Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Two-loop parameter relations between dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction applied to SUSY-QCD

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 24 Aug 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This result confirms the equivalence of the two schemes through three-loops, if applied to SUSY-QCD.

how it is stated · asserted 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0908.3403 (version 2)
Pith IDMZKYGNLD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationL. Mihaila. "Two-loop parameter relations between dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction applied to SUSY-QCD." arXiv:0908.3403 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/MZKYGNLD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,995 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The two-loop relations between the running gluino-quark-squark coupling, the gluino and the quark mass defined in dimensional regularization (DREG) and dimensional reduction (DRED) in the framework of SUSY-QCD are presented. Furthermore, we verify with the help of these relations that the three-loop beta-functions derived in the minimal subtraction scheme combined with DREG or DRED transform into each other. This result confirms the equivalence of the two schemes through three-loops, if applied to SUSY-QCD.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The two-loop relations between the running gluino-quark-squark coupling, the gluino and the quark mass defined in dimensional regularization (DREG) and dimensional reduction (DRED) in the framework of SUSY-QCD are presented. contribution 0.65 0.90 0.21 asserted 1.00
s1 Furthermore, we verify with the help of these relations that the three-loop beta-functions derived in the minimal subtraction scheme combined with DREG or DRED transform into each other. result 0.76 0.90 0.12 asserted 0.99
s2 This result confirms the equivalence of the two schemes through three-loops, if applied to SUSY-QCD. interpretation 0.98 0.74 0.80 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The two-loop relations between the running gluino-quark-squark coupling, the gluino and the quark mass defined in dimensional regularization (DREG) and dimensional reduction (DRED) in the framework of SUSY-QCD are presented. Furthermore, we verify with the help of these relations that the three-loop beta-functions derived in the minimal subtraction scheme combined with DREG or DRED transform into each other. This result confirms the equivalence of the two schemes through three-loops, if applied to SUSY-QCD.

Human review
How the literature uses it

8 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • We employed the one-loop conversion relations [ref] for all parameters except $α_3$ and $m_b$ where two-loop relations [ref] have been used in order to be consistent with the decoupling at the SUSY scale.

    Minimal Supersymmetric SU(5) and Gauge Coupling Unification at Three Loops · Running and decoupling · 0.95

  • To establish the conversion relations between the running parameters in the two schemes, one can use the method discussed in section [ref], where such relations have been derived in the context of non-supersymmetric theories.[For more details see Ref. [ref] .] The conversion relations that are of interest for the numerical analysis discussed in this section are those involving the gauge couplings and the quark masses of the third generation, as only their Yukawa couplings give sizable effects.

    Precision Calculations in Supersymmetric Theories · Gauge coupling unification in the minimal SUSY SU(5) model · 0.88

What it cites · 33 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Compares with 3 papers
  • As a by-product result we reconfirm the two-loop conversion relation derived in [ref] .

    Two-loop matching coefficients for the strong coupling in the MSSM · Introduction · 0.83

  • For the gluino mass anomalous dimension we obtain [equation] It is an easy exercise to verify that the three-loop mass anomalous dimensions given above differ from the ones computed in scheme [ref] only by the finite shifts for coupling constants and masses discussed in Section [ref].

    The SUSY-QCD beta function to three loops · Three-loop fermion mass anomalous dimensions in · 1.00

  • For the gluino mass anomalous dimension we obtain [equation] It is an easy exercise to verify that the three-loop mass anomalous dimensions given above differ from the ones computed in scheme [ref] only by the finite shifts for coupling constants and masses discussed in Section [ref].

    $N=1$ supersymmetry and the three loop anomalous dimension for the chiral superfield · Three-loop fermion mass anomalous dimensions in · 1.00

Cites as support 1 paper
  • This can be understood from the fact that they are proportional to the corresponding one-loop effective charges, which have been shown to be equal [ref] , and the proportionality factors are universal quantities equal for gluon and gluinos in a supersymmetric theory.

    SUSY-QCD Decays of Squarks and Gluinos · Running coupling constants · 0.97

Cites as background 8 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.