Pith.

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · arXiv:0902.0675 v2 · submitted 4 Feb 2009

Determination of the Atmospheric Neutrino Flux and Searches for New Physics with AMANDA-II

The IceCube Collaboration

The paper says

“Analyzing a set of 5511 candidate neutrino events collected during 1387 days of livetime from 2000 to 2006, we find no evidence for such effects and set upper limits on VLI and QD parameters using a maximum likelihood method.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The AMANDA-II detector, operating since 2000 in the deep ice at the geographic South Pole, has accumulated a large sample of atmospheric muon neutrinos in the 100 GeV to 10 TeV energy range. The zenith angle and energy distribution of these events can be used to search for various phenomenological signatures of quantum gravity in the neutrino sector, such as violation of Lorentz invariance (VLI) or quantum decoherence (QD). Analyzing a set of 5511 candidate neutrino events collected during 1387 days of livetime from 2000 to 2006, we find no evidence for such effects and set upper limits on VLI and QD parameters using a maximum likelihood method. Given the absence of evidence for new flavor-changing physics, we use the same methodology to determine the conventional atmospheric muon neutrino flux above 100 GeV.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.80 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The AMANDA-II detector, operating since 2000 in the deep ice at the geographic South Pole, has accumulated a large sample of atmospheric muon neutrinos in the 100 GeV to 10 TeV energy range. method 0.56 0.78 0.03 asserted 1.00
The zenith angle and energy distribution of these events can be used to search for various phenomenological signatures of quantum gravity in the neutrino sector, such as violation of Lorentz invariance (VLI) or quantum decoherence (QD). method 0.41 0.13 0.03 hedged possibility 0.55
Analyzing a set of 5511 candidate neutrino events collected during 1387 days of livetime from 2000 to 2006, we find no evidence for such effects and set upper limits on VLI and QD parameters using a maximum likelihood method. result 0.98 0.98 0.59 asserted 1.00
Given the absence of evidence for new flavor-changing physics, we use the same methodology to determine the conventional atmospheric muon neutrino flux above 100 GeV. contribution 0.81 0.91 0.17 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.56

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,845 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 10 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

27 arXiv papers cite this in 34 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 18 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 9 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 3 papers
  • Neutrino decoherence is often represented using an open quantum system formalism [ref] considering both the neutrino and its environment, and beyond neutrinos this formalism has also be employed to study decoherence resulting from gravitational sources more generally [ref] .

    Neutrino signals of lightcone fluctuations resulting from fluctuating space-time · Analytic decoherence operator · 0.92

  • The huge range of energies and baselines provided by the atmospheric neutrinos opens up the possibility of exploring many different and exciting physics topics, from the measurement of neutrino mixing parameters [ref] to more exotic ones [ref] .

    Exploring the Earth matter effect with atmospheric neutrinos in ice · Atmospheric neutrino flux · 0.86

  • The AN flux in the wide energy range remains the issue of the great interest since the low energy AN flux is a research matter in the neutrino oscillations studies, and the high energy atmospheric neutrino flux is now appearing as the unavoidable background for astrophysical neutrino experiments [ref] .

    Impact of high-energy hadron interactions on the atmospheric neutrino flux predictions · Introduction · 0.83

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Cites as background 2 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment