Indisputable facts when implementing spiking neuron networks
read the original abstract
In this article, our wish is to demystify some aspects of coding with spike-timing, through a simple review of well-understood technical facts regarding spike coding. The goal is to help better understanding to which extend computing and modelling with spiking neuron networks can be biologically plausible and computationally efficient. We intentionally restrict ourselves to a deterministic dynamics, in this review, and we consider that the dynamics of the network is defined by a non-stochastic mapping. This allows us to stay in a rather simple framework and to propose a review with concrete numerical values, results and formula on (i) general time constraints, (ii) links between continuous signals and spike trains, (iii) spiking networks parameter adjustments. When implementing spiking neuron networks, for computational or biological simulation purposes, it is important to take into account the indisputable facts here reviewed. This precaution could prevent from implementing mechanisms meaningless with regards to obvious time constraints, or from introducing spikes artificially, when continuous calculations would be sufficient and simpler. It is also pointed out that implementing a spiking neuron network is finally a simple task, unless complex neural codes are considered.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.