RECORD
First Law, Counterterms and Kerr-AdS_5 Black Holes
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Aug 2007
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Using a new coordinate system with a boundary metric that has an arbitrary angular velocity, one can show that the resulting physical quantities satisfy the first law.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We apply the counterterm subtraction technique to calculate the action and other quantities for the Kerr--AdS black hole in five dimensions using two boundary metrics; the Einstein universe and rotating Einstein universe with arbitrary angular velocity. In both cases, the resulting thermodynamic quantities satisfy the first law of thermodynamics. We point out that the reason for the violation of the first law in previous calculations is that the rotating Einstein universe, used as a boundary metric, was rotating with an angular velocity that depends on the black hole rotation parameter. Using a new coordinate system with a boundary metric that has an arbitrary angular velocity, one can show that the resulting physical quantities satisfy the first law.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We apply the counterterm subtraction technique to calculate the action and other quantities for the Kerr--AdS black hole in five dimensions using two boundary metrics; the Einstein universe and rotating Einstein universe with arbitrary angular velocity. | contribution 0.52 | 0.96 | 0.08 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | In both cases, the resulting thermodynamic quantities satisfy the first law of thermodynamics. | result 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.34 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We point out that the reason for the violation of the first law in previous calculations is that the rotating Einstein universe, used as a boundary metric, was rotating with an angular velocity that depends on the black hole rotation parameter. | interpretation 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.36 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Using a new coordinate system with a boundary metric that has an arbitrary angular velocity, one can show that the resulting physical quantities satisfy the first law. | result 0.53 | 0.86 | 0.52 | asserted 0.96 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We apply the counterterm subtraction technique to calculate the action and other quantities for the Kerr--AdS black hole in five dimensions using two boundary metrics; the Einstein universe and rotating Einstein universe with arbitrary angular velocity. In both cases, the resulting thermodynamic quantities satisfy the first law of thermodynamics. We point out that the reason for the violation of the first law in previous calculations is that the rotating Einstein universe, used as a boundary metric, was rotating with an angular velocity that depends on the black hole rotation parameter. Using a new coordinate system with a boundary metric that has an arbitrary angular velocity, one can show that the resulting physical quantities satisfy the first law.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences
Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
It was addressed in [ref] for Kerr-AdS$_5$ spacetime, how the choice of the shift vectors affect on the first law.
Coarse-graining black holes out of equilibrium with boundary observables on time slice · Choice of shift vectors · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.