Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Transverse Observables and Mass Determination at Hadron Colliders

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 18 Sep 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim I prove that the transverse mass, when maximized over possible kinematic configurations, can be used to determine both of the unknown masses.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0709.2740 (version 3)
Pith IDMBJ3PXSC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBen Gripaios. "Transverse Observables and Mass Determination at Hadron Colliders." arXiv:0709.2740 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/MBJ3PXSC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,038 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

I consider the two-body decay of a particle at a hadron collider into a visible and an invisible particle, generalizing $W \to e \nu$, where the masses of the decaying particle and the invisible decay particle are, {\em a priori}, unknown. I prove that the transverse mass, when maximized over possible kinematic configurations, can be used to determine both of the unknown masses. I argue that the proof can be generalized to cover cases such as decays of pair-produced superpartners to the lightest, stable superpartner at the Large Hadron Collider.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 I consider the two-body decay of a particle at a hadron collider into a visible and an invisible particle, generalizing $W \to e \nu$, where the masses of the decaying particle and the invisible decay particle are, {\em a priori}, unknown. background 0.73 0.54 0.03 asserted 0.68
s1 I prove that the transverse mass, when maximized over possible kinematic configurations, can be used to determine both of the unknown masses. result 0.88 0.91 0.91 asserted 1.00
s2 I argue that the proof can be generalized to cover cases such as decays of pair-produced superpartners to the lightest, stable superpartner at the Large Hadron Collider. interpretation 0.80 0.51 0.08 hedged possibility 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

I consider the two-body decay of a particle at a hadron collider into a visible and an invisible particle, generalizing $W \to e \nu$, where the masses of the decaying particle and the invisible decay particle are, {\em a priori}, unknown. I prove that the transverse mass, when maximized over possible kinematic configurations, can be used to determine both of the unknown masses. I argue that the proof can be generalized to cover cases such as decays of pair-produced superpartners to the lightest, stable superpartner at the Large Hadron Collider.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

58 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 56 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 6 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 9 of the 96 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Builds on it 1 of 2 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

How the literature uses it

58 arXiv papers cite this in 96 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 63 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Compares with it 3 papers
Cites it as background 23 papers

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites as support 1 paper
  • Cho et al. [ref] have recently given evidence that this problem can be surmounted as well.

    Gluino Stransverse Mass · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.