REVIEW 3 cited by
Background independent quantization and wave propagation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We apply a type of background independent "polymer" quantization to a free scalar field in a flat spacetime. Using semi-classical states, we find an effective wave equation that is both nonlinear and Lorentz invariance violating. We solve this equation perturbatively for several cases of physical interest, and show that polymer corrections to solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation depend on the amplitude of the field. This leads to an effective dispersion relation that depends on the amplitude, frequency and shape of the wave-packet, and is hence distinct from other modified dispersion relations found in the literature. We also demonstrate that polymer effects tend to accumulate with time for plane-symmetric waveforms. We conclude by discussing the possibility of measuring deviations from the Klein-Gordon equation in particle accelerators or astrophysical observations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An effective Friedmann equation for a bouncing anisotropic universe
Derives the effective Friedmann equation and the exact parabolic shear–density relation at the bounce for polymer Bianchi-I, with constants −4, 4, 0 in the sharply peaked limit.
-
Polymer cosmology with polymer matter: Effective dynamics
A polymer-quantized scalar field on a polymer-quantized FLRW background produces a bounce whose location depends on the matter polymer scale, with generic asymmetric evolution across the bounce.
-
Einstein@Home all-sky "bucket" search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O3 public data
A non-detection and upper limit for continuous gravitational waves is claimed, but the body text is an unrelated cosmology paper, making the result unverifiable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.