Comment on "Feynman Effective Classical Potential in the Schrodinger Formulation"

D. Zappala'; G. Andronico; V. Branchina

REVIEW

Comment on "Feynman Effective Classical Potential in the Schrodinger Formulation"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0205067 v1 pith:XJB5LX42 submitted 2002-05-13 quant-ph hep-th

G. Andronico , V. Branchina , D. Zappala' This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phhep-th

keywords effectivepotentialclassicalcommentfeynmanformulationresultsschrodinger

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

We comment on the paper "Feynman Effective Classical Potential in the Schrodinger Formulation"[Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3303 (1998)]. We show that the results in this paper about the time evolution of a wave packet in a double well potential can be properly explained by resorting to a variational principle for the effective action. A way to improve on these results is also discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools