Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hall-effect in LuNi_2B_2C and YNi_2B_2C borocarbides: a comparative study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/9902299 v1 pith:PZQ3DYIJ submitted 1999-02-22 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords normalstatecompoundsbetaborocarbideshalllunimixed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Hall effect in LuNi_2B_2C and YNi_2B_2C borocarbides has been investigated in normal and superconducting mixed states. The Hall resistivity rho_{xy} for both compounds is negative in the normal as well as in the mixed state and has no sign reversal below T_c typical for high-T_c superconductors. In the mixed state the behavior of both systems is quite similar. The scaling relation rho_{xy}\sim\rho_{xx}^\beta (\rho_{xx} is the longitudinal resistivity) was found with \beta=2.0 and 2.1 for annealed Lu- and Y-based compounds, respectively. The scaling exponent \beta decreases with increasing degree of disorder and can be varied by annealing. This is attributed to a variation of the strength of flux pinning. In the normal state weakly temperature dependent Hall coefficients were observed for both compounds. A distinct nonlinearity in the \rho_{xy} dependence on field H was found for LuNi_2B_2C in the normal state below 40K, accompanied by a large magnetoresistance (MR) reaching +90% for H=160kOe at T=20K. At the same time for YNi_2B_2C only linear \rho_{xy}(H) dependences were observed in the normal state with an approximately three times lower MR value. This difference in the normal state behavior of the very similar Lu- and Y-based borocarbides seems to be connected with the difference in the topology of the Fermi surface of these compounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools