Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Holographic entanglement entropy for disconnected regions

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Nov 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present a simple derivation of the entanglement entropy for a region made up of a union of disjoint intervals in 1+1 dimensional quantum field theories using holographic techniques.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0711.4118 (version 2)
Pith IDRD3YB4ZO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMukund Rangamani, Veronika E. Hubeny. "Holographic entanglement entropy for disconnected regions." arXiv:0711.4118 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/RD3YB4ZO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,921 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a simple derivation of the entanglement entropy for a region made up of a union of disjoint intervals in 1+1 dimensional quantum field theories using holographic techniques. This generalizes the results for 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories derived previously by exploiting the uniformization map. We further comment on the generalization of our result to higher dimensional field theories.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a simple derivation of the entanglement entropy for a region made up of a union of disjoint intervals in 1+1 dimensional quantum field theories using holographic techniques. contribution 0.99 0.96 0.67 asserted 1.00
s1 This generalizes the results for 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories derived previously by exploiting the uniformization map. background 0.53 0.17 0.11 asserted 1.00
s2 We further comment on the generalization of our result to higher dimensional field theories. future work 0.83 0.54 0.05 unclear 0.86

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a simple derivation of the entanglement entropy for a region made up of a union of disjoint intervals in 1+1 dimensional quantum field theories using holographic techniques. This generalizes the results for 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories derived previously by exploiting the uniformization map. We further comment on the generalization of our result to higher dimensional field theories.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

27 arXiv papers cite this in 35 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 25 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • However in [ref] the linear combination that gives the entanglement entropy undergoes a phase transition thus the derivation is flawed.], i.e. [equation] Where the coefficients are constants that are independent from the choice of the partition.

    Entanglement contour and modular flow from subset entanglement entropies · The partial entanglement entropy proposal · contest 0.92

Cites it as background 9 papers

What it cites · 31 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
  • We have noted in disconnectd that while [ref] propose a far simpler expression for the entanglement entropy of a region bounded by two curves (namely cases (a) and (c) of twoDregions), involving only the three naturally defined minimal surfaces, this doesn't seem to reduce to the requisite result for the infinite strip case.

    AdS/CFT and Strong Subadditivity of Entanglement Entropy · Discussion · contest 0.80

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
  • By the holographic prescription of [ref] we have

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT · Disconnected regions in $1+1$ dimensional field theories · 0.97

  • By the holographic prescription of [ref] we have

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy · Disconnected regions in $1+1$ dimensional field theories · 0.97

  • The covariant holographic prescription [ref] for computing this is to consider the problem of finding a co-dimension two extremal surface $_$ in the bulk geometry $$ (dual to the state in question), which ends on the boundary of the chosen region $$ at the spacetime boundary $$. $S_$ is then given by the area of $_$ in Planck units , $S_= Area \(_\) 4 G_N$.

    A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal · Introduction · 0.88

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.