On Physical Equivalence between Nonlinear Gravity Theories
read the original abstract
We argue that in a nonlinear gravity theory, which according to well-known results is dynamically equivalent to a self-gravitating scalar field in General Relativity, the true physical variables are exactly those which describe the equivalent general-relativistic model (these variables are known as Einstein frame). Whenever such variables cannot be defined, there are strong indications that the original theory is unphysical. We explicitly show how to map, in the presence of matter, the Jordan frame to the Einstein one and backwards. We study energetics for asymptotically flat solutions. This is based on the second-order dynamics obtained, without changing the metric, by the use of a Helmholtz Lagrangian. We prove for a large class of these Lagrangians that the ADM energy is positive for solutions close to flat space. The proof of this Positive Energy Theorem relies on the existence of the Einstein frame, since in the (Helmholtz--)Jordan frame the Dominant Energy Condition does not hold and the field variables are unrelated to the total energy of the system.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Could a so far ignored symmetry of the classical laws of gravity explain the cosmological puzzles?
Weyl symmetry of gravity is restored if masses transform as m → Ω^{-1}m under conformal changes, allowing any matter to couple invariantly and potentially accounting for dark energy and dark matter.
-
The Unknown Face of Scalar-Tensor Gravitational Theories
The conformal frame problem in scalar-tensor theories stems from incomplete transformation rules for parameters and overlooked Ward identities; active conformal transformations provide the suitable framework while pas...
-
Conformal form-invariant parametrization of scalar-tensor gravity theories: A critical analysis
A critical review of conformal form-invariant parametrization in scalar-tensor theories, testing its novelty relative to existing frames and the universality of frame-invariant physical predictions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.