RECORD
Directed d-mer diffusion describing Kardar-Parisi-Zhang type of surface growth
Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 19 Jul 2009
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We provide evidence for the agreement with field theoretical predictions of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class and numerical results.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We show that d+1-dimensional surface growth models can be mapped onto driven lattice gases of d-mers. The continuous surface growth corresponds to one dimensional drift of d-mers perpendicular to the (d-1)-dimensional "plane" spanned by the d-mers. This facilitates efficient, bit-coded algorithms with generalized Kawasaki dynamics of spins. Our simulations in d=2,3,4,5 dimensions provide scaling exponent estimates on much larger system sizes and simulations times published so far, where the effective growth exponent exhibits an increase. We provide evidence for the agreement with field theoretical predictions of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class and numerical results. We show that the (2+1)-dimensional exponents conciliate with the values suggested by Lassig within error margin, for the largest system sizes studied here, but we can't support his predictions for (3+1)d numerically.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We show that d+1-dimensional surface growth models can be mapped onto driven lattice gases of d-mers. | contribution 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.61 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The continuous surface growth corresponds to one dimensional drift of d-mers perpendicular to the (d-1)-dimensional "plane" spanned by the d-mers. | method 0.40 | 0.55 | 0.18 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | This facilitates efficient, bit-coded algorithms with generalized Kawasaki dynamics of spins. | method 0.95 | 0.57 | 0.06 | asserted 0.95 |
| s3 | Our simulations in d=2,3,4,5 dimensions provide scaling exponent estimates on much larger system sizes and simulations times published so far, where the effective growth exponent exhibits an increase. | result 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.22 | asserted 0.98 |
| s4 | We provide evidence for the agreement with field theoretical predictions of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class and numerical results. | result 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.28 | asserted 0.83 |
| s5 | We show that the (2+1)-dimensional exponents conciliate with the values suggested by Lassig within error margin, for the largest system sizes studied here, but we can't support his predictions for (3+1)d numerically. | result 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.19 | asserted 0.61 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We show that d+1-dimensional surface growth models can be mapped onto driven lattice gases of d-mers. The continuous surface growth corresponds to one dimensional drift of d-mers perpendicular to the (d-1)-dimensional "plane" spanned by the d-mers. This facilitates efficient, bit-coded algorithms with generalized Kawasaki dynamics of spins. Our simulations in d=2,3,4,5 dimensions provide scaling exponent estimates on much larger system sizes and simulations times published so far, where the effective growth exponent exhibits an increase. We provide evidence for the agreement with field theoretical predictions of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class and numerical results. We show that the (2+1)-dimensional exponents conciliate with the values suggested by Lassig within error margin, for the largest system sizes studied here, but we can't support his predictions for (3+1)d numerically.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.