Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Comparative Study of NJL and Sakai-Sugimoto Models

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 8 Sep 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In the presence of the background magnetic field, while the large chemical potential triggers the de Haas-van Alphen oscillation and the boundstate destabilization effect of the magnetic field in the NJL model, the Sakai-Sugimoto model completely fails to capture these phenomena, indicating the lack of the fermi sphere in the latter model.

how it is stated · asserted 0.78 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0909.1494 (version 1)
Pith ID6XUDF37A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDaiske Yamada. "A Comparative Study of NJL and Sakai-Sugimoto Models." arXiv:0909.1494 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/6XUDF37A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,878 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.74 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio and Sakai-Sugimoto models are juxtaposed, focusing on the models' dynamically generated masses and the phase diagrams. The models are studied in the parameter space of temperature, constant electromagnetic fields and the quark chemical potential. When the chemical potential is zero or small, the models show good agreement. However, the responses of the models under the large chemical potential are very different. In the presence of the background magnetic field, while the large chemical potential triggers the de Haas-van Alphen oscillation and the boundstate destabilization effect of the magnetic field in the NJL model, the Sakai-Sugimoto model completely fails to capture these phenomena, indicating the lack of the fermi sphere in the latter model. Also the orders of the chiral phase transitions are generally different.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio and Sakai-Sugimoto models are juxtaposed, focusing on the models' dynamically generated masses and the phase diagrams. contribution 0.95 0.76 0.06 asserted 0.87
s1 The models are studied in the parameter space of temperature, constant electromagnetic fields and the quark chemical potential. method 0.77 0.78 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 When the chemical potential is zero or small, the models show good agreement. result 1.00 0.80 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 However, the responses of the models under the large chemical potential are very different. result 1.00 0.80 0.22 asserted 1.00
s4 In the presence of the background magnetic field, while the large chemical potential triggers the de Haas-van Alphen oscillation and the boundstate destabilization effect of the magnetic field in the NJL model, the Sakai-Sugimoto model completely fails to capture these phenomena, indicating the lack of the fermi sphere in the latter model. result 0.82 0.78 0.57 asserted 0.78
s5 Also the orders of the chiral phase transitions are generally different. result 1.00 0.81 0.13 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.64 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio and Sakai-Sugimoto models are juxtaposed, focusing on the models' dynamically generated masses and the phase diagrams. The models are studied in the parameter space of temperature, constant electromagnetic fields and the quark chemical potential. When the chemical potential is zero or small, the models show good agreement. However, the responses of the models under the large chemical potential are very different. In the presence of the background magnetic field, while the large chemical potential triggers the de Haas-van Alphen oscillation and the boundstate destabilization effect of the magnetic field in the NJL model, the Sakai-Sugimoto model completely fails to capture these phenomena, indicating the lack of the fermi sphere in the latter model. Also the orders of the chiral phase transitions are generally different.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Compares with it 1 paper
  • [ref] show an amazing agreement in the chiral phase transition lines throughout the $t$-$b$-$μ$ space; in particular, both results show IMC for moderate magnetic fields.[Ref. [ref] claims that the Sakai-Sugimoto model does not agree with NJL results; but in this reference the CS contribution was ignored.] In QCD, it is expected that part of the normal chirally symmetric phase is replaced by a color superconductor [ref] .

    Inverse magnetic catalysis in dense holographic matter · General results: inverse magnetic catalysis and comparison to NJL · 0.85

What it cites · 35 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 7 papers
  • We adopt the standard embedding map of the original paper [ref] .

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD · Probe Action and Equations of Motion · 0.97

  • Thus, in addition to the components ([ref]), we include [equation] where following Reference [ref] , we assume the dependence of this component on $U$ and this function must be determined by solving the equations of motion that follow from the probe action.

    Holographic chiral phase transition with chemical potential · External Parameters · 0.89

  • Plugging the solution ([ref]) in the Lagrangian ([ref]), we obtain the on-shell expression [equation] Following Reference [ref] , we measure the quantities in the units of $u_0$ by introducing [ This scaling by $u_0$ is a temporary prescription and as mentioned earlier, we will measure all physical quantities in the units of $R$ at the end. ] [equation] Again, following the same reference, we further set $z=y^-3$, yielding [equation] From the relation ([ref]), we have [equation] and we can eliminate $y_R$ in favor of $$.

    A holographic model of deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration · Confined Phase · 0.92

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
  • However, we have the fact that the SS model exhibits the chiral phase transition in the deconfined phase, and moreover, there are evidences from the lattice simulations that indicate the existence of the quark boundstate in QCD, significantly above the deconfinement temperature [ref] .

    Meson Correlators in Finite Temperature Lattice QCD · Chiral Phase Transition and Dynamical Mass · 0.99

Cites as background 20 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.