, Q. Wang, G. Zheng, and D. DeMille, High density loading and collisional loss of laser-cooled molecules in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163403 (2024)

    2024

  90. [97]

    Kogel, T

    F. Kogel, T. Garg, M. Rockenh¨ auser, S. A. Morales- Ram ´ ırez, and T. Langen, Isotopologue-selective laser cooling of molecules, New Journal of Physics27, 13001 (2025)

    2025

  91. [98]

    Rockenh¨ auser, F

    M. Rockenh¨ auser, F. Kogel, E. Pultinevicius, and T. Langen, Absorption spectroscopy for laser cool- ing and high-fidelity detection of barium monofluoride molecules, Phys. Rev. A108, 062812 (2023)

    2023

  92. [99]

    Denis, Y

    M. Denis, Y. Hao, E. Eliav, N. R. Hutzler, M. K. Nayak, R. G. E. Timmermans, and A. Borschesvky, Enhanced P,T-violating nuclear magnetic quadrupole moment ef- fects in laser-coolable molecules, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics152, 084303 (2020)

    2020

  93. [100]

    Grasdijk, O

    O. Grasdijk, O. Timgren, J. Kastelic, T. Wright, S. Lamoreaux, D. DeMille, K. Kang, K. Wenz, P. Ag- garwal,et al., CeNTREX: a new search for time-reversal symmetry violation in the 205Tl nucleus, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 044007 (2021)

    2021

  94. [102]

    NIST Physical Measurement Laboratory, Atomic data for barium (Ba), Handbook of Basic Atomic Spectroscopic Data,https://physics.nist.gov/ PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/bariumtable1.htm (2026), accessed: 2026-07-06

    2026

  95. [103]

    W. E. Ernst, J. K¨ andler, and T. T¨ orring, Hyperfine structure and electric dipole moment of BaF X2Σ+, The Journal of Chemical Physics84, 4769 (1986)

    1986

  96. [104]

    Rahmlow,Towards a measurement of parity noncon- servation in diatomic molecules, dissertation, Yale Uni- versity (2010)

    D. Rahmlow,Towards a measurement of parity noncon- servation in diatomic molecules, dissertation, Yale Uni- versity (2010). Appendix A: Potential NSD-PV measurement level crossings in 137BaF The sensitivity of each level crossing in Fig. 2 to NSD-PV effects is determined by ev...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.