pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: gr-qc/0411065 · v1 · submitted 2004-11-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

A follow-up to 'Does Nature abhor a logarithm?' (and apparently she doesn't)

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords abhoraddressapparentlybekenstein-hawkingblackbriefcanonicalcommentary
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This letter contains a brief discussion on the leading-order canonical correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking (black hole) entropy. In particular, we address some recent criticism directed at an earlier commentary.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.