RECORD
Communication Requirements for Generating Correlated Random Variables
Information Theory · Submitted 1 May 2008
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This work characterizes the optimal tradeoff between the amount of common randomness used and the required rate of description.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Two familiar notions of correlation are rediscovered as extreme operating points for simulating a discrete memoryless channel, in which a channel output is generated based only on a description of the channel input. Wyner's "common information" coincides with the minimum description rate needed. However, when common randomness independent of the input is available, the necessary description rate reduces to Shannon's mutual information. This work characterizes the optimal tradeoff between the amount of common randomness used and the required rate of description.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Two familiar notions of correlation are rediscovered as extreme operating points for simulating a discrete memoryless channel, in which a channel output is generated based only on a description of the channel input. | contribution 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Wyner's "common information" coincides with the minimum description rate needed. | result 0.93 | 0.34 | 0.15 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | However, when common randomness independent of the input is available, the necessary description rate reduces to Shannon's mutual information. | result 0.88 | 0.23 | 0.19 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | This work characterizes the optimal tradeoff between the amount of common randomness used and the required rate of description. | contribution 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.72 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Two familiar notions of correlation are rediscovered as extreme operating points for simulating a discrete memoryless channel, in which a channel output is generated based only on a description of the channel input. Wyner's "common information" coincides with the minimum description rate needed. However, when common randomness independent of the input is available, the necessary description rate reduces to Shannon's mutual information. This work characterizes the optimal tradeoff between the amount of common randomness used and the required rate of description.
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States the same result 1 paper
-
This work characterizes the optimal trade-off between the amount of common randomness used and the required rate of description.
Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
Cuff's theorem [ref] regarding the trade-off between classical communication and common randomness for a non-feedback reverse Shannon theorem is a special case of Theorem [ref] below, essentially because a noisy classical channel is a special case of a quantum measurement and thus the simulation task is a special case.
The information-theoretic costs of simulating quantum measurements · Non-feedback measurement compression · 0.80
Compares with it 1 paper
-
Thus, Theorem [ref] below “sits in between” the communication tasks considered in Ref. [ref] and Ref. [ref] .
The information-theoretic costs of simulating quantum measurements · Non-feedback measurement compression · 0.94
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.