Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On recent strategies proposed for proving the Riemann hypothesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv math-ph/0109006 v1 pith:JHGQBO22 submitted 2001-09-04 math-ph hep-thmath.GMmath.MPmath.NT

classification math-phhep-thmath.GMmath.MPmath.NT
keywords strategieshypothesisproofproposedriemannsomeaimingalong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We comment on some apparently weak points in the novel strategies recently developed by various authors aiming at a proof of the Riemann hypothesis. After noting the existence of relevant previous papers where similar tools have been used, we refine some of these strategies. It is not clear at the moment if the problems we point out here can be resolved rigorously, and thus a proof of the RH be obtained, along the lines proposed. However, a specific suggestion of a procedure to overcome the encountered difficulties is made, what constitutes a step towards this goal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools