Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Photoionization of atoms stuffed inside a two-shell fullerene

Atomic and Molecular Clusters · Submitted 12 Apr 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A whole variety of new peculiarities are found that deserve experimental verification.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0904.1844 (version 2)
Pith IDQDSQNQF3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. Z. Liverts, L. V. Chernysheva, M. Ya. Amusia. "Photoionization of atoms stuffed inside a two-shell fullerene." arXiv:0904.1844 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/QDSQNQF3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,539 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.44 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The photoionization of a two-shell endohedral A@CN1@CN2 is considered. Formulas are presented for cross-sections and angular anisotropy parameters, both dipole and non-dipole. The effect of the fullerenes shell upon photoelectron from atom A is taken into account substituting the action of the fullerene by two zero-thickness "bubble potential". The fullerenes shells polarization is included assuming that the radius of the outer shell R2 is much bigger than the inner R1 and both much exceeds the atomic radius r. This permits to express the effect via CN1,N2 polarizabilities, which are connected to their photoionization cross-sections. The interaction between shells CN1 and CN2 is taken into account in the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). The effect of photoelectron scattering by both "bubble potentials" is included in the lowest order and in the RPA frame. As concrete examples, two endohedrals Ar@C60@C240 and Xe@C60@C240 are considered. In the first case we consider 3p and 3s, while in the second 5p, 5s and 4d subshells. A whole variety of new peculiarities are found that deserve experimental verification.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The photoionization of a two-shell endohedral A@CN1@CN2 is considered. contribution 0.76 0.49 0.04 asserted 0.80
s1 Formulas are presented for cross-sections and angular anisotropy parameters, both dipole and non-dipole. contribution 0.88 0.88 0.06 asserted 0.99
s2 The effect of the fullerenes shell upon photoelectron from atom A is taken into account substituting the action of the fullerene by two zero-thickness "bubble potential". method 0.99 0.78 0.05 asserted 0.99
s3 The fullerenes shells polarization is included assuming that the radius of the outer shell R2 is much bigger than the inner R1 and both much exceeds the atomic radius r. method 0.98 0.63 0.03 asserted 0.98
s4 This permits to express the effect via CN1,N2 polarizabilities, which are connected to their photoionization cross-sections. method 0.94 0.79 0.08 asserted 0.90
s5 The interaction between shells CN1 and CN2 is taken into account in the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). method 0.99 0.80 0.04 asserted 1.00
s6 The effect of photoelectron scattering by both "bubble potentials" is included in the lowest order and in the RPA frame. method 0.98 0.87 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 As concrete examples, two endohedrals Ar@C60@C240 and Xe@C60@C240 are considered. contribution 0.60 0.77 0.04 asserted 0.96
s8 In the first case we consider 3p and 3s, while in the second 5p, 5s and 4d subshells. contribution 0.66 0.72 0.04 asserted 0.97
s9 A whole variety of new peculiarities are found that deserve experimental verification. result 0.39 0.91 0.46 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The photoionization of a two-shell endohedral A@CN1@CN2 is considered. Formulas are presented for cross-sections and angular anisotropy parameters, both dipole and non-dipole. The effect of the fullerenes shell upon photoelectron from atom A is taken into account substituting the action of the fullerene by two zero-thickness "bubble potential". The fullerenes shells polarization is included assuming that the radius of the outer shell R2 is much bigger than the inner R1 and both much exceeds the atomic radius r. This permits to express the effect via CN1,N2 polarizabilities, which are connected to their photoionization cross-sections. The interaction between shells CN1 and CN2 is taken into account in the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). The effect of photoelectron scattering by both "bubble potentials" is included in the lowest order and in the RPA frame. As concrete examples, two endohedrals Ar@C60@C240 and Xe@C60@C240 are considered. In the first case we consider 3p and 3s, while in the second 5p, 5s and 4d subshells. A whole variety of new peculiarities are found that deserve experimental verification.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.