Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/9510453 v1 pith:UZAJW5SG submitted 1995-10-31 hep-ph nucl-th

Baryon masses at second order in large-N chiral perturbation theory

classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords orderchirallarge-baryonlambdamassesperturbationrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider flavor breaking in the the octet and decuplet baryon masses at second order in large-$N$ chiral perturbation theory, where $N$ is the number of QCD colors. We assume that $1/N \sim 1/N_F \sim m_s / \Lambda \gg m_{u,d}/\Lambda, \alpha_{EM}$, where $N_F$ is the number of light quark flavors, and $m_{u,d,s} / \Lambda$ are the parameters controlling $SU(N_F)$ flavor breaking in chiral perturbation theory. We consistently include non-analytic contributions to the baryon masses at orders $m_q^{3/2}$, $m_q^2 \ln m_q$, and $(m_q \ln m_q) / N$. The $m_q^{3/2}$ corrections are small for the relations that follow from $SU(N_F)$ symmetry alone, but the corrections to the large-$N$ relations are large and have the wrong sign. Chiral power-counting and large-$N$ consistency allow a 2-loop contribution at order $m_q^2 \ln m_q$, and a non-trivial explicit calculation is required to show that this contribution vanishes. At second order in the expansion, there are eight relations that are non-trivial consequences of the $1/N$ expansion, all of which are well satisfied within the experimental errors. The average deviation at this order is $7 \MeV$ for the $\De I = 0$ mass differences and $0.35 \MeV$ for the $\De I \ne 0$ mass differences, consistent with the expectation that the error is of order $1/N^2 \sim 10\%$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.