Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Correcting \alpha_3(M_Z) in the NMSGUT

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 22 Oct 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that superheavy threshold corrections in the New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT based on the SO(10) Higgs system ${\bf{210\oplus 126\oplus {\bar {126}}\oplus 10 \oplus 120}} $ can comfortably correct the prediction for the value of $\alpha_3(M_Z)$ from the relatively large value predicted by the two loop RG equations to the central value determined by the current world average.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0710.4018 (version 1)
Pith ID5LYLAFVG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCharanjit S. Aulakh, Sumit Kumar Garg. "Correcting \alpha_3(M_Z) in the NMSGUT." arXiv:0710.4018 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/5LYLAFVG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,442 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.25 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We show that superheavy threshold corrections in the New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT based on the SO(10) Higgs system ${\bf{210\oplus 126\oplus {\bar {126}}\oplus 10 \oplus 120}} $ can comfortably correct the prediction for the value of $\alpha_3(M_Z)$ from the relatively large value predicted by the two loop RG equations to the central value determined by the current world average. The unification scale is raised above the one loop value over almost all of the viable parameter space.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We show that superheavy threshold corrections in the New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT based on the SO(10) Higgs system ${\bf{210\oplus 126\oplus {\bar {126}}\oplus 10 \oplus 120}} $ can comfortably correct the prediction for the value of $\alpha_3(M_Z)$ from the relatively large value predicted by the two loop RG equations to the central value determined by the current world average. result 0.92 0.91 0.89 asserted 0.96
s1 The unification scale is raised above the one loop value over almost all of the viable parameter space. result 1.00 0.83 0.12 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.78.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We show that superheavy threshold corrections in the New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT based on the SO(10) Higgs system ${\bf{210\oplus 126\oplus {\bar {126}}\oplus 10 \oplus 120}} $ can comfortably correct the prediction for the value of $\alpha_3(M_Z)$ from the relatively large value predicted by the two loop RG equations to the central value determined by the current world average. The unification scale is raised above the one loop value over almost all of the viable parameter space.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 14 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers
  • The question whether the renormalizable Supersymmetric SO(10) GUT based on the Higgs set $210⊕10⊕120⊕126⊕126$ (i.e the so called Next or New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT NMSGUT [ref] ( although a more accurate name might be the Full Minimal Supersymmetric GUM(FMSGUM) !) is capable of encompassing fermion mass-mixing data has received much attention lately [ref] .

    The New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT : Spectra, RG analysis and Fermion Fits · Introduction · 0.98

  • There is a plethora of literature about the supersymmetric version of this model [ref] , which is often referred to as the "Minimal Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theory" (MSGUT)[An alternative approach containing two 10-dimensional Higgs representations can be found in [ref] .].

    Fits to SO(10) Grand Unified Models · Minimal Model with $10_H + 126_H$ (MN, MS) · 1.00

  • There is a long history of fitting SO(10) to fermion masses, see, e.g., [ref] Some works focussed on particular SO(10) models, while others focussed on a general SO(10) Yukawa sector only.

    Confronting SUSY SO(10) with updated Lattice and Neutrino Data · Introduction · 1.00

What it cites · 20 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • we find from the equations of [ref] α_s(M_Z)- Δ_α_s = 0.130±0.001+3.1 ×10^-7 GeV^-2 ×[(m_t^pole)^2 - (172.7 GeV)^2] + H_α_s where $Δ_α_s=Δ_α_s^GUT+Δ_α_s^Susy$ threshold corrections.

    The strong coupling, unification, and recent data · Threshold corrections · 0.81

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 6 papers
  • Since the discovery of neutrino oscillations renormalizable Supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs [ref] have increasingly come to occupy the middle ground of the Grand Unification landscape due to their natural accommodation of seesaw mechanisms for neutrino masses and their ability to justify R-parity as a part of the gauge symmetry [ref] while preserving it unbroken to low energies [ref] when the most economical and viable Higgs set i.e $126 ⊕126 ⊕210$ is used.

    SO(10) theory of R-parity and neutrino mass · Introduction · 0.82

  • Since the discovery of neutrino oscillations renormalizable Supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs [ref] have increasingly come to occupy the middle ground of the Grand Unification landscape due to their natural accommodation of seesaw mechanisms for neutrino masses and their ability to justify R-parity as a part of the gauge symmetry [ref] while preserving it unbroken to low energies [ref] when the most economical and viable Higgs set i.e $126 ⊕126 ⊕210$ is used.

    The minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory · Introduction · 0.82

  • Since the discovery of neutrino oscillations renormalizable Supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs [ref] have increasingly come to occupy the middle ground of the Grand Unification landscape due to their natural accommodation of seesaw mechanisms for neutrino masses and their ability to justify R-parity as a part of the gauge symmetry [ref] while preserving it unbroken to low energies [ref] when the most economical and viable Higgs set i.e $126 ⊕126 ⊕210$ is used.

    The minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory: I. symmetry breaking and the particle spectrum · Introduction · 0.82

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.