pith. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0509301 · v1 · submitted 2005-09-12 · 🌌 astro-ph · hep-ph· hep-th

Spontaneous Isotropy Breaking: A Mechanism for CMB Multipole Alignments

classification 🌌 astro-ph hep-phhep-th
keywords fluctuationsmodelspoweradditivealignmentsisotropyanisotropybreaking
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce a class of models in which statistical isotropy is broken spontaneously in the CMB by a non-linear response to long-wavelength fluctuations in a mediating field. These fluctuations appear as a gradient locally and pick out a single preferred direction. The non-linear response imprints this direction in a range of multipole moments. We consider two manifestations of isotropy breaking: additive contributions and multiplicative modulation of the intrinsic anisotropy. Since WMAP exhibits an alignment of power deficits, an additive contribution is less likely to produce the observed alignments than the usual isotropic fluctuations, a fact which we illustrate with an explicit cosmological model of long-wavelength quintessence fluctuations. This problem applies to other models involving foregrounds or background anisotropy that seek to restore power to the CMB. Additive models that account directly for the observed power exacerbate the low power of the intrinsic fluctuations. Multiplicative models can overcome these difficulties. We construct a proof of principle model that significantly improves the likelihood and generates stronger alignments than WMAP in 30-45% of realizations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forecasts of CMB $E$-mode anomalies for AliCPT-1

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Forecasts indicate AliCPT combined with Simons Observatory can detect injected E-mode dipole modulation at 99% confidence, while AliCPT alone risks biases in alignment and parity tests due to limited sky coverage.