Pith. sign in

REVIEW

GEANT4 and CREME96 comparison using only proton fluxes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0712.2149 v2 pith:FZRQYCTF submitted 2007-12-13 physics.comp-ph physics.space-ph

Giuseppe Falzetta , Francesco Longo , Alba Zanini This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phphysics.space-ph
keywords geant4protoncreme96fluxescomparisondifferentlistsobtained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

CREME96 and GEANT4 are two well known particle transport codes through matter in space science. We present a comparison between the proton fluxes outgoing from an aluminium target, obtained by using both tools. The primary proton flux is obtained by CREME96 only, covering an energy range from MeV to hundreds GeV with the same result in both cases. We studied different thickness targets and two different GEANT4 physics lists in order to show how the spectra of the outgoing proton fluxes are modified. Our findings show consistent agreement of simulation data by each tool, with regards both GEANT4 physics lists and every thickness target analysed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools