RECORD
Novel QCD Effects from Initial and Final State Interactions
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 Sep 2007
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Initial-state and final-state interactions, which are conventionally neglected in the parton model, have a profound effect in QCD hard-scattering reactions.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Initial-state and final-state interactions, which are conventionally neglected in the parton model, have a profound effect in QCD hard-scattering reactions. These effects, which arise from gluon exchange between the active and spectator quarks, cause leading-twist single-spin asymmetries, diffractive deep inelastic scattering, diffractive hard hadronic reactions, and the breakdown of the Lam-Tung relation in Drell-Yan reactions. Diffractive deep inelastic scattering also leads to nuclear shadowing and non-universal antishadowing of nuclear structure functions through multiple scattering reactions in the nuclear target. Factorization-breaking effects are particularly important for hard hadron interactions since both initial-state and final-state interactions appear. Related factorization breaking effects can also appear in exclusive electroproduction reactions and in deeply virtual Compton scattering. None of the effects of initial-state and final-state interactions are incorporated in the light-front wavefunctions of the target hadron computed in isolation.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Initial-state and final-state interactions, which are conventionally neglected in the parton model, have a profound effect in QCD hard-scattering reactions. | background 0.86 | 0.09 | 0.48 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | These effects, which arise from gluon exchange between the active and spectator quarks, cause leading-twist single-spin asymmetries, diffractive deep inelastic scattering, diffractive hard hadronic reactions, and the breakdown of the Lam-Tung relation in Drell-Yan reactions. | result 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.28 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Diffractive deep inelastic scattering also leads to nuclear shadowing and non-universal antishadowing of nuclear structure functions through multiple scattering reactions in the nuclear target. | result 0.54 | 0.14 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Factorization-breaking effects are particularly important for hard hadron interactions since both initial-state and final-state interactions appear. | interpretation 0.44 | 0.13 | 0.13 | asserted 0.99 |
| s4 | Related factorization breaking effects can also appear in exclusive electroproduction reactions and in deeply virtual Compton scattering. | background 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.05 | hedged possibility 0.62 |
| s5 | None of the effects of initial-state and final-state interactions are incorporated in the light-front wavefunctions of the target hadron computed in isolation. | gap 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.22 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Initial-state and final-state interactions, which are conventionally neglected in the parton model, have a profound effect in QCD hard-scattering reactions. These effects, which arise from gluon exchange between the active and spectator quarks, cause leading-twist single-spin asymmetries, diffractive deep inelastic scattering, diffractive hard hadronic reactions, and the breakdown of the Lam-Tung relation in Drell-Yan reactions. Diffractive deep inelastic scattering also leads to nuclear shadowing and non-universal antishadowing of nuclear structure functions through multiple scattering reactions in the nuclear target. Factorization-breaking effects are particularly important for hard hadron interactions since both initial-state and final-state interactions appear. Related factorization breaking effects can also appear in exclusive electroproduction reactions and in deeply virtual Compton scattering. None of the effects of initial-state and final-state interactions are incorporated in the light-front wavefunctions of the target hadron computed in isolation.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 26 sentences without a confident label
Cites as support 7 papers
-
The resulting diffractive contributions leave the target intact and do not resolve its quark structure; thus there are contributions to the DIS structure functions which cannot be interpreted as parton probabilities [ref] ; the leading-twist contribution to DIS from rescattering of a quark in the target is a coherent effect which is not included in the light-front wave functions computed in isolation.
Structure Functions are not Parton Probabilities · Diffractive Deep Inelastic Scattering · 0.98
-
In fact, final-state interactions from gluon exchange between the outgoing quarks and the target spectator system lead to single-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep inelastic lepton-proton scattering which are not power-law suppressed at large photon virtuality $Q^2$ at fixed $x_bj$ [ref] .
Final-State Interactions and Single-Spin Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering · Single-Spin Asymmetries from Initial- and Final-State Interactions · 0.98
-
These interactions produce the Sivers effect at leading twist [ref] with different signs in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering and the Drell-Yan reaction [ref] .
Leading-twist Single-transverse-spin asymmetries: Drell-Yan and Deep-Inelastic Scattering · Introduction · 0.98
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.